Palm: Target Increase to $14 in 'Pre' Anticipation [View article]
At the end of 2007 Sprint reported a standard post-paid user base of roughly 41M people. In order to sell 10M Pre smartphones (assuming zero growth which is feasible considering Sprint has been hemorrhaging customers for a while) that would mean the Pre would have to be sold to 25% of Sprint's customer base!
Now if it becomes available to many other global networks (is the current version compatible as a world phone?) then that takes some of the pressure off of Sprint to sell all 10M of the units, but still, we haven't heard hardly a peep from international carriers except your one O2 comment.
I still see PALM as a buy the rumor, sell the news type of company. And come early June I'll probably be selling the news.
Don't know if you read the Boy Genius Report but he's cited other PALM handsets running WebOS that will be available for other carriers in the future.
I agree that Pre on Sprint doesn't necessarily inspire confidence since it's a long-shot company on a shrinking carrier. Hearing they have devices planned for other networks put a pause to some of my negativity about PALM's prospects.
I want to short the heck out of this stock because the run-up has just been nuts, but fighting the tape and calling a top just leads to most people cashing out in the red.
If the June 7th release date is true, come early June I think would be a good time to buy some puts on the stock. I have a feeling it may end up being a buy the rumor, sell the news type of event.
So they diluted current shareholders to gather enough cash to make it through to June when they hope the device they're launching on Sprint will lure customers away from iPhones on AT&T and Storms on Verizon? And their EPS loss was even higher than the Street expected?
What are PALM's expectations of the device by year end? How long is it exclusive on Sprint?
I just can't see this ending good for PALM but there's so much expectation on the device that the stock seems resistant to the really, really bad news in earnings.
@Savitz I get what you're saying about only two outcomes, good or bad. But I don't think there's likely to be much action on the stock until they report again in May or we get some initial impressions on the sales numbers.
Palm's High Stakes Pre Intro Announcement [View article]
Look it's debatable whether or not the Pre is "better" than the iPhone but what the average consumer cares about is does it provide a better experience than the iPhone? I'd say right now the answer is almost certainly not.
The iPhone has the App Store, iTunes, etc. already in place. The Pre supposedly surfs the web really well but is going to need lots of developers to program for it.
Apple made it so that developers who program for OSX could program for the iPhone. There's no comparable infrastructure in place for the Pre.
Another poster talked about Palm's name recognition. Palm Pilots were considered "cool" like 12 years ago. No one's taken the Treo seriously in the past 3-4 years. Palm's name is mud in the eyes of most smartphone users.
Do consumers really need another smartphone OS? BB OS, iPhone's OS, Nokia's OS (Symbian?), Android, WinMo, now WebOS??? There's only so much consumers care about an if the user experience isn't there then consumers won't care what it runs.
On Mar 11 08:06 AM Aryamehr wrote:
> The Pre is unequivocally a much better phone than the iPhone, all you need to do is use it and it will speak > for itself. The phone is going to need very little marketing, it > will be sold out on its first week of introduction.
Palm's Pre: Salvation in Sunnyvale? [View article]
How do you expect the Pre to work without a data connection? You're harping on the iPhone and Blackberry as being expensive because they require a data connection but every smartphone requires a data package. If the Pre is a "smartphone" it will be no different.
And like other people have said: it's on Sprint.
On Feb 23 11:23 PM reitmedia wrote:
> Unlike the iPhone which > is on the most expensive network and unlike the Blackberry which > always require an expensive Blackberry data plan, the PRE is designed > to be open to other networks and for many developers. >
Don't Expect Oil Prices to Break $50 Until Q2 - FirstEnergy Capital [View article]
The last two times oil got rejected at $50 it headed below $35. The rejection off $50 this time, the price drop looks much more shallow. It will be interesting to see if it drops convincingly below $40 but the oil bulls definitely seem to have put up a fight.
Future cuts in production, even considering the oversupply that's got oil tankers being used for storage, seem to be making the bears cautious?
Looking at the 3 month chart, oil has made a series of higher lows since December. A break below $35 would be a strong sign for the bears. If it can hold above approx $37.50 on this latest down leg, it may be a buy signal (at least until it gets rejected at $50 again).
Palm Continues to Bask in the Glow of Pre [View article]
nice use of the English language: "Janakowski, who takes over coverage of the company from Thomas Lee." =)
I still can't get past PALM as being a has-been... or also-ran... or just yet another 'iPhone killer.'
Relegating the handset to Sprint, who seems to be hemorrhaging customers like it's going out of style, and still expecting 1M units even though it won't ship until Q3 of 2009 seems like pretty lofty expectations.
Palm Pre Sales Guesstimate: 1.5 Million in First Year [View article]
I feel like this is something you should have written about a decade ago when PALM Pilots were still for sale or when people where still buying Treos... PALM is down and out, trying to bust into a crowded market on a declining network, and it won't be sold for another six months.
