<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>phillyslick's Instablog</title>
    <description></description>
    <author>
      <name>phillyslick</name>
    </author>
    <link>http://seekingalpha.com</link>
    <item>
      <title>Diamond Core Driller In The Rough: Drillcon AB </title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/instablog/669483-phillyslick/1064031-diamond-core-driller-in-the-rough-drillcon-ab?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">1064031</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<p>Drillcon AB (DRIL.STO) is a swedish-based company specializing in diamond core drilling and raise boring.</p><p>It is a small-cap company listed on the NASDAQ OMX First North market.</p><p>Drillcon AB currently trades at 4.7 SEK per share, has a price to earnings ratio (P/E) of 6.4 and has a dividend yield of 3%.</p><p>The largest shareholder of Drillcon (a pension fund) holds 5.5% of the outstanding shares.</p><p>Drillcon AB is growing its revenue, income and dividend and has a solid cash flow.</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2012 09:38:09 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>Drillcon AB (DRIL.STO) is a swedish-based company specializing in diamond core drilling and raise boring.</p><p>It is a small-cap company listed on the NASDAQ OMX First North market.</p><p>Drillcon AB currently trades at 4.7 SEK per share, has a price to earnings ratio (P/E) of 6.4 and has a dividend yield of 3%.</p><p>The largest shareholder of Drillcon (a pension fund) holds 5.5% of the outstanding shares.</p><p>Drillcon AB is growing its revenue, income and dividend and has a solid cash flow.</p>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/instablog/tag/Drilling">Drilling</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/instablog/tag/Mining">Mining</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/instablog/tag/Materials">Materials</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/instablog/tag/Resources">Resources</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/instablog/tag/Diamond">Diamond</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Vitrolife: A Small-cap With Potential</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/instablog/669483-phillyslick/319301-vitrolife-a-small-cap-with-potential?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">319301</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[On February 7th 2012, Vitrolife AB (STO:VITR) reported their best ever sales in a single quarter.<p>Sales have increased for 36 consecutive quarters and have grown ~75% since 2006. Over the same period, net income doubled.</p><p>The current p/e is ~27 and dividend yield is ~1.3%.</p><p>Vitrolife specializes in 3 areas: in vitro fertilization, stem cell therapy and transplantations. They have access to US, European, Middle-east and Asian markets.</p><p>As of Dec. 2011, JP Morgan was one of the top 10 investors in Vitrolife.</p><p>Other information (from: <a href="http://www.news-medical.net/news/20120207/Vitrolife-fourth-quarter-sales-increase-1825-to-SEK-95-million.aspx" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">http://www.news-medical.net/news/20120207/Vitrolife-fourth-quarter-sales-increase-1825-to-SEK-95-million.aspx</a> )</p><p>-- Vitrolife was the first company to obtain regulatory approval in China for a whole series of cultivation media for IVF</p><p>-- A study showed that EmbryoGlue&reg;, a product patented by Vitrolife, increases the chances of <a href="http://www.news-medical.net/health/Infertility-What-is-Infertility.aspx" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">infertile</a> women having children.</p><p>-- A clinical study showing good results when using STEEN Solution&trade; was published in a prominent scientific journal. In all more than 100 patients have now received new lungs through the use of STEEN Solution&trade;.</p><p>As an investor with a strong background in the medical sciences, I believe Vitrolife is taking a smart approach to addressing the challenges of in vitro fertilization, stem cell therapy and transplantations. Thus, I would argue Vitrolife is a good investment with long-term potential.</p><p>I am long Vitrolife</p>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 09:44:49 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[On February 7th 2012, Vitrolife AB (STO:VITR) reported their best ever sales in a single quarter.<p>Sales have increased for 36 consecutive quarters and have grown ~75% since 2006. Over the same period, net income doubled.</p><p>The current p/e is ~27 and dividend yield is ~1.3%.</p><p>Vitrolife specializes in 3 areas: in vitro fertilization, stem cell therapy and transplantations. They have access to US, European, Middle-east and Asian markets.</p><p>As of Dec. 2011, JP Morgan was one of the top 10 investors in Vitrolife.</p><p>Other information (from: <a href="http://www.news-medical.net/news/20120207/Vitrolife-fourth-quarter-sales-increase-1825-to-SEK-95-million.aspx" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">http://www.news-medical.net/news/20120207/Vitrolife-fourth-quarter-sales-increase-1825-to-SEK-95-million.aspx</a> )</p><p>-- Vitrolife was the first company to obtain regulatory approval in China for a whole series of cultivation media for IVF</p><p>-- A study showed that EmbryoGlue&reg;, a product patented by Vitrolife, increases the chances of <a href="http://www.news-medical.net/health/Infertility-What-is-Infertility.aspx" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">infertile</a> women having children.