Full index of posts »
StockTalks

Allocation Or Stock Selection  An Example http://seekingalpha.com/p/1xfy7 Sep 7, 2014

Simple GMR $EEM, $IJJ, $ILF http://seekingalpha.com/p/1uu8b Jul 31, 2014

Naive Graham: Taming Leveraged Funds http://seekingalpha.com/p/1sgbh Jun 20, 2014
Latest Comments
 lintervvv on An Annually Updated And A Permanent Portfolio Of Dividend Growth Stocks Thanks. I'll be joining you. What's the worst t...
 varan on An Annually Updated And A Permanent Portfolio Of Dividend Growth Stocks I will update the list in the last week of Dece...
 lintervvv on An Annually Updated And A Permanent Portfolio Of Dividend Growth Stocks I see no reason not to go with this strategy wi...
 yawkey5 on A Five Fund Basket For The Long Haul Thanks for the heads up. I am currently running...
 Rt Sentiment on A Five Fund Basket For The Long Haul Great article and looking forward to your updat...
 varan on An Annually Updated And A Permanent Portfolio Of Dividend Growth Stocks This strategy seems to be quite competitive wit...
Most Commented
 Simple GMR ( Comments)
 A low drawdown strategy for sector rotation for Fidelity Select Funds ( Comments)
 Naive Graham: Passive Investing According To The Master ( Comments)
 Adaptive Asset Allocation For Lazy Portfolios ( Comments)
 Simple Monthly Strategy Based On Polygamous Paired Switching ( Comments)
Posts by Themes
60/40 Portfolio,
adaptive allocation,
Adaptive allocation,
Adaptive Allocation,
Adaptive Asset Allocation,
Adaptive asset allocation,
Adaptive Asset Allocation ,
Annually rebalanced portfolio,
annually updated portfolio of dividend growth stocks,
Asset allocation,
Asset Allocation,
Beating the market,
Closed End Funds,
Distribution Phase,
Dividend Growth Investing,
Dividend Growth stocks,
Dividend growth stocks,
Dividend growth stocks.,
Dividends,
ETF trading strategy,
Fidelity Select Funds,
Global Market Rotation Strategy simplified,
Hedged Portfolio,
Leveraged ETFs,
Leveraged Funds,
MLPs,
Modern Portfolio Theory,
modified risk parity,
Most diversified portfolio of some utility stocks,
Naive Graham asset allocation strategy,
permanent portfolio of dividend growth stocks,
PIMCO funds,
Portfolio Allocation,
Portfolio strategy,
Quarterly rebalancing,
Quarterly Rebalancing,
rebalancing,
Risk Parity,
Sector ETFs,
Sector Rotation,
Trading volitilty ETFs,
Withdrawal phase of retirement,
Workplace Retirement Plans,
zero annual drawdown portfolio
View varan's Instablogs on:
JNJ Or Fidelity Health/Biotech Funds
The following figure shows a comparison of the CAGRs of Buy and Hold portfolios of (1) Fidelity health related funds: FSPHX, FBIOX and FPHAX and (2) JNJ.
For every month during the period of interest, with the assumption that the portfolio was initiated at the last trading day of the prior month, and held till the end of the period, the CAGR of the portfolio was computed.
The fund portfolio was rebalanced to be equal weight at the end of every year. For years prior to 2002 (the date of inception of FPHAX) only the other two funds were used.
From the figure it is clear that no matter which month the portfolios were initiated in, the CAGR of the funds portfolio was higher than that of JNJ, very often by significant amounts.
(click to enlarge)
Historical Performance Of Some Portfolios During The Withdrawal Phase
These are some results for the withdrawal phase for retirees who commenced their retirement in any year since 1987 thru 2014 with the following withdrawal schedule:
1. Withdraw 4% of the portfolio value on January 1 of the year of retirement.
2. In subsequent years, at the beginning of the year, prior to rebalancing the portfolio if necessary, withdraw the previous year's withdrawal amount incremented by the previous year's inflation rate.
The portfolios considered are:
1. SP500 with dividends (MUTF:VFINX).
2. Mid cap value (MUTF:FDVLX)
3. 30% VFINX, 30% FDVLX, 40% Aggregate Bond Fund (MUTF:VBMFX)
4. 30% VFINX, 30% FDVLX, 20% VBMFX, 20% Long Term Treasury Fund (MUTF:VUSTX)
5. 60% FDVLX 40% VUSTX
The first figure depicts the compound annual growth rate (Net CAGR) of the portfolio net of withdrawals computed for the period starting in the year of retirement thru 2014. Note that except for the VFINX, Net CAGR is always positive. Thus, although the VFINX portfolio would have sustained the withdrawal schedule, for retirement beginning in some of the years around 2000, the portfolio value at the end of 2014 would have been lower than its starting value. For every other portfolio, if the retirement commenced in any year starting in 19872014, at the end of 2014 the portfolio value would be higher than the starting value.
(click to enlarge)
In the following figure are shown the maximum excess (beginning of the year) drawdowns for various portfolios. This quantity is defined to be the difference between the initial starting value of the portfolio and its lowest value at the time of withdrawal in any of the subsequent years, less 4%, as at best 4% will be the drawdown of the portfolio at the beginning of retirement. Clearly the excess drawdowns of the all equity portfolios will be unacceptable for most retirees. However, for the 60/40 portfolios, the excess drawdowns appear to be a good measure of what can be expected from well constructed portfolios. (For example, the portfolio of JNJ, MCD, CL, KO and PG with the same withdrawal schedule would have had the maximum excess drawdown of about 24%, similar to the 20% for the 60/40 portfolios.). (click to enlarge).
I
A Five Fund Basket For The Long Haul
The yearly balanced equally weighted portfolio of four Fidelity funds and the long term treasury bond fund (FDFAX, FSCSX, FBIOX, FRESX and VUSTX/TLT) has yielded very good returns for the last twenty five years. The following figure compares its performance with that of VFINX/SPY and BRKA as well as with an annually rebalanced portfolio of the same five fund basket wherein the weights are determined on the basis of a modified version of risk parity. The figure displays the annualized CAGRs of the portfolios that were initially funded at the beginning any month during the period 1991todate, and held up to today. Clearly the fund based portfolios would have outperformed SPY independent of what month they were initially funded in. (By the way, this way of comparing past performance seems to be the best one, as it removes all doubt about the dependence of the returns on the starting date. Looking at the returns on the basis of just a handful of starting dates has led to a lot of unnecessary arguments on SA.)
(click to enlarge)
Obviously the future performance of the portfolio relative to SPY may be entirely different, but the results suggest that this basket may prove to be a good long term investment, a conclusion that is also supported by the various performance metrics shown below.
This is the allocation for the annually rebalanced portfolio according to a modified risk parity method for the current year 2015 (YTD return : 4.4%, 2014 return : 27.7%)
FBIOX 13.3%
FRESX 24.4%
TLT 43.8%
FDFAX 16.9%
FSCSX 1.6%