<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>Charles Moscoe's Comments</title>
    <description>Charles Moscoe's Comments RSS Syndication from SeekingAlpha.com</description>
    <link>http://seekingalpha.com/user/728107/comments</link>
    <item>
      <title>OCZ: Bankruptcy Within 6 Months?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1332211/comments?source=feed#comment-17623951</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">17623951</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I will go on record saying that I believe your article was responsible for the panic sell from $1.65 to $1.22. The stock was stable up until the release and then it just fell off a cliff a few minutes later, with no other news or information released that day. In fact it acted relatively well the day prior, showing some signs of recovery due to the delayed earnings. I probably should have shorted it as I got an alert and when I saw the word 'bankruptcy', I knew this already shaky stock could easily plunge. I don't generally trade penny stocks however, when I buy its for medium-long term, so I didn't make a play. I would also say that the vast majority of Seeking Alpha articles have zero effect on any stock price, but some short focused articles can move stocks downwards, especially volatile stocks like OCZ coming off that announcement. I think you intentionally used 'bankruptcy' in the subject title in order to get maximum shock effect and it worked.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Apr 2013 00:48:58 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I will go on record saying that I believe your article was responsible for the panic sell from $1.65 to $1.22. The stock was stable up until the release and then it just fell off a cliff a few minutes later, with no other news or information released that day. In fact it acted relatively well the day prior, showing some signs of recovery due to the delayed earnings. I probably should have shorted it as I got an alert and when I saw the word 'bankruptcy', I knew this already shaky stock could easily plunge. I don't generally trade penny stocks however, when I buy its for medium-long term, so I didn't make a play. I would also say that the vast majority of Seeking Alpha articles have zero effect on any stock price, but some short focused articles can move stocks downwards, especially volatile stocks like OCZ coming off that announcement. I think you intentionally used 'bankruptcy' in the subject title in order to get maximum shock effect and it worked.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>OCZ: Bankruptcy Within 6 Months?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1332211/comments?source=feed#comment-17623501</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">17623501</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I'm bullish on this stock but not enough to buy in YET. I'll wait for you guys to bash it down a few more notches. Its already trading like it is going bankrupt and so far there is absolutely no reason to believe that it actually will. My whole point is here that I think you guys have such a hatred towards longs of this company (Ashraf refers to them as 'racists' and believes that I am 'abusing' him for daringly challenging him), that it looks like it has blurred your objective vision of the real story. I'm a buyer of fear and panic generally. ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Apr 2013 00:35:59 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I'm bullish on this stock but not enough to buy in YET. I'll wait for you guys to bash it down a few more notches. Its already trading like it is going bankrupt and so far there is absolutely no reason to believe that it actually will. My whole point is here that I think you guys have such a hatred towards longs of this company (Ashraf refers to them as 'racists' and believes that I am 'abusing' him for daringly challenging him), that it looks like it has blurred your objective vision of the real story. I'm a buyer of fear and panic generally. ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>OCZ: Bankruptcy Within 6 Months?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1332211/comments?source=feed#comment-17587601</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">17587601</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[FWIW, both Ashraf and Austin take great enjoyment in gloating about their articles and baiting the longs on the Yahoo! Finance message boards. Ashraf knows what he is doing with putting 'bankruptcy' in the subject as that will create panic and will hurt his 'racist' detractors that much more. Thats what its all about with the guy, he's not a trader (I think one article he said he bought 100 shares of OCZ for a whopping $200 and sold for a loss of like $10), he's not a journalist (as they don't post on message boards), he's just a student and a prevalent technology blogger. The unfortunate thing is that with his soap box here at Seeking Alpha he can crush share prices of penny stocks by creating fear and panic. I'm neither long or short OCZ but I'm certainly bullish at these levels. Bankruptcy fear is way overdone (non-existent) and the potential upside is enormous. His buddy Austin Craig has already posted on Yahoo! Finance Message Boards that he is preparing a huge OCZ hit piece, so expect the next shoe to drop next week and then maybe that will be a good entry point. Seeking Alpha should be a lot more careful IMO given their syndication. Its one thing to constantly write attack articles on the same company repeatedly, but to then go and gloat about it publicly on another site, that is crossing a big line IMO.