Contemplating the Demise of Bank of America, Citi and JPMorgan [View article]
Banks make money by loaning out money to people who will pay them back more. Period. When credit is flowing, they can extract a lot out of people and get away with it. When credit is tight and people and/or businesses become concerned with the difficulty in paying back more money than they borrowed, doesn't it make sense that bank traffic will be reduced, especially amongst those with the ability to repay. I was always amazed at how easily banks write off capital, when they have to generate a lot of activity to make up a dollar lost.
New Limits on Credit Card Companies: Is Hell Freezing Over? [View article]
Great article but I thought I would add my 2 cents. "educating customers" and "letting the chips fall where they may" only works within a highly financially literate society - i.e. not in the U.S.) But they credit companies write things in legaleze, so very few people actually can understand it.
"amount that the industry stands to lose in annual revenue, if the rules go into effect as proposed, would be about $12 billion." Well, who stands to gain that? The american consumer. Maybe it can be put to better use. Or reduce the overall debt in the country.
Wall Street Breakfast: Must-Know News [View article]
On Nov 26 02:24 PM eddie64 wrote:
> MARKET BOTTOM & REVERSAL UPWARD -- WITH FORCE: > will occur when........... > [1] SEC reinstates UPTICK RULE; > [2] Mark-to-Market accounting discontinued; > [3] Sarbanes/Oxley reversed; > [4] Naked Short Sellers prosecuted; > > All at ZERO COST to the taxpayer, and $$$$$ Trillions returned to > our investment, college & retirement accounts!!!!!!!!!!!!
> > > The question is WHY AREN'T THESE BEING DONE??????????
Great points. But the answer is that government NEVER reduces their control. They only add to it. And with Dems in control it will only get worse.
Contemplating the Demise of Bank of America, Citi and JPMorgan [View article]
New Limits on Credit Card Companies: Is Hell Freezing Over? [View article]
"educating customers" and "letting the chips fall where they may" only works within a highly financially literate society - i.e. not in the U.S.)
But they credit companies write things in legaleze, so very few people actually can understand it.
"amount that the industry stands to lose in annual revenue, if the rules go into effect as proposed, would be about $12 billion."
Well, who stands to gain that? The american consumer. Maybe it can be put to better use. Or reduce the overall debt in the country.
Wall Street Breakfast: Must-Know News [View article]
On Nov 26 02:24 PM eddie64 wrote:
> MARKET BOTTOM & REVERSAL UPWARD -- WITH FORCE:
> will occur when...........
> [1] SEC reinstates UPTICK RULE;
> [2] Mark-to-Market accounting discontinued;
> [3] Sarbanes/Oxley reversed;
> [4] Naked Short Sellers prosecuted;
>
> All at ZERO COST to the taxpayer, and $$$$$ Trillions returned to
> our investment, college & retirement accounts!!!!!!!!!!!!
>
>
> The question is WHY AREN'T THESE BEING DONE??????????
Great points. But the answer is that government NEVER reduces their control. They only add to it. And with Dems in control it will only get worse.
That Sucking Sound? It's FDIC Insurance Taking Over [View article]
Examining Citigroup Ten Years Later [View article]
Wall Street Breakfast: Must-Know News [View article]