A Crony Capitalist For The Space Age, The Renewables Age, And For The Age Of Obama [View article]
Are you conveniently forgetting that Musk bought NUMMI from GM and TM for about 4% of in- place value and put a trained but laid off workforce back on the payroll? This was a con?
As for subsidizing game changing industry, it's nothing new. The SS United States, still by far the fastest and arguably the best ever transatlantic liner, was all American built and operated (no bogus Panama registries and third world crews) and was subsidized almost 65% by the government. It was a difficult grant process with ample politicking, but was believed necessary by the Truman, Eisenhower and Kennedy administrations as fundamental to a renewed merchant marine, devastated by isolationists and then WW2.
The domestic automobile industry, with two out of three bankrupted and bailed out with treasury billions or the Italians is still in free fall manufacturing mostly unmarketable junk, but still sucking mega dollars out of Washington, ( in the name of jobs).
Musk and Tesla have it very right, but one might observe there's a bit of the stink of Drew Pearson and Tucker lingering in the air. The model S makes the Volt instantly irrelevant which for a paltry 30 mile electric range, cost billions in bail-out cash to develop. But let's trash Tesla.
Who is conning whom here?
Can't cover short? Make up a story. Or two or three. long TSLA
Has The Future Changed That Much For Tesla Motors? [View article]
Ergo. Ferrari. Rich people do have money. Luxury brands are doing fine. New LaFerrari, a stunning KERS, hybrid fighter jet without wings, is sold out at 499 copies, just like the Enzo. Ferrari is profitable, selling very expensive automobile art to capable buyers. A few flashy knuckleheads will always be regarded as rich kids with expensive toys but most luxury items whether Omegas, Cigarette boats, Private jets or houses in Malibu sell at full value. The model S is no more a rich kid toy than a mid-range BMW or Benz. A 5 series or E class is a superb ICE automobile, and when hybridized cost as much or more than a model S. The difference is that Tesla has crafted a brilliant all electric game changer. If the naysayers want cheap let them buy Leafs, a cruel ugly joke with no practical range. The model S is beautiful and capable, and luxury quality at a fair price. Let the technicians rant about their so-called analytical charts and graphs, at the end of the day, the market is an auction, scarcity gets bidded up. TSLA is overbought for good reason, the longs agree with Musk. If this run up is a short squeeze, god bless the bears, I've made enough in two months to have an S in every color.
Apple (AAPL +1.4%) roundup: 1) Thanks to improving iMac supplies, U.S. Mac sales rose 31% Y/Y in January, estimates NPD. The sales jump follows a 22% Y/Y drop in Q4 global Mac shipments. 2) LG Display (LPL) reportedly cut panel output for the 9.7" iPad by 90% in January, thanks to iPad Mini sales and seasonality. It expects output to pick up in Q2 ahead of a Q3 refresh. 3) Good Technology reports iOS hardware made up 77% of its Q4 enterprise device activations, up from 71% a year earlier. 4) European carriers are crying poor over iPhone/Android subsidies, and want changes. Obtaining them might be easier said than done. (Firefox OS) [View news story]
now there are three comments. To wit:
OMG!! Sell, the sky is falling again .. Oh wait, that's Russia. Of course iMac sales rose when supplies came up to demand.
Doh
So Q2 won't be as awful as the bears would like. Nevertheless, AAPL will get hammered again. Still the highest market cap --even at 450.
(ps: really... all you short sellers, why not go pick on GOOG for a change?)
Judge Lucy Koh yesterday ordered Tim Cook to testify in a lawsuit over whether Apple (AAPL), Google (GOOG) and other hi-tech companies breached antitrust laws by agreeing not to try to poach each others' employees. Erich Schmidt is also due to appear in the trial, as is Intel's (INTC) Paul Otellini. Lawyers for the five plaintiffs in the case reckon that damages could reach hundreds of millions of dollars. [View news story]
Doesn't appear the honorable Judge has a choice. She didn't file the action nor did any governments. This is a hoped-for lawyers paradise, and their estimate of a big payout is the only motivation. Her honor is following jurist protocols, with the filing too vague and over-reaching to instantly dismiss. It looks as though two matters are at issue: 1.Fat settlements 2. broadening anti-trust through precedent. (to gain fat compensation) .