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sat, 13 Apr 2013 16:58:36 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[FWIW, both Ashraf and Austin take great enjoyment in gloating about their articles and baiting the longs on the Yahoo! Finance message boards. Ashraf knows what he is doing with putting 'bankruptcy' in the subject as that will create panic and will hurt his 'racist' detractors that much more. Thats what its all about with the guy, he's not a trader (I think one article he said he bought 100 shares of OCZ for a whopping $200 and sold for a loss of like $10), he's not a journalist (as they don't post on message boards), he's just a student and a prevalent technology blogger. The unfortunate thing is that with his soap box here at Seeking Alpha he can crush share prices of penny stocks by creating fear and panic. I'm neither long or short OCZ but I'm certainly bullish at these levels. Bankruptcy fear is way overdone (non-existent) and the potential upside is enormous. His buddy Austin Craig has already posted on Yahoo! Finance Message Boards that he is preparing a huge OCZ hit piece, so expect the next shoe to drop next week and then maybe that will be a good entry point. Seeking Alpha should be a lot more careful IMO given their syndication. Its one thing to constantly write attack articles on the same company repeatedly, but to then go and gloat about it publicly on another site, that is crossing a big line IMO.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>OCZ: Bankruptcy Within 6 Months?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1332211/comments?source=feed#comment-17492621</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">17492621</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Opportunity coming soon. I think $1.10 is a good buy in if you can get it.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2013 10:40:41 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Opportunity coming soon. I think $1.10 is a good buy in if you can get it.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>OCZ: Bankruptcy Within 6 Months?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1332211/comments?source=feed#comment-17482631</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">17482631</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I've studied this stock and its not going bankrupt. There is a play here soon. Looking for a retest of the lows.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2013 04:09:34 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I've studied this stock and its not going bankrupt. There is a play here soon. Looking for a retest of the lows.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Skullcandy: Is There Hope For This Former High Flier?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1285081/comments?source=feed#comment-16586621</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">16586621</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[We could go on forever with your argument, but the same detractors of Skullcandy cite Beats (another head phone company) as the reason the company has recently failed (and they are right) but then in the same breath say that it is an 'undifferentiated commodity business'. The argument makes no sense as you can't have it both ways. Beats is killing it, with a headphone with audio technology that is on par with Skullcandy at double the price. They just happen to be executing much better than Skullcandy at the moment and are cooler and have a better sell through. However, this can change on a dime. But my point is that is as far away from a 'commodity' that you can get. It is all about the branding here and IF Skullcandy can bring cool back and properly leverage the brand, the sky is the limit. If they can't then shares will hover around where they are right now.  I think its a great risk/reward scenario.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2013 01:38:30 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[We could go on forever with your argument, but the same detractors of Skullcandy cite Beats (another head phone company) as the reason the company has recently failed (and they are right) but then in the same breath say that it is an 'undifferentiated commodity business'. The argument makes no sense as you can't have it both ways. Beats is killing it, with a headphone with audio technology that is on par with Skullcandy at double the price. They just happen to be executing much better than Skullcandy at the moment and are cooler and have a better sell through. However, this can change on a dime. But my point is that is as far away from a 'commodity' that you can get. It is all about the branding here and IF Skullcandy can bring cool back and properly leverage the brand, the sky is the limit. If they can't then shares will hover around where they are right now.  I think its a great risk/reward scenario.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Skullcandy: Is There Hope For This Former High Flier?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1285081/comments?source=feed#comment-16586311</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">16586311</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I disagree and I think that track record is very important. Before a reader follows an opinion they should diligently research from whom the opinion is coming from. Lets face it, some opinions are better than others, particularly financial ones. Clearly you are a top contributor on Seeking Alpha, but I just found your article to be more 'boiler plate' than actually having any compelling arguments to either buy or sell the stock. I didn't really see that as an issue as 90% of the Seeking Alpha articles fall into this category, but then you agreed to a ridiculously uniformed comment from another poster that Skullcandy is selling 'lemon juice', well I have to step in at that point and put a stop to the madness! Good luck with your studies, I know you will be good at whatever career path you ultimately choose.