<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>Transcend Asset's Comments</title>
    <description>Transcend Asset's Comments RSS Syndication from SeekingAlpha.com</description>
    <link>http://seekingalpha.com/user/6444791/comments</link>
    <item>
      <title>Shipping: This Rally Doesn't Add Up</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1444331/comments?source=feed#comment-19233631</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">19233631</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[tencjedd, I can see where the $8.75M number came from.  I'd like to know more about how you came up with the other numbers.  Especially the $13M and $9.5M.  What is an FFA market?<br/><br/>Thanks!]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 01:52:10 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[tencjedd, I can see where the $8.75M number came from.  I'd like to know more about how you came up with the other numbers.  Especially the $13M and $9.5M.  What is an FFA market?<br/><br/>Thanks!]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>After rising nearly 13% at the open following better than expected Q1 revenues with a jump in subscribers to its premium service, Pandora (P -4.2%) shares moved too far too fast before falling amid questions about the quality of its results. "Pandora needs to show further monetization gains in order to reach sustainable profitabilty," Dougherty's Steven Frankel says. "The mission is far from complete."</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/1046941?source=feed#comment-19230751</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">19230751</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Things being what they are, it is good to see that rather than letting 3rd parties do their ads, the company has figured out how to increase revenue through ads and that's been going up nicely.  2015 might be a problem, but definitely before then, there's been plenty of improvements.<br/><br/>Still don't think the company deserves to be bashed.  Track record of Google doing better than others simply by creating something similar is pretty poor, actually.  Think Facebook-like Google+, Dropbox-like Google Drive.  Really, Google never ended up #1 in these.  Just as Bing cannot outrun Google in search, I haven't got confidence Google can do better outside of search and Android (but you can't really count Android when there's no monies coming from that, can you?)<br/><br/>Going to keep P.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 22:11:35 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Things being what they are, it is good to see that rather than letting 3rd parties do their ads, the company has figured out how to increase revenue through ads and that's been going up nicely.  2015 might be a problem, but definitely before then, there's been plenty of improvements.<br/><br/>Still don't think the company deserves to be bashed.  Track record of Google doing better than others simply by creating something similar is pretty poor, actually.  Think Facebook-like Google+, Dropbox-like Google Drive.  Really, Google never ended up #1 in these.  Just as Bing cannot outrun Google in search, I haven't got confidence Google can do better outside of search and Android (but you can't really count Android when there's no monies coming from that, can you?)<br/><br/>Going to keep P.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>After rising nearly 13% at the open following better than expected Q1 revenues with a jump in subscribers to its premium service, Pandora (P -4.2%) shares moved too far too fast before falling amid questions about the quality of its results. "Pandora needs to show further monetization gains in order to reach sustainable profitabilty," Dougherty's Steven Frankel says. "The mission is far from complete."</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/1046941?source=feed#comment-19230531</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">19230531</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Hrmmm... unless Pandora comes up with really good ad revenue, which truthfully they are moving towards -- then all the clicking and listening would add up to less than monies... so then it would go to the 25% of revenue structure.<br/><br/>Wow.  So unfair.  The real control is in the hands of the copyright holders.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 21:57:51 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Hrmmm... unless Pandora comes up with really good ad revenue, which truthfully they are moving towards -- then all the clicking and listening would add up to less than monies... so then it would go to the 25% of revenue structure.<br/><br/>Wow.  So unfair.  The real control is in the hands of the copyright holders.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>After rising nearly 13% at the open following better than expected Q1 revenues with a jump in subscribers to its premium service, Pandora (P -4.2%) shares moved too far too fast before falling amid questions about the quality of its results. "Pandora needs to show further monetization gains in order to reach sustainable profitabilty," Dougherty's Steven Frankel says. "The mission is far from complete."</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/1046941?source=feed#comment-19230471</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">19230471</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Oh wow, the more I try to read that the more it's a pile of confusion.  Ok.  