<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>varan's Comments</title>
    <description>varan's Comments RSS Syndication from SeekingAlpha.com</description>
    <link>http://seekingalpha.com/user/709762/comments</link>
    <item>
      <title>Beware Long-Term Damage From Stock Market Bubble Forming Now</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1441281/comments?source=feed#comment-18996081</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18996081</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[The author states in a reply to a comment:<br/><br/>There are some people that believe that if someone predicted the market would go up and it did that they were &quot;right.&quot; These same people believe that if someone predicted the market would go down and it didn't that the person was &quot;wrong.&quot;<br/><br/>OK, so as I had thought, he claims to be unfalsifiable.<br/><br/>Which means that his ruminations are immune from any rational analysis.<br/><br/>Perfect.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 11:00:02 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[The author states in a reply to a comment:<br/><br/>There are some people that believe that if someone predicted the market would go up and it did that they were &quot;right.&quot; These same people believe that if someone predicted the market would go down and it didn't that the person was &quot;wrong.&quot;<br/><br/>OK, so as I had thought, he claims to be unfalsifiable.<br/><br/>Which means that his ruminations are immune from any rational analysis.<br/><br/>Perfect.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Beware Long-Term Damage From Stock Market Bubble Forming Now</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1441281/comments?source=feed#comment-18983151</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18983151</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[This is awesome.<br/><br/>First you forecast a market bust, and when proved absolutely wrong by the subsequent rise in the market, you say that boom is not real, and the market is ultimately going to listen to your commands and come down. Of course your forecast was correct, but was proven wrong only by the artificially induced external forces. If only the market was allowed to behave as you wanted it to behave.<br/><br/>Really awesome capability for prognostication. A sight to behold and admire.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 12:33:47 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[This is awesome.<br/><br/>First you forecast a market bust, and when proved absolutely wrong by the subsequent rise in the market, you say that boom is not real, and the market is ultimately going to listen to your commands and come down. Of course your forecast was correct, but was proven wrong only by the artificially induced external forces. If only the market was allowed to behave as you wanted it to behave.<br/><br/>Really awesome capability for prognostication. A sight to behold and admire.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Get In On The Ground Floor Like A VC With Public BDCs</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1437021/comments?source=feed#comment-18859081</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18859081</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[you should show this chart of SFE.<br/><br/><a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://yhoo.it/10GNAe6'>http://yhoo.it/10GNAe6</a>;range=my;compare=;ind...]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 14:04:56 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[you should show this chart of SFE.<br/><br/><a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://yhoo.it/10GNAe6'>http://yhoo.it/10GNAe6</a>;range=my;compare=;ind...]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Boring, Diversified, And (Still) Tough To Beat</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1429071/comments?source=feed#comment-18772181</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18772181</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[30% of the universe of funds performed better than GMI. Does not sound that great. Anything lower than 80-85% is hardly a ringing endorsement.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 14:07:08 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[30% of the universe of funds performed better than GMI. Does not sound that great. Anything lower than 80-85% is hardly a ringing endorsement.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>5 Dividend Stocks From The Ira Sohn Investment Conference</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1423551/comments?source=feed#comment-18685501</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18685501</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[What is the performance of the past recommendations from this conference? ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2013 14:49:37 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[What is the performance of the past recommendations from this conference? ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>A low turnover high performance strategy for trading ETFs</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/instablog/709762-varan/253547-a-low-turnover-high-performance-strategy-for-trading-etfs?source=feed#comment-18676861</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18676861</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Thanks.<br/><br/>I have not considered shorting.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2013 11:50:40 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Thanks.<br/><br/>I have not considered shorting.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Dividend Growth Investors - Prepare For The Correction</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1418081/comments?source=feed#comment-18628771</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18628771</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Or you do not worry about labeling yourself as this kind of investor or that and acting accordingly. Even if you want high income, a portfolio such as this<br/><br/><a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://bit.ly/15sRS0A'>http://bit.ly/15sRS0A</a><br/><br/>that contains many stocks that do not qualify as DG stocks, suffered only 21% annual loss in 2008.