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2013 01:22:55 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I disagree and I think that track record is very important. Before a reader follows an opinion they should diligently research from whom the opinion is coming from. Lets face it, some opinions are better than others, particularly financial ones. Clearly you are a top contributor on Seeking Alpha, but I just found your article to be more 'boiler plate' than actually having any compelling arguments to either buy or sell the stock. I didn't really see that as an issue as 90% of the Seeking Alpha articles fall into this category, but then you agreed to a ridiculously uniformed comment from another poster that Skullcandy is selling 'lemon juice', well I have to step in at that point and put a stop to the madness! Good luck with your studies, I know you will be good at whatever career path you ultimately choose.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Skullcandy: Is There Hope For This Former High Flier?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1285081/comments?source=feed#comment-16585091</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">16585091</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Mr. Interzone<br/><br/>I wish I had the time to write a couple articles every day as Ashraf does. However, I run a business very similar to Skullcandy and can speak to the branding and marketing and margin and cash flow points with authority. It is a space that I am intimate with and know quite well. I also don't believe having more articles written than the next guy makes anybody more accomplished, and I think even Ashraf would agree with that. I just happen to know this company inside out and I will defend my points, even if I happen to lose 'followers' (which I do not care about incidentally as I don't write articles to make money).]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2013 23:59:31 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Mr. Interzone<br/><br/>I wish I had the time to write a couple articles every day as Ashraf does. However, I run a business very similar to Skullcandy and can speak to the branding and marketing and margin and cash flow points with authority. It is a space that I am intimate with and know quite well. I also don't believe having more articles written than the next guy makes anybody more accomplished, and I think even Ashraf would agree with that. I just happen to know this company inside out and I will defend my points, even if I happen to lose 'followers' (which I do not care about incidentally as I don't write articles to make money).]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Skullcandy: Is There Hope For This Former High Flier?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1285081/comments?source=feed#comment-16584921</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">16584921</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[No question that Q1 2013 is a 'reset'. They should still be profitable for FY 2013. Q1 is historically a very small profit or a loss and is the weakest quarter for this company. The loss, while unexpected, is not that big of a shocker. Margins can rebound quickly if they follow the plan. Execution is everything obviously, but my point is the upside potential is $20 a share and the downside from these levels is maybe another $1. It can't get much cheaper than that with their liquidity value inching up to their market cap. I called the bottom in an article on ADNC when it was trading at cash value and nobody wanted to touch it with a 10 foot pole, and see this as a similar type of opportunity. Even in a worst case scenario it will lose $1 from current levels, while the best case puts it into the $20s. I will be happy with a turnaround and a price in the teens at some point this year or next. As you pointed out, the market is forward looking, so any glimpse of hope will supercharge a rally here, thats all it will take. I like my odds here, looking for $10 upside or $1 downside. Even if you price in the odds of the turnaround being successful at 50%, you are getting 5 times value on your money. Hard to argue from a value perspective, that this is not at or near a bottom.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2013 23:48:53 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[No question that Q1 2013 is a 'reset'. They should still be profitable for FY 2013. Q1 is historically a very small profit or a loss and is the weakest quarter for this company. The loss, while unexpected, is not that big of a shocker. Margins can rebound quickly if they follow the plan. Execution is everything obviously, but my point is the upside potential is $20 a share and the downside from these levels is maybe another $1. It can't get much cheaper than that with their liquidity value inching up to their market cap. I called the bottom in an article on ADNC when it was trading at cash value and nobody wanted to touch it with a 10 foot pole, and see this as a similar type of opportunity. Even in a worst case scenario it will lose $1 from current levels, while the best case puts it into the $20s. I will be happy with a turnaround and a price in the teens at some point this year or next. As you pointed out, the market is forward looking, so any glimpse of hope will supercharge a rally here, thats all it will take. I like my odds here, looking for $10 upside or $1 downside. Even if you price in the odds of the turnaround being successful at 50%, you are getting 5 times value on your money. Hard to argue from a value perspective, that this is not at or near a bottom.