ej76az

7 Comments

    • Vanguard's New Total World ETF [view article]
      I wonder why the expense ratio is so high? This is equivalent to 41% VTI, with an expense ratio of only .07%, and the remainder VEU and VWO, which are each .25%. VT should therefore be .18, not .25. Jun 27 06:28 PM
    • World Market Weighting Your Equity Allocation [view article]
      wow, now you can buy just one: VT!


      On Jun 23 12:48 PM ej76az wrote:

      > just use VEU instead of EFA, EWC, and VWO       Jun 27 06:20 PM
    • World Market Weighting Your Equity Allocation [view article]
      just use VEU instead of EFA, EWC, and VWO Jun 23 12:48 PM
    • ETFs vs. Mutual Funds: The Long and Short (Term) Of It [view article]
      Perhaps I should have said almost none. Backtesting and data mining can usually produce outliers, so I suppose if one looks hard enough one could find some tiny number of actively managed funds that outperformed their corresponding indexes, even over the long term.

      I had never heard of any of the 3 funds you named. The Sequoia website is not functioning. The Legg Mason Value Trust website describes the fund as large-cap value, and the Longleaf Partners Fund website describes the fund as large- and mid-cap value. Nevertheless, both websites compare the funds to the S&P 500 Index, which is totally misleading. The long-term performance of each of these funds is comparable to that of the large-cap value index, which, as most people know, has outperformed the large cap (i.e. S&P 500) index.

      In any event, there is no proven methodology for determining which actively managed mutual funds will outperform their corresponding indexes in the future. All studies of past performance show no correlation with subsequent performance (e.g., the few actively managed funds that outperformed their corresponding indexes from 1980-1990 did not do so from 1990-2000). Therefore there's no rational way to choose any actively managed fund over its corresponding index fund.       Apr 21 04:05 PM
    • ETFs vs. Mutual Funds: The Long and Short (Term) Of It [view article]
      Preposterous Statement Number One: "The active management of mutual funds serves to usually provide superior returns that outperform the market averages." Actually, no actively managed mututal fund has ever outperformeded its corresponding index over the long term, and even in the short term the overwhelming majority of actively managed mutual funds underperform their corresponding indexes.

      Preposterous Statement Number Two: "While ETF’s [sic] are great instruments for generating returns and achieving diversification in the short-term, mutual fund investing can pay off over longer periods of time." Actually, ETFs have lower expenses than index mutual funds and therefore are cheaper over time, assuming you're not paying high commissions. Vanguard's website allows you to compare any mutual fund to any ETF over any time period.       Apr 19 02:00 PM
    • Fundamental Indexing: New Ain't Necessarily Bad [view article]
      I e-mailed WT, and here's the absurd response I received:


      Hello,

      At this time WisdomTree has decided to only include backtesting data for 10 years to the public. While this is an abbreviated period from the 50 year backtest, we believe that it is a broad representation of the market cycles.

      Thank you for your interest in WisdomTree. If you have any further questions feel free to email or call 1-866-909-9473 and we’ll be more than happy to answer them.

      Sincerely,

      Ryan Davis


      A helluva way to run a railroad. WT sure won't be getting any of my money!       Apr 10 12:58 PM
    • Fundamental Indexing: New Ain't Necessarily Bad [view article]
      Where did you get the 40-year backtesting? WisdomTree's website only shows 10-year backtesting. Apr 09 05:32 PM
Loading...
Symbols:
Authors:
Quick Links:
Contribute an Article Become a Seeking Alpha Contributor

Transcripts

More Transcripts»