</p><p>-- A clinical study showing good results when using STEEN Solution&trade; was published in a prominent scientific journal. In all more than 100 patients have now received new lungs through the use of STEEN Solution&trade;.</p><p>As an investor with a strong background in the medical sciences, I believe Vitrolife is taking a smart approach to addressing the challenges of in vitro fertilization, stem cell therapy and transplantations. Thus, I would argue Vitrolife is a good investment with long-term potential.</p><p>I am long Vitrolife</p>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/instablog/tag/quick-picks-lists">quick-picks-lists</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>t-testing the Case-Shiller</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/instablog/669483-phillyslick/84001-t-testing-the-case-shiller?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">84001</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[The Case-Shiller index rose 1.2% in May compared with April. I asked myself today -&nbsp;Is the 1.2% rise due to chance, or are house prices actually rising?<br><br>I downloaded the Case-Shiller excel file and ran paired t-tests comparing the results of 20 cities from February, March, April, and May of 2010.<br>Here's the results (mean value):<br><br>February (133.2) v. March (133.1); p &gt; 0.05<br>March (133.1) v. April (134.0); p &lt; 0.001<br>April (134.0) v. May (134.5); p = 0.011<br><br>In conclusion, the Case-Shiller index has been rising since March and it is very unlikely that this is due to chance... Average house prices in these 20 cities are significantly rising.&nbsp;<br><br><br><strong>Disclosure: </strong>No positions in US housing]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 09:45:48 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[The Case-Shiller index rose 1.2% in May compared with April. I asked myself today -&nbsp;Is the 1.2% rise due to chance, or are house prices actually rising?<br><br>I downloaded the Case-Shiller excel file and ran paired t-tests comparing the results of 20 cities from February, March, April, and May of 2010.<br>Here's the results (mean value):<br><br>February (133.2) v. March (133.1); p &gt; 0.05<br>March (133.1) v. April (134.0); p &lt; 0.001<br>April (134.0) v. May (134.5); p = 0.011<br><br>In conclusion, the Case-Shiller index has been rising since March and it is very unlikely that this is due to chance... Average house prices in these 20 cities are significantly rising.&nbsp;<br><br><br><strong>Disclosure: </strong>No positions in US housing]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/instablog/tag/Housing">Housing</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Questions on Gold</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/instablog/669483-phillyslick/82079-questions-on-gold?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">82079</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I have been watching the price of gold recently and feel that it is overpriced. I am far more inclined to buy a put then a call option at current prices. One economist points out:<br><br>&quot;The July 10th-16th copy of the Economist has a lengthy article about gold. Good discussion but they miss one big point. Neither the supply nor demand for gold has changed so why has the price increased?&nbsp;Gold has increased in USD because the USD has dropped. Gold price increases have not done nearly as well in CAD, for example.&quot;<br><br>After reading the article and seeing that the supply and demand has not changed in the past 10 years, i'm even more surprised and confused by the increase in the price of gold. Has the USD really performed so badly? Or is it that people are willing to pay more for gold as an investment than as jewelery? <br><br>I still think that gold is overpriced - I recently read an article on Financial Times that some hedge funds currently hold more gold than some nations - for example Paulson &amp; Co. holds more gold than Australia. As the economist article points out, people are holding gold because of the uncertainty of other financial instruments. I could imagine that as soon as interest rates go up, or some stability returns to the stock market, these large hedge funds could pull out all their positions in gold, and then...?&nbsp;Either way, I'm not invested in gold and there's no way for me to buy put options, so i'm really just a spectator. I'll be watching it closely.&nbsp;<br><br><br><br><br><br><strong>Disclosure: </strong>No positions in gold]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2010 08:07:07 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I have been watching the price of gold recently and feel that it is overpriced. I am far more inclined to buy a put then a call option at current prices. One economist points out:<br><br>&quot;The July 10th-16th copy of the Economist has a lengthy article about gold. Good discussion but they miss one big point. Neither the supply nor demand for gold has changed so why has the price increased?