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Skullcandy: Is There Hope For This Former High Flier?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1285081/comments?source=feed#comment-16584611</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">16584611</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I think you would agree that Jim Cramer has a ton of followers (probably a million times more than you) and you would be hard pressed to find anybody that has not lost their shirt following him.<br/><br/>Thats not to say that you aren't a good writer and reasonably entertaining. You probably have a good career in journalism ahead of you but I think you are missing the story here. And margins have bottomed, the CFO said that during the call that they will increase throughout 2013.<br/><br/>Are there risks? Absolutely. But the company is valued on par with many OTC companies that don't even have products for sale, let alone $300m in sales and positive cash flow. To write an article this long and not touch on the glaringly obvious value, is just short sighted. I will check back here again in a year as I don't have time to write more about this company and we will see who is right.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2013 23:29:28 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I think you would agree that Jim Cramer has a ton of followers (probably a million times more than you) and you would be hard pressed to find anybody that has not lost their shirt following him.<br/><br/>Thats not to say that you aren't a good writer and reasonably entertaining. You probably have a good career in journalism ahead of you but I think you are missing the story here. And margins have bottomed, the CFO said that during the call that they will increase throughout 2013.<br/><br/>Are there risks? Absolutely. But the company is valued on par with many OTC companies that don't even have products for sale, let alone $300m in sales and positive cash flow. To write an article this long and not touch on the glaringly obvious value, is just short sighted. I will check back here again in a year as I don't have time to write more about this company and we will see who is right.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Skullcandy: Is There Hope For This Former High Flier?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1285081/comments?source=feed#comment-16584471</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">16584471</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I Googled 'buffet' and 'lemon juice' and all I could find were some listings for a Chinese buffet in my area.<br/><br/>I take it that you have probably never ran a business before, but nothing is simple especially when revenues are near $300m.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2013 23:20:58 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I Googled 'buffet' and 'lemon juice' and all I could find were some listings for a Chinese buffet in my area.<br/><br/>I take it that you have probably never ran a business before, but nothing is simple especially when revenues are near $300m.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Skullcandy: Is There Hope For This Former High Flier?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1285081/comments?source=feed#comment-16584421</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">16584421</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[No personal attack intended, Ashraf. I just don't think your stock recommendations on the whole have been very good. People would lose a lot of money following you. I've dropped the ball myself with SKUL. Which is why I suggest that readers do their own due diligence. ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2013 23:18:22 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[No personal attack intended, Ashraf. I just don't think your stock recommendations on the whole have been very good. People would lose a lot of money following you. I've dropped the ball myself with SKUL. Which is why I suggest that readers do their own due diligence. ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Skullcandy: Is There Hope For This Former High Flier?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1285081/comments?source=feed#comment-16582871</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">16582871</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[What is a lemon juice stand?<br/><br/>I've only seen lemon juice sold among other products in a grocery store.<br/><br/>This article really doesn't offer any new perspective, only rehashes what a few analysts (who coincidentally have never been right about this name before) have to say.<br/><br/>But you have Ashraf agreeing with you, despite him making a major contradictory point about brand equity in his article. <br/><br/>I urge readers to do their own due diligence, starting with Ashraf's stock recommendations, both long and short. <br/><br/>Report back here with your findings... 'nuff said.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2013 22:16:17 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[What is a lemon juice stand?<br/><br/>I've only seen lemon juice sold among other products in a grocery store.