So it's 25% or more.  So now according to you it's at 66%.  I don't see it going to 25%.... given this is a minimum.  That stinks =/]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 21:55:34 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Oh wow, the more I try to read that the more it's a pile of confusion.  Ok.  So it's 25% or more.  So now according to you it's at 66%.  I don't see it going to 25%.... given this is a minimum.  That stinks =/]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>After rising nearly 13% at the open following better than expected Q1 revenues with a jump in subscribers to its premium service, Pandora (P -4.2%) shares moved too far too fast before falling amid questions about the quality of its results. "Pandora needs to show further monetization gains in order to reach sustainable profitabilty," Dougherty's Steven Frankel says. "The mission is far from complete."</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/1046941?source=feed#comment-19230311</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">19230311</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I'd think they have to share their revenue stream info and then pay pure play up front, and then hand over any extra monies up to the 25% level.  That's my reading on it.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 21:50:43 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I'd think they have to share their revenue stream info and then pay pure play up front, and then hand over any extra monies up to the 25% level.  That's my reading on it.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>After rising nearly 13% at the open following better than expected Q1 revenues with a jump in subscribers to its premium service, Pandora (P -4.2%) shares moved too far too fast before falling amid questions about the quality of its results. "Pandora needs to show further monetization gains in order to reach sustainable profitabilty," Dougherty's Steven Frankel says. "The mission is far from complete."</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/1046941?source=feed#comment-19230281</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">19230281</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[The quote is from this: <a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://bit.ly/150Z9jL'>http://bit.ly/150Z9jL</a>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 21:49:22 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[The quote is from this: <a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://bit.ly/150Z9jL'>http://bit.ly/150Z9jL</a>]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>After rising nearly 13% at the open following better than expected Q1 revenues with a jump in subscribers to its premium service, Pandora (P -4.2%) shares moved too far too fast before falling amid questions about the quality of its results. "Pandora needs to show further monetization gains in order to reach sustainable profitabilty," Dougherty's Steven Frankel says. "The mission is far from complete."</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/1046941?source=feed#comment-19230271</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">19230271</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Not sure you got the percentages right.  &quot;For larger pureplay webcasters, the deal offers a substantial advantage over the CRB rates. The rates for large pureplay webcasters are the greater of 25% of revenue or a per performance royalty that is far lower than that required by the CRB – even through 2015. As set forth below, the per performance royalty for 2015 will be the same rate that webcasters were charged for 2008 under the CRB decision – and far less than that agreed to by the broadcasters in their settlement with SoundExchange. As most large webcasters claimed that the CRB-determined royalties would total 75% or more of their revenues, this new rate represents a substantial savings. The pureplay per performance royalties (with a per ATH royalty rate for 2006-2008) are as follows:&quot;]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 21:48:55 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Not sure you got the percentages right.  &quot;For larger pureplay webcasters, the deal offers a substantial advantage over the CRB rates. The rates for large pureplay webcasters are the greater of 25% of revenue or a per performance royalty that is far lower than that required by the CRB – even through 2015. As set forth below, the per performance royalty for 2015 will be the same rate that webcasters were charged for 2008 under the CRB decision – and far less than that agreed to by the broadcasters in their settlement with SoundExchange. As most large webcasters claimed that the CRB-determined royalties would total 75% or more of their revenues, this new rate represents a substantial savings. The pureplay per performance royalties (with a per ATH royalty rate for 2006-2008) are as follows:&quot;]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Pandora Radio: Stuck In The Mud Until 2015's Catalyst</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1277281/comments?source=feed#comment-19227191</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">19227191</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Err... sorry, but Google does very well with ad support for their search engine.  Hence, Bing wants a bit of the pie too.  So ads can keep a business alive if done properly.