YOU LEFT OUT "MRNA' IN MY OPINION. AS FAR AS THE OTHER STOCKS, CEO'S AND RESEARCH FIRMS WHO ALWAYS HAVE A GOOD THING TO SAY ABOUT STOCKS AND THE HIGH TARGET PRICES THEY ATTACH TO EACH STOCK, IS TOTALLY MISLEADING TO INVESTORS. EVERYONE SHOULD JUST STICK TO BASICS AND NOT LET ANYTHING INFLUENCE THEM ONE BIT. I STICK TO MANAGEMENTS PERCENTAGE OF OWNERSHIP OF STOCK, REURN ON EQUITY, AND SERIOUS REVENUE. SIMPLE!
Cramer's Mad Money - Paul Krugman Is Wrong (8/10/09) [View article]
CRAMER HAS A RIGHT TO DISAGREE WITH PAUL KRUGMAN. EVERYONE HAS THE RIGHT TO VOICE THEIR OPINION. I DIDN'T AGREE WITH CRAMER WHEN HE MENTIONED A HALF DOZEN TIMES ON HIS T.V. SHOW THAT HE RECOMMENDED TO BUY "MRNA". BY THE END OF THE YEAR THE STOCK LOST HALF ITS VALUE. SO MUCH FOR BEING WRONG. NO ONE IS PERFECT AND 'MRNA' IS AROUND $1.53 FROM $20.00. OH OF COURSE ITS A NEW COMPANY NOW, AFTER THE EMBARRASSMENT SET BY MANAGEMENT, AND CEO WAS REPLACED TOO. NOW IN 4-7 YEARS THEY MAY GET AN APPROVAL, AND WITH FRESH NEW SHAREHOLDERS WHO WEREN'T LEFT WITH A FINANCIAL DISASTER, THEY ALL CAN DREAM OF THE RICHES THAT MAY OR MAY NOT COME. NEW SHAREHOLDERS ARE EXCITED, 45 NEWS ANNOUNCEMENTS SINCE JUNE 1ST., BUT PRICE STILL ABOUT THE SAME. COMPANIES NEED SHAREHOLDERS LIKE THIS, BECAUSE THAT'S HOW THEY SURVIVED THE FIRST 25 YEARS AND ACCOMPLISHED ABSOLUTELY NOTHING. AND DO NOT LOOK AT THE STATS, OR THEIR BALANCE SHEET, BECAUSE SHAREHOLDERS ALWAYS SAY IT DOESN'T MATTER. YEA RIGHT!
Gone Nowhere in 8 Years [View article]
AS FAR AS THE OTHER STOCKS, CEO'S AND RESEARCH FIRMS WHO ALWAYS HAVE A GOOD THING TO SAY ABOUT STOCKS AND THE HIGH TARGET PRICES THEY ATTACH TO EACH STOCK, IS TOTALLY MISLEADING TO INVESTORS.
EVERYONE SHOULD JUST STICK TO BASICS AND NOT LET
ANYTHING INFLUENCE THEM ONE BIT.
I STICK TO MANAGEMENTS PERCENTAGE OF OWNERSHIP OF STOCK, REURN ON EQUITY, AND SERIOUS REVENUE.
SIMPLE!
Cramer's Mad Money - Paul Krugman Is Wrong (8/10/09) [View article]
PAUL KRUGMAN. EVERYONE HAS THE RIGHT TO VOICE THEIR OPINION.
I DIDN'T AGREE WITH CRAMER WHEN HE MENTIONED
A HALF DOZEN TIMES ON HIS T.V. SHOW THAT HE RECOMMENDED TO BUY "MRNA".
BY THE END OF THE YEAR THE STOCK LOST HALF ITS VALUE. SO MUCH FOR BEING WRONG.
NO ONE IS PERFECT AND 'MRNA' IS AROUND $1.53 FROM $20.00. OH OF COURSE ITS A NEW COMPANY NOW, AFTER THE EMBARRASSMENT SET BY MANAGEMENT, AND CEO WAS REPLACED TOO.
NOW IN 4-7 YEARS THEY MAY GET AN APPROVAL,
AND WITH FRESH NEW SHAREHOLDERS WHO WEREN'T LEFT WITH A FINANCIAL DISASTER, THEY ALL CAN DREAM OF THE RICHES THAT MAY OR MAY NOT COME. NEW SHAREHOLDERS ARE EXCITED, 45 NEWS ANNOUNCEMENTS SINCE JUNE 1ST., BUT PRICE STILL ABOUT THE SAME. COMPANIES NEED SHAREHOLDERS LIKE THIS, BECAUSE THAT'S HOW THEY SURVIVED THE FIRST 25 YEARS AND ACCOMPLISHED ABSOLUTELY NOTHING.
AND DO NOT LOOK AT THE STATS, OR THEIR BALANCE SHEET, BECAUSE SHAREHOLDERS ALWAYS SAY IT DOESN'T MATTER. YEA RIGHT!