PALM should be back below $5 at some point in the near future.
On Jan 13 11:41 AM MTVDAVE wrote:
> I think this stock is going to be huge.If palm had rimm's market > cap,the stock would be trading at ten cents.With their new products > and name recognition this stock is going way up!The people that are > negative on this stock are just upset because they feel they missed > the boat,but it's not to late!
Palm Pre Sales Guesstimate: 1.5 Million in First Year [View article]
1.5 million units for the Pre, exclusive to Sprint at 40 million postpaid subs (I'm assuming the Pre won't be offered prepaid), is roughly 4.25% of their subscriber base buying this phone.
Is that feasible? That seems pretty high considering the projected launch isn't until half the year is already over. PALM has a gap below $5 that's just begging to be filled, especially in this market.
Palm's Pre Goes a Step Further Than the iPhone [View article]
RK makes a good point... Look at the desktop OS mix. There's Windows, OS X, and Linux... much beyond that and you're not just niche, you're uber-niche. And the other OS's are all pretty well established.
Another point I saw brought up was whether or not the WebOS would be backwards compatible with Palm's previous apps. A lot of people who are hanging onto their Palm Pilots would probably love to upgrade to a 21st century device, but if they don't take that into consideration they'll probably upset some of their most loyal customers.
On Jan 09 09:22 AM RK wrote:
> The world already has Symbian, OS X, Android, RIM, Win mobile. That > is 5. The new Palm OS makes it 6. This cannot last. I see only 3-4 > standing at the end. OS X, Win mobile, and Android would be my bet > due to they are funded by deep deep pocket companies.
Jegan and Huneycutt have it right... PALM is a short at these price levels.
Limiting the Pre to Sprint, especially initially, seems like a really bad move. If it's CDMA why not put it on VZW? Or why not release the rumored GSM Pre on AT&T or T-Mo at the same time?
On the west coast I haven't heard many positive things about Sprint, and my experience with Nextel has really been nothing but negative so that means based on the network I'd never even consider looking at this device.
As as far as shipping 10s of millions of units, BoyGenius had a report saying the device would have a $400 price point. If that's true, good luck moving that.
The iPhone moved those kinds of units because it was the first phone of its kind. This one will be another also-ran.
Large Screen iPod Touch May Launch in Fall '09 [View article]
I'd love to see it, especially at a compelling price point. Of course since it's AAPL the compelling price point may be out of the question.
My immediate concern with the 7" or 9" screen is where it would fit in the device continuum, especially sans keyboard. It's not a netbook, it's a tablet. And it sounds like you'd still be typing on the screen, which might be awkward given the larger form factor.
Earnings Estimates Collapse for Goldman and Morgan [View article]
One of the things I'd be weary of with the earnings report is guidance. You may be correct that they're reporting on a time period right before things went to hell in a handbasket... however if they guide significantly lower for Q4 than expectations then they're likely to get pummeled, especially in this market.
Earnings Estimates Collapse for Goldman and Morgan [View article]
One of the things I'd be weary of with the earnings report is guidance. You may be correct that they're reporting on a time period right before things went to hell in a handbasket... however if they guide significantly lower for Q4 than expectations then they're likely to get pummeled, especially in this market.
Sort by:
Latest | Highest ratedPalm: Target Increase to $14 in 'Pre' Anticipation [View article]
Now if it becomes available to many other global networks (is the current version compatible as a world phone?) then that takes some of the pressure off of Sprint to sell all 10M of the units, but still, we haven't heard hardly a peep from international carriers except your one O2 comment.
I still see PALM as a buy the rumor, sell the news type of company. And come early June I'll probably be selling the news.
Palm: Hot or Hype? [View article]
I agree that Pre on Sprint doesn't necessarily inspire confidence since it's a long-shot company on a shrinking carrier. Hearing they have devices planned for other networks put a pause to some of my negativity about PALM's prospects.
I want to short the heck out of this stock because the run-up has just been nuts, but fighting the tape and calling a top just leads to most people cashing out in the red.
If the June 7th release date is true, come early June I think would be a good time to buy some puts on the stock. I have a feeling it may end up being a buy the rumor, sell the news type of event.
Palm: No Middle Ground [View article]
What are PALM's expectations of the device by year end?
How long is it exclusive on Sprint?
I just can't see this ending good for PALM but there's so much expectation on the device that the stock seems resistant to the really, really bad news in earnings.
@Savitz I get what you're saying about only two outcomes, good or bad. But I don't think there's likely to be much action on the stock until they report again in May or we get some initial impressions on the sales numbers.
Palm's High Stakes Pre Intro Announcement [View article]
The iPhone has the App Store, iTunes, etc. already in place. The Pre supposedly surfs the web really well but is going to need lots of developers to program for it.