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 18:57:30 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Err... sorry, but Google does very well with ad support for their search engine.  Hence, Bing wants a bit of the pie too.  So ads can keep a business alive if done properly.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>After rising nearly 13% at the open following better than expected Q1 revenues with a jump in subscribers to its premium service, Pandora (P -4.2%) shares moved too far too fast before falling amid questions about the quality of its results. "Pandora needs to show further monetization gains in order to reach sustainable profitabilty," Dougherty's Steven Frankel says. "The mission is far from complete."</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/1046941?source=feed#comment-19226731</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">19226731</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Thanks! How did you come up with 25%? In this SA article, the writer thinks it's 50%.  <a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://seekingalpha.com/a/rdk1'>http://seekingalpha.co...</a><br/><br/>I am just wondering if really and truly there's no way for Pandora to make money. Hrmmm...]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 18:39:16 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Thanks! How did you come up with 25%? In this SA article, the writer thinks it's 50%.  <a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://seekingalpha.com/a/rdk1'>http://seekingalpha.co...</a><br/><br/>I am just wondering if really and truly there's no way for Pandora to make money. Hrmmm...]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>After rising nearly 13% at the open following better than expected Q1 revenues with a jump in subscribers to its premium service, Pandora (P -4.2%) shares moved too far too fast before falling amid questions about the quality of its results. "Pandora needs to show further monetization gains in order to reach sustainable profitabilty," Dougherty's Steven Frankel says. "The mission is far from complete."</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/1046941?source=feed#comment-19224341</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">19224341</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Thanks for the link, DigitalMediaView.  Question for you... which category does Pandora fall under? Is it PurePlay? Thanks!]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 17:33:32 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Thanks for the link, DigitalMediaView.  Question for you... which category does Pandora fall under? Is it PurePlay? Thanks!]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>National Bank Of Greece: Trading Halts Between May 24-30</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1458311/comments?source=feed#comment-19220801</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">19220801</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[zgfunkz, you should ask your broker.  It varies by brokerage.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 16:05:57 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[zgfunkz, you should ask your broker.  It varies by brokerage.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Blackberry (BBRY) is downgraded to Hold by Bernstein's Pierre Ferragu, who lowers his price target to $15 from $22. "We dislike the risk/reward of our BB10 trade," he writes. "With Blackberry Live behind us, we see few additional positive catalysts coming through in the next 6 months." Shares -2.3% premarket.</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/1025991?source=feed#comment-19194401</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">19194401</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Yada yada, lighten up =D<br/><br/>In the end, we're just trying to have BlackBerry brand everything BlackBerry, no? QNX's problem is most people do not know it's owned by BlackBerry.  BB10's problem is the code is not the same as QNX.  And we're getting technical *sigh*<br/><br/>My gripe is that BlackBerry is no good at telling the Americans they've got QNX under their hood.  Maybe that will stop the shorting.<br/><br/>Knowitall is a Nokia fan.  And I'm a Nokia and BlackBerry shareholder... used to be a fan of both.  Kinda zoned out on both of them... both stocks are out of life support/ out of the emergency room but still in critical condition LOL.  Peace to all!]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 01:44:05 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Yada yada, lighten up =D<br/><br/>In the end, we're just trying to have BlackBerry brand everything BlackBerry, no? QNX's problem is most people do not know it's owned by BlackBerry.  BB10's problem is the code is not the same as QNX.  And we're getting technical *sigh*<br/><br/>My gripe is that BlackBerry is no good at telling the Americans they've got QNX under their hood.  Maybe that will stop the shorting.<br/><br/>Knowitall is a Nokia fan.  And I'm a Nokia and BlackBerry shareholder... used to be a fan of both.  Kinda zoned out on both of them... both stocks are out of life support/ out of the emergency room but still in critical condition LOL.  Peace to all!]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Blackberry (BBRY) is downgraded to Hold by Bernstein's Pierre Ferragu, who lowers his price target to $15 from $22. "We dislike the risk/reward of our BB10 trade," he writes. "With Blackberry Live behind us, we see few additional positive catalysts coming through in the next 6 months." Shares -2.3% premarket.