FourBrane

Oil vs. the Market: Major Changes Expected This Month

mjaniec: "the recent conflict?" What a relief. I guess the war is over.

Crude Sell-off: Solid Entry Point into U.S. Oil Majors

Pokeyclips2020, the water usage in tar sands extraction is not as high as you presently think. The water is recycled. The CRS Report for Congress (RS34258) dated January 17, 2008 claims that 2-3 barrels of water from the Athabaska River are needed per barrel of bitumen produced, but notes that this is before recycling. Makeup water is only .5 barrel per barrel of bitumen. (To make this clear, the first barrel of bitumen takes 2-3 barrels of water. The process loses about .5 barrel to escaped steam, etc. and thus the second barrel of bitumen needs just .5 barrels of additional "makeup" water.)
Alberta is indeed concerned about pollution problems surrounding the extraction process and are likely to do several things, all of which will increase the production price. First on the list may be a 30% increase in royalties.
I am long oil-related stocks, and momentarily taking a beating, but I look at the next five years and see no way for oil to remain below $150 per barrel. While I think your 300% margin requirement may be a trifle high (new side scanning techniques make drilling dry holes less likely), E&P is still an intensely risky, capital burning business and it will take oil remaining well above $100/bbl for at least a year before we see some serious new development. The oil exploration industry has to feel comfortable that the high price will still be in force 2-3 years from now when their production starts flowing before they will start shoveling money out the door to find and develop new expensive domestic resources. There are still millions of acres under contract in the Gulf of Mexico (GOM) which have not been explored, let alone drilled. Putting more unexplored acres under contract in the Atlantic or Pacific won't result in a single well being drilled until the price per barrel has stayed high for a long time and all of the GOM tracts have been drilled and are producing. The GOM comes first because flowline infrastructure already exists close to every new tract, so it's cheaper to get that oil to market.

An Oil-Driven Paradigm Shift?

The comments found here are a representative cross section of the idea spectrum, running from right wing drill anywhere and to hell with the damn land people to back to moccasins and bone needles conservationists to the dreaming Polyannas who are certain that Amenrican Inventiveness can cure anything. Three blind men discussing the elephant, each describing their particular guess on what it looks like based on trunk, leg and tail.
Sadly, I doubt that there is a easy way out of this one because the elephant in the room is over-population. Demand for oil, food, water, and every other resource is now or will shortly be approaching asymptote.
Buy oil, natgas, uranium, other metals, water rights...and guns.

Fuel Check

It is amusing to read stories today using "plumeted" to reference a drop of $2 and change. As for inventories, they may fall for lots of reasons...oil refiners may decide to draw down in hopes they can replace stocks later more cheaply, or, bad weather or other difficulties delay offloading tankers, or, a key supplier decided to fill an order to China ahead of our guys.
I think Jangchup has it right. It's some intermediate profit taking.
Bespoke's charts show us just what we would expect as a commodity becomes hugely more expensive: processors stop storing tons of it. Very few jewelers can afford to keep thousands of pounds of gold laying around waiting for use, but if gold were as cheap as bricks you'd see towering stacks of the stuff in the jeweler's back yard...for convenience. Same with refiners. They pay attention to dollar inventory turns llike anyone else. To fill a tank farm now takes twice as much money. Only a fool would keep up the old habits of filling all his tanks to the max.