The depression will end as it always does, when the savers start spending again. Mow if you are a saver what looks like the safest place to move your savings toward? When gold starts exhibiting momentum as inevitably it will, money will be coming out of treasuries which will be losing value as interest rates go up due to inflation and... blah blah blah!
Gold: Not an Effective Hedge Against Inflation [View article]
The real question is not what an ounce of gold returns against other investments; it is what does an ounce of gold buy today and what does $35 dollars buy today vs. in 1935?
As an LMC shareholder I know Hudbay got a steal!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
On Dec 12 05:45 PM jegan ;-) wrote:
> And then there's Lundin Mining (LMC) which has dropped from a high > of $14 a share to under a buck and can now be found standing under > a lamppost swing a purse trying to sell itself to any drunken sailor. > > > jegan
Freeport-McMoran: Dead Money Until Copper Prices Recover [View article]
I am kind of surprised FCX didn't make a play for Lundin Mining (LMC)who is their partner in Tenke; also NXG is a steal at these price levels with their low cost reserves in copper and gold!!
Lundin Mining: Unearthing Big Gains from the Commodity 'Supercycle' [View article]
LMC is merging w/Hudbay Minerals. I think it is pretty much a done deal. Each share of LMC is worth .39 HBM. Good deal for HBM which bought a lot of temporarily depreciated assets.
Surprising Call for Return to the Gold Standard [View article]
I agree; we're most interested in a blockbuster quarter than in building a company!
On Nov 19 08:25 AM Black Rain wrote:
> My theory is our current mess is GREED! It appears to me that risk > has been mis-aligned with senior executive compensation. There is > simply too much incentive to drive corporate earnings at any cost. > > > Most compensation is in the form of stock options. When you are a > CEO you only care about driving the earnings of your company during > your tenure. There is no long-term consequences to taking outsized > risks -- all of the risk lies with the shareholders if you put the > company on a path to destruction that will play out years down the > road. > > When you retire, the guy behind you (next CEO) has to take even bigger > risks in order to keep driving earnings upward at an increasing pace > to make HIS stock options pay off. Rinse and repeat as you go through > multiple CEO's and you have a perfect recipe for overleveraging your > balance sheet and taking unwarranted risks to drive as much short > term earnings as you can. > > I think this is what caused Alan Greenspan to question his belief > in the system. His view of the system was that companies would have > a motivated interest in their own survival that would prevent them > from doing the absurdly stupid. But how can that be when you are > going to increase top CEO compensation from the normal $5M - $10M > to $10s or 100s of millions for a few extra nickels and dimes of > earnings today? The only way to achieve this would be to increase > the risk your company is taking . . .
how can u luv a stock at 14 and hate it at 3? Is the world coming to an end next week- which seems to be ur time horizon. Ur advice is crap!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Don't Let Bulk Shippers Sink Your Portfolio... For Now [View article]
write on...
On Nov 10 05:10 AM antwillant wrote:
> An article like this might have been worth reading several months > ago when stock prices were still high. In other words, its a bit > late and using only hindsight as a measure of the value of the industry. > As usual.
Sort by:
Latest | Highest ratedChinese Raw Materials Companies Stay on the Acquisition Trail [View article]
Why Does the CIBC Slam Silver? [View article]
Cramer's Lightning Round - Prudential Not So Prudent (2/11/09) [View article]
Gold Will Shine in 2009 (Part II) [View article]
When gold starts exhibiting momentum as inevitably it will, money will be coming out of treasuries which will be losing value as interest rates go up due to inflation and... blah blah blah!
Gold: Not an Effective Hedge Against Inflation [View article]
Big Mining Is in Big Trouble [View article]
On Dec 12 05:45 PM jegan ;-) wrote:
> And then there's Lundin Mining (LMC) which has dropped from a high
> of $14 a share to under a buck and can now be found standing under
> a lamppost swing a purse trying to sell itself to any drunken sailor.
>
>
> jegan
Confused About Warrants? Using Goldcorp to Explain [View article]
Freeport-McMoran: Dead Money Until Copper Prices Recover [View article]
Lundin Mining: Unearthing Big Gains from the Commodity 'Supercycle' [View article]
Surprising Call for Return to the Gold Standard [View article]
On Nov 19 08:25 AM Black Rain wrote:
> My theory is our current mess is GREED! It appears to me that risk
> has been mis-aligned with senior executive compensation. There is
> simply too much incentive to drive corporate earnings at any cost.
>
>
> Most compensation is in the form of stock options. When you are a
> CEO you only care about driving the earnings of your company during
> your tenure. There is no long-term consequences to taking outsized
> risks -- all of the risk lies with the shareholders if you put the
> company on a path to destruction that will play out years down the
> road.
>
> When you retire, the guy behind you (next CEO) has to take even bigger
> risks in order to keep driving earnings upward at an increasing pace
> to make HIS stock options pay off. Rinse and repeat as you go through
> multiple CEO's and you have a perfect recipe for overleveraging your
> balance sheet and taking unwarranted risks to drive as much short
> term earnings as you can.
>
> I think this is what caused Alan Greenspan to question his belief
> in the system. His view of the system was that companies would have
> a motivated interest in their own survival that would prevent them
> from doing the absurdly stupid. But how can that be when you are
> going to increase top CEO compensation from the normal $5M - $10M
> to $10s or 100s of millions for a few extra nickels and dimes of
> earnings today? The only way to achieve this would be to increase
> the risk your company is taking . . .
Credit Markets and the Price of Gold [View article]
Cramer's Lightning Round - Ceasefire on Northrop Grumman (11/12/08) [View article]
Don't Let Bulk Shippers Sink Your Portfolio... For Now [View article]
On Nov 10 05:10 AM antwillant wrote:
> An article like this might have been worth reading several months
> ago when stock prices were still high. In other words, its a bit
> late and using only hindsight as a measure of the value of the industry.
> As usual.
UBS Lowers Gold Expectations Again [View article]
Gold Miners: Amazingly Cheap [View article]