<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>crljacobi's Instablog</title>
    <description></description>
    <author>
      <name>crljacobi</name>
    </author>
    <link>http://seekingalpha.com</link>
    <item>
      <title>Q4 estimates for Bronco Drill (BRNC)</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/instablog/712438-crljacobi/129133-q4-estimates-for-bronco-drill-brnc?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">129133</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[BRNC will likely report 4th quarter and full year 2010 results in early March. &nbsp;Below are a few back-of-the-envelope estimates of the Q4 numbers. &nbsp;<br> <br> First, a word of caution. &nbsp;Besides the revenue numbers--which are reported monthly and derived from documents already filed with theSEC --this is speculation. &nbsp;You shouldn't make investing decisions based on what you read on the internet or based on anticipation of one quarter of decent results. &nbsp;<br> <br> That said, here goes:<br> <br> Revenue should be around $37.5 million, based on reported utilization rates, number of rigs operating, and revenue day rates.<br> By that measure, Bronco is improving. &nbsp;Revenues in Q3 were 34.8 million.<br> There aren't any assumptions baked into that estimate, it is straight from their reports. &nbsp;<br> <br> Here's where it gets speculative. &nbsp;A wage increase of $320/day was instituted in October. &nbsp;IF (a Big IF) it began at the beginning of the month, costs increased about 700,000. &nbsp;And where do they put that cost? &nbsp;Since I didn't want to spend a half an hour finding out (laziness), it'll just get added in at the end. &nbsp;<br> <br> Next, owned rigs declined from 34 to 24. &nbsp;Let's assume that rig depreciation is most of the depreciation charge. &nbsp;When were these rigs categorized as held for sale? &nbsp;I don't know. &nbsp;It matters a lot when trying to figure out depreciation. &nbsp;I'll assume that all 34 were fully depreciated all throughout Q3. &nbsp;34 down to 24 is a 30% decrease. &nbsp;Take 30% off of the Q3 depreciation and amortization number--7.1 million--and you get about 5 million. &nbsp;So let's say D&amp;A for Q4 will be closer to 5 million than 7 million. &nbsp;Great!<br> <br> I haven't heard of any cost reduction programs this quarter, let's assume that General and Administrative costs hold mostly steady at 3.7 million. &nbsp;And let's keep Contract Drilling costs the same at 24.6 million. &nbsp;<br> <br> Assume zero impairments, though there may be a small charge. &nbsp;I haven't heard of anything this quarter so I'm assuming zero.<br> <br> Hold interest expense and interest income roughly the same. &nbsp;1 million and 121,000, respectively. &nbsp;Remember that the company expects to be debt free by the end of the year, so interest charge should be zero going forward, or very very close. &nbsp;&nbsp;<br> <br> All that seems pretty good. &nbsp;The trouble is the &quot;change in fair value of warrant&quot; charge. &nbsp;It will be painful. &nbsp;The more Bronco's share price increases, the more valuable the warrant is to the holder, and the more costly it is to Bronco. &nbsp;Bronco is up 101.51% from October 1, 2010 to December 31st, 2010. &nbsp;Also note that the warrants are now in the money. &nbsp;Ouch. &nbsp; &nbsp;<br> <br> In summary:<br> (in millions)<br> 37.5 &nbsp;Contract Drilling Revenues<br> -25.3 Contract Drilling Expenses<br> -5 (ish) Depreciation and Amortization<br> -3.7 General and Administrative<br> -0 Loss on Bronco MX transaction<br> -0 Impairments<br> -0 Loss on sale of assets<br> -1 Interest Expense<br> +121k Interest Income<br>-700k The wage increase<br> ____________<br> <br> = +1.921 ($1,921,000)<br> <br> Expect further losses on the Libya and MX equity partnerships, and a loss on the warrants. &nbsp;I think I heard that the MX partnership is improving, and the Libya partnership should be bottoming out soon. &nbsp;But&nbsp;I can't predict the amounts of those charges. &nbsp;Who knows?<br> <br>Bronco may squeak by with a (very)&nbsp;small profit. &nbsp;Also, I am slightly worried that my Depreciation and Amortization estimate is too low. &nbsp;If I'm wrong, I'd hope it's at least below 6 million. &nbsp;Still, things are getting much better and there is lots of reason for optimism in Q1 and Q2 of 2011. &nbsp;<br> <br>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sun, 16 Jan 2011 23:46:44 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[BRNC will likely report 4th quarter and full year 2010 results in early March. &nbsp;Below are a few back-of-the-envelope estimates of the Q4 numbers. &nbsp;<br> <br> First, a word of caution. &nbsp;Besides the revenue numbers--which are reported monthly and derived from documents already filed with theSEC --this is speculation. &nbsp;You shouldn't make investing decisions based on what you read on the internet or based on anticipation of one quarter of decent results. &nbsp;<br> <br> That said, here goes:<br> <br> Revenue should be around $37.5 million, based on reported utilization rates, number of rigs operating, and revenue day rates.