<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>Warren Mitlak's Comments</title>
    <description>Warren Mitlak's Comments RSS Syndication from SeekingAlpha.com</description>
    <link>http://seekingalpha.com/user/6507101/comments</link>
    <item>
      <title>Markel Goes On Sale</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1083941/comments?source=feed#comment-13250701</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">13250701</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Tomkat,<br/>Thanks for the explanation.<br/>The expense line for Markel  on the income statement is called<br/>&quot;Underwriting, acquisition and insurance expenses&quot; vs. &quot;Acquisition expenses&quot; on the Alterra income statement.  Isn't the combined ratio the way to compare the profitability of different insurance companies' operations?<br/><br/>  ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2013 07:17:09 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Tomkat,<br/>Thanks for the explanation.<br/>The expense line for Markel  on the income statement is called<br/>&quot;Underwriting, acquisition and insurance expenses&quot; vs. &quot;Acquisition expenses&quot; on the Alterra income statement.  Isn't the combined ratio the way to compare the profitability of different insurance companies' operations?<br/><br/>  ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Markel Goes On Sale</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1083941/comments?source=feed#comment-13178391</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">13178391</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[TomKat,  Thanks for your comments.  I would be concerned as well  if Markel had higher expenses than its competitors.  Where did you get the figures that their expense ratio has grown from 30% to 44%?  Their 2011 annual report shows  that their combined ratio is less than the industry average.<br/><br/>Markel continues to sell more insurance so it does not seem to be affecting their sales.  According to Markel's most recent 10-Q, the company's revenue from premiums is up for the third quarter 2012 vs. 2011 and for the first nine months of 2012 vs. 2011.<br/><br/>Also, I haven't seen any estimates from Markel on their losses from Hurricane Sandy.  Last year they reported 8 points of loss on their combined ratio of 102%.  The loss was for multiple  natural catastrophes.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2013 08:46:19 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[TomKat,  Thanks for your comments.  I would be concerned as well  if Markel had higher expenses than its competitors.  Where did you get the figures that their expense ratio has grown from 30% to 44%?  Their 2011 annual report shows  that their combined ratio is less than the industry average.<br/><br/>Markel continues to sell more insurance so it does not seem to be affecting their sales.  According to Markel's most recent 10-Q, the company's revenue from premiums is up for the third quarter 2012 vs. 2011 and for the first nine months of 2012 vs. 2011.<br/><br/>Also, I haven't seen any estimates from Markel on their losses from Hurricane Sandy.  Last year they reported 8 points of loss on their combined ratio of 102%.  The loss was for multiple  natural catastrophes.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
