soloinvestor's Comments RSS Syndication from SeekingAlpha.com http://seekingalpha.com/user/693325/comments http://seekingalpha.com/article/1207461/comments?source=feed#comment-15429631 15429631 Sun, 24 Feb 2013 03:49:11 -0500 http://seekingalpha.com/article/1207461/comments?source=feed#comment-15416941 15416941 The ETF with the highest return last 60 days is chosen. (ETF/TLT)
Rebalancing every 4 weeks.

I get 498.07 % total return. (05/1/2003 - 02/15/2003)

I get 295.03 % total return. (05/22/2003 - 2/15/2013)

If possible, Can you give more detail (4 weeks) of your performance ?

Thanks]]> Sat, 23 Feb 2013 13:00:40 -0500 The ETF with the highest return last 60 days is chosen. (ETF/TLT)
Rebalancing every 4 weeks.

I get 498.07 % total return. (05/1/2003 - 02/15/2003)

I get 295.03 % total return. (05/22/2003 - 2/15/2013)

If possible, Can you give more detail (4 weeks) of your performance ?

Thanks]]> http://seekingalpha.com/article/206776/comments?source=feed#comment-15167021 15167021 Mon, 18 Feb 2013 14:12:01 -0500 http://seekingalpha.com/article/1158421/comments?source=feed#comment-14645491 14645491 What was the performance prior to 2009 ?
Do you have a yearly performance breakdown ?
Where can I subscriber to the screener ?

Thanks]]> Wed, 06 Feb 2013 10:07:54 -0500 What was the performance prior to 2009 ?
Do you have a yearly performance breakdown ?
Where can I subscriber to the screener ?

Thanks]]> http://seekingalpha.com/article/1110681/comments?source=feed#comment-14342491 14342491
There is a index data that goes back prior 2011, however it is a backtested data.

Goto S&P indices website for that index and read the performance disclosure.]]> Wed, 30 Jan 2013 03:30:27 -0500
There is a index data that goes back prior 2011, however it is a backtested data.

Goto S&P indices website for that index and read the performance disclosure.]]> http://seekingalpha.com/article/1126481/comments?source=feed#comment-14084891 14084891
Good Luck]]> Thu, 24 Jan 2013 02:29:13 -0500
Good Luck]]> http://seekingalpha.com/article/1110681/comments?source=feed#comment-13853151 13853151
I have no problems with your article. It could be a good strategy in the future.]]> Thu, 17 Jan 2013 19:37:44 -0500
I have no problems with your article. It could be a good strategy in the future.]]> http://seekingalpha.com/article/1110681/comments?source=feed#comment-13852671 13852671
Are Bloomberg indices a subscription service ? I was interested in other indexes.

Again, Thanks for the article.]]> Thu, 17 Jan 2013 19:28:38 -0500
Are Bloomberg indices a subscription service ? I was interested in other indexes.

Again, Thanks for the article.]]> http://seekingalpha.com/article/1110681/comments?source=feed#comment-13813871 13813871
According to S&P website, The inception date of the S&P 500 Low Volatility Index was April 4, 2011, at the market close. The inception date of the S&P 500 Low Volatility Index CAD Hedged was January
24, 2012, at the market close. All information presented prior to the index inception date is back-tested. Back-tested performance is not actual performance, but is
hypothetical. The back-test calculations are based on the same methodology that was in effect when the index was officially launched.

---------------------
So, you are backtesting with the data that is already backtested.

Anyway, thanks for posting your strategy. I hope it works in the future.]]> Thu, 17 Jan 2013 05:24:48 -0500
According to S&P website, The inception date of the S&P 500 Low Volatility Index was April 4, 2011, at the market close. The inception date of the S&P 500 Low Volatility Index CAD Hedged was January
24, 2012, at the market close. All information presented prior to the index inception date is back-tested. Back-tested performance is not actual performance, but is
hypothetical. The back-test calculations are based on the same methodology that was in effect when the index was officially launched.

---------------------
So, you are backtesting with the data that is already backtested.

Anyway, thanks for posting your strategy. I hope it works in the future.]]> http://seekingalpha.com/article/1110681/comments?source=feed#comment-13810231 13810231 S&P website provides last 5 years of daily index data.]]> Thu, 17 Jan 2013 03:18:07 -0500 S&P website provides last 5 years of daily index data.]]> http://seekingalpha.com/article/983071/comments?source=feed#comment-11358561 11358561
Thanks
Bruce]]> Thu, 08 Nov 2012 02:51:23 -0500
Thanks
Bruce]]> http://seekingalpha.com/article/904561/comments?source=feed#comment-10163101 10163101 Thu, 04 Oct 2012 11:26:09 -0400 http://seekingalpha.com/article/652181/comments?source=feed#comment-6387351 6387351 Wed, 13 Jun 2012 13:32:51 -0400 http://seekingalpha.com/article/595761/comments?source=feed#comment-5541201 5541201 What is your thoughts on this article ?

REITs Begin To Show Cracks
By Chris Ciovacco

http://seekingalpha.co...

I appreciate all your articles and comments.

Thanks in advance]]> Thu, 17 May 2012 13:51:38 -0400 What is your thoughts on this article ?

REITs Begin To Show Cracks
By Chris Ciovacco

http://seekingalpha.co...

I appreciate all your articles and comments.

Thanks in advance]]> http://seekingalpha.com/article/580191/comments?source=feed#comment-5459241 5459241 Tue, 15 May 2012 13:00:53 -0400 http://seekingalpha.com/article/580191/comments?source=feed#comment-5364501 5364501 Fri, 11 May 2012 23:29:18 -0400 http://seekingalpha.com/article/524781/comments?source=feed#comment-4761641 4761641 Wed, 25 Apr 2012 01:32:09 -0400 http://seekingalpha.com/article/509901/comments?source=feed#comment-4579171 4579171 Thu, 19 Apr 2012 11:10:40 -0400 http://seekingalpha.com/article/479081/comments?source=feed#comment-4159381 4159381 Wed, 04 Apr 2012 23:10:03 -0400 http://seekingalpha.com/article/300195/comments?source=feed#comment-1980454 1980454 Tue, 18 Oct 2011 12:24:15 -0400 http://seekingalpha.com/article/300195/comments?source=feed#comment-1980452 1980452 Tue, 18 Oct 2011 12:23:33 -0400 http://seekingalpha.com/article/216435/comments?source=feed#comment-1136724 1136724 That is not very smart, is it ?]]> Wed, 28 Jul 2010 11:24:02 -0400 That is not very smart, is it ?]]> http://seekingalpha.com/article/216435/comments?source=feed#comment-1133121 1133121
So you're saying that "Smart Money" is going to be staying on the sidelines until "Dumb Money" develops a trend.

I CALL THAT DUMB AND DUMBER.]]> Mon, 26 Jul 2010 11:04:45 -0400
So you're saying that "Smart Money" is going to be staying on the sidelines until "Dumb Money" develops a trend.

I CALL THAT DUMB AND DUMBER.]]>