I don't doubt plaintiffs succeeding at a first trial, especially if by Jury. However, I fail to comprehend what it is about no compete and confidentiality contracts of employment, and the open job market -- even if the big techs have a no poaching back room agreement, -- what this has to do with anti trust. I spent 28 years under very tight employer contracts and for good reasons. 1. I had a stable career by contract agreement and 2. The value of my creativity could not be compromised by less scrupulous employees, at least not without breach of their contracts. In any enterprise with highly proprietary technical, trade and brand secrets, the goodwill foundations of shareholder value has to be staunchly protected. It would be a breach of fiduciary NOT to negotiate no poaching policies.
If this action should maintain any standing in ANY court, then yes, the govt can and will use it to exact tribute. With this potential case Her honor Judge Koh faces yet another thorny litigation ... rife with very real threats to free enterprise and the defense of intellectual property.
Well said @quincy99, all of your comments in this thread. Hmm, $500 close, convenient coincidence indeed. Sick.
Elsewhere, the WSJ wag the dog yellow journalism from Monday has yet to subside, with Reuters reporting the same "news" today.
The conundrum here is that the company has unbeatable financials and the hell for stout AAPL iOS has always been essentially unsullied by hackers, 'bots and viruses. The Stock isn't nearly so invulnerable, but this isn't anything AAPL's board or executives can hope to correct. Fraud, insider trading, market manipulation and the entire suite of dishonest tools, coveted by the greed mongers, falls outside the expertise of any of the so-called regulators, the Justice department or the courts. When it suits the cartel, we of the "begging for crumbs retail constituency" occasionally make an educated guess. In truth though, we are not going to beat the house, the AAPL stock game is as rigged as marked cards in Deadwood.
Still long AAPL, but retired on MNST and POT, and some smart RE investing with very good rental cash.
Sharp (SHCAY.PK) has "nearly halted production" of displays for the regular iPad as demand shifts towards the iPad Mini and Apple (AAPL -0.6%) attempts to manage inventory, Reuters reports. Many analysts have already forecast the Mini, which is thinner and much lighter than the 4th-gen regular iPad, will account for a majority of iPad sales in Q1. Higher Mini sales benefit display suppliers AUO and LPL. Due to lower price tags, Apple's average gross profit on Mini sales appears to be lower than its average gross profit on regular iPad sales. [View news story]
Um well, first, in order for this thread to be of any merit, one would need to accept the Reuters story as fact. IMHO it is nothing more than a belated regurgitation of the bogus Murdoch slam from Monday. It is regardless a gross misstatement of unsubstantiated rumors, that have been shown to be decidedly false. Anyone here recall the WSJ citing their own staged tv "interview" as the source for then publishing that AAPL sales were falling short of expectations, hence massive supply cuts?
No?
Well, of the handful of remaining honest news outlets, those that verify with real sources before publishing as old fashioned responsible journalism requires, they all say the WSJ article was bogus. Even the Journal disavowed their own numbers within hours of publishing. But the infotainment media had already seized their negative AAPL headline and they've kept at it all week. So, this entire discussion of margins, iPad vs iPad mini vs Mac Pro vs Mac Air is ridiculous, driven by Monday's WSJ tripe that somehow refuses to abate. I guess it suits the hedges and naked traders to sustain any instability, but it is dishonest to the point of fraud.
I am long AAPL and relishing the 23rd. Time to whack the bears. They've more than earned a spanking.
Apple (AAPL) retail VP Jerry McDougal has left the company, a spokesman confirms. McDougal is leaving as Apple continues looking for a retail SVP to succeed John Browett, whose controversial tenure ended in October. McDougal was mentioned as 1 of 3 possible internal replacements for Browett in a recent AllThingsD column; 5 external candidate were also mentioned. [View news story]
Apple (AAPL) retail VP Jerry McDougal has left the company, a spokesman confirms. McDougal is leaving as Apple continues looking for a retail SVP to succeed John Browett, whose controversial tenure ended in October. McDougal was mentioned as 1 of 3 possible internal replacements for Browett in a recent AllThingsD column; 5 external candidate were also mentioned. [View news story]
Oh geez, who cares about Jerry McDougal except maybe his wife --- old axiom: "Retirement: Twice as much husband, Half as much money". Bet he left with a pantload of options.