</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/1025991?source=feed#comment-19194111</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">19194111</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[As I see it, the lack of marketing of QNX 2 hurts shareholders.  We know of it, but because it doesn't get enough air time, Apple gets all the credit.  And BlackBerry gets all the DOWNGRADES =(]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 01:31:41 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[As I see it, the lack of marketing of QNX 2 hurts shareholders.  We know of it, but because it doesn't get enough air time, Apple gets all the credit.  And BlackBerry gets all the DOWNGRADES =(]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>National Bank Of Greece: Trading Halts Between May 24-30</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1458311/comments?source=feed#comment-19192391</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">19192391</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Ksmanyam01,<br/><br/>Stocks under $5 are risky -- depending largely on your timeframe and cashflow.  It's fine to hold if you believe it will be around 5 years from now.  If you expected immediate appreciation, this is where the headache comes in.  Diversify and also at all times, know that you are not buying a GIC or government bond.  The risk with stocks is always the possibility of a big zero.  So spread your money out (doesn't mean a bank won't fail and a GIC won't be a zero or a government won't fail either... but, anyways! back to stocks...)<br/><br/>Personally, I have been adding to my holding of NBG.  If it goes up, great, if it wants to sit there for a very long time, I'm ok with it.<br/><br/>To be honest, when I first got in to this stock, it was probably $1.50.  All it did was go down and freak me out.  It went down to 80 cents or so.  I thought it would be a zero.  It was depressing because for this stock, I did not go in anticipating a zero.  Because it's Greece's largest bank, I classified it as a zero-risk turnaround subject to a big zero only if the country became socialist or communist or something like that.  And the lowest I expected it to go was $1.25 or so.<br/><br/>Needless to say, my approach to a stock affects my emotional response.  I'm sorry to hear you sold at a lost.  Only time will tell whether this thing turns out to be a zero or not.  I'm in now only because I've been following it with real money now for so long.  And because I have managed to make money on it.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 23:51:04 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Ksmanyam01,<br/><br/>Stocks under $5 are risky -- depending largely on your timeframe and cashflow.  It's fine to hold if you believe it will be around 5 years from now.  If you expected immediate appreciation, this is where the headache comes in.  Diversify and also at all times, know that you are not buying a GIC or government bond.  The risk with stocks is always the possibility of a big zero.  So spread your money out (doesn't mean a bank won't fail and a GIC won't be a zero or a government won't fail either... but, anyways! back to stocks...)<br/><br/>Personally, I have been adding to my holding of NBG.  If it goes up, great, if it wants to sit there for a very long time, I'm ok with it.<br/><br/>To be honest, when I first got in to this stock, it was probably $1.50.  All it did was go down and freak me out.  It went down to 80 cents or so.  I thought it would be a zero.  It was depressing because for this stock, I did not go in anticipating a zero.  Because it's Greece's largest bank, I classified it as a zero-risk turnaround subject to a big zero only if the country became socialist or communist or something like that.  And the lowest I expected it to go was $1.25 or so.<br/><br/>Needless to say, my approach to a stock affects my emotional response.  I'm sorry to hear you sold at a lost.  Only time will tell whether this thing turns out to be a zero or not.  I'm in now only because I've been following it with real money now for so long.  And because I have managed to make money on it.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>National Bank Of Greece: Trading Halts Between May 24-30</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1458311/comments?source=feed#comment-19192001</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">19192001</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Skipper, buy NBG on the Athens exchange.  Then you get issued rights.  You are supposed to be an owner of the shares by tomorrow.  Then, it's pretty much $5.50 per share when you exercise your rights.  That's 55 cents equivalent before the reverse split.<br/><br/>No idea if you are going to get the rights if you purchase tomorrow though or the settlement date has to be tomorrow.<br/><br/>What I want to know is if the rights are going to be transferable.  Can they be sold to other non-owners? Since the ADR version won't have rights going directly to owners but have rights sold off and then cash dividend directed to us, I wonder what of the Athens version... is it a transferable kind of right or not? Hrmmm... and though we cannot get the rights out west, I wonder if we can buy the rights on the exchange?? Meaning the North American exchange.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 23:29:54 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Skipper, buy NBG on the Athens exchange.  Then you get issued rights.  