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2013 12:07:36 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Or you do not worry about labeling yourself as this kind of investor or that and acting accordingly. Even if you want high income, a portfolio such as this<br/><br/><a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://bit.ly/15sRS0A'>http://bit.ly/15sRS0A</a><br/><br/>that contains many stocks that do not qualify as DG stocks, suffered only 21% annual loss in 2008.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Is High Beta Worth The Risk?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1413961/comments?source=feed#comment-18625551</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18625551</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[By the way, SPLV, by its name, gives a false sense of security.<br/><br/>If you look at the historical values of the corresponding index, it also had a maximum draw down of about 34% during 2008 (for SPHB it was a whopping 65%). If you are willing to accept such draw downs, you might as well contribute to grandpa Warren's charities by buying BRK-A/B and reap higher returns. If you want minimal draw downs, some very simple re-balancing/allocation strategies without SPLV are available, and they do not sacrifice returns either.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2013 11:16:49 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[By the way, SPLV, by its name, gives a false sense of security.<br/><br/>If you look at the historical values of the corresponding index, it also had a maximum draw down of about 34% during 2008 (for SPHB it was a whopping 65%). If you are willing to accept such draw downs, you might as well contribute to grandpa Warren's charities by buying BRK-A/B and reap higher returns. If you want minimal draw downs, some very simple re-balancing/allocation strategies without SPLV are available, and they do not sacrifice returns either.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Is High Beta Worth The Risk?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1413961/comments?source=feed#comment-18600231</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18600231</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[You don't have to choose. Just buy SPHB or SPLV or TLT  depending upon which one did better during the prior month and repeat every month. (During 2012-2013 you did not have to include TLT in this, but if you look at the earlier data for the corresponding indices from the S&amp;P site, adding TLT to the mix results in a significant improvement in the performance - almost 10% added to the CAGR. during 2009-2011 by adding TLT.)]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 May 2013 18:41:35 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[You don't have to choose. Just buy SPHB or SPLV or TLT  depending upon which one did better during the prior month and repeat every month. (During 2012-2013 you did not have to include TLT in this, but if you look at the earlier data for the corresponding indices from the S&amp;P site, adding TLT to the mix results in a significant improvement in the performance - almost 10% added to the CAGR. during 2009-2011 by adding TLT.)]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Intel Drops An Atomic Bomb On ARM's 'Abomination'</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1406441/comments?source=feed#comment-18599971</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18599971</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[hey Ashraf don't be so sensitive. If you are going to break down at the slightest hint of dissent, why write articles on a public forum such as this? I have seen worse: his seems to be pretty mild. Why call him a jerk?]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 May 2013 18:33:03 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[hey Ashraf don't be so sensitive. If you are going to break down at the slightest hint of dissent, why write articles on a public forum such as this? I have seen worse: his seems to be pretty mild. Why call him a jerk?]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Intel Drops An Atomic Bomb On ARM's 'Abomination'</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1406441/comments?source=feed#comment-18586431</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18586431</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Profits since close of day 5/6/2013 (Publication date of this article)<br/><br/>ARMH 2.64%<br/>INTC 1.38%<br/><br/>Numbers. We want numbers.<br/><br/>(I sold my ARMH at 42, and still have 100s of INTC).]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 May 2013 13:34:31 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Profits since close of day 5/6/2013 (Publication date of this article)<br/><br/>ARMH 2.64%<br/>INTC 1.38%<br/><br/>Numbers. We want numbers.<br/><br/>(I sold my ARMH at 42, and still have 100s of INTC).]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Equity/Fixed Income Momentum - May 2013</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1406701/comments?source=feed#comment-18558371</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18558371</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Actually this is not a 'momentum' strategy. It's best characterized as 'paired-switching' wherein in you take nominally uncorrelated assets and switch between them depending on the relative performance, with the hope that you catch the periods when one is doing better than the other; such periods are guaranteed to exist if the assets are negatively correlated, such as SPY and TLT.