<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>SA Editor Jonathan Liss's Comments</title>
    <description>SA Editor Jonathan Liss's Comments RSS Syndication from SeekingAlpha.com</description>
    <link>http://seekingalpha.com/user/637/comments</link>
    <item>
      <title>3 'Tweaks' That Will Fortify Your ETF Portfolio</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1431571/comments?source=feed#comment-18798681</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18798681</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Agreed. In terms of lowering the duration of your high yield (and even investment grade) bond funds, I have been using the bulletshares suite of products for my parents' portfolio with great affect. This has the added benefit of offering complete control over the exact duration (as they are issued in yearly increments) and also allows you to largely avoid the interest rate risk headache by holding to maturity, as you would with individual bond issues. I'm holding BSJF and BSJG specifically and can push out the duration a year at a time. ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 03:55:18 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Agreed. In terms of lowering the duration of your high yield (and even investment grade) bond funds, I have been using the bulletshares suite of products for my parents' portfolio with great affect. This has the added benefit of offering complete control over the exact duration (as they are issued in yearly increments) and also allows you to largely avoid the interest rate risk headache by holding to maturity, as you would with individual bond issues. I'm holding BSJF and BSJG specifically and can push out the duration a year at a time. ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Unraveling The VXX Roll Yield Riddle</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1421431/comments?source=feed#comment-18663381</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18663381</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I have added in the multitude of VIX ETPs to the secondary tickers field as this article is certainly relevant to anyone that has positioned themselves anywhere along the VIX curve, long or short. Many of the '2nd gen.' VIX ETPs make an effort to mitigate the roll issue to an extent with varying degrees of success. ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2013 04:35:43 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I have added in the multitude of VIX ETPs to the secondary tickers field as this article is certainly relevant to anyone that has positioned themselves anywhere along the VIX curve, long or short. Many of the '2nd gen.' VIX ETPs make an effort to mitigate the roll issue to an extent with varying degrees of success. ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>iShares Barclays TIPS Bond ETF (TIP) announces monthly distribution of $0.3111. 30-day SEC yield of 7.84% (as of 4/30/2013). For shareholders of record May 03. Payable May 07. Ex-div date May 01.</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/987841?source=feed#comment-18345891</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18345891</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[It's good to have at least some exposure to TIPS just in case inflation does suddenly spike to protect your spending power. <br/><br/>BTW, anyone know what deal with this yield is? As they didn't pay last month it's clearly a 1-month inflated yield. The 12 month is considerably lower. ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2013 07:08:02 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[It's good to have at least some exposure to TIPS just in case inflation does suddenly spike to protect your spending power. <br/><br/>BTW, anyone know what deal with this yield is? As they didn't pay last month it's clearly a 1-month inflated yield. The 12 month is considerably lower. ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>What's Wrong With This Picture?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1370571/comments?source=feed#comment-18100491</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18100491</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Yep, last time sentiment was this low, the market was just about to start a multi-year bull run. When sentiment is this low, it's usually a good contrarian indicator. ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Apr 2013 17:04:14 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Yep, last time sentiment was this low, the market was just about to start a multi-year bull run. When sentiment is this low, it's usually a good contrarian indicator. ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Western Digital: The New Paradigm Unfolds</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1370621/comments?source=feed#comment-18089591</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18089591</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[We have made said fix Sunil - thanks!]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Apr 2013 13:43:21 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[We have made said fix Sunil - thanks!]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Sarepta Therapeutics: Irrational Exuberance</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1364651/comments?source=feed#comment-18075811</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18075811</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Seriously? Based on that logic, there's no place for any analysis about any company that makes any product that may help someone. ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Apr 2013 09:58:13 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Seriously? Based on that logic, there's no place for any analysis about any company that makes any product that may help someone. ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Oilfield Water Management: The Oil And Gas Industry's Holy Grail</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1309811/comments?source=feed#comment-17325151</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">17325151</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Note: This article originally stated that Colorado specifies a &quot;40-millimeter&quot; thickness for pit liners. The reference was corrected to read “40-mil.” A mil is one thousandth of an inch, versus a millimeter, which is one thousandth of a meter.