<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>J. M. Manness's Comments</title>
    <description>J. M. Manness's Comments RSS Syndication from SeekingAlpha.com</description>
    <link>http://seekingalpha.com/user/72017/comments</link>
    <item>
      <title>Best Windows Laptop? MacBook Pro!</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1379281/comments?source=feed#comment-18211661</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18211661</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Well said.<br/><br/>Some people want to tinker with a dune buggy. Others just want to drive from here to there reliably. Nothing wrong with the first, but neither with the second.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2013 01:57:12 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Well said.<br/><br/>Some people want to tinker with a dune buggy. Others just want to drive from here to there reliably. Nothing wrong with the first, but neither with the second.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Valuing A Triumphant BlackBerry</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1379261/comments?source=feed#comment-18204191</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18204191</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Mondego,<br/><br/>&quot;...if Lazaridis had a little more foresight.&quot;<br/><br/>I agree with you completely. I examined the one main reason for BB's fall here:<br/><a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://bit.ly/QzAsG4'>http://bit.ly/QzAsG4</a>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sun, 28 Apr 2013 20:18:50 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Mondego,<br/><br/>&quot;...if Lazaridis had a little more foresight.&quot;<br/><br/>I agree with you completely. I examined the one main reason for BB's fall here:<br/><a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://bit.ly/QzAsG4'>http://bit.ly/QzAsG4</a>]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Valuing A Triumphant BlackBerry</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1379261/comments?source=feed#comment-18202161</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18202161</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Black Spruce.<br/><br/>Good article. A lot of &quot;ifs&quot; in there, but if the future where known then investing would be boring! :-)<br/><br/>Good luck to all you BB fans. <br/><br/>---<br/>Some months ago I wrote:<br/>Does BB have a chance to come back?<br/><a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://seekingalpha.com/a/oku7'>http://seekingalpha.co...</a>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sun, 28 Apr 2013 18:34:01 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Black Spruce.<br/><br/>Good article. A lot of &quot;ifs&quot; in there, but if the future where known then investing would be boring! :-)<br/><br/>Good luck to all you BB fans. <br/><br/>---<br/>Some months ago I wrote:<br/>Does BB have a chance to come back?<br/><a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://seekingalpha.com/a/oku7'>http://seekingalpha.co...</a>]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Best Windows Laptop? MacBook Pro!</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1379281/comments?source=feed#comment-18197191</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18197191</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[@imc<br/>Thanks for the input! ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sun, 28 Apr 2013 14:56:22 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[@imc<br/>Thanks for the input! ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Android Dead? - Part 10: Google Introduces Its Own Walled-Garden</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1338021/comments?source=feed#comment-17771981</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">17771981</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[privacy breach - follow the link in the article:<br/><a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://seekingalpha.com/a/sly3'>http://seekingalpha.co...</a><br/><br/>&quot;Google always has eliminated apps that break the term of services&quot; That is all that Apple does. As I said of the latest Google purge - 60,000 is a lot of apps.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2013 01:26:50 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[privacy breach - follow the link in the article:<br/><a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://seekingalpha.com/a/sly3'>http://seekingalpha.co...</a><br/><br/>&quot;Google always has eliminated apps that break the term of services&quot; That is all that Apple does. As I said of the latest Google purge - 60,000 is a lot of apps.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Android Dead? - Part 10: Google Introduces Its Own Walled-Garden</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1338021/comments?source=feed#comment-17593611</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">17593611</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[&quot;Make your own investment decisions thoughtfully. Don't fall in love with companies or their stocks. Do understand the business drivers, business model, and the expectation and ownership structure of the shares in the marketplace. Don't trust the opinions of others.&quot;<br/><br/>I agree completely.<br/><br/>I do present various points. Whether I am biased or not should not be the issue, but rather whether the points make any sense or not. (I admit from the get go that I am an Apple fan, but I have also criticized Apple at times as well.)<br/><br/>-<br/>I should note, that never did I say - in the first article or any other - that Apple was a better investment than Google. In this series I merely make some points as to potential areas of concern to Android users/investors. It is for the reader to read, judge if the arguments have any validity, and then decide for him- or herself what affect this will have on the future.<br/><br/>-<br/>Thank you for your comments.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sun, 14 Apr 2013 02:32:02 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[&quot;Make your own investment decisions thoughtfully. Don't fall in love with companies or their stocks. Do understand the business drivers, business model, and the expectation and ownership structure of the shares in the marketplace. Don't trust the opinions of others.