<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>SRCtrades's Comments</title>
    <description>SRCtrades's Comments RSS Syndication from SeekingAlpha.com</description>
    <link>http://seekingalpha.com/user/679833/comments</link>
    <item>
      <title>Debt Burden Makes Horizon Pharma An Attractive Short</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/750481/comments?source=feed#comment-7837361</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">7837361</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Hey Martin, great article. I think their might be a mistake though, the warrant dilution, they have been free to sell since May.<br/><br/><a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://1.usa.gov/N1Mt2f'>http://1.usa.gov/N1Mt2f</a>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2012 11:36:22 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Hey Martin, great article. I think their might be a mistake though, the warrant dilution, they have been free to sell since May.<br/><br/><a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://1.usa.gov/N1Mt2f'>http://1.usa.gov/N1Mt2f</a>]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Best Way To Trade The Facebook IPO</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/527301/comments?source=feed#comment-5009131</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">5009131</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Twitter investment announced, small but will no doubt grow. <a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://bit.ly/KMaSve'>http://bit.ly/KMaSve</a><br/><br/>Plus FB IPO date likely two weeks away. <a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://bit.ly/ImCrr4'>http://bit.ly/ImCrr4</a>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2012 08:47:40 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Twitter investment announced, small but will no doubt grow. <a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://bit.ly/KMaSve'>http://bit.ly/KMaSve</a><br/><br/>Plus FB IPO date likely two weeks away. <a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://bit.ly/ImCrr4'>http://bit.ly/ImCrr4</a>]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Best Way To Trade The Facebook IPO</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/527301/comments?source=feed#comment-4870971</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">4870971</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Offer has not been priced yet.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2012 17:27:47 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Offer has not been priced yet.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Best Way To Trade The Facebook IPO</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/527301/comments?source=feed#comment-4852131</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">4852131</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Not a trade on fundamentals. Thought that was pretty clear. A play based on a major catalyst and how this low float stock can really run.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2012 10:18:54 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Not a trade on fundamentals. Thought that was pretty clear. A play based on a major catalyst and how this low float stock can really run.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Best Way To Trade The Facebook IPO</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/527301/comments?source=feed#comment-4804341</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">4804341</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[SVVC is cheaper and has greater potential to run.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2012 04:17:47 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[SVVC is cheaper and has greater potential to run.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Best Way To Trade The Facebook IPO</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/527301/comments?source=feed#comment-4804321</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">4804321</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Probably rebound to $20 post capital raising.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2012 04:16:14 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Probably rebound to $20 post capital raising.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Short Case for Mesoblast: Little Upside Left, No Need for a Catalyst</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/288209/comments?source=feed#comment-4516931</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">4516931</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Would like to read the follow up.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2012 16:42:11 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Would like to read the follow up.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Harbin Electric: Opportunities In Selling Overpriced Options</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/298838/comments?source=feed#comment-2003528</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">2003528</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Why is the takeover at $24? Noone else wants to buy this company.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sat, 29 Oct 2011 14:10:44 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Why is the takeover at $24? Noone else wants to buy this company.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Time To Buy Star Scientific</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/292053/comments?source=feed#comment-1893076</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">1893076</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[&quot;Billion dollar product&quot;, what a joke!!!]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2011 11:37:08 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[&quot;Billion dollar product&quot;, what a joke!!!]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Goldman's Advanced Battery Report: A Contrarian View</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/213037/comments?source=feed#comment-1104495</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">1104495</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Hi John<br/><br/>Thanks for your response. I understand how the incremental revenues will come about. My concern is that these new batteries (despite being priced higher) will have the same miserable margins traditional batteries have.<br/><br/>Do you see this being a &quot;winner take all&quot; market developing for a time i.e. Xide or another company design and patent a superior battery to cope with start.stop technology and consequently grab a large market share and achieve high margins? Or will competition be similar to the traditional market? Which is more likely?<br/><br/>regards<br/><br/>Michael]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2010 06:43:41 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Hi John<br/><br/>Thanks for your response. I understand how the incremental revenues will come about. My concern is that these new batteries (despite being priced higher) will have the same miserable margins traditional batteries have.<br/><br/>Do you see this being a &quot;winner take all&quot; market developing for a time i.e. Xide or another company design and patent a superior battery to cope with start.stop technology and consequently grab a large market share and achieve high margins? Or will competition be similar to the traditional market? Which is more likely?<br/><br/>regards<br/><br/>Michael]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Goldman's Advanced Battery Report: A Contrarian View</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/213037/comments?source=feed#comment-1097385</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">1097385</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Dear John<br/><br/>Thanks for all the research you have done. I am a believer of your general thesis. However I have some questions around who will actually benefit from this.<br/><br/>Let’s use Exide for example. They are operating in the industry that from 2015 could have an additional $2billion tailwind in revenues due to start stop motors being implemented. This I rate as a high probability. What I cannot put a high probability on is who will benefit from this. <br/><br/>Will the company who comes up with these new batteries for start stop motors get patent protection and dominate the industry for a period of time before something better comes along? Or will a variety of producers snare their respective market shares - in this case I worry that this industry/XIDE profitability will continue to be awful due to the intense competition, despite the increase in revenues. <br/><br/>Thanks<br/><br/>Michael]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jul 2010 12:40:11 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Dear John<br/><br/>Thanks for all the research you have done. I am a believer of your general thesis. However I have some questions around who will actually benefit from this.<br/><br/>Let’s use Exide for example. They are operating in the industry that from 2015 could have an additional $2billion tailwind in revenues due to start stop motors being implemented. This I rate as a high probability. What I cannot put a high probability on is who will benefit from this. <br/><br/>Will the company who comes up with these new batteries for start stop motors get patent protection and dominate the industry for a period of time before something better comes along? Or will a variety of producers snare their respective market shares - in this case I worry that this industry/XIDE profitability will continue to be awful due to the intense competition, despite the increase in revenues. <br/><br/>Thanks<br/><br/>Michael]]>
      </description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