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sun, 07 Apr 2013 14:09:03 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Note: This article originally stated that Colorado specifies a &quot;40-millimeter&quot; thickness for pit liners. The reference was corrected to read “40-mil.” A mil is one thousandth of an inch, versus a millimeter, which is one thousandth of a meter.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Nuveen New York AMT-Free Muni Fund: A Good Holding For Highly Taxed Investors</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1299771/comments?source=feed#comment-16847191</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">16847191</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Thanks for a great look at a lesser-known fund as always George. How would you say this fund stacks up vs. NVN in your view?]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Mar 2013 17:29:15 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Thanks for a great look at a lesser-known fund as always George. How would you say this fund stacks up vs. NVN in your view?]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>DB announces a halt in new creations on 26 ETNs it is the indexer or issuer on (effective 3/29), meaning the potential for the notes to trade at significant premiums to NAV as redemptions will still be available. DB expects to resume creations by mid-April. The affected notes follow: BDD, BDG, BOM, BOS, BUNL, BUNT, DEFL, DGP, DGZ, DOD, DTO, DZZ, INFL, ITLT, ITLY, JGBD, JGBL, JGBS, JGBT, LBND, OLO, SBND, SZO, UDNT, UUPT, WMW.</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/892791?source=feed#comment-16505331</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">16505331</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[It means no new shares will be issued between March 29 and mid-April essentially turning these funds into Closed-End Funds. The way ETFs and ETNs trade so close to NAV is by allowing authorized participants to come in and create or redeem baskets of 50,000 shares at Net Asset Value, allowing them to arbitrage any differences to NAV that may exist. Without the ability to create new shares investors may bid these Notes above their NAV during this period with no ability for authorized participants to come in and bring the shares back down to NAV. ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2013 14:06:32 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[It means no new shares will be issued between March 29 and mid-April essentially turning these funds into Closed-End Funds. The way ETFs and ETNs trade so close to NAV is by allowing authorized participants to come in and create or redeem baskets of 50,000 shares at Net Asset Value, allowing them to arbitrage any differences to NAV that may exist. Without the ability to create new shares investors may bid these Notes above their NAV during this period with no ability for authorized participants to come in and bring the shares back down to NAV. ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Guggenheim announces it will shutter 9 ETFs "in order to focus resources on products that have demonstrated greater marketplace demand." Final day of trading to be March 15 with liquidation expected to be "on or around" March 22. The affected funds (with direct competitors in parentheses) are: ABCS (SDIV, VYM), EWEF, EWMD, EWSM, FAA, RSU (SSO), RSW (SDS), WFVK and WXSP. (PR)</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/837841?source=feed#comment-16489461</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">16489461</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Pity indeed. There is another smallcap equal weight fund - <a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://bit.ly/15lWHTB'>http://bit.ly/15lWHTB</a> - Guggenheim Russell 2000 equal weight (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ewrs' title='Guggenheim Russell 2000 Equal Weight ETF'>EWRS</a>) - but the outperformance doesn't seem to be there. ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2013 09:39:37 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Pity indeed. There is another smallcap equal weight fund - <a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://bit.ly/15lWHTB'>http://bit.ly/15lWHTB</a> - Guggenheim Russell 2000 equal weight (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ewrs' title='Guggenheim Russell 2000 Equal Weight ETF'>EWRS</a>) - but the outperformance doesn't seem to be there. ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>iShares S&amp;amp;P U.S. Preferred Stock Index ETF (PFF) announces monthly distribution of $0.100. 30-day SEC yield of 5.54%. For shareholders of record Mar. 05. Payable Mar. 07. Ex-div date Mar. 01.</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/862261?source=feed#comment-16488731</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">16488731</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[That is correct. It was taken directly from the issuer site at the time the market current was published and as such would be accurate for the prior day's close (2/28/13) only.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2013 09:28:52 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[That is correct. It was taken directly from the issuer site at the time the market current was published and as such would be accurate for the prior day's close (2/28/13) only.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>iShares S&amp;amp;P U.S. Preferred Stock Index ETF (PFF) announces monthly distribution of $0.100. 30-day SEC yield of 5.54%. For shareholders of record Mar. 05. Payable Mar. 07. Ex-div date Mar. 01.</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/862261?source=feed#comment-16485321</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">16485321</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[This is what SPDR writes on their fund pages: &quot;An annualized yield that is calculated by dividing the investment income earned by the fund less expenses over the most recent 30-day period by the current maximum offering price.&quot;]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2013 08:21:18 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[This is what SPDR writes on their fund pages: &quot;An annualized yield that is calculated by dividing the investment income earned by the fund less expenses over the most recent 30-day period by the current maximum offering price.