<br> By that measure, Bronco is improving. &nbsp;Revenues in Q3 were 34.8 million.<br> There aren't any assumptions baked into that estimate, it is straight from their reports. &nbsp;<br> <br> Here's where it gets speculative. &nbsp;A wage increase of $320/day was instituted in October. &nbsp;IF (a Big IF) it began at the beginning of the month, costs increased about 700,000. &nbsp;And where do they put that cost? &nbsp;Since I didn't want to spend a half an hour finding out (laziness), it'll just get added in at the end. &nbsp;<br> <br> Next, owned rigs declined from 34 to 24. &nbsp;Let's assume that rig depreciation is most of the depreciation charge. &nbsp;When were these rigs categorized as held for sale? &nbsp;I don't know. &nbsp;It matters a lot when trying to figure out depreciation. &nbsp;I'll assume that all 34 were fully depreciated all throughout Q3. &nbsp;34 down to 24 is a 30% decrease. &nbsp;Take 30% off of the Q3 depreciation and amortization number--7.1 million--and you get about 5 million. &nbsp;So let's say D&amp;A for Q4 will be closer to 5 million than 7 million. &nbsp;Great!<br> <br> I haven't heard of any cost reduction programs this quarter, let's assume that General and Administrative costs hold mostly steady at 3.7 million. &nbsp;And let's keep Contract Drilling costs the same at 24.6 million. &nbsp;<br> <br> Assume zero impairments, though there may be a small charge. &nbsp;I haven't heard of anything this quarter so I'm assuming zero.<br> <br> Hold interest expense and interest income roughly the same. &nbsp;1 million and 121,000, respectively. &nbsp;Remember that the company expects to be debt free by the end of the year, so interest charge should be zero going forward, or very very close. &nbsp;&nbsp;<br> <br> All that seems pretty good. &nbsp;The trouble is the &quot;change in fair value of warrant&quot; charge. &nbsp;It will be painful. &nbsp;The more Bronco's share price increases, the more valuable the warrant is to the holder, and the more costly it is to Bronco. &nbsp;Bronco is up 101.51% from October 1, 2010 to December 31st, 2010. &nbsp;Also note that the warrants are now in the money. &nbsp;Ouch. &nbsp; &nbsp;<br> <br> In summary:<br> (in millions)<br> 37.5 &nbsp;Contract Drilling Revenues<br> -25.3 Contract Drilling Expenses<br> -5 (ish) Depreciation and Amortization<br> -3.7 General and Administrative<br> -0 Loss on Bronco MX transaction<br> -0 Impairments<br> -0 Loss on sale of assets<br> -1 Interest Expense<br> +121k Interest Income<br>-700k The wage increase<br> ____________<br> <br> = +1.921 ($1,921,000)<br> <br> Expect further losses on the Libya and MX equity partnerships, and a loss on the warrants. &nbsp;I think I heard that the MX partnership is improving, and the Libya partnership should be bottoming out soon. &nbsp;But&nbsp;I can't predict the amounts of those charges. &nbsp;Who knows?<br> <br>Bronco may squeak by with a (very)&nbsp;small profit. &nbsp;Also, I am slightly worried that my Depreciation and Amortization estimate is too low. &nbsp;If I'm wrong, I'd hope it's at least below 6 million. &nbsp;Still, things are getting much better and there is lots of reason for optimism in Q1 and Q2 of 2011. &nbsp;<br> <br>]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/brnc/instablogs">brnc</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Bronco Drilling</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/instablog/712438-crljacobi/88998-bronco-drilling?source=feed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">88998</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<span>Bronco Drilling is financially sound and cheap--very cheap. &nbsp;I think the stock could double or triple from here. &nbsp;Ben Graham would say that the stock is worth book value, or around $12.36 per share. &nbsp;A potential doubling or tripling of investment dollars does not come without risks. &nbsp;</span> <div><span><br>The problem with Bronco is that it is currently unprofitable, and may be unprofitable for awhile longer, as its industry heals. &nbsp;So an investment in Bronco is a bet that it is worth more and that it will be able to survive long enough to return to profitability. &nbsp;</span><br> <span><br>On the product differentiation scale, drilling leans towards the low end. &nbsp;&nbsp;That is, drilling is an undifferentiated, commodity-type service. &nbsp;Which means that Bronco can&rsquo;t specialize and raise prices. &nbsp;Which means that supply and demand is going to determine how many of their rigs are put to use, and at what profit margin. &nbsp;In that case, we have good news. &nbsp;Drilling is on a cyclical upswing--analysts estimate that industry-wide utilization rates are between 50% and 