<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>wkl's Comments</title>
    <description>wkl's Comments RSS Syndication from SeekingAlpha.com</description>
    <link>http://seekingalpha.com/user/612178/comments</link>
    <item>
      <title>President Obama's proposal to extend the middle-class tax cuts before reforming the tax code and entitlements is a &quot;sucker's game,&quot; declares Wilbur Ross. There's no trade-off there, it's just the president saying give me what I want, and I'll agree to talk about the rest later. What's being obscured by Washington is that the fiscal cliff issue isn't about taxes and revenue, but that our country is spending way too much. &amp;ldquo;You can't solve the bulk of the problem with revenues,&quot; Ross says. &quot;It&amp;rsquo;s not going to happen.&amp;rdquo;</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/669921?source=feed#comment-11678181</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">11678181</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[kmi,<br/>&quot;At the end of the day the Repubs lost&quot;. No they did not. The balance of power is the same today as before the election. Nothing has changed.<br/>President - Dem<br/>Senate - Dem controlled<br/>House - Rep controlled.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2012 08:39:56 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[kmi,<br/>&quot;At the end of the day the Repubs lost&quot;. No they did not. The balance of power is the same today as before the election. Nothing has changed.<br/>President - Dem<br/>Senate - Dem controlled<br/>House - Rep controlled.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>President Obama's proposal to extend the middle-class tax cuts before reforming the tax code and entitlements is a &quot;sucker's game,&quot; declares Wilbur Ross. There's no trade-off there, it's just the president saying give me what I want, and I'll agree to talk about the rest later. What's being obscured by Washington is that the fiscal cliff issue isn't about taxes and revenue, but that our country is spending way too much. &amp;ldquo;You can't solve the bulk of the problem with revenues,&quot; Ross says. &quot;It&amp;rsquo;s not going to happen.&amp;rdquo;</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/669921?source=feed#comment-11669731</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">11669731</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[You should be very happy. Because if doing nothing and going over the cliff is to happen, it will be just what you are calling for above.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2012 22:44:18 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[You should be very happy. Because if doing nothing and going over the cliff is to happen, it will be just what you are calling for above.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>President Obama's proposal to extend the middle-class tax cuts before reforming the tax code and entitlements is a &quot;sucker's game,&quot; declares Wilbur Ross. There's no trade-off there, it's just the president saying give me what I want, and I'll agree to talk about the rest later. What's being obscured by Washington is that the fiscal cliff issue isn't about taxes and revenue, but that our country is spending way too much. &amp;ldquo;You can't solve the bulk of the problem with revenues,&quot; Ross says. &quot;It&amp;rsquo;s not going to happen.&amp;rdquo;</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/669921?source=feed#comment-11669021</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">11669021</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[ironchefw, good idea but more idiots voted against that this election than voted for it.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2012 22:18:49 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[ironchefw, good idea but more idiots voted against that this election than voted for it.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Gold Is Not An 'Investment'</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/995771/comments?source=feed#comment-11486601</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">11486601</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Cullen,<br/>Thank you for the exchange. Your description of the differences in the two theories is now well understood. You have increased my interest in your MR views and I would like to learn more. Do you have other writings on the subject to view, along with the link you provided.  ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sun, 11 Nov 2012 19:33:08 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Cullen,<br/>Thank you for the exchange. Your description of the differences in the two theories is now well understood. You have increased my interest in your MR views and I would like to learn more. Do you have other writings on the subject to view, along with the link you provided.  ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Gold Is Not An 'Investment'</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/995771/comments?source=feed#comment-11481571</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">11481571</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Cullen,<br/>Forgive me if I am wrong. But are you not from the school of MMT thought? And is it not true that in reality, MR is your school of thought to explain MMT Cullens way?]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sun, 11 Nov 2012 15:23:12 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Cullen,<br/>Forgive me if I am wrong. But are you not from the school of MMT thought? And is it not true that in reality, MR is your school of thought to explain MMT Cullens way?]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Gold Is Not An 'Investment'</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/995771/comments?source=feed#comment-11478091</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">11478091</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[jferreiro,<br/>One must always take these MMT theorists with a grain of salt. Of course gold is an investment. It is a hedge against all paper currencies. Otherwise, why would all central banks around the world hold so much of it in their portfolios? Maybe Cullen would like to espouse his theories on this.