Apple iPhone 5 Production Cut: Signaling A New Product Release? [View article]
Bravo krichard:
Yours is the only accurate comment that applies to this latest flim flam.
Why is there no factual confirmation that Apple is cutting production? Simple answer, this was price manipulation. Vague and oblique perhaps but manipulation nevertheless.
Look at the scenario for this fraud: an obscure Murdoch boilerroom somewhere in Asia tapes a staged interview with a pretend "expert" commentator. Then Murdoch's WSJ has an "independent" reporter suddenly see this obscure video interview and he cuts and pastes overnight a HEADLINE story. The WSJ trots it out early enough that a veritable avalanche of print, blog, online and broadcast media have their morning lead story (plenty of them Murdoch businesses). When the WSJ partially retracts, the media ignores any new facts, and the WSJ makes no apology. Blatant manipulation and the market reaction was to trim $17 billion in valuation.
If this were ever investigated, and fat chance of that, it would uncover billions in naked shorts successfully played in Monday's market. What is never said is that the original "expert" interview was absolute bull***t, a total fabrication with zero corroboration of any of the comments made. I don't know about the rest of you lambs to the slaughter, but this is another profoundly obvious scam, with APPL the target every day.
So realistically, there is no point seriously discussing APPL and the market, unless and until we all recognize that most of the daily volume in APPL is either high speed bot trading or outright price manipulation. As with the rest of the market, trading algorhythms are written to leverage micro trends, and are currently biased in favor of APPL negatives, whether or not factual or truthful. Today's action deliberately destabilizing APPL merely reinforces the obvious conclusion that the market has become a rigged Casino.
Apple's Valuation Remains A Steal, Sticking With $710 Estimate [View article]
Miller charged, but.....here's an update from newspaper reports in mid December. Note the cryptic --still trying to determine-- caveat.
"The Federal Bureau of Investigation, the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, which have been working together on the case, are still trying to determine if Miller’s trade is a part of a more extensive scam, sources said."
Yes, of course. He did not act alone. Good luck finding the other crooks. I am certain this is a common practice, perhaps not as immediately dramatic as Miller's ill-timed gambit. The real impact has been exponentially greater than Rochdale's piddling $5mm loss. By authoring and sustaining substantial but artificial instability, these felons make duck soup for the hedge gamers and algorhythm bots. In any other legal setting, all of them would be charged as accessories after the fact or as known receivers of stolen property. My property.
Apple's Valuation Remains A Steal, Sticking With $710 Estimate [View article]
Thank you rrosey2 for finally saying HERE at SA what has become a profound grasp of the obvious. There are NO, exactly NO fundamentals, at least in a legitimate marketplace, that can adequately explain away the obscene undervaluation of AAPL, a company with $120B in cash, a consistently explosive product lineup, a ridiculously low PE, jam-packed retail stores and nothing short of continuous great results and unflagging consumer loyalty. Even the ridiculous pronouncements of so-called "expert" analysts fail to sufficiently define what could hold APPL near $500, instead of the $700 or $800 best in the world business performance should support.
It is all too clear that by early October, the September high was being illegally leveraged with massive one-day, obviously DISHONEST transactions, enabled by the criminally lax SEC and the sorry evolution of the markets into robot-manipulated daytrading, and not ethical investing in real success. Oh, we are supposed to just turn the other cheek to a one day billion dollar manipulation with a 1/2 billion dollar back end short by the same players? Do we have to accept this in an orderly society ? It is outright larceny and profoundly illegal. We've been robbed.
But where's the enforcement? Absent satisfactory regulation and aggressive law enforcement, all that remains is for AAPL management to carry the day despite massive fraud trading. I am still long in AAPL but only because the felons who now keep the tables have left a few crumbs for we worms, the unseen and insignificant retail owners. Damnation on those crooks who have turned investing into a rigged Casino. Talk about fiscal cliffs... How about some enforcement? What about your Justice Department Mr. President?