You are supposed to be an owner of the shares by tomorrow.  Then, it's pretty much $5.50 per share when you exercise your rights.  That's 55 cents equivalent before the reverse split.<br/><br/>No idea if you are going to get the rights if you purchase tomorrow though or the settlement date has to be tomorrow.<br/><br/>What I want to know is if the rights are going to be transferable.  Can they be sold to other non-owners? Since the ADR version won't have rights going directly to owners but have rights sold off and then cash dividend directed to us, I wonder what of the Athens version... is it a transferable kind of right or not? Hrmmm... and though we cannot get the rights out west, I wonder if we can buy the rights on the exchange?? Meaning the North American exchange.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>National Bank Of Greece: Trading Halts Between May 24-30</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1458311/comments?source=feed#comment-19183241</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">19183241</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Any idea how Alpha Bank became over the counter stock?<br/><br/>My only worry is that NBG becomes OTC.  Alpha Bank has a market cap over $1 Billion, though the share prices are under $1.  My research on Nasdaq requires a value of $1 million and 750,000 shares.  NBG seems to meet that requirement now and in the future.  Your thoughts?]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 18:03:14 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Any idea how Alpha Bank became over the counter stock?<br/><br/>My only worry is that NBG becomes OTC.  Alpha Bank has a market cap over $1 Billion, though the share prices are under $1.  My research on Nasdaq requires a value of $1 million and 750,000 shares.  NBG seems to meet that requirement now and in the future.  Your thoughts?]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>If we keep moving up like this, stocks could go "parabolic," says Art Cashin. The stocks that have the heaviest short positions have already raced ahead of the indices, and they are going to crumble if we keep going. (Video).</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/1033841?source=feed#comment-19170321</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">19170321</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Herr, where do you go to find margin requirement changes? I'm interested.  Thanks =)]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 13:26:57 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Herr, where do you go to find margin requirement changes? I'm interested.  Thanks =)]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Some Thoughts On The Recent Surge In National Bank Of Greece</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1448381/comments?source=feed#comment-19150471</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">19150471</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Greek banks are receiving a lot of hedge fund attention.  I agree that the price will likely not drop quickly at this point, though continue to slide.  I believe the stock stops trading this Friday and will not be back on till May 30th.  This is due to the reverse split.  That should control the chaos even if we have another red day on the markets tmrw and Friday.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 01:57:24 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Greek banks are receiving a lot of hedge fund attention.  I agree that the price will likely not drop quickly at this point, though continue to slide.  I believe the stock stops trading this Friday and will not be back on till May 30th.  This is due to the reverse split.  That should control the chaos even if we have another red day on the markets tmrw and Friday.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Kodak Doesn't Think Much Of UniBoss, So Why Should You?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1445991/comments?source=feed#comment-19108431</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">19108431</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[News ahead, shorts better cover! As per this article, <br/><a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://bit.ly/12Vq539'>http://bit.ly/12Vq539</a><br/><br/>&quot;UniPixel has also been invited to attend the 10th Annual Craig-Hallum Conference in Minneapolis, Minnesota on May 29, and on the next day will present at the Cowen Group's 41st Annual Technology, Media &amp; Telecom Conference in New York City. The company will then attend Computex Taipei in Taiwan on June 4-8, where it will showcase product samples and prototypes.&quot;]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 08:03:55 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[News ahead, shorts better cover! As per this article, <br/><a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://bit.ly/12Vq539'>http://bit.ly/12Vq539</a><br/><br/>&quot;UniPixel has also been invited to attend the 10th Annual Craig-Hallum Conference in Minneapolis, Minnesota on May 29, and on the next day will present at the Cowen Group's 41st Annual Technology, Media &amp; Telecom Conference in New York City. The company will then attend Computex Taipei in Taiwan on June 4-8, where it will showcase product samples and prototypes.