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2013 19:52:35 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Actually this is not a 'momentum' strategy. It's best characterized as 'paired-switching' wherein in you take nominally uncorrelated assets and switch between them depending on the relative performance, with the hope that you catch the periods when one is doing better than the other; such periods are guaranteed to exist if the assets are negatively correlated, such as SPY and TLT.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Equity/Fixed Income Momentum - May 2013</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1406701/comments?source=feed#comment-18507461</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18507461</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Quarterly (rather than monthly) switching between VTI/SPY and TLT is even better, with the added benefit of reduced transaction costs.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 May 2013 16:42:43 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Quarterly (rather than monthly) switching between VTI/SPY and TLT is even better, with the added benefit of reduced transaction costs.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Intel Drops An Atomic Bomb On ARM's 'Abomination'</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1406441/comments?source=feed#comment-18504671</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18504671</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I am all for your prognostication panning out, as I own some INTC, but the market seems to have ignored the explosion of the bomb that you are talking about, at least for today.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 May 2013 15:40:45 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I am all for your prognostication panning out, as I own some INTC, but the market seems to have ignored the explosion of the bomb that you are talking about, at least for today.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Investing Is Work That Should Pay Dividends</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1400401/comments?source=feed#comment-18449081</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18449081</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I don't know if it does indeed require so much work.  If you are investing for the long haul, say for thirty years for your retirement, putting your money in SPY or some such index is enough for most people. That requires may be one hour of work every year. <br/><br/>I think that as soon as you buy the idea that it requires a lot of work, you start trading and agonizing over which hack's list to follow (and there are a lot of hacks who show you fancy graphs and numbers and tell you that all theory except theirs is wrong,  only to end up barely beating the market, if that, and if they don't beat the market they tell you that your objective should be something other than beating the market) and which stock to trade, and consequently create a lot of activity that is uncalled for, and most of the time it does not end well.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sat, 04 May 2013 18:47:49 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I don't know if it does indeed require so much work.  If you are investing for the long haul, say for thirty years for your retirement, putting your money in SPY or some such index is enough for most people. That requires may be one hour of work every year. <br/><br/>I think that as soon as you buy the idea that it requires a lot of work, you start trading and agonizing over which hack's list to follow (and there are a lot of hacks who show you fancy graphs and numbers and tell you that all theory except theirs is wrong,  only to end up barely beating the market, if that, and if they don't beat the market they tell you that your objective should be something other than beating the market) and which stock to trade, and consequently create a lot of activity that is uncalled for, and most of the time it does not end well.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Road To Omaha: Volatility Or Wealth Creation</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1388841/comments?source=feed#comment-18321141</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18321141</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I basically buy your hypothesis but it does not appear to be consistent with the performance of VFINX(SP500) as compared with that of 60%/40% VFINX(SP500)/VUSTX(long treasury), the latter being much less volatile but yielding essentially similar returns during 1991-2013.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 13:17:38 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I basically buy your hypothesis but it does not appear to be consistent with the performance of VFINX(SP500) as compared with that of 60%/40% VFINX(SP500)/VUSTX(long treasury), the latter being much less volatile but yielding essentially similar returns during 1991-2013.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>A Portfolio Of Mutual Funds</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/instablog/709762-varan/1811221-a-portfolio-of-mutual-funds?source=feed#comment-18315321</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18315321</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[great. <br/><br/>thanks.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 11:32:30 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[great. <br/><br/>thanks.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>If I Could Buy Just One Stock, It Would Be This One</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1369301/comments?source=feed#comment-18279381</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18279381</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Magical arithmetic is good for your soul. Practicing that will show you ponies everywhere.<br/><br/>If you can, simulate the growth of $5K deposited every year+dividend re-invested in two portfolios - one containing the darling of DG crowd, MCD, and the other BRK-A.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2013 14:15:10 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Magical arithmetic is good for your soul. Practicing that will show you ponies everywhere.