<br/><br/>This article really doesn't offer any new perspective, only rehashes what a few analysts (who coincidentally have never been right about this name before) have to say.<br/><br/>But you have Ashraf agreeing with you, despite him making a major contradictory point about brand equity in his article. <br/><br/>I urge readers to do their own due diligence, starting with Ashraf's stock recommendations, both long and short. <br/><br/>Report back here with your findings... 'nuff said.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Skullcandy: Is There Hope For This Former High Flier?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1285081/comments?source=feed#comment-16544671</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">16544671</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[There was also an insider purchase by the CFO of 15,000 shares. at $5.25. This added about 50% to his position. There has not been any recent insider buying activity so this is a very welcome sign.<br/><br/>This is a stock where you either believe in the story or not. If they pull off the turnaround that I think they will this will be back to the teens in no time and trend much higher than that as they get the multiple that they deserve like a Lululemon, Monster or even a slower growth Nike.<br/><br/>The analysts (who have been wrong from day 1 on this name) will all jump behind the name once the turnaround starts unfolding and the stock is breaking higher. At that point most people have missed the boat already. Its a lot more profitable in the long run when you buy at or near the bottom.  Simply put, you can accumulate a lot more shares and even lower your cost average by selling some as it rises.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2013 10:42:32 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[There was also an insider purchase by the CFO of 15,000 shares. at $5.25. This added about 50% to his position. There has not been any recent insider buying activity so this is a very welcome sign.<br/><br/>This is a stock where you either believe in the story or not. If they pull off the turnaround that I think they will this will be back to the teens in no time and trend much higher than that as they get the multiple that they deserve like a Lululemon, Monster or even a slower growth Nike.<br/><br/>The analysts (who have been wrong from day 1 on this name) will all jump behind the name once the turnaround starts unfolding and the stock is breaking higher. At that point most people have missed the boat already. Its a lot more profitable in the long run when you buy at or near the bottom.  Simply put, you can accumulate a lot more shares and even lower your cost average by selling some as it rises.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Skullcandy Q4 2012 Looking Back, Then Forward</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1283021/comments?source=feed#comment-16458211</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">16458211</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I think with today's announcement of the new CEO coming from Nike (who started as a shoe distribution company), that we will see a an expansion of the Skullcandy brand across different channels. Alden alluded to speakers etc... Huge growth outside of headphones and this is the direction Beats is going also.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2013 16:18:30 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I think with today's announcement of the new CEO coming from Nike (who started as a shoe distribution company), that we will see a an expansion of the Skullcandy brand across different channels. Alden alluded to speakers etc... Huge growth outside of headphones and this is the direction Beats is going also.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Will Sony Buy Skullcandy?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1261551/comments?source=feed#comment-16150961</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">16150961</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[The outgoing CEO sold shares as part of a pre-arranged sales plan, so I would not use that as any indication for anything. He was going to sell if the price was $15 or $5. It is VERY rare that a pre-arranged sales plan that is filed in advance with the SEC gets stopped or modified due to a material event. I'm pretty sure that is illegal. Anyhow, I agree with the Sony thesis, but do not think it will be very easy for them to acquire the company anywhere south of the 'teens'. It simply would not be in the shareholders best interest otherwise. Skullcandy can be turned around and has zero debt and produces alot of cash consistently. It does not NEED to be taken over, but again I agree that the idea and synergies with Sony makes alot of sense. I also think we will see a number of licensing agreements and partnerships rolled out with streaming music, stereo equipment etc... all leveraging the powerful Skullcandy brand without any capital costs.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2013 17:57:35 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[The outgoing CEO sold shares as part of a pre-arranged sales plan, so I would not use that as any indication for anything. He was going to sell if the price was $15 or $5. It is VERY rare that a pre-arranged sales plan that is filed in advance with the SEC gets stopped or modified due to a material event. I'm pretty sure that is illegal. Anyhow, I agree with the Sony thesis, but do not think it will be very easy for them to acquire the company anywhere south of the 'teens'. It simply would not be in the shareholders best interest otherwise. Skullcandy can be turned around and has zero debt and produces alot of cash consistently. It does not NEED to be taken over, but again I agree that the idea and synergies with Sony makes alot of sense. I also think we will see a number of licensing agreements and partnerships rolled out with streaming music, stereo equipment etc... all leveraging the powerful Skullcandy brand without any capital costs.