&quot;]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Some Thoughts On The Recent Surge In National Bank Of Greece</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1448381/comments?source=feed#comment-19108121</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">19108121</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Roll the dice... I am getting in now because I anticipate any good news in Greece will raise the stock.  Doesn't have to be directly banking news, can be any macro signs of recovery.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 07:52:14 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Roll the dice... I am getting in now because I anticipate any good news in Greece will raise the stock.  Doesn't have to be directly banking news, can be any macro signs of recovery.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Some Thoughts On The Recent Surge In National Bank Of Greece</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1448381/comments?source=feed#comment-19090481</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">19090481</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Not surprised given the commentaries on another SA article by the author states the ADRs do give a small dividend (in the past) when they don't get the rights.  But it seems there's no formal announcement from NBG itself so then the ADRs are stuck in the dumps.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 17:14:32 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Not surprised given the commentaries on another SA article by the author states the ADRs do give a small dividend (in the past) when they don't get the rights.  But it seems there's no formal announcement from NBG itself so then the ADRs are stuck in the dumps.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Apple (AAPL +1.9%) roundup: 1) Brian White cites Chinese 3G growth as a reason for his $888 PT: he points out China's 3G sub base rose 83% Y/Y in April to 293.1M, and is expected to hit 375M-400M by year's end. China Mobile (CHL - previous) had 120M 3G subs; China Unicom (CHU) had 92M, and China Telecom (CHA) 81M. 2) Taiwan's Economic Times reports Apple is testing 1.5" OLED displays for an iWatch, and that "market rumors" indicate Foxconn has received iWatch trial production orders. 3) Digitimes reports MacBook orders are expected to grow 20% Q/Q in Q2, as Apple launches new systems sporting Intel Haswell CPUs at June's WWDC conference.</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/1035731?source=feed#comment-19046601</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">19046601</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Apple Analysts are crazy folks.  What with the $1111 PT and now a $888 PT.  They sure know how to sway people with magic numbers.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 17:52:12 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Apple Analysts are crazy folks.  What with the $1111 PT and now a $888 PT.  They sure know how to sway people with magic numbers.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>After Clearing A Major Hurdle, Greece's Outlook Brightens</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1177971/comments?source=feed#comment-19046211</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">19046211</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[True -- releasing the bulk of information to none! Or well, &quot;It's all Greek to me!!&quot; Seems like the perfect saying here ;)<br/><br/>I was planning to hold NBG for 5 years, anyways, trading some for extra.  So not entirely concerned.  Unless it was going for dead.  But I think it, along with much of Europe, is and will be on long-term life support.<br/><br/>I do have F.  It was stuck in a rut for 7 months.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 17:41:28 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[True -- releasing the bulk of information to none! Or well, &quot;It's all Greek to me!!&quot; Seems like the perfect saying here ;)<br/><br/>I was planning to hold NBG for 5 years, anyways, trading some for extra.  So not entirely concerned.  Unless it was going for dead.  But I think it, along with much of Europe, is and will be on long-term life support.<br/><br/>I do have F.  It was stuck in a rut for 7 months.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>After Clearing A Major Hurdle, Greece's Outlook Brightens</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1177971/comments?source=feed#comment-19044741</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">19044741</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[What is unknown right now is when the rights are effective, and when they expire.  I would expect them to have a long expiry date but what would be interesting is to know when the exercise date is.  It's not necessarily bad as the people with full control over rights are existing shareholders.<br/><br/>Also, dilution is dependent on how many shareholders exercise their rights... that is my understanding.<br/><br/>Be glad to hear differently as I am all theoretical here and have never exercised rights.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 17:00:07 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[What is unknown right now is when the rights are effective, and when they expire.  I would expect them to have a long expiry date but what would be interesting is to know when the exercise date is.  It's not necessarily bad as the people with full control over rights are existing shareholders.<br/><br/>Also, dilution is dependent on how many shareholders exercise their rights... that is my understanding.<br/><br/>Be glad to hear differently as I am all theoretical here and have never exercised rights.