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sun, 11 Nov 2012 12:11:11 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[jferreiro,<br/>One must always take these MMT theorists with a grain of salt. Of course gold is an investment. It is a hedge against all paper currencies. Otherwise, why would all central banks around the world hold so much of it in their portfolios? Maybe Cullen would like to espouse his theories on this.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Bearishness among heavy-hitter money managers surveyed by Barron's rises to 27%, nearly double the amount from April's poll. As for individual sectors, there's no love for the utilities, with just 1% of respondents picking it as the best-performing industry over the next 12 months, and 20% choosing it as the worst. We've given away the answer, but guess which is today's cover. Feel better, bulls?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/618021?source=feed#comment-10963791</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">10963791</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Same publisher.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sat, 27 Oct 2012 10:33:23 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Same publisher.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Initial Jobless Claims: +46K to 388K vs. 365K consensus, 342K prior (revised). Continuing claims -29K to 3.25M.</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/593571?source=feed#comment-10651741</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">10651741</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[No, wait, let me guess. The first jobs report after the election will show the unemployment rate back above 8%.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2012 08:39:54 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[No, wait, let me guess. The first jobs report after the election will show the unemployment rate back above 8%.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Former Clinton economic adviser Laura D&amp;rsquo;Andrea Tyson describes how the &quot;vicious circle&quot; of income inequality leads to educational inequality, which then perpetuates the wealth gaps in the U.S. Tyson also notes how poverty is much higher in single-parent families than in those with married parents. But while she wants to increase taxes for the rich and pour money into education, she stops short of advocating policies to strengthen marriage.</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/552081?source=feed#comment-9765251</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">9765251</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Sounds great Nunay.<br/>Who would have ever thought a child needs nurturing parents. Since your wife feels we have come to the point that better education going forward for our children is better parenting, I have an idea for your wife. Have her go to her teacher's Union Boss and suggest all future increases in money intended for schools, instead be funneled toward a new federal program where the money is given to the parents where it must be spent on better parenting skills. We get your wife's frustrations. What we don't get is the constant fight put up by the Unions to choke the competion to public education, i.e. charter and private schools and a parents right to have their dollars go to educate their children in the best way they see fit.    ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sun, 23 Sep 2012 12:36:52 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Sounds great Nunay.<br/>Who would have ever thought a child needs nurturing parents. Since your wife feels we have come to the point that better education going forward for our children is better parenting, I have an idea for your wife. Have her go to her teacher's Union Boss and suggest all future increases in money intended for schools, instead be funneled toward a new federal program where the money is given to the parents where it must be spent on better parenting skills. We get your wife's frustrations. What we don't get is the constant fight put up by the Unions to choke the competion to public education, i.e. charter and private schools and a parents right to have their dollars go to educate their children in the best way they see fit.    ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>After three &quot;jobless recoveries&quot; in the last twenty years, NYT's Hedrick Smith suggests it's time to take a lesson from Henry Ford. History has proven Ford's virtuous circle to be effective, and if business managers &quot;give the middle class a better share of the nation&amp;rsquo;s economic gains... the economy will grow faster.&quot;</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/519061?source=feed#comment-9054021</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">9054021</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[You are absolutely right. But if the study did so, the author failed to mention if the increase was indexed to inflation. Why? Does it serve his argument to show a wide discrepancy? Not only has the 549% increase in wages OUTPACED the inflation rate over the past 25 years, but wages have OUTPACED productivity also over that time period. The 549% increase in wages represents an average annual increase of 7%.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2012 14:50:41 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[You are absolutely right. But if the study did so, the author failed to mention if the increase was indexed to inflation. Why? Does it serve his argument to show a wide discrepancy? Not only has the 549% increase in wages OUTPACED the inflation rate over the past 25 years, but wages have OUTPACED productivity also over that time period. The 549% increase in wages represents an average annual increase of 7%.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>After three &quot;jobless recoveries&quot; in the last twenty years, NYT's Hedrick Smith suggests it's time to take a lesson from Henry Ford. History has proven Ford's virtuous circle to be effective, and if business managers &quot;give the middle class a better share of the nation&amp;rsquo;s economic gains... the economy will grow faster.