&quot;]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Guggenheim announces it will shutter 9 ETFs "in order to focus resources on products that have demonstrated greater marketplace demand." Final day of trading to be March 15 with liquidation expected to be "on or around" March 22. The affected funds (with direct competitors in parentheses) are: ABCS (SDIV, VYM), EWEF, EWMD, EWSM, FAA, RSU (SSO), RSW (SDS), WFVK and WXSP. (PR)</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/837841?source=feed#comment-16484971</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">16484971</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[No affect on SDIV except that it's maybe gained some slight additional AUM/liquidity]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2013 08:10:42 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[No affect on SDIV except that it's maybe gained some slight additional AUM/liquidity]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Baidu Is A Buy, Dude</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1274061/comments?source=feed#comment-16313071</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">16313071</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I think the original is pretty darn sweet. And fun! Like yours too though]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2013 03:54:37 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I think the original is pretty darn sweet. And fun! Like yours too though]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>iShares S&amp;amp;P U.S. Preferred Stock Index ETF (PFF) announces monthly distribution of $0.100. 30-day SEC yield of 5.54%. For shareholders of record Mar. 05. Payable Mar. 07. Ex-div date Mar. 01.</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/862261?source=feed#comment-15816891</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">15816891</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[BTW, the 30-day SEC yield is as of March 1, so based on the past distribution. As several of you have pointed out, the 30-day yield on the March distribution will likely be significantly lower.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Mar 2013 15:24:51 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[BTW, the 30-day SEC yield is as of March 1, so based on the past distribution. As several of you have pointed out, the 30-day yield on the March distribution will likely be significantly lower.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Why Apple Should Ignore Its Shareholders</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1173751/comments?source=feed#comment-14891061</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">14891061</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Well since I have no crystal ball, I let the fundamentals determine when I add to a position or lighten up.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2013 12:41:57 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Well since I have no crystal ball, I let the fundamentals determine when I add to a position or lighten up.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Why Apple Should Ignore Its Shareholders</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1173751/comments?source=feed#comment-14873791</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">14873791</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Yep, brilliant analysis - not only for Apple product lovers but for investors. I believe Apple will continue to focus on making great products - if they do the stock price will eventually bounce back. That should be their focus as a company. Ironically by ignoring creating 'shareholder value', they actually are much more likely to increase it. This longer-term view is the reason I bought more shares of the QQQ for both myself and my kids (which is heavily weighted to Apple - we can't really buy individual stocks here at SA due to the obvious conflicts of interest that could create) when Apple fell below $500 - we don't need the money anytime soon. It's always better to buy low ;-)]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2013 03:08:28 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Yep, brilliant analysis - not only for Apple product lovers but for investors. I believe Apple will continue to focus on making great products - if they do the stock price will eventually bounce back. That should be their focus as a company. Ironically by ignoring creating 'shareholder value', they actually are much more likely to increase it. This longer-term view is the reason I bought more shares of the QQQ for both myself and my kids (which is heavily weighted to Apple - we can't really buy individual stocks here at SA due to the obvious conflicts of interest that could create) when Apple fell below $500 - we don't need the money anytime soon. It's always better to buy low ;-)]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Facing the same pressure to obtain yield as the rest of us,, corporate treasurers - including Google's - are moving cash into junk bonds and emerging market paper. It's a new direction for the group which usually sticks with short maturities and investment-grade debt.</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/767101?source=feed#comment-13822601</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">13822601</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[LOL]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2013 09:55:36 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[LOL]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Facing the same pressure to obtain yield as the rest of us,, corporate treasurers - including Google's - are moving cash into junk bonds and emerging market paper. It's a new direction for the group which usually sticks with short maturities and investment-grade debt.</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/767101?source=feed#comment-13815881</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">13815881</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[The chase for yield has the marking of a 'bubble' all over it]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2013 07:48:23 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[The chase for yield has the marking of a 'bubble' all over it]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Vanguard's recent expense reduction means 9 of its 10 sector ETFs are now the cheapest available to U.S. investors. With an annual expense ratio of just 0.14%, VOX, VPU, VCR, VDC, VDE, VHT, VIS, VGT, and VAW stack up favorably vs. the 0.18% charged&amp;nbsp; by State Street's Sector SPDRs (XLU, XLY, XLP, XLE, XLF, XLV, XLK, XLI, XLB and XTL which charges 0.35%) and the 0.47%-0.48% iShares sector ETFs (RXI, KXI, IYE, IYF, IYZ, IYH, IDU, IYW, IYM, IYJ) charge. At 0.19%, Vanguard Financials (VFH) is still slightly more expensive than the Financial SPDR (XLF).