&quot;<br/><br/>I agree completely.<br/><br/>I do present various points. Whether I am biased or not should not be the issue, but rather whether the points make any sense or not. (I admit from the get go that I am an Apple fan, but I have also criticized Apple at times as well.)<br/><br/>-<br/>I should note, that never did I say - in the first article or any other - that Apple was a better investment than Google. In this series I merely make some points as to potential areas of concern to Android users/investors. It is for the reader to read, judge if the arguments have any validity, and then decide for him- or herself what affect this will have on the future.<br/><br/>-<br/>Thank you for your comments.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Android Dead? - Part 9: Is Google 'Nefarious'?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1334811/comments?source=feed#comment-17555011</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">17555011</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[@Oletos - Thanks!]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2013 15:09:44 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[@Oletos - Thanks!]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Android Dead? - Part 9: Is Google 'Nefarious'?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1334811/comments?source=feed#comment-17554911</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">17554911</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[not true]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2013 15:08:46 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[not true]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Android Is Dead, Part 3: The Numbers</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1075001/comments?source=feed#comment-17137221</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">17137221</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Agree, I am disappointed in the level of dis-functionality of the ATV Remote app. All you get is a keyboard - and sometimes not even that!]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2013 19:35:53 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Agree, I am disappointed in the level of dis-functionality of the ATV Remote app. All you get is a keyboard - and sometimes not even that!]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Android Is Dead, Part 3: The Numbers</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1075001/comments?source=feed#comment-17137181</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">17137181</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I just got a ATV. Chase - you do have a point that the interface is pretty bad. It's a great example of how a good thing taken to an extreme can be awful. Simplicity taken too far makes the interface very annoying. <br/><br/>For example, To run a film in netflix you have to go down about six levels. To get back out you have to retrace the six levels. Then, if you want to return to your movie, you go through the whole bloody thing again.<br/><br/>That said, however.... I do really like it and have no intention of returning it. ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2013 19:34:24 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I just got a ATV. Chase - you do have a point that the interface is pretty bad. It's a great example of how a good thing taken to an extreme can be awful. Simplicity taken too far makes the interface very annoying. <br/><br/>For example, To run a film in netflix you have to go down about six levels. To get back out you have to retrace the six levels. Then, if you want to return to your movie, you go through the whole bloody thing again.<br/><br/>That said, however.... I do really like it and have no intention of returning it. ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Android Is Dead - Part 8: The S4 Fights Back - BUT...</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1309501/comments?source=feed#comment-17071941</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">17071941</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[@dnp<br/>&quot;There is a single Android and there is a single LInux, so I am missing your point.&quot;<br/><br/>There is NOT one single Android. Aside from the different versions of Android, whole point of Android was that OEMs could modify it, and they have to one degree or another.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2013 11:51:21 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[@dnp<br/>&quot;There is a single Android and there is a single LInux, so I am missing your point.&quot;<br/><br/>There is NOT one single Android. Aside from the different versions of Android, whole point of Android was that OEMs could modify it, and they have to one degree or another.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Android Is Dead - Part 8: The S4 Fights Back - BUT...</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1309501/comments?source=feed#comment-17043561</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">17043561</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[@dnpvd51 - you say:<br/>&quot;I am missing the downside of modifiability.&quot;<br/><br/>I am not trying to justify MS or anyone else - just relate the issues involved.<br/><br/>The downside of Android being modifiable by the different OEMs is that there is no longer one single Android for developers who need to deal with a fragmented platform. This is a problem that many have noted.<br/><br/>A related problem is the fact that many devices are not compatible with newer versions of Android. The iOS family, however, usually maintains compatibility of new versions of iOS going back with devices that go back at least three years. That is, you can be sure that a new iPhone will be upgradable for at least 2 or 3 years. (Obviously features that require new hardware will not work, but core upgrades and most features will.)<br/><br/>Regards - JMM]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sun, 31 Mar 2013 18:39:16 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[@dnpvd51 - you say:<br/>&quot;I am missing the downside of modifiability.&quot;<br/><br/>I am not trying to justify MS or anyone else - just relate the issues involved.