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Why I Am Buying Skullcandy Shares Hand Over Fist</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1171941/comments?source=feed#comment-16113571</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">16113571</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[We also saw it with ADNC, when I wrote an article when it was trading at cash levels at $5.75 a few months ago. Pretty much nobody agreed with me at the time, as the comments show. I made a quick 40% on it in about a week off a sharp rebound. Analysts wrote it off and had targets as low as $4 (same as SKUL). It has since rebounded near as high as $15 and the same analysts are now putting price targets as high as $18. I'm also alot more confident in SKUL than I ever was in ADNC. I love the brand and I love Rick Alden. This guy is a genius and he will right this ship. I've traded in and out of SKUL since its IPO, but its cheap enough now that I am just holding a large permanent position. In fact, I won't be making another trade until I ultimately sell SKUL, which will be either when it gets bought out or trades in the teens. I'm taking some time off trading to concentrate on my advertising business, so I welcome the waiting game for once. It may trade lower, but I will just buy more. No fear.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sun, 10 Mar 2013 22:57:50 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[We also saw it with ADNC, when I wrote an article when it was trading at cash levels at $5.75 a few months ago. Pretty much nobody agreed with me at the time, as the comments show. I made a quick 40% on it in about a week off a sharp rebound. Analysts wrote it off and had targets as low as $4 (same as SKUL). It has since rebounded near as high as $15 and the same analysts are now putting price targets as high as $18. I'm also alot more confident in SKUL than I ever was in ADNC. I love the brand and I love Rick Alden. This guy is a genius and he will right this ship. I've traded in and out of SKUL since its IPO, but its cheap enough now that I am just holding a large permanent position. In fact, I won't be making another trade until I ultimately sell SKUL, which will be either when it gets bought out or trades in the teens. I'm taking some time off trading to concentrate on my advertising business, so I welcome the waiting game for once. It may trade lower, but I will just buy more. No fear.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Why I Am Buying Skullcandy Shares Hand Over Fist</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1171941/comments?source=feed#comment-16106101</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">16106101</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[1) Cash position is solid, $28m credit line and nothing drawn on it. New CFO is smart and has hedged international receivables so they don't lose like they just did with the HMV bankruptcy in Europe. Alot of risk out of the picture here.<br/><br/>2) Massive international growth story, still in its infancy. 100% sales growth YOY. Huge opportunity.<br/><br/>3) Alden mentions a 'major retail partner' who is begging the company to expand outside the headphone market and that is where the company is headed. Look for speakers and mobility devices. Should dramatically increase revenues with little to no marketing expense being complimentary. Leverage the strong brand.<br/><br/>4) Andrus, despite making terrible management decisions through his tenure, brought on a huge winner in Astro Gaming. This is probably why he scored the private equity job that specifically has him looking for small startups with $5m+ annual sales. Just like Astro. Gaming accessories will grow to be a $7B market in the near term and Skullcandy already has their foot in the door.<br/><br/>5) Abandoning Andrus' idea of staying 'authentic' by staying in small retailers like skate and surf shops. Sales in all channels have improved with big box exposure. Pretty clear that a Walmart deal is in the cards for this year. End of the day, much more sales, which is what its all about.<br/><br/>6) Consolidation in retail to 4 major headphone players, with Skullcandy being one of them. Retailers not carrying the 10+ brands anymore as consumers are getting confused and not buying any.<br/><br/>7) Margins will improve steadily throughout 2013.<br/><br/>8) Better optimization and streamlining of endorsements. Got the right stars, but not using them effectively.<br/><br/>9) Share price spiked initially over 10% with a mediocre release, shows that any slight average to good news can rocket this stock.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sun, 10 Mar 2013 17:48:37 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[1) Cash position is solid, $28m credit line and nothing drawn on it. New CFO is smart and has hedged international receivables so they don't lose like they just did with the HMV bankruptcy in Europe. Alot of risk out of the picture here.<br/><br/>2) Massive international growth story, still in its infancy. 100% sales growth YOY. Huge opportunity.<br/><br/>3) Alden mentions a 'major retail partner' who is begging the company to expand outside the headphone market and that is where the company is headed. Look for speakers and mobility devices. Should dramatically increase revenues with little to no marketing expense being complimentary. Leverage the strong brand.