solo223

Crystallex: Still At the Wrath Of The Market

Now that someone has posted something positive about KRY, wait for J.L. Bane to come out of his closet to bash KRY some more after being ridiculed the last time around with his, shall we say' outdated story....

Crystallex’s Las Cristinas Contract in Doubt

To J.L. Bane...Appears RC CRowell has a lot more credibility than you do. He was obviously BETTER informed given his position if what he wrote was factual and there is no reason to believe it isn't. In your case, the turn of events should shame you and compell you to apologize to investors for the inaccuracy of your story (that 2 year old presidential PR). In the future, I submit that you do better research before posting these kind of stories. Moreover, try to be more objective, in spite of KRY's failings (and there has been many) they ultimately had no control on the timing of the permits and a 3 year wait isn't all that usual in the mining industry, something you conveniently left out in your assessment.

Crystallex’s Las Cristinas Contract in Doubt

To the SA Editors...Then why do you allow authors to post inaccurate and/or outdated information. In this case J.L. Bane destroyed his own credibility(which was already tarnished might I add) by using a presidential PR that was 2 years old and posting it as something new. Has it occured to you that such authors who do not take the time to certify their articles are accurate and time-relevant may HURT individuals who have invested some of their life-savings in stocks. In this case, it took a critic for Bane to even ackownledge his mistake else it would probably have gone unnoticed by the horde of readers (including myself). Yes I have a bias against J.L. Bane but only because his stories are biased themselves. The same holds true for Raul Gallegos from REUTERS who amuses himself (and his friends?) by issuing PR's that are either incomplete to start with and partly inaccurate. I have a lot more respect for a man like Bill Cara who has in the past objectively talked about the bad AND the good side of KRY. If I were you people, I would question J.L. Bane's motivation and his competencies and tell him to either shape up or find another job or forum to post his views, by posting such an article as this one he proves he is no better than the clowns that populate the Yahoo boards.

Crystallex’s Las Cristinas Contract in Doubt

In all honesty Mr. Bane, you appear to have some kind of gripe against KRY. Not once have I have seen you print anything positive about them. Although it's been a few years since getting the MOA and that at times they have been overly optimistic and issuing PR's about the final permit being near, one has to consider that permits do not get issued after a month of study and thus the 3 year wait for the final permit is nothing unusual in KRY's case. Moreover you and your friend Raul Gallegos have all the appearances of being the dynamic duo set out on destroying that ever evil company. Although you claim not to have any form of stake in this, i'm wondering if you and Gallegos aren't on someone's payroll to issue such reports. As indicated in the first comment here, it seems quite a strech when you use Presidential PR's that were issued over 2 years ago to support your story...Gallegos is even worse as he print what amounts to inaccurate and incomplete stories. Now please take your paycheck and go away...your credibility is nil

Nothing New in Crystallex Presentation

I believe you are mistaken. The current $3.00 you are referring to is in US currency as KRY trades both on the TSE and AMEX. As things stands the current price on march 1st was $3.50, 18 cents below Kara's recommendation, hardly anything to cry about.

Besides which, everyone knows that KRY is a highly speculative buy and can fluctuate wildly on any given day, 25% of the float is owned by institutions so that must mean something. I am confident that they will land the final permit. Be patient, all good things come to those who wait. If Chavez decides to muddle the issue, well we all knew what we were getting into to begin with.