&quot;</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/519061?source=feed#comment-9050221</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">9050221</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I do find some merit in the author's writings, and it pertains to the subject of moral sentiment in business. But, the bottom line in all enterprises is to turn a profit and grow the business. My biggest complaint with all articles from the press, and in particular the NYT, is they always find a need to argue their point with a BOLD FACED LIE! Case in point, a quote from the article. &quot;Although productivity increased by 80.1 percent from 1973 to 2011, average wages rose only 4.2 percent and hourly compensation (wages plus benefits) rose only 10 percent over that time, according to government data analyzed by the Economic Policy Institute.<br/>The average wage in the US in 1973 was $7,580.16. In the year 2010, the average was $41,673.83. An increase of 549%.<br/>This information can be found under the National Average Wage Index by year at  <a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://1.usa.gov/TaDC59'>http://1.usa.gov/TaDC59</a>  <br/> <br/> <br/> ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2012 12:46:09 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I do find some merit in the author's writings, and it pertains to the subject of moral sentiment in business. But, the bottom line in all enterprises is to turn a profit and grow the business. My biggest complaint with all articles from the press, and in particular the NYT, is they always find a need to argue their point with a BOLD FACED LIE! Case in point, a quote from the article. &quot;Although productivity increased by 80.1 percent from 1973 to 2011, average wages rose only 4.2 percent and hourly compensation (wages plus benefits) rose only 10 percent over that time, according to government data analyzed by the Economic Policy Institute.<br/>The average wage in the US in 1973 was $7,580.16. In the year 2010, the average was $41,673.83. An increase of 549%.<br/>This information can be found under the National Average Wage Index by year at  <a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://1.usa.gov/TaDC59'>http://1.usa.gov/TaDC59</a>  <br/> <br/> <br/> ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title> Financial markets are telling to us to focus on jobs, not deficits, Paul Krugman writes: &quot;Investors are all dressed up with... no place to put their money. So they're buying government debt, even at very low returns... By making money available so cheaply, they are in effect begging governments to issue more debt. And governments should be granting their wish, not obsessing over short-term deficits.&amp;rdquo; </title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/445901?source=feed#comment-7872081</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">7872081</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Gee Paul, could it be that investors are just hiding out in government debt because of fear rather than risking capital to the unknown? And by the unknown, I mean public policies both at home and around the world, especially Europe. And don't forget the largest holder of that debt is the Fed. ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sat, 28 Jul 2012 12:22:30 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Gee Paul, could it be that investors are just hiding out in government debt because of fear rather than risking capital to the unknown? And by the unknown, I mean public policies both at home and around the world, especially Europe. And don't forget the largest holder of that debt is the Fed. ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title> As corn prices explode in the face of the worst drought in over a half century, ethanol, once touted as the homegrown, eco-friendly replacement for foreign oil, is fast becoming the new product everyone loves to hate. The fact is however, we've come to rely on the corn-based fuel's high octane level as a boost to the sub-grade gasoline currently being churned out of our nation's refineries. The crisis leaves us with two tough choices: higher gas prices, or higher food prices. </title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/445891?source=feed#comment-7871651</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">7871651</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[One other component to the argument against ethanol that gets very little attention is it's depletion of another resource, water.   ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sat, 28 Jul 2012 12:07:57 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[One other component to the argument against ethanol that gets very little attention is it's depletion of another resource, water.   ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Why China Matters To U.S. Dividend Income Investors</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/720851/comments?source=feed#comment-7409371</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">7409371</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I was not comletely clear on this. It only pertains to the fact that China's central bank no longer needs to purchase through a &quot;primary dealer&quot;, but can place their bid directly.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sun, 15 Jul 2012 20:09:48 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I was not comletely clear on this. It only pertains to the fact that China's central bank no longer needs to purchase through a &quot;primary dealer&quot;, but can place their bid directly.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Why China Matters To U.S. Dividend Income Investors</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/720851/comments?source=feed#comment-7408691</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">7408691</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Richard,<br/>Please correct me if I am wrong, but I am under the impression that our treasury has implemented a program where China is now buying U.S. debt at negotiated prices that are not public knowledge. If this is true, how will China be able to influence interest rates when they do not purchase from the normal auctions? In other words, they have no bearing at all now on the bid to cover ratios.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sun, 15 Jul 2012 19:19:37 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Richard,<br/>Please correct me if I am wrong, but I am under the impression that our treasury has implemented a program where China is now buying U.S. debt at negotiated prices that are not public knowledge. If this is true, how will China be able to influence interest rates when they do not purchase from the normal auctions? In other words, they have no bearing at all now on the bid to cover ratios.