&nbsp;Gold has increased in USD because the USD has dropped. Gold price increases have not done nearly as well in CAD, for example.&quot;<br><br>After reading the article and seeing that the supply and demand has not changed in the past 10 years, i'm even more surprised and confused by the increase in the price of gold. Has the USD really performed so badly? Or is it that people are willing to pay more for gold as an investment than as jewelery? <br><br>I still think that gold is overpriced - I recently read an article on Financial Times that some hedge funds currently hold more gold than some nations - for example Paulson &amp; Co. holds more gold than Australia. As the economist article points out, people are holding gold because of the uncertainty of other financial instruments. I could imagine that as soon as interest rates go up, or some stability returns to the stock market, these large hedge funds could pull out all their positions in gold, and then...?&nbsp;Either way, I'm not invested in gold and there's no way for me to buy put options, so i'm really just a spectator. I'll be watching it closely.&nbsp;<br><br><br><br><br><br><strong>Disclosure: </strong>No positions in gold]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/gold/instablogs">gold</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/gld/instablogs">gld</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/instablog/tag/Gold">Gold</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Market Rally on Q2 Earnings?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/instablog/669483-phillyslick/81104-market-rally-on-q2-earnings?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">81104</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[There seems to be a lot of optimism surrounding the start of Q2 earnings season, which has probably contributed to the 5% gain seen in markets last week. I think that Q2 earnings probably will be impressive, but does that alone justify jumping into the markets right now? &nbsp;If earnings meet or even exceed expectations will the rally be enough to ensure we have passed the 2010 market lows?<br><br>I think before we all jump in ahead of earnings season we should at least pause to consider a few things:<br><br>The majority of economic reports released in the past month or so have been negative and often missed analyst expectations. Of course, these reports don't reflect the ability of corporations to make record profits, but it does paint a dreary picture of the economic climate during Q2.&nbsp;<br><br>Because macroeconomics have played such an important role in the markets in the past few months, even impressive Q2 results can be crushed by a downgrade of other PIIGS (maybe Italy), or bad news from China such as a slowing housing market, or lower than expected GDP. I can't help but feel that we are at the mercy of the media at the moment - ie., maybe Samsung will report record-breaking profits, but if the media turns their focus from Q2 earnings to debt, housing, growth, etc, you can be sure Samsung's earning won't be reflected in it's share price for long.<br><br>I'm more of the buy-and-hold dividend investing type, so you wont see me trying to ride any rally these weeks ahead. If you are venturing in, I wish you all the best and would recommend you get out fast before the next 'crisis' takes hold of the media.<br><br><br><br><br><br><strong>Disclosure: </strong>Long NASDAQ OMX hedged with puts]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sun, 11 Jul 2010 10:12:29 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[There seems to be a lot of optimism surrounding the start of Q2 earnings season, which has probably contributed to the 5% gain seen in markets last week. I think that Q2 earnings probably will be impressive, but does that alone justify jumping into the markets right now? &nbsp;If earnings meet or even exceed expectations will the rally be enough to ensure we have passed the 2010 market lows?<br><br>I think before we all jump in ahead of earnings season we should at least pause to consider a few things:<br><br>The majority of economic reports released in the past month or so have been negative and often missed analyst expectations. Of course, these reports don't reflect the ability of corporations to make record profits, but it does paint a dreary picture of the economic climate during Q2.&nbsp;<br><br>Because macroeconomics have played such an important role in the markets in the past few months, even impressive Q2 results can be crushed by a downgrade of other PIIGS (maybe Italy), or bad news from China such as a slowing housing market, or lower than expected GDP. I can't help but feel that we are at the mercy of the media at the moment - ie., maybe Samsung will report record-breaking profits, but if the media turns their focus from Q2 earnings to debt, housing, growth, etc, you can be sure Samsung's earning won't be reflected in it's share price for long.<br><br>I'm more of the buy-and-hold dividend investing type, so you wont see me trying to ride any rally these weeks ahead. If you are venturing in, I wish you all the best and would recommend you get out fast before the next 'crisis' takes hold of the media.<br><br><br><br><br><br><strong>Disclosure: </strong>Long NASDAQ OMX hedged with puts]]>
      </description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
