Seeking Alpha

varan's  Instablog

Send Message
Individual investor.
View varan's Instablogs on:
  • Historical Performance Of Some Portfolios During The Withdrawal Phase

    These are some results for the withdrawal phase for retirees who commenced their retirement in any year since 1987 thru 2014 with the following withdrawal schedule:

    1. Withdraw 4% of the portfolio value on January 1 of the year of retirement.

    2. In subsequent years, at the beginning of the year, prior to rebalancing the portfolio if necessary, withdraw the previous year's withdrawal amount incremented by the previous year's inflation rate.

    The portfolios considered are:

    1. SP500 with dividends (MUTF:VFINX).

    2. Mid cap value (MUTF:FDVLX)

    3. 30% VFINX, 30% FDVLX, 40% Aggregate Bond Fund (MUTF:VBMFX)

    4. 30% VFINX, 30% FDVLX, 20% VBMFX, 20% Long Term Treasury Fund (MUTF:VUSTX)

    5. 60% FDVLX 40% VUSTX

    The first figure depicts the compound annual growth rate (Net CAGR) of the portfolio net of withdrawals computed for the period starting in the year of retirement thru 2014. Note that except for the VFINX, Net CAGR is always positive. Thus, although the VFINX portfolio would have sustained the withdrawal schedule, for retirement beginning in some of the years around 2000, the portfolio value at the end of 2014 would have been lower than its starting value. For every other portfolio, if the retirement commenced in any year starting in 1987-2014, at the end of 2014 the portfolio value would be higher than the starting value.

    (click to enlarge)

    In the following figure are shown the maximum excess (beginning of the year) drawdowns for various portfolios. This quantity is defined to be the difference between the initial starting value of the portfolio and its lowest value at the time of withdrawal in any of the subsequent years, less 4%, as at best 4% will be the drawdown of the portfolio at the beginning of retirement. Clearly the excess drawdowns of the all equity portfolios will be unacceptable for most retirees. However, for the 60/40 portfolios, the excess drawdowns appear to be a good measure of what can be expected from well constructed portfolios. (For example, the portfolio of JNJ, MCD, CL, KO and PG with the same withdrawal schedule would have had the maximum excess drawdown of about 24%, similar to the 20% for the 60/40 portfolios.). (click to enlarge).


    Apr 30 10:05 AM | Link | 4 Comments
  • A Five Fund Basket For The Long Haul

    The yearly balanced equally weighted portfolio of four Fidelity funds and the long term treasury bond fund (FDFAX, FSCSX, FBIOX, FRESX and VUSTX/TLT) has yielded very good returns for the last twenty five years. The following figure compares its performance with that of VFINX/SPY and BRK-A as well as with an annually rebalanced portfolio of the same five fund basket wherein the weights are determined on the basis of a modified version of risk parity. The figure displays the annualized CAGRs of the portfolios that were initially funded at the beginning any month during the period 1991-todate, and held up to today. Clearly the fund based portfolios would have outperformed SPY independent of what month they were initially funded in. (By the way, this way of comparing past performance seems to be the best one, as it removes all doubt about the dependence of the returns on the starting date. Looking at the returns on the basis of just a handful of starting dates has led to a lot of unnecessary arguments on SA.)

    (click to enlarge)

    Obviously the future performance of the portfolio relative to SPY may be entirely different, but the results suggest that this basket may prove to be a good long term investment, a conclusion that is also supported by the various performance metrics shown below.

     CAGR (%)MaxDD (%)SharpeSortinoVolatility (%)
    Eq. Wt.14.333.20.911.6912.6
    Risk Parity16.

    This is the allocation for the annually rebalanced portfolio according to a modified risk parity method for the current year 2015 (YTD return : 4.4%, 2014 return : 27.7%)

    FBIOX 13.3%

    FRESX 24.4%

    TLT 43.8%

    FDFAX 16.9%

    FSCSX 1.6%

    Jan 18 3:18 PM | Link | 19 Comments
  • Allocation Or Stock Selection - An Example

    Although there is nothing like good stock picking skills to get returns like Warren Buffett, for an investor who, for whatever reasons, is unable to acquire such abilities, it may be possible to construct portfolios based on simple allocation strategies whose returns are almost as good as those of some portfolios based on stock selection, with somewhat less efforts.

    A recent article on SA by a fundamental analyst par excellence provides a good example ( ). The case study described in this article considers a portfolio that was initiated with $3M at the beginning of 2006. Even after annual withdrawals that increased every year as the dividends accrued from the twenty stocks of the portfolio, it ends up with $5.6M at the end of 2013, thus weathering the intervening shocks in the market with admirable and rarely matched success.

    I have compared the the performance of this all stock portfolio with that of various portfolios based the Naïve Graham allocation strategy ( ) . The following are the relevant details for each portfolio:

    1. The starting capital was $3M.
    2. The portfolio was rebalanced at the beginning of every quarter according to the Naïve Graham method.
    3. At the beginning of every year, an amount equal to the annual accrued dividends as specified the article referenced above was withdrawn from portfolio. The specific withdrawal amounts are given below:


    Amount withdrawn

















    It might be noted that the timing of the withdrawals may affect the results, but the withdrawal at the beginning of the year probably biases the results against the allocation portfolios.

    The amount left in the portfolios at the end of 2013 is given in the following table:


    Value at EOY 2013







    iShares Value


    iShares Gowth


    Fidelity Value


    Fidelity Growth


    All Stock


    For the iShares Growth portfolio, the following ETFs were used in addition to TLT: IVW, IJK and IJT. For the Fidelity Growth portfolio, I used the following funds: FBGRX, FMCSX and FCPGX. For the other portfolios the same funds were used as in the original post on Naïve Graham referenced above.

    Sep 07 4:29 PM | Link | 24 Comments
Full index of posts »
Latest Followers


More »

Latest Comments

Instablogs are Seeking Alpha's free blogging platform customized for finance, with instant set up and exposure to millions of readers interested in the financial markets. Publish your own instablog in minutes.