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Valuations Of Johnson &amp; Johnson, Merck And Abbott Laboratories</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/707431/comments?source=feed#comment-7178661</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">7178661</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I look forward to reading any future articles you may write on this equity.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sun, 08 Jul 2012 18:40:37 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I look forward to reading any future articles you may write on this equity.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Valuations Of Johnson &amp; Johnson, Merck And Abbott Laboratories</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/707431/comments?source=feed#comment-7177091</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">7177091</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Christopher,<br/>I feel that any in depth analysis of ABT going forward should be done with the view as two companies, rather than one. Do you favor either company over the other after the split? I currently have ABT as an investment, and think the split will add value. I will be in a wait and see mode to determine whether to hold both companies or to hold one over the other. Do you have an opinion on make up of this company after the breakup into 2 companies?.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sun, 08 Jul 2012 17:06:49 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Christopher,<br/>I feel that any in depth analysis of ABT going forward should be done with the view as two companies, rather than one. Do you favor either company over the other after the split? I currently have ABT as an investment, and think the split will add value. I will be in a wait and see mode to determine whether to hold both companies or to hold one over the other. Do you have an opinion on make up of this company after the breakup into 2 companies?.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>3 Highly Profitable Dividend Stocks That Analysts Advocate</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/707161/comments?source=feed#comment-7169731</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">7169731</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Obviously, you don't understand Dividend Growth investing either.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sun, 08 Jul 2012 11:27:51 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Obviously, you don't understand Dividend Growth investing either.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Big Copper Developments Will Affect These 4 Stocks</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/678111/comments?source=feed#comment-6721141</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6721141</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I think you should consider that SCCO already hedges a large percentage of their production now, more than any other producer. The price they receive now fluctuates less than the other miner's you mentioned. This is a downside in a rising price enviornment, but very stable for them when prices fall. If what you write becomes true, I envision other miner's adapting more to Southern Copper's strategy.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sat, 23 Jun 2012 10:42:29 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I think you should consider that SCCO already hedges a large percentage of their production now, more than any other producer. The price they receive now fluctuates less than the other miner's you mentioned. This is a downside in a rising price enviornment, but very stable for them when prices fall. If what you write becomes true, I envision other miner's adapting more to Southern Copper's strategy.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>CSX, Union Pacific, Norfolk Stock All Undervalued</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/665741/comments?source=feed#comment-6547381</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6547381</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Eh, not gonna happen. Depends to much on subsidies and cost passed on to over burdened states.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2012 19:21:48 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Eh, not gonna happen. Depends to much on subsidies and cost passed on to over burdened states.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Fed Policies: Dr. Bernanke's Monster</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/409901/comments?source=feed#comment-3200931</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">3200931</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[You blame George Bush? Hell, lets just go back to the beginning and blame George Washington. Why do we always look back to place blame? Life is not about where you have been, it is about where you are going.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2012 19:26:44 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[You blame George Bush? Hell, lets just go back to the beginning and blame George Washington. Why do we always look back to place blame? Life is not about where you have been, it is about where you are going.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title> Not only is further stimulus off the table, but the Fed is likely to emerge from next week's policy meeting with a slightly more upbeat view of the economy, reports Jon Hilsenrath. The fast decline in unemployment has taken Fed officials by surprise, and it could mean more underlying strength in the economy than other data would indicate. </title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/182971?source=feed#comment-3169181</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">3169181</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Nice funning with you. See ya next fall on the grid iron.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sun, 04 Mar 2012 22:22:14 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Nice funning with you. See ya next fall on the grid iron.