More on Apple: Topeka's Brian White, he of the $1,111 PT, claims "an insatiable appetite" exists for the iPad Mini in mainland China and Hong Kong, with checks indicating nearly all models are sold out in Hong Kong stores. He also claims Chinese iPhone 5 availability has improved, and that local resellers are calling it the most popular high-end smartphone. (previous) [View news story]
Well, once again I suppose I am just another smug sob with his many uberkool Apples.....the machines that work flawlessly regardless of relative age. My mac pro tower just keeps chugging and even though a 2007, all upgrades install with ease and even the most challenging software runs clean and reliably. And how nicely coordinated then are my MacBook Pro, my iPad, my 4s phone and first edition 64G iPod. And with a very simple $24 app, I can bring my mac pro up,on my ipad, phone or laptop, anywhere on the civilized, smug apple planet and watch and control my 12 security cams. Or the rest of everything on the desktop. Aint that just tooooo smug? Yep, smugs the word, just living it up in these smug iClouds. ...... And oh yes, smug smug smug about my shares bought at $17 when the world was flat. It's fun being smug.
Is A Chance To Buy Apple At $400 Coming Soon? [View article]
All just the usual noise for we AAPL longs. Apparently most of the self anointed experts --they call themselves "anal - lists" -- have some sage criteria we investing fools aren't privy to. After all, had I listened to these folk, I wouldn't have AAPL at $17 or MNST at 25c. Fool that I should be, I even think a completely empty MS retail store might be a good reason to buy a Surface , after all lots of idle employees to explain why it doesn't sell, er...... work. And what's with the confrontational red shirts? Does no one at MS even understand color psychology? But we digress, these many negative soothsayers are explaining the unexplainable yet again. It has nothing to do with the company. AAPLs volatility is attributable primarily to BOT trading, the hedge plays and end of year window dressing at the mutuals, plus margin hikes by obscure settlement houses. All combine to generate a fluctuating auction sentiment arena, duck soup for high speed algorhythm BOT trades. Might help all of us humans if the many writers here would regard the market as no longer the province of investment, but the robot casino it has metamorphosed into. Are we retail investors expecting too much to ask that the robot masters reveal their market-making programs? Otherwise, we havent long until the market no longer reflects valuation or any other tangibility. However, last I checked most of the listed companies are still managed by human beings.
Oh Apple, About That 'Win' You Thought You Got... [View article]
There is dumb, there is really dumb, then there is Karl Denninger, then there is really brilliant Tim Cook. Get your facts in order before you trash the CEO of what is still the world's highest valued company. Steve Jobs set the dogs loose on Samsung, among many others when he avowed to "go nuclear". The core principles sustaining the many patent lawsuits Mr. Cook INHERITED are that Google's Android is a very thinly disguised illegal copy of Apple's iOS. The tactic by Apple's legal teams is to go after the manufacturers of Android-enabled devices, especially those that also copy the design, the look and feel of Apple's products, most particularly Samsung. The monetary settlement in the Apple-Samsung trial is inconsequential, what is significant is that an American jury found Samsung to be blatant thieves of Apple's intellectual property. Finally, I'd say your short success is your recent good fortune, mine is from buying AAPL at $17 a share and holding.
A Crony Capitalist For The Space Age, The Renewables Age, And For The Age Of Obama [View article]
As for subsidizing game changing industry, it's nothing new. The SS United States, still by far the fastest and arguably the best ever transatlantic liner, was all American built and operated (no bogus Panama registries and third world crews) and was subsidized almost 65% by the government. It was a difficult grant process with ample politicking, but was believed necessary by the Truman, Eisenhower and Kennedy administrations as fundamental to a renewed merchant marine, devastated by isolationists and then WW2.
The domestic automobile industry, with two out of three bankrupted and bailed out with treasury billions or the Italians is still in free fall manufacturing mostly unmarketable junk, but still sucking mega dollars out of Washington, ( in the name of jobs).
Musk and Tesla have it very right, but one might observe there's a bit of the stink of Drew Pearson and Tucker lingering in the air. The model S makes the Volt instantly irrelevant which for a paltry 30 mile electric range, cost billions in bail-out cash to develop. But let's trash Tesla.
Who is conning whom here?
Can't cover short? Make up a story. Or two or three.
long TSLA
Has The Future Changed That Much For Tesla Motors? [View article]
Apple (AAPL +1.4%) roundup: 1) Thanks to improving iMac supplies, U.S. Mac sales rose 31% Y/Y in January, estimates NPD. The sales jump follows a 22% Y/Y drop in Q4 global Mac shipments. 2) LG Display (LPL) reportedly cut panel output for the 9.7" iPad by 90% in January, thanks to iPad Mini sales and seasonality. It expects output to pick up in Q2 ahead of a Q3 refresh. 3) Good Technology reports iOS hardware made up 77% of its Q4 enterprise device activations, up from 71% a year earlier. 4) European carriers are crying poor over iPhone/Android subsidies, and want changes. Obtaining them might be easier said than done. (Firefox OS) [View news story]
OMG!! Sell, the sky is falling again .. Oh wait, that's Russia. Of course iMac sales rose when supplies came up to demand.