</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/751341?source=feed#comment-13476411</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">13476411</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I wonder why their Financials sector fund costs significantly more than their other sector funds? I know they're an at-cost fund provider but it's especially interesting when you consider that the sector SPDRs are all the same 0.18%. Is SSgA taking a loss on XLF? Is their index easier to build/maintain? Curious if anyone knows?]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2013 04:09:31 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I wonder why their Financials sector fund costs significantly more than their other sector funds? I know they're an at-cost fund provider but it's especially interesting when you consider that the sector SPDRs are all the same 0.18%. Is SSgA taking a loss on XLF? Is their index easier to build/maintain? Curious if anyone knows?]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>5 Best U.S. ETFs For 2013</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1089411/comments?source=feed#comment-13445541</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">13445541</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[This article explains it perfectly: <a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://bit.ly/U1qVIi'>http://bit.ly/U1qVIi</a>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2013 13:30:49 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[This article explains it perfectly: <a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://bit.ly/U1qVIi'>http://bit.ly/U1qVIi</a>]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>5 Best U.S. ETFs For 2013</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1089411/comments?source=feed#comment-13354271</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">13354271</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA['options'? I see only a single non-leveraged option here]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sun, 06 Jan 2013 05:45:52 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA['options'? I see only a single non-leveraged option here]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Larry Swedroe's 'Think, Act, and Invest Like Warren Buffett'</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1083791/comments?source=feed#comment-13250961</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">13250961</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Agree David - I read Larry's latest book and his philosophy is not that of Buffett's imho. Still, the book is a great read for self-directed investors looking to avoid making typical mistakes in managing their own money.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2013 07:30:28 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Agree David - I read Larry's latest book and his philosophy is not that of Buffett's imho. Still, the book is a great read for self-directed investors looking to avoid making typical mistakes in managing their own money.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Arne Alsin Positions For 2013: A Stock Picker's Market, Par Excellence</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1089631/comments?source=feed#comment-13220521</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">13220521</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Also, like poker sometimes you make a wise bet (where the odds are stacked in your favor) and you lose anyway. It's just part of the game. ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2013 11:33:51 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Also, like poker sometimes you make a wise bet (where the odds are stacked in your favor) and you lose anyway. It's just part of the game. ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>5 Best U.S. ETFs For 2013</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1089411/comments?source=feed#comment-13209001</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">13209001</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[You can't safely hold leveraged ETFs for more than short periods (as they make clear in the prospectuses, the intended holding period is 1 day) due to the probability to decay to returns that results from compounding. They are for short-term bets and short-term portfolio insurance/hedging and nothing more.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2013 04:12:28 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[You can't safely hold leveraged ETFs for more than short periods (as they make clear in the prospectuses, the intended holding period is 1 day) due to the probability to decay to returns that results from compounding. They are for short-term bets and short-term portfolio insurance/hedging and nothing more.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Positioning for 2013: Guide To The Series</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1077051/comments?source=feed#comment-13140101</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">13140101</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Thanks Cliff! <br/><br/>We had Dave Van Knapp on DGI, Larry Swedroe on Fixed Income (within a broader portfolio) and Financial Lexicon on the bond market. Sounds like we'll have to include you as part of this series next year as I'm sure you have a thing or 2 to say about the topics you suggest here.<br/><br/>Have a terrific new year!<br/>Jonathan]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2012 04:46:29 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Thanks Cliff! <br/><br/>We had Dave Van Knapp on DGI, Larry Swedroe on Fixed Income (within a broader portfolio) and Financial Lexicon on the bond market. Sounds like we'll have to include you as part of this series next year as I'm sure you have a thing or 2 to say about the topics you suggest here.<br/><br/>Have a terrific new year!