> Regarding the dividend yield...don't see how you come up with "over > 9%." Although the next dividend won't be declared until early June, > the board has already announced a slash from .31 to .10 and, at the > current share price, that yields about 3%. What have I missed? BTW, > I hope you are right!
Tamiflu and Relenza are not vaccines, they are anti-virals, used to treat the symptoms of a viral illness. They do not prevent a person from acquiring the disease. Just wanted to clarify...
On Apr 28 08:09 AM Freya wrote:
> The vaccines produced via the Chicken/egg route may take many months > to produce an adequate solution if the present vaccines like Tamiflu > and Relenza do not provide the protection needed. > > After all, they were not designed with this in mind. > > Nothing out there has been designed with this in mind. I do not know > about BCRX, but I do know that NVAX has a proprietary artificial > means of producing vaccines. They have the potential to come to a > solution much faster than the others. > > Thanks for the heads up on QDEL, I knew that there was such a device > but didn't know who manufactured it.
Divided About Allied Capital Dividends [View article]
The company did miss a beat--they did not pay the March 27th dividend. I sure miss it...
On Apr 21 04:57 PM Tae Kim wrote:
> Hi all, > > Thanks for reading my a (obviously controversial) article.. I do > agree that the likelihood of dividend reciept is slim to none... > But I also feel (unless you know otherwise) that it's NOT an impossibility.. > I'm sure you'll agree, crazier things have happend in these markets.. > > > While the firm doesn't "expect to declare dividends in 2009", the > payments are mostly hinged on the overall success of the company. > Similar to other corporate structures (like LP's, Trusts etc..) ALD > is an RIC which REQUIRES them to payout a significant % of EPS.. > Meaning IF (again a big if) the company is able to recapitalize and > improve solvency/leverage ratios and EPS, the anticipation of dividends > should increase proportionately.. The company can't simply hoard > the earnings for future growth needs.. > > Many are SPECULATING that the dividends have shot at being paid, > contingent on the overall earnings success and improvement of of > the firm's fundamentals... If i'm not mistaken, the company has paid > dividends annually since the 60's without missing a beat.. While > I do agree with everyone here that the likelihood is VERY small, > I am not a good enough analyst to say this is impossible. For anyone > who is speculating on these dividends, I just wanted to offer a different > way to place their bets..
Sort by:
Latest | Highest ratedTime to Reenter GE [View article]
On May 17 09:41 AM star_talking wrote:
> Regarding the dividend yield...don't see how you come up with "over
> 9%." Although the next dividend won't be declared until early June,
> the board has already announced a slash from .31 to .10 and, at the
> current share price, that yields about 3%. What have I missed? BTW,
> I hope you are right!
Wall Street Breakfast: Must-Know News [View article]
The Swine Flu Effect [View article]
On Apr 28 08:09 AM Freya wrote:
> The vaccines produced via the Chicken/egg route may take many months
> to produce an adequate solution if the present vaccines like Tamiflu
> and Relenza do not provide the protection needed.
>
> After all, they were not designed with this in mind.
>
> Nothing out there has been designed with this in mind. I do not know
> about BCRX, but I do know that NVAX has a proprietary artificial
> means of producing vaccines. They have the potential to come to a
> solution much faster than the others.
>
> Thanks for the heads up on QDEL, I knew that there was such a device
> but didn't know who manufactured it.
Divided About Allied Capital Dividends [View article]
On Apr 21 04:57 PM Tae Kim wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Thanks for reading my a (obviously controversial) article.. I do
> agree that the likelihood of dividend reciept is slim to none...
> But I also feel (unless you know otherwise) that it's NOT an impossibility..
> I'm sure you'll agree, crazier things have happend in these markets..
>
>
> While the firm doesn't "expect to declare dividends in 2009", the
> payments are mostly hinged on the overall success of the company.
> Similar to other corporate structures (like LP's, Trusts etc..) ALD
> is an RIC which REQUIRES them to payout a significant % of EPS..
> Meaning IF (again a big if) the company is able to recapitalize and
> improve solvency/leverage ratios and EPS, the anticipation of dividends
> should increase proportionately.. The company can't simply hoard
> the earnings for future growth needs..
>
> Many are SPECULATING that the dividends have shot at being paid,
> contingent on the overall earnings success and improvement of of
> the firm's fundamentals... If i'm not mistaken, the company has paid
> dividends annually since the 60's without missing a beat.. While
> I do agree with everyone here that the likelihood is VERY small,
> I am not a good enough analyst to say this is impossible. For anyone
> who is speculating on these dividends, I just wanted to offer a different
> way to place their bets..
Divided About Allied Capital Dividends [View article]
Cramer's Mad Money - Inflated EGO (3/20/09) [View article]
Wall Street Breakfast: Must-Know News [View article]
PPG Industries: Attractively Valued [View article]
Nine Olympic Stocks [View article]