<br/><br/>If you can, simulate the growth of $5K deposited every year+dividend re-invested in two portfolios - one containing the darling of DG crowd, MCD, and the other BRK-A.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>If I Could Buy Just One Stock, It Would Be This One</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1369301/comments?source=feed#comment-18247581</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18247581</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[@illum invest<br/><br/>But if the money come from dividends it you get electrolytes as a bonus.<br/><br/>Just the price appreciation is only price appreciation.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2013 19:43:57 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[@illum invest<br/><br/>But if the money come from dividends it you get electrolytes as a bonus.<br/><br/>Just the price appreciation is only price appreciation.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Dividend Growth - A Very Useful Distraction?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1375481/comments?source=feed#comment-18179851</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18179851</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[You can get the best of both worlds by investing every year in the 10 dividend champions whose dividend growth during the prior five years was the highest. High total returns, and  you get dividends. From this yearly selection filtering out stocks  with capitalization lower than 10B seems to work better.<br/><br/>Whatever makes the most money. Even mutual funds can yield good returns if you do it right.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sat, 27 Apr 2013 20:38:40 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[You can get the best of both worlds by investing every year in the 10 dividend champions whose dividend growth during the prior five years was the highest. High total returns, and  you get dividends. From this yearly selection filtering out stocks  with capitalization lower than 10B seems to work better.<br/><br/>Whatever makes the most money. Even mutual funds can yield good returns if you do it right.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>If I Could Buy Just One Stock, It Would Be This One</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1369301/comments?source=feed#comment-18179141</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18179141</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Or they can ignore this article altogether, and go to so many other inspirational and motivational articles by the heroic DGI authors on SA.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sat, 27 Apr 2013 19:53:58 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Or they can ignore this article altogether, and go to so many other inspirational and motivational articles by the heroic DGI authors on SA.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>If I Could Buy Just One Stock, It Would Be This One</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1369301/comments?source=feed#comment-18171481</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18171481</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[@Conservative<br/><br/>You don't understand. The performance of every DGI portfolio is better than the average performance of DGI portfolios.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sat, 27 Apr 2013 12:16:34 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[@Conservative<br/><br/>You don't understand. The performance of every DGI portfolio is better than the average performance of DGI portfolios.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>If I Could Buy Just One Stock, It Would Be This One</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1369301/comments?source=feed#comment-18112101</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18112101</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Of course you can always find stocks which are guaranteed to increase their dividends in the future. ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Apr 2013 22:04:38 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Of course you can always find stocks which are guaranteed to increase their dividends in the future. ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>If I Could Buy Just One Stock, It Would Be This One</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1369301/comments?source=feed#comment-18105231</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18105231</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[@mjs_28s<br/>What are you talking about? Too much DGI koolaid?<br/><br/>Start with $1M in BRK-A. Withdraw $50K at the beginning of the year every year by selling some stock from 2003 thru 2013. You would have $1.15M today.<br/><br/>If you started with 40000 withdrawal, you could have increased your withdrawal by 3% every year and would have $1.22M today.<br/><br/>What was the problem?]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Apr 2013 18:46:48 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[@mjs_28s<br/>What are you talking about? Too much DGI koolaid?<br/><br/>Start with $1M in BRK-A. Withdraw $50K at the beginning of the year every year by selling some stock from 2003 thru 2013. You would have $1.15M today.<br/><br/>If you started with 40000 withdrawal, you could have increased your withdrawal by 3% every year and would have $1.22M today.<br/><br/>What was the problem?]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>If I Could Buy Just One Stock, It Would Be This One</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1369301/comments?source=feed#comment-18091001</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18091001</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I would buy IEP.<br/><br/>But for the sake of diversification, an equally weighted portfolio of IEP, MKL and BRK.B.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Apr 2013 14:08:37 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I would buy IEP.<br/><br/>But for the sake of diversification, an equally weighted portfolio of IEP, MKL and BRK.B.