Doh
So Q2 won't be as awful as the bears would like. Nevertheless, AAPL will get hammered again. Still the highest market cap --even at 450.
(ps: really... all you short sellers, why not go pick on GOOG for a change?)
Long AAPL.
Judge Lucy Koh yesterday ordered Tim Cook to testify in a lawsuit over whether Apple (AAPL), Google (GOOG) and other hi-tech companies breached antitrust laws by agreeing not to try to poach each others' employees. Erich Schmidt is also due to appear in the trial, as is Intel's (INTC) Paul Otellini. Lawyers for the five plaintiffs in the case reckon that damages could reach hundreds of millions of dollars. [View news story]
I don't doubt plaintiffs succeeding at a first trial, especially if by Jury. However, I fail to comprehend what it is about no compete and confidentiality contracts of employment, and the open job market -- even if the big techs have a no poaching back room agreement, -- what this has to do with anti trust. I spent 28 years under very tight employer contracts and for good reasons. 1. I had a stable career by contract agreement and 2. The value of my creativity could not be compromised by less scrupulous employees, at least not without breach of their contracts. In any enterprise with highly proprietary technical, trade and brand secrets, the goodwill foundations of shareholder value has to be staunchly protected. It would be a breach of fiduciary NOT to negotiate no poaching policies.
If this action should maintain any standing in ANY court, then yes, the govt can and will use it to exact tribute. With this potential case Her honor Judge Koh faces yet another thorny litigation ... rife with very real threats to free enterprise and the defense of intellectual property.
I am long AAPL.
Apple Is Not A Retirement Stock [View article]
Elsewhere, the WSJ wag the dog yellow journalism from Monday has yet to subside, with Reuters reporting the same "news" today.
The conundrum here is that the company has unbeatable financials and the hell for stout AAPL iOS has always been essentially unsullied by hackers, 'bots and viruses. The Stock isn't nearly so invulnerable, but this isn't anything AAPL's board or executives can hope to correct. Fraud, insider trading, market manipulation and the entire suite of dishonest tools, coveted by the greed mongers, falls outside the expertise of any of the so-called regulators, the Justice department or the courts. When it suits the cartel, we of the "begging for crumbs retail constituency" occasionally make an educated guess. In truth though, we are not going to beat the house, the AAPL stock game is as rigged as marked cards in Deadwood.
Still long AAPL, but retired on MNST and POT, and some smart RE investing with very good rental cash.
Sharp (SHCAY.PK) has "nearly halted production" of displays for the regular iPad as demand shifts towards the iPad Mini and Apple (AAPL -0.6%) attempts to manage inventory, Reuters reports. Many analysts have already forecast the Mini, which is thinner and much lighter than the 4th-gen regular iPad, will account for a majority of iPad sales in Q1. Higher Mini sales benefit display suppliers AUO and LPL. Due to lower price tags, Apple's average gross profit on Mini sales appears to be lower than its average gross profit on regular iPad sales. [View news story]
No?
Well, of the handful of remaining honest news outlets, those that verify with real sources before publishing as old fashioned responsible journalism requires, they all say the WSJ article was bogus. Even the Journal disavowed their own numbers within hours of publishing. But the infotainment media had already seized their negative AAPL headline and they've kept at it all week. So, this entire discussion of margins, iPad vs iPad mini vs Mac Pro vs Mac Air is ridiculous, driven by Monday's WSJ tripe that somehow refuses to abate. I guess it suits the hedges and naked traders to sustain any instability, but it is dishonest to the point of fraud.
I am long AAPL and relishing the 23rd. Time to whack the bears. They've more than earned a spanking.
