Full index of posts »
StockTalks

Allocation Or Stock Selection  An Example http://seekingalpha.com/p/1xfy7 Sep 7, 2014

Simple GMR $EEM, $IJJ, $ILF http://seekingalpha.com/p/1uu8b Jul 31, 2014

Naive Graham: Taming Leveraged Funds http://seekingalpha.com/p/1sgbh Jun 20, 2014
Latest Comments
 ls78 on Winning Buffett's Bet Good presentation. Thanks
 varan on Winning Buffett's Bet ls78yes. that is true. the differences are refl...
 Market Map on Winning Buffett's Bet Post 1989, Japan had excellent credit quality o...
 varan on Simple GMR By a mile. QQQ is the one.Thanks.
 ls78 on Simple GMR Looks like QQQ again.
 ls78 on Winning Buffett's Bet Varan it looks like a monthly rebalancing has h...
Most Commented
 Simple GMR ( Comments)
 A low drawdown strategy for sector rotation for Fidelity Select Funds ( Comments)
 Naive Graham: Passive Investing According To The Master ( Comments)
 Adaptive Asset Allocation For Lazy Portfolios ( Comments)
 Simple Monthly Strategy Based On Polygamous Paired Switching ( Comments)
Posts by Themes
60/40 Portfolio,
adaptive allocation,
Adaptive allocation,
Adaptive Allocation,
Adaptive Asset Allocation,
Adaptive asset allocation,
Adaptive Asset Allocation ,
Annually rebalanced portfolio,
annually updated portfolio of dividend growth stocks,
Asset allocation,
Asset Allocation,
Beating the market,
Buffett's Bet,
Closed End Funds,
Distribution Phase,
Dividend Growth Investing,
Dividend Growth stocks,
Dividend growth stocks,
Dividend growth stocks.,
Dividends,
ETF trading strategy,
Fidelity Select Funds,
Global Market Rotation Strategy simplified,
Hedged Portfolio,
Leveraged ETFs,
Leveraged Funds,
MLPs,
Modern Portfolio Theory,
modified risk parity,
Most diversified portfolio of some utility stocks,
Naive Graham asset allocation strategy,
permanent portfolio of dividend growth stocks,
PIMCO funds,
Portfolio Allocation,
Portfolio strategy,
Quarterly Rebalancing,
Quarterly rebalancing,
rebalancing,
Risk Parity,
Sector ETFs,
Sector Rotation,
Trading volitilty ETFs,
Withdrawal phase of retirement,
Workplace Retirement Plans,
zero annual drawdown portfolio
View varan's Instablogs on:
Winning Buffett's Bet
The following figure depicts the results of a calculation to show that, for any ten year period starting on the first trading day of any month since 1988, the annually rebalanced equal weight or risk parity portfolios of QLD and UBT would have yielded higher total return than SP500. The returns of QLD were calculated by using the daily returns of the Nasdaq 100 index (^NDX), and, likewise, the VUSTX data was used for the simulation of the UBT returns. Of these two, the risk parity portfolio is preferable as it reduces the maximum drawdown from 60% to 22%, though either would be sufficient for the purpose if the time horizon is ten years.
(click to enlarge)
JNJ Or Fidelity Health/Biotech Funds
The following figure shows a comparison of the CAGRs of Buy and Hold portfolios of (1) Fidelity health related funds: FSPHX, FBIOX and FPHAX and (2) JNJ.
For every month during the period of interest, with the assumption that the portfolio was initiated at the last trading day of the prior month, and held till the end of the period, the CAGR of the portfolio was computed.
The fund portfolio was rebalanced to be equal weight at the end of every year. For years prior to 2002 (the date of inception of FPHAX) only the other two funds were used.
From the figure it is clear that no matter which month the portfolios were initiated in, the CAGR of the funds portfolio was higher than that of JNJ, very often by significant amounts.
(click to enlarge)
Historical Performance Of Some Portfolios During The Withdrawal Phase
These are some results for the withdrawal phase for retirees who commenced their retirement in any year since 1987 thru 2014 with the following withdrawal schedule:
1. Withdraw 4% of the portfolio value on January 1 of the year of retirement.
2. In subsequent years, at the beginning of the year, prior to rebalancing the portfolio if necessary, withdraw the previous year's withdrawal amount incremented by the previous year's inflation rate.
The portfolios considered are:
1. SP500 with dividends (MUTF:VFINX).
2. Mid cap value (MUTF:FDVLX)
3. 30% VFINX, 30% FDVLX, 40% Aggregate Bond Fund (MUTF:VBMFX)
4. 30% VFINX, 30% FDVLX, 20% VBMFX, 20% Long Term Treasury Fund (MUTF:VUSTX)
5. 60% FDVLX 40% VUSTX
The first figure depicts the compound annual growth rate (Net CAGR) of the portfolio net of withdrawals computed for the period starting in the year of retirement thru 2014. Note that except for the VFINX, Net CAGR is always positive. Thus, although the VFINX portfolio would have sustained the withdrawal schedule, for retirement beginning in some of the years around 2000, the portfolio value at the end of 2014 would have been lower than its starting value. For every other portfolio, if the retirement commenced in any year starting in 19872014, at the end of 2014 the portfolio value would be higher than the starting value.
(click to enlarge)
In the following figure are shown the maximum excess (beginning of the year) drawdowns for various portfolios. This quantity is defined to be the difference between the initial starting value of the portfolio and its lowest value at the time of withdrawal in any of the subsequent years, less 4%, as at best 4% will be the drawdown of the portfolio at the beginning of retirement. Clearly the excess drawdowns of the all equity portfolios will be unacceptable for most retirees. However, for the 60/40 portfolios, the excess drawdowns appear to be a good measure of what can be expected from well constructed portfolios. (For example, the portfolio of JNJ, MCD, CL, KO and PG with the same withdrawal schedule would have had the maximum excess drawdown of about 24%, similar to the 20% for the 60/40 portfolios.). (click to enlarge).
I