Yep. Hopefully the one extra voice added to the discussion. If not, I guess worst case is my incremental hot air was insignificant in the scheme of things.
In part the stocks I am watching are based on whether they are on my watch list or have discussed them in the past. As you say, Apple is discussed to death and the incremental value of my own contribution would probably be minimal. While some will surely disagree, I feel I can add more value to the discussion of the others listed.
Reading Between the Lines To Spot the Next Cisco [View article]
TradeRadar - True. But that makes it all the more unlikely that they would go from 15 weeks to 5 all at once. In the interest of avoiding disruption even if the system could take them from 15 to 5 I would expect them to go 15 to 14, 13 and so on.
The comment, to me, sounded as if Cisco was making an abrupt change in their ordering patterns. I just don't believe they could or would ever do that.
Reading Between the Lines To Spot the Next Cisco [View article]
Thanks for both comments.
It is definitely more important to have reliability than low inventory or short lead times. My point, though, is that LEAN doesn't seem to explain Cisco's order slowdown this quarter. It just seems like a cover story for everyone.
The Chip Glut Is Beyond Semi-Serious [View article]
It may be weakening now, but it must have been strong at some point for the semis to be adding so much capacity. The problem with that is that orders can be canceled. Somehow the chip industry always believes the orders are for real "this time" even though they have been proved wrong over and over.
The Chip Glut Is Beyond Semi-Serious [View article]
Chips are a global commodity, and the foreign producers are having considerable impact. Some of the data presented above are U.S. specific, while others I follow (such as the SIA Global Sales Report) are global.
Other dynamics, such as inventory levels, are probably something that can be extrapolated. If US chipmakers are building inventory it could mean that foreign manufacturers are taking share, or it could mean that foreign manufacturers are also building inventory. In the short term the latter is usually more significant that the former but it is something to be aware of as the counter-argument.
I would say the weakest data above, with respect to a more global chip industry, is the capacity utilization figure. With more new fabs built overseas than in the U.S., U.S. capacity utilization is less relevant to the total industry than it has been historically. By using the Fed data, I am making an implicit assumption that global fabs are all being utilized at roughly the same rate. Sometimes this will not be the case.
The Chip Glut Is Beyond Semi-Serious [View article]
Thanks.
I have been (publicly) bearish for approximately 1 year, and during that time the SOX is down about 5% vs. a 10% gain in the S&P 500, so I wouldn't say the bearish outlook was invalid. Admittedly (which I have also noted) I may have missed the August bottom. The data just haven't reversed enough to warrant a turn toward bullishness on my part.
To be specific, I think the fundamentals are going to get much worse, but the market will look past the bottom in fundamentals and the stocks will recover before the fundamentals do. I am not confident, yet, that we have reached that point but it is possible that we have. Sorry I can't be more helpful than that.
As far as the article you referenced, I share Notable Calls' opinion.
The Week Ahead: Earnings Galore [View article]
The Week Ahead: Earnings Galore [View article]
The Week Ahead: Earnings Galore [View article]
Reading Between the Lines To Spot the Next Cisco [View article]
The comment, to me, sounded as if Cisco was making an abrupt change in their ordering patterns. I just don't believe they could or would ever do that.
Reading Between the Lines To Spot the Next Cisco [View article]
It is definitely more important to have reliability than low inventory or short lead times. My point, though, is that LEAN doesn't seem to explain Cisco's order slowdown this quarter. It just seems like a cover story for everyone.
Altera's Q1 Results: The Market's Enthusiasm Was Difficult to Understand [View article]
Making Sense of Semis: Does the Industry Still Have What it Takes? [View article]
The Chip Glut Is Beyond Semi-Serious [View article]
I still believe things will hit bottom when the orders for new supply start to grow slower than end demand.
The Chip Glut Is Beyond Semi-Serious [View article]
Eternal optimists, I guess.
The Chip Glut Is Beyond Semi-Serious [View article]
Other dynamics, such as inventory levels, are probably something that can be extrapolated. If US chipmakers are building inventory it could mean that foreign manufacturers are taking share, or it could mean that foreign manufacturers are also building inventory. In the short term the latter is usually more significant that the former but it is something to be aware of as the counter-argument.
I would say the weakest data above, with respect to a more global chip industry, is the capacity utilization figure. With more new fabs built overseas than in the U.S., U.S. capacity utilization is less relevant to the total industry than it has been historically. By using the Fed data, I am making an implicit assumption that global fabs are all being utilized at roughly the same rate. Sometimes this will not be the case.
The Chip Glut Is Beyond Semi-Serious [View article]
I have been (publicly) bearish for approximately 1 year, and during that time the SOX is down about 5% vs. a 10% gain in the S&P 500, so I wouldn't say the bearish outlook was invalid. Admittedly (which I have also noted) I may have missed the August bottom. The data just haven't reversed enough to warrant a turn toward bullishness on my part.
To be specific, I think the fundamentals are going to get much worse, but the market will look past the bottom in fundamentals and the stocks will recover before the fundamentals do. I am not confident, yet, that we have reached that point but it is possible that we have. Sorry I can't be more helpful than that.
As far as the article you referenced, I share Notable Calls' opinion.