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title> Not only is further stimulus off the table, but the Fed is likely to emerge from next week's policy meeting with a slightly more upbeat view of the economy, reports Jon Hilsenrath. The fast decline in unemployment has taken Fed officials by surprise, and it could mean more underlying strength in the economy than other data would indicate. </title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/182971?source=feed#comment-3168861</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">3168861</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Bear fan's transcend the greatest Bear of all. &quot;Papa Bear&quot; George Halas. Any dig a bear fan can get in to someone from Packer Land, player or fan, only makes the old man smile. Wherever he may be now.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sun, 04 Mar 2012 22:04:14 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Bear fan's transcend the greatest Bear of all. &quot;Papa Bear&quot; George Halas. Any dig a bear fan can get in to someone from Packer Land, player or fan, only makes the old man smile. Wherever he may be now.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title> Not only is further stimulus off the table, but the Fed is likely to emerge from next week's policy meeting with a slightly more upbeat view of the economy, reports Jon Hilsenrath. The fast decline in unemployment has taken Fed officials by surprise, and it could mean more underlying strength in the economy than other data would indicate. </title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/182971?source=feed#comment-3167391</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">3167391</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[From IL and can not take any Packer fan seriously. Aaron Rogers- career year. Soon you will forget him just like the last one. What was his name? Bart Favre? Brett Star?]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sun, 04 Mar 2012 20:45:05 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[From IL and can not take any Packer fan seriously. Aaron Rogers- career year. Soon you will forget him just like the last one. What was his name? Bart Favre? Brett Star?]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Fed Policies: Dr. Bernanke's Monster</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/409901/comments?source=feed#comment-3162721</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">3162721</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I agree that this president has been a complete failure. But you are really making my point. The congress must be viewed as one entity in presenting legislation to either be signed or vetoed. The fact, as you state, they have not negotiated a budget to present for 3 years is most definitely a lack of leadership in congress whatever the reasons are. If this institution can not agree on a budget, what chance do they have to agree on long term fiscal policy? Yes, the president must have input on the matter. But there seems to be very little common ground in which to negotiate. This is why I consider this election to be one of the most important elections in many years. We the people must send a clear and consise message to Washington on the direction WE choose.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sun, 04 Mar 2012 16:38:19 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I agree that this president has been a complete failure. But you are really making my point. The congress must be viewed as one entity in presenting legislation to either be signed or vetoed. The fact, as you state, they have not negotiated a budget to present for 3 years is most definitely a lack of leadership in congress whatever the reasons are. If this institution can not agree on a budget, what chance do they have to agree on long term fiscal policy? Yes, the president must have input on the matter. But there seems to be very little common ground in which to negotiate. This is why I consider this election to be one of the most important elections in many years. We the people must send a clear and consise message to Washington on the direction WE choose.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Fed Policies: Dr. Bernanke's Monster</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/409901/comments?source=feed#comment-3161181</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">3161181</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Wyostocks,<br/>You are too naive. Do you think this president and this congress will really do what is right? Forced or not. Their idea of a solution is only to bicker and play to their respective ideological bases. On the other hand, if all they do is nothing, maybe a true equilibrium in the markets will be found. Will hurt like Hell though. But I still don't think sound fiscal policy will ever take place under this administration. The conclusion to my thought's are, if our elected officials would have enacted sound fiscal policy after the collapse Ben could have or should have ended monetary stimulus after QE1.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sun, 04 Mar 2012 15:14:30 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Wyostocks,<br/>You are too naive. Do you think this president and this congress will really do what is right? Forced or not. Their idea of a solution is only to bicker and play to their respective ideological bases. On the other hand, if all they do is nothing, maybe a true equilibrium in the markets will be found. Will hurt like Hell though. But I still don't think sound fiscal policy will ever take place under this administration. The conclusion to my thought's are, if our elected officials would have enacted sound fiscal policy after the collapse Ben could have or should have ended monetary stimulus after QE1.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Fed Policies: Dr. Bernanke's Monster</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/409901/comments?source=feed#comment-3160451</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">3160451</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Eric,<br/>This is one of the best articles I have seen explaining this subject. I would like to add the mad Dr.'s two assistant's, (U.S. Congress, and the President). They have failed to keep up their end of the bargain pertaining to sound fiscal policy. I too agree the Fed should have ended monetary stimulus after QE1. It is easy for the masses to focus on one villian, Uncle Ben. But I am ready to give him the benefit of the doubt, I beleive he has always thought this problem to best be solved by long term sound fiscal policy. But in all seriousness, what really has congress and the administration done since the crisis to promote sound fiscal policy? Did Ben have a choice? Without the President and Congress agreeing on either short term or long term solutions, what was Ben to do? Throw up his hands and say &quot;Oh well I did all I can do&quot;? The true villain's in this story are the elected official's, the congress and the President. Neither of these two villains wanted to take the political risk's to enact the correct policies going forward.