<br/><br/>The downside of Android being modifiable by the different OEMs is that there is no longer one single Android for developers who need to deal with a fragmented platform. This is a problem that many have noted.<br/><br/>A related problem is the fact that many devices are not compatible with newer versions of Android. The iOS family, however, usually maintains compatibility of new versions of iOS going back with devices that go back at least three years. That is, you can be sure that a new iPhone will be upgradable for at least 2 or 3 years. (Obviously features that require new hardware will not work, but core upgrades and most features will.)<br/><br/>Regards - JMM]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Android Is Dead - Part 8: The S4 Fights Back - BUT...</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1309501/comments?source=feed#comment-17041101</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">17041101</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[&quot;What customers want will make the difference, and there is a strong move away from proprietary OS towards transparency and licensing free.&quot;<br/><br/>I really don't think that very many customers give a hoot about &quot;OS transparency and licensing free.&quot; Only a bunch of techies and pseudo-techies really care. Otherwise Linux would dominate the desktop.<br/><br/>Android has moved to the position it has in part because there are dozens of OEMs making phones, and many of these are cheaper than iPhones. They are also on more carriers. Very very few people have real ideological preferences here.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sun, 31 Mar 2013 16:35:52 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[&quot;What customers want will make the difference, and there is a strong move away from proprietary OS towards transparency and licensing free.&quot;<br/><br/>I really don't think that very many customers give a hoot about &quot;OS transparency and licensing free.&quot; Only a bunch of techies and pseudo-techies really care. Otherwise Linux would dominate the desktop.<br/><br/>Android has moved to the position it has in part because there are dozens of OEMs making phones, and many of these are cheaper than iPhones. They are also on more carriers. Very very few people have real ideological preferences here.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Android Is Dead - Part 8: The S4 Fights Back - BUT...</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1309501/comments?source=feed#comment-17040951</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">17040951</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[All choices are trade off. The modifiability is a two-edged sword.<br/><br/>It may be a feature, but it does have negative repercussions. ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sun, 31 Mar 2013 16:22:45 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[All choices are trade off. The modifiability is a two-edged sword.<br/><br/>It may be a feature, but it does have negative repercussions. ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Android Is Dead - Part 8: The S4 Fights Back - BUT...</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1309501/comments?source=feed#comment-17029351</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">17029351</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Amazon also modifies Android.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sun, 31 Mar 2013 06:43:56 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Amazon also modifies Android.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Android Is Dead - Part 8: The S4 Fights Back - BUT...</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1309501/comments?source=feed#comment-17005501</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">17005501</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[@DS<br/><br/>You make some good points but I do think you miss on ecosystem.<br/><br/>Since it is so easy to pirate apps in Android, AND Android users do not like to pay for apps, most apps earn money by advertising. Since this is so, the users have very little invested in the ecosystem. They can easily switch to another platform and not loose very much. <br/><br/>As for music, books, etc. - these are pretty much platform independent. ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sat, 30 Mar 2013 01:44:59 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[@DS<br/><br/>You make some good points but I do think you miss on ecosystem.<br/><br/>Since it is so easy to pirate apps in Android, AND Android users do not like to pay for apps, most apps earn money by advertising. Since this is so, the users have very little invested in the ecosystem. They can easily switch to another platform and not loose very much. <br/><br/>As for music, books, etc. - these are pretty much platform independent. ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Android Is Dead - Part 8: The S4 Fights Back - BUT...</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1309501/comments?source=feed#comment-17003521</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">17003521</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[&quot;But I am very sure they are going lose their market share to BB not to windows mobile.&quot;<br/><br/>And why do you say that??]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Mar 2013 23:02:59 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[&quot;But I am very sure they are going lose their market share to BB not to windows mobile.&quot;<br/><br/>And why do you say that??]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Android Is Dead - Part 8: The S4 Fights Back - BUT...</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1309501/comments?source=feed#comment-17003401</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">17003401</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Please see my next post in the series. It should be interesting, but it will take me several days to research.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Mar 2013 22:47:56 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Please see my next post in the series. It should be interesting, but it will take me several days to research.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Android Is Dead - Part 8: The S4 Fights Back - BUT...