Apple (AAPL) retail VP Jerry McDougal has left the company, a spokesman confirms. McDougal is leaving as Apple continues looking for a retail SVP to succeed John Browett, whose controversial tenure ended in October. McDougal was mentioned as 1 of 3 possible internal replacements for Browett in a recent AllThingsD column; 5 external candidate were also mentioned. [View news story]
Apple (AAPL) retail VP Jerry McDougal has left the company, a spokesman confirms. McDougal is leaving as Apple continues looking for a retail SVP to succeed John Browett, whose controversial tenure ended in October. McDougal was mentioned as 1 of 3 possible internal replacements for Browett in a recent AllThingsD column; 5 external candidate were also mentioned. [View news story]
Move on, nothing to see here ---
Apple iPhone 5 Production Cut: Signaling A New Product Release? [View article]
Yours is the only accurate comment that applies to this latest flim flam.
Why is there no factual confirmation that Apple is cutting production? Simple answer, this was price manipulation. Vague and oblique perhaps but manipulation nevertheless.
Look at the scenario for this fraud: an obscure Murdoch boilerroom somewhere in Asia tapes a staged interview with a pretend "expert" commentator. Then Murdoch's WSJ has an "independent" reporter suddenly see this obscure video interview and he cuts and pastes overnight a HEADLINE story. The WSJ trots it out early enough that a veritable avalanche of print, blog, online and broadcast media have their morning lead story (plenty of them Murdoch businesses). When the WSJ partially retracts, the media ignores any new facts, and the WSJ makes no apology. Blatant manipulation and the market reaction was to trim $17 billion in valuation.
If this were ever investigated, and fat chance of that, it would uncover billions in naked shorts successfully played in Monday's market. What is never said is that the original "expert" interview was absolute bull***t, a total fabrication with zero corroboration of any of the comments made. I don't know about the rest of you lambs to the slaughter, but this is another profoundly obvious scam, with APPL the target every day.
So realistically, there is no point seriously discussing APPL and the market, unless and until we all recognize that most of the daily volume in APPL is either high speed bot trading or outright price manipulation. As with the rest of the market, trading algorhythms are written to leverage micro trends, and are currently biased in favor of APPL negatives, whether or not factual or truthful. Today's action deliberately destabilizing APPL merely reinforces the obvious conclusion that the market has become a rigged Casino.
Apple's Valuation Remains A Steal, Sticking With $710 Estimate [View article]
"The Federal Bureau of Investigation, the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, which have been working together on the case, are still trying to determine if Miller’s trade is a part of a more extensive scam, sources said."
Yes, of course. He did not act alone. Good luck finding the other crooks. I am certain this is a common practice, perhaps not as immediately dramatic as Miller's ill-timed gambit. The real impact has been exponentially greater than Rochdale's piddling $5mm loss. By authoring and sustaining substantial but artificial instability, these felons make duck soup for the hedge gamers and algorhythm bots. In any other legal setting, all of them would be charged as accessories after the fact or as known receivers of stolen property. My property.
BTW ..Miller made bail. $300,000. Whose money?
Apple's Valuation Remains A Steal, Sticking With $710 Estimate [View article]
It is all too clear that by early October, the September high was being illegally leveraged with massive one-day, obviously DISHONEST transactions, enabled by the criminally lax SEC and the sorry evolution of the markets into robot-manipulated daytrading, and not ethical investing in real success. Oh, we are supposed to just turn the other cheek to a one day billion dollar manipulation with a 1/2 billion dollar back end short by the same players? Do we have to accept this in an orderly society ? It is outright larceny and profoundly illegal. We've been robbed.
But where's the enforcement? Absent satisfactory regulation and aggressive law enforcement, all that remains is for AAPL management to carry the day despite massive fraud trading. I am still long in AAPL but only because the felons who now keep the tables have left a few crumbs for we worms, the unseen and insignificant retail owners. Damnation on those crooks who have turned investing into a rigged Casino. Talk about fiscal cliffs... How about some enforcement? What about your Justice Department Mr. President?
More on Apple: Topeka's Brian White, he of the $1,111 PT, claims "an insatiable appetite" exists for the iPad Mini in mainland China and Hong Kong, with checks indicating nearly all models are sold out in Hong Kong stores. He also claims Chinese iPhone 5 availability has improved, and that local resellers are calling it the most popular high-end smartphone. (previous) [View news story]
Is A Chance To Buy Apple At $400 Coming Soon? [View article]
Is A Chance To Buy Apple At $400 Coming Soon? [View article]
Oh Apple, About That 'Win' You Thought You Got... [View article]