<br/>Jonathan]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Dave Van Knapp Positions For 2013: Tuning Out Market 'Noise' With Dividend Growth Investing</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1083851/comments?source=feed#comment-13111331</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">13111331</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[With all due respect giorgiolb,<br/><br/>Larry Swedroe manages $4.5B directly, is responsible for strategy on another $14.5B, has authored 12 books on finance, been profiled in the NY Times, and has beaten benchmarks on a properly risk-adjusted basis for 20 years. He's widely respected in finance circles. Why should he care what you think? You are not a well-known entity, have no proven track record, don't manage anyone's money other than your own, and don't even bother putting your real name out there for people to see. He puts himself on the line daily with his decisions front and center. So does Dave Van Knapp and all of our other writers. They are the opposite of anonymous, putting themselves and their investment choices on the line daily in the public sphere. You should be more willing to live and let live. <br/><br/>I am not personally partial to any approach on the site (I think each investor needs a strategy that helps them meet their financial goals in a way that lets them sleep at night) but it 'rubs me the wrong way' when anonymous commenters troll others articles just to harass them and don't listen to their replies in good faith, or just agree to disagree and move on. <br/><br/>In the same way people like Dave and the rest of our excellent DG community ignored Larry W after awhile and rightfully so (he was rude and didn't listen to others replies), I don't see how you can expect authors like Swedroe to do anything different with your frequently aggressive and snarky comments when what you have is a genuine intellectual disagreement - nothing more.<br/><br/>Best and much success in the new year!<br/>Jonathan Liss]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sun, 30 Dec 2012 07:59:46 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[With all due respect giorgiolb,<br/><br/>Larry Swedroe manages $4.5B directly, is responsible for strategy on another $14.5B, has authored 12 books on finance, been profiled in the NY Times, and has beaten benchmarks on a properly risk-adjusted basis for 20 years. He's widely respected in finance circles. Why should he care what you think? You are not a well-known entity, have no proven track record, don't manage anyone's money other than your own, and don't even bother putting your real name out there for people to see. He puts himself on the line daily with his decisions front and center. So does Dave Van Knapp and all of our other writers. They are the opposite of anonymous, putting themselves and their investment choices on the line daily in the public sphere. You should be more willing to live and let live. <br/><br/>I am not personally partial to any approach on the site (I think each investor needs a strategy that helps them meet their financial goals in a way that lets them sleep at night) but it 'rubs me the wrong way' when anonymous commenters troll others articles just to harass them and don't listen to their replies in good faith, or just agree to disagree and move on. <br/><br/>In the same way people like Dave and the rest of our excellent DG community ignored Larry W after awhile and rightfully so (he was rude and didn't listen to others replies), I don't see how you can expect authors like Swedroe to do anything different with your frequently aggressive and snarky comments when what you have is a genuine intellectual disagreement - nothing more.<br/><br/>Best and much success in the new year!<br/>Jonathan Liss]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Dave Van Knapp Positions For 2013: Tuning Out Market 'Noise' With Dividend Growth Investing</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1083851/comments?source=feed#comment-13051261</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">13051261</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I think this a valid point. No type of investment strategy is right for everyone. If someone hasn't amassed enough principal to live off the interest plus SS in retirement, they will likely have no choice but to dip into principal. If you need principal on a regular basis, it makes sense to diversify into other asset classes to ensure you have enough for your daily living expenses. ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2012 02:57:27 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I think this a valid point. No type of investment strategy is right for everyone. If someone hasn't amassed enough principal to live off the interest plus SS in retirement, they will likely have no choice but to dip into principal. If you need principal on a regular basis, it makes sense to diversify into other asset classes to ensure you have enough for your daily living expenses. ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Eric Parnell Positions For 2013: Gold's An Essential Diversifier In Any Portfolio</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1082331/comments?source=feed#comment-13051211</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">13051211</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[LOL. Good luck getting her to give it up so you can sell it in a pinch... ;-)]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2012 02:51:27 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[LOL. Good luck getting her to give it up so you can sell it in a pinch... ;-)]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Eric Parnell Positions For 2013: Gold's An Essential Diversifier In Any Portfolio</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1082331/comments?source=feed#comment-13019281</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">13019281</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Great point. However there is at least some evidence to suggest gold and silver will perform well in deflationary environments. See here for example: <a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://bit.ly/nKBKru'>http://bit.ly/nKBKru</a><br/><br/>Others should feel free to weigh in - I'd be curious for more insight as to how gold may perform in a deflationary environment.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2012 07:13:25 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Great point. However there is at least some evidence to suggest gold and silver will perform well in deflationary environments. See here for example: <a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://bit.ly/nKBKru'>http://bit.ly/nKBKru</a><br/><br/>Others should feel free to weigh in - I'd be curious for more insight as to how gold may perform in a deflationary environment.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