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>After Clearing A Major Hurdle, Greece's Outlook Brightens</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1177971/comments?source=feed#comment-19043581</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">19043581</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Actually, this article on Reuters on NBG is very confusing.<br/><a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://reut.rs/17Vjew4'>http://reut.rs/17Vjew4</a><br/><br/>If you read the headlines, it says RIGHTS.  Then doesn't that mean right to buy more shares at $5.50? (pricing after reverse split?) ok, that doesn't necessarily mean you get that kind of price on the market, right? You'd have to essentially be buying the stock now on the Athens for more than that, and then you'd get the rights.<br/><br/>This means the price as of now will not fall to 55 cents?!?<br/><br/>The body of the news is further confusing as it doesn't give a date for the 1 for 10.  Anyone have a Greek version of the news that does a better job than Reuters?? Thanks =)]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 16:32:53 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Actually, this article on Reuters on NBG is very confusing.<br/><a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://reut.rs/17Vjew4'>http://reut.rs/17Vjew4</a><br/><br/>If you read the headlines, it says RIGHTS.  Then doesn't that mean right to buy more shares at $5.50? (pricing after reverse split?) ok, that doesn't necessarily mean you get that kind of price on the market, right? You'd have to essentially be buying the stock now on the Athens for more than that, and then you'd get the rights.<br/><br/>This means the price as of now will not fall to 55 cents?!?<br/><br/>The body of the news is further confusing as it doesn't give a date for the 1 for 10.  Anyone have a Greek version of the news that does a better job than Reuters?? Thanks =)]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>After Clearing A Major Hurdle, Greece's Outlook Brightens</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1177971/comments?source=feed#comment-19043261</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">19043261</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Looks like we're headed for 55 cents?]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 16:27:58 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Looks like we're headed for 55 cents?]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Shipping: This Rally Doesn't Add Up</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1444331/comments?source=feed#comment-19034541</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">19034541</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[&quot;Subsequent to December 31, 2010, on January 25, 2011 Korea Line Corporation (&quot;KLC&quot;), one of our charterers, filed for protective receivership in Seoul, Korea. On February 15th, the Korean Courts approved this request. The Company and KLC have agreed that all of Company's charters to KLC remain intact until the Court allows KLC to resume hire payments, although no charter hire payments are currently being received. The Company has further come to an agreement with KLC regarding arrangements to take over the employment of the majority of the affected chartered vessels for this interim period. Earnings during this interim period would be used to offset the charter hire otherwise due from KLC. During February, the Company re-chartered out all affected vessels on the spot market, which is currently averaging around $15,000 per day.  The Company will continue to trade these vessels until our business arrangements with KLC have been resolved.  As of March 4, 2011, Eagle Bulk is owed approximately $8.3 million of charter hire all related to 2011 activities with KLC, of which approximately $2.5 million was due and owing prior to KLC filing for rehabilitation. With regard to the &quot;Nighthawk,&quot; which was scheduled to be delivered to KLC in February 2011, the Company and KLC have agreed in principle, subject to Court approval, to defer the commencement of this charter to allow Eagle to employ the vessel for its own account for the time being. During January and February of 2011, the Company took delivery of two newbuilding vessels, the Thrush and Nighthawk, which immediately entered into short term time charters.&quot;]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 13:26:39 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[&quot;Subsequent to December 31, 2010, on January 25, 2011 Korea Line Corporation (&quot;KLC&quot;), one of our charterers, filed for protective receivership in Seoul, Korea. On February 15th, the Korean Courts approved this request. The Company and KLC have agreed that all of Company's charters to KLC remain intact until the Court allows KLC to resume hire payments, although no charter hire payments are currently being received. The Company has further come to an agreement with KLC regarding arrangements to take over the employment of the majority of the affected chartered vessels for this interim period. Earnings during this interim period would be used to offset the charter hire otherwise due from KLC. During February, the Company re-chartered out all affected vessels on the spot market, which is currently averaging around $15,000 per day.  The Company will continue to trade these vessels until our business arrangements with KLC have been resolved.  