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Is Dividend Growth Investing Crippling Your Dividend-Based Retirement?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1362311/comments?source=feed#comment-18048091</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18048091</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[You are not quite correct. Effective growth rate that you would use in a compounding calculator is not the sum of the dividend growth rate and the price growth rate.<br/><br/><a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://bit.ly/StyTpo'>http://bit.ly/StyTpo</a><br/><br/>Of course for every set of triples of initial yield, dividend growth rate and the price growth rate, you can compute an effective growth rate. If you use that, there is indeed no 'different set of rules'.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2013 16:36:18 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[You are not quite correct. Effective growth rate that you would use in a compounding calculator is not the sum of the dividend growth rate and the price growth rate.<br/><br/><a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://bit.ly/StyTpo'>http://bit.ly/StyTpo</a><br/><br/>Of course for every set of triples of initial yield, dividend growth rate and the price growth rate, you can compute an effective growth rate. If you use that, there is indeed no 'different set of rules'.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Is Dividend Growth Investing Crippling Your Dividend-Based Retirement?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1362311/comments?source=feed#comment-18032381</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18032381</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[1% price growth and 10% dividend growth leads to a yield of 47% in 30 years.<br/><br/>I would like to have that stock too.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2013 11:21:25 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[1% price growth and 10% dividend growth leads to a yield of 47% in 30 years.<br/><br/>I would like to have that stock too.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Is Dividend Growth Investing Crippling Your Dividend-Based Retirement?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1362311/comments?source=feed#comment-18000551</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18000551</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Why set your site so low? MSFT would have been much better.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2013 17:29:06 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Why set your site so low? MSFT would have been much better.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Is Dividend Growth Investing Crippling Your Dividend-Based Retirement?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1362311/comments?source=feed#comment-17997361</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">17997361</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I think that most of my cohorts got sidetracked from their investment plans due to the diversion of the riches that were oh so close in sight during the dot com boom and bust that led them to believe that if they could just find the right stock(s) they will hit a home run. If they had just stuck even to a typical stock mutual fund that most people had at the time, they would have been just fine. The fraction of the people who had the prescience to buy just the right stocks was not that high, and so just from a statistical/probabilistic point of view it makes sense to not assume that you will be a member of that lucky group.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2013 16:48:08 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I think that most of my cohorts got sidetracked from their investment plans due to the diversion of the riches that were oh so close in sight during the dot com boom and bust that led them to believe that if they could just find the right stock(s) they will hit a home run. If they had just stuck even to a typical stock mutual fund that most people had at the time, they would have been just fine. The fraction of the people who had the prescience to buy just the right stocks was not that high, and so just from a statistical/probabilistic point of view it makes sense to not assume that you will be a member of that lucky group.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Is Dividend Growth Investing Crippling Your Dividend-Based Retirement?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1362311/comments?source=feed#comment-17993451</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">17993451</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Do a simple calculation: look at the SP500 returns with dividend reinvested for the period 1983:1993, and the returns of 60% SPY 40% VUSTX for 1994-2012 (since SPY was available only starting in 1994). You will find that a person who started in 1983 would have a little over 950K if he had put in $5.5K per year. No need for stock selection. No need for monitoring. Just put the money and watch it grow.<br/><br/>So the problem is not as daunting as it seems in the first cut.<br/><br/>The trick is to stick to the plan and forget about all the noise from various articles on SA and other financial media.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2013 15:37:08 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Do a simple calculation: look at the SP500 returns with dividend reinvested for the period 1983:1993, and the returns of 60% SPY 40% VUSTX for 1994-2012 (since SPY was available only starting in 1994). You will find that a person who started in 1983 would have a little over 950K if he had put in $5.5K per year. No need for stock selection. No need for monitoring. Just put the money and watch it grow.<br/><br/>So the problem is not as daunting as it seems in the first cut.<br/><br/>The trick is to stick to the plan and forget about all the noise from various articles on SA and other financial media.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
