Despite Its Recent Run-Up, The DJIA Isn't Expensive [View article]
Re: "but this market is WAY OVERSOLD." Presume you meant to say "WAY OVERBOUGHT."
Fellow alum.
On Jul 25 01:30 PM HATEFEEBAY wrote:
> As a trader that trades nearly $10 Million a month in my home, I > am literally buying physical silver, silver stocks and DXD against > the DJIA. This is CLEARLY a bear rally, no forward earnings, unemployment > increasing where revenues will shrink, the US printing money both > literally and figuratively monetizing the debt to levels not seen > in history, the US dollar is GONE, I want nothing to do with it and > I am an American, a very scared one. Finance is my gig, Wharton Alumni > Class of 2003, look me up and one that has done well even in this > mad market, but this market is WAY OVERSOLD and it should be at 7000 > IMHO and I am shorting it because of quantifiable metrics will come > into play and this economy will tank thanks to Obama and Company > and all their idiotic policies. Going forward, I will not live in > the US much longer and I have been overseas a lot and this country > is socialism and rewarding people for not working-a very sad time > in our country, perhaps the saddest yet. Gary
Not a very good writer div tree. Not only does the table at the top of the article not identify ORCL as a dividend paying stock, but you go on in the third paragraph with the following:
"Contrarily, there are few other companies that have not had any favorable dividend policy. The argument for no dividends has been that they need cash for continued innovation and growth. In this third group, the prominent ones that have not paid dividends are Cisco (CSCO), Apple (AAPL), Google (GOOG), Oracle (ORCL), EMC Corp (EMC), eBay (EBAY), and Dell (DELL). Keen observer will note that majority are these companies are from hardware sector."
While I'll admit I skimmed over the last paragraph. I did so because I had already encountered two references in the article to categorizing ORCL as a non-dividend paying stock:: 1st in the table; 2nd in the 3rd paragraph in the article. Accept my apologies for skimming over the last paragraph identifying ORCL's dividend announcement.
But then I have to ask you, why didn't you clean up the article to make it consistent? Don't you think you have a duty, if you wish to call yourself a journalist, to correct the mistatements in your article, particularly when there remains such an inconsistency? Who's smart?
On Apr 03 04:56 PM Dividend Tree. wrote:
> not so smart, squawk > I did mention ORCL's dividend announcement immediately after"Third > Group". it is the first sentence in that para. > > Momintn: > I like IBM too. It has adapted very well in last decade or so. From > a pure hardware play to software tech and services....
Surprised by your article's oversight of ORCL's announcement during its last earnings call, March 23, just before publication of your article, that it will begin to pay a quarterly dividend of $.05 per share. First ex-dividend date this Monday, April 6.
Might wish to do some research on recent news before publishing articles in the future. Beyond that, good article because it highlights to the lay investor how investing in tech is increasingly becoming a dividend play as well.
Despite Its Recent Run-Up, The DJIA Isn't Expensive [View article]
Fellow alum.
On Jul 25 01:30 PM HATEFEEBAY wrote:
> As a trader that trades nearly $10 Million a month in my home, I
> am literally buying physical silver, silver stocks and DXD against
> the DJIA. This is CLEARLY a bear rally, no forward earnings, unemployment
> increasing where revenues will shrink, the US printing money both
> literally and figuratively monetizing the debt to levels not seen
> in history, the US dollar is GONE, I want nothing to do with it and
> I am an American, a very scared one. Finance is my gig, Wharton Alumni
> Class of 2003, look me up and one that has done well even in this
> mad market, but this market is WAY OVERSOLD and it should be at 7000
> IMHO and I am shorting it because of quantifiable metrics will come
> into play and this economy will tank thanks to Obama and Company
> and all their idiotic policies. Going forward, I will not live in
> the US much longer and I have been overseas a lot and this country
> is socialism and rewarding people for not working-a very sad time
> in our country, perhaps the saddest yet. Gary
Opportunities for Tech Dividends [View article]
"Contrarily, there are few other companies that have not had any favorable dividend policy. The argument for no dividends has been that they need cash for continued innovation and growth. In this third group, the prominent ones that have not paid dividends are Cisco (CSCO), Apple (AAPL), Google (GOOG), Oracle (ORCL), EMC Corp (EMC), eBay (EBAY), and Dell (DELL). Keen observer will note that majority are these companies are from hardware sector."
While I'll admit I skimmed over the last paragraph. I did so because I had already encountered two references in the article to categorizing ORCL as a non-dividend paying stock:: 1st in the table; 2nd in the 3rd paragraph in the article. Accept my apologies for skimming over the last paragraph identifying ORCL's dividend announcement.
But then I have to ask you, why didn't you clean up the article to make it consistent? Don't you think you have a duty, if you wish to call yourself a journalist, to correct the mistatements in your article, particularly when there remains such an inconsistency? Who's smart?
On Apr 03 04:56 PM Dividend Tree. wrote:
> not so smart, squawk
> I did mention ORCL's dividend announcement immediately after"Third
> Group". it is the first sentence in that para.
>
> Momintn:
> I like IBM too. It has adapted very well in last decade or so. From
> a pure hardware play to software tech and services....
Opportunities for Tech Dividends [View article]
Might wish to do some research on recent news before publishing articles in the future. Beyond that, good article because it highlights to the lay investor how investing in tech is increasingly becoming a dividend play as well.