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sun, 04 Mar 2012 14:41:13 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Eric,<br/>This is one of the best articles I have seen explaining this subject. I would like to add the mad Dr.'s two assistant's, (U.S. Congress, and the President). They have failed to keep up their end of the bargain pertaining to sound fiscal policy. I too agree the Fed should have ended monetary stimulus after QE1. It is easy for the masses to focus on one villian, Uncle Ben. But I am ready to give him the benefit of the doubt, I beleive he has always thought this problem to best be solved by long term sound fiscal policy. But in all seriousness, what really has congress and the administration done since the crisis to promote sound fiscal policy? Did Ben have a choice? Without the President and Congress agreeing on either short term or long term solutions, what was Ben to do? Throw up his hands and say &quot;Oh well I did all I can do&quot;? The true villain's in this story are the elected official's, the congress and the President. Neither of these two villains wanted to take the political risk's to enact the correct policies going forward.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Only In The Washington Post: No Link Between Growth And Jobs</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/410071/comments?source=feed#comment-3156671</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">3156671</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Dean,<br/>We do live in a time when our individual thought processes and logic are turned over to the marketeer. We have all lost our ability to reason.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sun, 04 Mar 2012 12:27:49 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Dean,<br/>We do live in a time when our individual thought processes and logic are turned over to the marketeer. We have all lost our ability to reason.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title> The immediate effects of completing the Keystone pipeline may be surprising and counterintuitive: It could increase domestic oil prices, raise prices at the pump, and the oil wouldn't even stay in the U.S. It would go directly from Canada to refineries in the Gulf region en route to export in Latin America and Europe; the U.S. would be used as little more than a transit corridor. </title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/182651?source=feed#comment-3140091</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">3140091</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Logical thoughts you present. The entire green energy program of this administration is nothing but a pie in the sky idea being force fed to the American people. Electric Cars? Will never sell. Do you hear Government Motors? I can't beleive he would even have the audacity in a speach to state that drilling for more oil to increase supply is nothing but a bumper sticker. Take a look at nat gas to see what prices do with an over abundance of supply. You are right, he has cast his lot with green energy and every decision he makes must cater to those group's agenda or his next election is lost. At the same, his supporters expect us to cheer his energy secretary's dream of gas rising to $8 a gallon to quicken their desire for this pie in the sky idea. This is madness. ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sat, 03 Mar 2012 15:25:15 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Logical thoughts you present. The entire green energy program of this administration is nothing but a pie in the sky idea being force fed to the American people. Electric Cars? Will never sell. Do you hear Government Motors? I can't beleive he would even have the audacity in a speach to state that drilling for more oil to increase supply is nothing but a bumper sticker. Take a look at nat gas to see what prices do with an over abundance of supply. You are right, he has cast his lot with green energy and every decision he makes must cater to those group's agenda or his next election is lost. At the same, his supporters expect us to cheer his energy secretary's dream of gas rising to $8 a gallon to quicken their desire for this pie in the sky idea. This is madness. ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title> The immediate effects of completing the Keystone pipeline may be surprising and counterintuitive: It could increase domestic oil prices, raise prices at the pump, and the oil wouldn't even stay in the U.S. It would go directly from Canada to refineries in the Gulf region en route to export in Latin America and Europe; the U.S. would be used as little more than a transit corridor. </title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/182651?source=feed#comment-3137001</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">3137001</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[No, I think you are Momma Obama. I think the Messiah resurrected you, his mother, to be his one true spokesperson. To preach the truth throughout the land so that all the non-believers will know the greatness of your son's spoken word. Thru his goodness, and your preaching, all of us who are non-believers will be saved from our ignorance. ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sat, 03 Mar 2012 12:55:16 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[No, I think you are Momma Obama. I think the Messiah resurrected you, his mother, to be his one true spokesperson. To preach the truth throughout the land so that all the non-believers will know the greatness of your son's spoken word. Thru his goodness, and your preaching, all of us who are non-believers will be saved from our ignorance. ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