<br/><br/>4) Andrus, despite making terrible management decisions through his tenure, brought on a huge winner in Astro Gaming. This is probably why he scored the private equity job that specifically has him looking for small startups with $5m+ annual sales. Just like Astro. Gaming accessories will grow to be a $7B market in the near term and Skullcandy already has their foot in the door.<br/><br/>5) Abandoning Andrus' idea of staying 'authentic' by staying in small retailers like skate and surf shops. Sales in all channels have improved with big box exposure. Pretty clear that a Walmart deal is in the cards for this year. End of the day, much more sales, which is what its all about.<br/><br/>6) Consolidation in retail to 4 major headphone players, with Skullcandy being one of them. Retailers not carrying the 10+ brands anymore as consumers are getting confused and not buying any.<br/><br/>7) Margins will improve steadily throughout 2013.<br/><br/>8) Better optimization and streamlining of endorsements. Got the right stars, but not using them effectively.<br/><br/>9) Share price spiked initially over 10% with a mediocre release, shows that any slight average to good news can rocket this stock.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Why I Am Buying Skullcandy Shares Hand Over Fist</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1171941/comments?source=feed#comment-16106061</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">16106061</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[They can buy back more than 17% now that the stock is down about 15% from when I wrote this article.<br/><br/>Margins will increase steadily all through 2013 and they are cash flow positive. ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sun, 10 Mar 2013 17:46:58 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[They can buy back more than 17% now that the stock is down about 15% from when I wrote this article.<br/><br/>Margins will increase steadily all through 2013 and they are cash flow positive. ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>What A Management Change At Skullcandy Could Mean</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1173241/comments?source=feed#comment-14861641</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">14861641</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[You make some good points, Frank and were certainly on the right side of the trade back in November, but I still maintain for the wrong reasons. Skullcandy lowered guidance due to poor management (Andrus now out) and excessive stock compensation which directly eats into the EPS. Sales are strong and continue to show growth. <br/><br/>I still think you miss the branding story here. Headphones can be considered a commodity, sure, but Skullcandy is a strong brand. The same way that shoes can be considered a commodity but people pay a premium for Nike. This is marketing 101 and I don't understand how so many people, including Wall Street analysts, miss that point. Perhaps they are too old to understand the story, but the branding is working and Skullcandy is 'cool' among it's target market. Furthermore they do have new in-house proprietary sound technology along with a number of patents that cater to innovations like headphones that are stitched into hoodies, which is perfect for snowboarders. There is alot more to this story than meets the eye and I would not be so quick to write them off as a 'commodity', because clearly its a branding story.<br/><br/>The fact that you see value in the share price despite these misconceived notions, could mean that the bottom is in. ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2013 18:04:23 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[You make some good points, Frank and were certainly on the right side of the trade back in November, but I still maintain for the wrong reasons. Skullcandy lowered guidance due to poor management (Andrus now out) and excessive stock compensation which directly eats into the EPS. Sales are strong and continue to show growth. <br/><br/>I still think you miss the branding story here. Headphones can be considered a commodity, sure, but Skullcandy is a strong brand. The same way that shoes can be considered a commodity but people pay a premium for Nike. This is marketing 101 and I don't understand how so many people, including Wall Street analysts, miss that point. Perhaps they are too old to understand the story, but the branding is working and Skullcandy is 'cool' among it's target market. Furthermore they do have new in-house proprietary sound technology along with a number of patents that cater to innovations like headphones that are stitched into hoodies, which is perfect for snowboarders. There is alot more to this story than meets the eye and I would not be so quick to write them off as a 'commodity', because clearly its a branding story.<br/><br/>The fact that you see value in the share price despite these misconceived notions, could mean that the bottom is in. ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Why I Am Buying Skullcandy Shares Hand Over Fist</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1171941/comments?source=feed#comment-14850001</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">14850001</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[It happens... Tough to time a trade perfectly. I still maintain that fair value is at least double the current PPS.