Apple made it so that developers who program for OSX could program for the iPhone. There's no comparable infrastructure in place for the Pre.
Another poster talked about Palm's name recognition. Palm Pilots were considered "cool" like 12 years ago. No one's taken the Treo seriously in the past 3-4 years. Palm's name is mud in the eyes of most smartphone users.
Do consumers really need another smartphone OS? BB OS, iPhone's OS, Nokia's OS (Symbian?), Android, WinMo, now WebOS??? There's only so much consumers care about an if the user experience isn't there then consumers won't care what it runs.
On Mar 11 08:06 AM Aryamehr wrote:
> The Pre is unequivocally a much better phone than the iPhone, all you need to do is use it and it will speak
> for itself. The phone is going to need very little marketing, it
> will be sold out on its first week of introduction.
Palm's Pre: Salvation in Sunnyvale? [View article]
And like other people have said: it's on Sprint.
On Feb 23 11:23 PM reitmedia wrote:
> Unlike the iPhone which
> is on the most expensive network and unlike the Blackberry which
> always require an expensive Blackberry data plan, the PRE is designed
> to be open to other networks and for many developers.
>
Don't Expect Oil Prices to Break $50 Until Q2 - FirstEnergy Capital [View article]
Future cuts in production, even considering the oversupply that's got oil tankers being used for storage, seem to be making the bears cautious?
Looking at the 3 month chart, oil has made a series of higher lows since December. A break below $35 would be a strong sign for the bears. If it can hold above approx $37.50 on this latest down leg, it may be a buy signal (at least until it gets rejected at $50 again).
Palm Continues to Bask in the Glow of Pre [View article]
"Janakowski, who takes over coverage of the company from Thomas Lee." =)
I still can't get past PALM as being a has-been... or also-ran... or just yet another 'iPhone killer.'
Relegating the handset to Sprint, who seems to be hemorrhaging customers like it's going out of style, and still expecting 1M units even though it won't ship until Q3 of 2009 seems like pretty lofty expectations.
Palm Pre Sales Guesstimate: 1.5 Million in First Year [View article]
I feel like this is something you should have written about a decade ago when PALM Pilots were still for sale or when people where still buying Treos... PALM is down and out, trying to bust into a crowded market on a declining network, and it won't be sold for another six months.
PALM should be back below $5 at some point in the near future.
On Jan 13 11:41 AM MTVDAVE wrote:
> I think this stock is going to be huge.If palm had rimm's market
> cap,the stock would be trading at ten cents.With their new products
> and name recognition this stock is going way up!The people that are
> negative on this stock are just upset because they feel they missed
> the boat,but it's not to late!
Palm Pre Sales Guesstimate: 1.5 Million in First Year [View article]
Is that feasible? That seems pretty high considering the projected launch isn't until half the year is already over. PALM has a gap below $5 that's just begging to be filled, especially in this market.
Palm's Pre Goes a Step Further Than the iPhone [View article]
Another point I saw brought up was whether or not the WebOS would be backwards compatible with Palm's previous apps. A lot of people who are hanging onto their Palm Pilots would probably love to upgrade to a 21st century device, but if they don't take that into consideration they'll probably upset some of their most loyal customers.
On Jan 09 09:22 AM RK wrote:
> The world already has Symbian, OS X, Android, RIM, Win mobile. That
> is 5. The new Palm OS makes it 6. This cannot last. I see only 3-4
> standing at the end. OS X, Win mobile, and Android would be my bet
> due to they are funded by deep deep pocket companies.
Pfizer: Best U.S. Large-Cap Idea for 2009 - RBC [View article]
Those Canadians are funny English speakers.
PFE looked really attractive at $15... I think it still looks pretty good from an income perspective... my concern is growth.
Palm: Showing Up the Analysts [View article]
Limiting the Pre to Sprint, especially initially, seems like a really bad move. If it's CDMA why not put it on VZW? Or why not release the rumored GSM Pre on AT&T or T-Mo at the same time?
On the west coast I haven't heard many positive things about Sprint, and my experience with Nextel has really been nothing but negative so that means based on the network I'd never even consider looking at this device.
As as far as shipping 10s of millions of units, BoyGenius had a report saying the device would have a $400 price point. If that's true, good luck moving that.
The iPhone moved those kinds of units because it was the first phone of its kind. This one will be another also-ran.
Large Screen iPod Touch May Launch in Fall '09 [View article]
My immediate concern with the 7" or 9" screen is where it would fit in the device continuum, especially sans keyboard. It's not a netbook, it's a tablet. And it sounds like you'd still be typing on the screen, which might be awkward given the larger form factor.
I dunno, all speculation at this point.
Earnings Estimates Collapse for Goldman and Morgan [View article]
Earnings Estimates Collapse for Goldman and Morgan [View article]