65%. &nbsp;And Baker Hughes has reported increases in operating rigs every week for the past few months. &nbsp;Note that pricing power returns to drillers at around 80% aggregate utilization. &nbsp;</span><br> <span><br>Since oil and gas prices will increase over the medium- to long-term, and lending conditions are easing, it&rsquo;s only a matter of time before 80% of rigs are drilling. &nbsp;It may take a year or two--who knows when--but it will happen. &nbsp;Eventually. &nbsp;And when it does, Bronco will surely be profitable. &nbsp;</span><br> <span><br>So they will be profitable some day--assuming they can survive long enough. &nbsp;In that area, there&rsquo;s more good news. &nbsp;Management says that it is prudent to take the company through an extended period of deleveraging. &nbsp;They expect to finish paying down debt and start spending on expansion by the end of this year. &nbsp;As my old finance professors used to say, &nbsp;&ldquo;Low debt allows management to salvage even the most mediocre companies.&rdquo; &nbsp;That is, leaving aside judgements of Bronco&rsquo;s quality, their low levels of debt provide them ample time to fix what needs to be fixed, and wait on the industry to heal. &nbsp;</span><br> <p><span>Also, they have positive operating cash flow, and steadily increasing utilization rates. &nbsp;They&rsquo;ll survive to see profitability.</span></p> <span>Bronco is cheap, sound, and poised to pop.</span></div> <br> <br> <strong>Disclosure: </strong>Long 37,000 shares of BRNC.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sat, 21 Aug 2010 23:10:05 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<span>Bronco Drilling is financially sound and cheap--very cheap. &nbsp;I think the stock could double or triple from here. &nbsp;Ben Graham would say that the stock is worth book value, or around $12.36 per share. &nbsp;A potential doubling or tripling of investment dollars does not come without risks. &nbsp;</span> <div><span><br>The problem with Bronco is that it is currently unprofitable, and may be unprofitable for awhile longer, as its industry heals. &nbsp;So an investment in Bronco is a bet that it is worth more and that it will be able to survive long enough to return to profitability. &nbsp;</span><br> <span><br>On the product differentiation scale, drilling leans towards the low end. &nbsp;&nbsp;That is, drilling is an undifferentiated, commodity-type service. &nbsp;Which means that Bronco can&rsquo;t specialize and raise prices. &nbsp;Which means that supply and demand is going to determine how many of their rigs are put to use, and at what profit margin. &nbsp;In that case, we have good news. &nbsp;Drilling is on a cyclical upswing--analysts estimate that industry-wide utilization rates are between 50% and 65%. &nbsp;And Baker Hughes has reported increases in operating rigs every week for the past few months. &nbsp;Note that pricing power returns to drillers at around 80% aggregate utilization. &nbsp;</span><br> <span><br>Since oil and gas prices will increase over the medium- to long-term, and lending conditions are easing, it&rsquo;s only a matter of time before 80% of rigs are drilling. &nbsp;It may take a year or two--who knows when--but it will happen. &nbsp;Eventually. &nbsp;And when it does, Bronco will surely be profitable. &nbsp;</span><br> <span><br>So they will be profitable some day--assuming they can survive long enough. &nbsp;In that area, there&rsquo;s more good news. &nbsp;Management says that it is prudent to take the company through an extended period of deleveraging. &nbsp;They expect to finish paying down debt and start spending on expansion by the end of this year. &nbsp;As my old finance professors used to say, &nbsp;&ldquo;Low debt allows management to salvage even the most mediocre companies.&rdquo; &nbsp;That is, leaving aside judgements of Bronco&rsquo;s quality, their low levels of debt provide them ample time to fix what needs to be fixed, and wait on the industry to heal. &nbsp;</span><br> <p><span>Also, they have positive operating cash flow, and steadily increasing utilization rates. &nbsp;They&rsquo;ll survive to see profitability.</span></p> <span>Bronco is cheap, sound, and poised to pop.</span></div> <br> <br> <strong>Disclosure: </strong>Long 37,000 shares of BRNC.]]>
      </description>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/brnc/instablogs">brnc</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/instablog/tag/Long Value">Long Value</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/instablog/tag/Ben Graham">Ben Graham</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/instablog/tag/Warren Buffett">Warren Buffett</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/instablog/tag/Walter Schloss">Walter Schloss</category>
      <category type="symbol" link="http://seekingalpha.com/instablog/tag/Drilling">Drilling</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