</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1309501/comments?source=feed#comment-17003361</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">17003361</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[&quot;is the #1 mobile operating system on the planet today, and will most likely remain in that top spot for many years to come.&quot;<br/><br/>Exactly what they said of BB and Symbian..]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Mar 2013 22:45:22 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[&quot;is the #1 mobile operating system on the planet today, and will most likely remain in that top spot for many years to come.&quot;<br/><br/>Exactly what they said of BB and Symbian..]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Android Is Dead - Part 8: The S4 Fights Back - BUT...</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1309501/comments?source=feed#comment-17003341</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">17003341</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Good question. <br/><br/>I should really write a post on that topic. It is pretty complex issue. <br/><br/>Please hold my feet to the fire on this one if I do not reply in the next 2-3 weeks.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Mar 2013 22:43:52 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Good question. <br/><br/>I should really write a post on that topic. It is pretty complex issue. <br/><br/>Please hold my feet to the fire on this one if I do not reply in the next 2-3 weeks.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Major U.K. Outlets Hike BlackBerry Z10 Price Above iPhone 5, Black Market Thriving</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1210621/comments?source=feed#comment-15358131</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">15358131</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Agreed - excellent post. Thanks.<br/><br/>There has also been a lot of downtalking on Apple recently. I adress some of that here:<br/><a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://bit.ly/VAxMKU'>http://bit.ly/VAxMKU</a>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2013 07:37:51 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Agreed - excellent post. Thanks.<br/><br/>There has also been a lot of downtalking on Apple recently. I adress some of that here:<br/><a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://bit.ly/VAxMKU'>http://bit.ly/VAxMKU</a>]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>News That Wasn't News: Samsung's Enterprise Move Against BlackBerry</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1201861/comments?source=feed#comment-15192091</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">15192091</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Re security and Android, you may want to see my post<br/>Android is Dead Part 1:<br/><a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://seekingalpha.com/a/llpt'>http://seekingalpha.co...</a>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2013 07:19:39 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Re security and Android, you may want to see my post<br/>Android is Dead Part 1:<br/><a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://seekingalpha.com/a/llpt'>http://seekingalpha.co...</a>]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Analysis: Does BlackBerry Have A Chance To Come Back?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1146751/comments?source=feed#comment-14481291</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">14481291</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[&quot; If so, that is all you need to know. It's clearly the superior OS hands down FACT.&quot;<br/><br/>There are no facts such as this in the design world - there are only trade-offs. <br/><br/>iOS provides services and security that is adequate for even military needs. The iPhone 5 is (arguably) the fastest performing smartphone (pending tests with Z10!!!) It is lighter than any of its major competitors yet offers competing battery life. I fail to see where BB is &quot;clearly superior.&quot; This is a matter of opinion, not 'hands down fact.&quot;]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2013 10:23:41 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[&quot; If so, that is all you need to know. It's clearly the superior OS hands down FACT.&quot;<br/><br/>There are no facts such as this in the design world - there are only trade-offs. <br/><br/>iOS provides services and security that is adequate for even military needs. The iPhone 5 is (arguably) the fastest performing smartphone (pending tests with Z10!!!) It is lighter than any of its major competitors yet offers competing battery life. I fail to see where BB is &quot;clearly superior.&quot; This is a matter of opinion, not 'hands down fact.&quot;]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Analysis: Does BlackBerry Have A Chance To Come Back?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1146751/comments?source=feed#comment-14460041</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">14460041</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[&quot;iOS is derived from OS X, with which it shares the Darwin foundation.&quot;<br/><a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://bit.ly/Tzfrgk'>http://bit.ly/Tzfrgk</a><br/>----<br/><br/>&quot;Darwin is an open source POSIX-compliant computer operating system released by Apple Inc. in 2000. It is composed of code developed by Apple, as well as code derived from NeXTSTEP, BSD, and other free software projects.&quot;<br/><br/><br/>&quot;Darwin is built around XNU, a hybrid kernel that combines the Mach 3 microkernel, various elements of BSD (including the process model, network stack, and virtual file system),[5] and an object-oriented device driver API called I/O Kit.[6] The hybrid kernel design compromises between the flexibility of a microkernel and the performance of a monolithic kernel.&quot;<br/><a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://bit.ly/Kr0apX'>http://bit.ly/Kr0apX</a>)]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2013 15:02:06 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[&quot;iOS is derived from OS X, with which it shares the Darwin foundation.