As of March 4, 2011, Eagle Bulk is owed approximately $8.3 million of charter hire all related to 2011 activities with KLC, of which approximately $2.5 million was due and owing prior to KLC filing for rehabilitation. With regard to the &quot;Nighthawk,&quot; which was scheduled to be delivered to KLC in February 2011, the Company and KLC have agreed in principle, subject to Court approval, to defer the commencement of this charter to allow Eagle to employ the vessel for its own account for the time being. During January and February of 2011, the Company took delivery of two newbuilding vessels, the Thrush and Nighthawk, which immediately entered into short term time charters.&quot;]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Shipping: This Rally Doesn't Add Up</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1444331/comments?source=feed#comment-19033931</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">19033931</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[You may be right that next quarter may be tough to beat.  The pocket of time between this quarter and next quarter, the stock still has room to run up due to macro events.  Then, I may just have to buy back in after the dust settles nearer to the quarterly.<br/><br/>If you want alpha and less risk on a turnaround shipper, I find this one better than FREE or EXM -- and DRYS for the time being.  Though I am starting to think they both have another neat component: stock in another company.  DRYS in Ocean Rig, and now EGLE in KLC.  I'm optimistic with the extras both come with.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 13:14:08 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[You may be right that next quarter may be tough to beat.  The pocket of time between this quarter and next quarter, the stock still has room to run up due to macro events.  Then, I may just have to buy back in after the dust settles nearer to the quarterly.<br/><br/>If you want alpha and less risk on a turnaround shipper, I find this one better than FREE or EXM -- and DRYS for the time being.  Though I am starting to think they both have another neat component: stock in another company.  DRYS in Ocean Rig, and now EGLE in KLC.  I'm optimistic with the extras both come with.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Shipping: This Rally Doesn't Add Up</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1444331/comments?source=feed#comment-19033371</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">19033371</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[And just saying: none of the shippers are genuinely correlating with BDI right now.  Neither are they correlating with fundamentals.  They are incredibly correlated with the perceived economic recovery in US and Japan, and upgrades in Greece.  If you don't want to go long any shipping stock, don't short any.  You can get mowed by the macro events.  <br/><br/>Some shippers are more likely to run into bankruptcy.  Eagle is if you just look at the balance sheet.  But if you examine the terms and the parties involved, then things get really interesting.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 13:02:43 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[And just saying: none of the shippers are genuinely correlating with BDI right now.  Neither are they correlating with fundamentals.  They are incredibly correlated with the perceived economic recovery in US and Japan, and upgrades in Greece.  If you don't want to go long any shipping stock, don't short any.  You can get mowed by the macro events.  <br/><br/>Some shippers are more likely to run into bankruptcy.  Eagle is if you just look at the balance sheet.  But if you examine the terms and the parties involved, then things get really interesting.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Shipping: This Rally Doesn't Add Up</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1444331/comments?source=feed#comment-19032931</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">19032931</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I have looked into many shipping stocks.  When there is war, drought, recession, political instability or piracy, dryships are affected.  The world will never be perfect but it is much better this year than the last 6 years.  There is so far also no other stock with a really strange high ownership by Goldman Sachs.  Or maybe there is, and I don't know of it.  I admit to not liking them but I happen to have to grudgingly admit their track record for winning is incredible.  All other factors considered, this GS thing weighed in, and I am in for awhile.  Like I said, I have a longer term chunk, and I trend trade some of the stock for income.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 12:52:23 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I have looked into many shipping stocks.  When there is war, drought, recession, political instability or piracy, dryships are affected.  The world will never be perfect but it is much better this year than the last 6 years.  There is so far also no other stock with a really strange high ownership by Goldman Sachs.  Or maybe there is, and I don't know of it.  I admit to not liking them but I happen to have to grudgingly admit their track record for winning is incredible.  All other factors considered, this GS thing weighed in, and I am in for awhile.  Like I said, I have a longer term chunk, and I trend trade some of the stock for income.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