&quot;<br/><a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://bit.ly/Tzfrgk'>http://bit.ly/Tzfrgk</a><br/>----<br/><br/>&quot;Darwin is an open source POSIX-compliant computer operating system released by Apple Inc. in 2000. It is composed of code developed by Apple, as well as code derived from NeXTSTEP, BSD, and other free software projects.&quot;<br/><br/><br/>&quot;Darwin is built around XNU, a hybrid kernel that combines the Mach 3 microkernel, various elements of BSD (including the process model, network stack, and virtual file system),[5] and an object-oriented device driver API called I/O Kit.[6] The hybrid kernel design compromises between the flexibility of a microkernel and the performance of a monolithic kernel.&quot;<br/><a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://bit.ly/Kr0apX'>http://bit.ly/Kr0apX</a>)]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Analysis: Does BlackBerry Have A Chance To Come Back?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1146751/comments?source=feed#comment-14459541</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">14459541</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Ryche<br/><br/>LOL - <br/><br/>good point.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2013 14:50:02 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Ryche<br/><br/>LOL - <br/><br/>good point.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Analysis: Does BlackBerry Have A Chance To Come Back?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1146751/comments?source=feed#comment-14459391</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">14459391</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Please provide links to definitions of :<br/>1- live/real time<br/>2- bridge gaps<br/>3- switch overs<br/><br/>TY]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2013 14:47:47 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Please provide links to definitions of :<br/>1- live/real time<br/>2- bridge gaps<br/>3- switch overs<br/><br/>TY]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Analysis: Does BlackBerry Have A Chance To Come Back?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1146751/comments?source=feed#comment-14446021</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">14446021</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[PS - Please let us know how you like the BB10 when you get it.<br/><br/>Enjoy!]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2013 09:48:24 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[PS - Please let us know how you like the BB10 when you get it.<br/><br/>Enjoy!]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Analysis: Does BlackBerry Have A Chance To Come Back?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1146751/comments?source=feed#comment-14445991</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">14445991</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[santorama<br/><br/>Thanks for the excellent comment.<br/><br/>I agree with you that BB10 offers some great features, many of them quite innovative. I agree that BB has learned from their mistakes. (You may like my post here: <a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://bit.ly/QzAsG4'>http://bit.ly/QzAsG4</a> )<br/><br/>I think that they are working very hard to put out a great product, and here I argue that people should NOT count them out.<br/><br/>The only thing I would possibly disagree with you on is &quot;Security UNMATCHED&quot; by others. What I have seen is that iOS has also seen acceptance in pretty much all the areas you list. So, while no other system may be superior to BB10, I am not sure that it is particularly superior to iOS either. <br/><br/>We will let the security specialists thrash this one out!! :-)<br/><br/>Regards.<br/><br/>JMM]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2013 09:47:07 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[santorama<br/><br/>Thanks for the excellent comment.<br/><br/>I agree with you that BB10 offers some great features, many of them quite innovative. I agree that BB has learned from their mistakes. (You may like my post here: <a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://bit.ly/QzAsG4'>http://bit.ly/QzAsG4</a> )<br/><br/>I think that they are working very hard to put out a great product, and here I argue that people should NOT count them out.<br/><br/>The only thing I would possibly disagree with you on is &quot;Security UNMATCHED&quot; by others. What I have seen is that iOS has also seen acceptance in pretty much all the areas you list. So, while no other system may be superior to BB10, I am not sure that it is particularly superior to iOS either. <br/><br/>We will let the security specialists thrash this one out!! :-)<br/><br/>Regards.<br/><br/>JMM]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Analysis: Does BlackBerry Have A Chance To Come Back?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1146751/comments?source=feed#comment-14442731</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">14442731</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Send me one - I will evaluate it.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2013 08:14:05 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Send me one - I will evaluate it.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Analysis: Does BlackBerry Have A Chance To Come Back?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1146751/comments?source=feed#comment-14442601</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">14442601</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[iOS based on POSIX open source BSD UNIX.<br/><br/>Apps keep running in the background if they need to. If they do not need to, then they do not request that level. Why does a notes program need to be continually eating cpu cycles when it is in the background? <br/><br/>Even a message app can go to sleep if the notifications system will wake it. It does not need to poll continuously.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2013 08:11:36 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[iOS based on POSIX open source BSD UNIX.<br/><br/>Apps keep running in the background if they need to. If they do not need to, then they do not request that level. Why does a notes program need to be continually eating cpu cycles when it is in the background? <br/><br/>Even a message app can go to sleep if the notifications system will wake it. It does not need to poll continuously.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