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2013 13:35:26 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[It happens... Tough to time a trade perfectly. I still maintain that fair value is at least double the current PPS.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Why I Am Buying Skullcandy Shares Hand Over Fist</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1171941/comments?source=feed#comment-14849851</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">14849851</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I think that Alden HAS to be frustrated seeing his once proud company flounder as it has on NASDAQ. Nobody wants to see that. Nevermind the fact that he has lost a tremendous amount of net worth. Its just my opinion but Andrus does not strike me as a serious hard nose business man, more of a rich kid living the life who still likes the party, maybe a little too much. <br/><br/>How offensive is it to shareholders to read PR after PR about open bar parties with models and pro athletes around the globe while lowering guidance? Guidance could have been kept in tack or raised if a little spending caution was used and/or some stock compensation was scaled back. We aren't talking about a multi-billion dollar company spending $100k on a party which wont affect the bottom line, but to Skullcandy every dollar counts. Great brand and super cool people, but at some point somebody has to come in and draw a line in the sand. This is a company that is BEGGING to go private and be managed by real corporate bean counters who will make everybody accountable for every penny that is spent.<br/><br/>The ground has been laid for a takeover. Everything about the company with regards to returning shareholder value has failed, but that won't matter going forward and you can bet that Andrus' resignation has alot to do with irresponsible mismanagement. Look at his new role, he is a very smart and creative guy but not management material for any publicly traded company.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2013 13:31:57 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I think that Alden HAS to be frustrated seeing his once proud company flounder as it has on NASDAQ. Nobody wants to see that. Nevermind the fact that he has lost a tremendous amount of net worth. Its just my opinion but Andrus does not strike me as a serious hard nose business man, more of a rich kid living the life who still likes the party, maybe a little too much. <br/><br/>How offensive is it to shareholders to read PR after PR about open bar parties with models and pro athletes around the globe while lowering guidance? Guidance could have been kept in tack or raised if a little spending caution was used and/or some stock compensation was scaled back. We aren't talking about a multi-billion dollar company spending $100k on a party which wont affect the bottom line, but to Skullcandy every dollar counts. Great brand and super cool people, but at some point somebody has to come in and draw a line in the sand. This is a company that is BEGGING to go private and be managed by real corporate bean counters who will make everybody accountable for every penny that is spent.<br/><br/>The ground has been laid for a takeover. Everything about the company with regards to returning shareholder value has failed, but that won't matter going forward and you can bet that Andrus' resignation has alot to do with irresponsible mismanagement. Look at his new role, he is a very smart and creative guy but not management material for any publicly traded company.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Why I Am Buying Skullcandy Shares Hand Over Fist</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1171941/comments?source=feed#comment-14847341</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">14847341</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[What is good is that Andrus will have no say going forward. He is off the board and no longer CEO. Perhaps that was the bone of contention? Him wanting to remain 'authentic' with Alden and the rest of the board wanting to go more mainstream with Walmart etc... What makes no sense to me is that they are in Target, which is pretty much like Walmart anyhow, so I don't understand why Andrus is so against Walmart? If you recall the Bloomberg Enterprise video where they asked Andrus about Walmart, I thought his strange response about &quot;let's not go there&quot; was a 'tell' that there was a deal in the works but now it seems obvious that it was a &quot;don't ask me about that, as I'm in that fight every day with the board etc...&quot;. Obviously as CEO he can prevent Skullcandy from going to Walmart, but clearly the shareholders suffered as a result. The fact that he held out so long though is almost building up some goodwill when they do actually go into Walmart (and this WILL happen) and it will be a major splash.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2013 12:39:43 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[What is good is that Andrus will have no say going forward. He is off the board and no longer CEO. Perhaps that was the bone of contention? Him wanting to remain 'authentic' with Alden and the rest of the board wanting to go more mainstream with Walmart etc... What makes no sense to me is that they are in Target, which is pretty much like Walmart anyhow, so I don't understand why Andrus is so against Walmart? If you recall the Bloomberg Enterprise video where they asked Andrus about Walmart, I thought his strange response about &quot;let's not go there&quot; was a 'tell' that there was a deal in the works but now it seems obvious that it was a &quot;don't ask me about that, as I'm in that fight every day with the board etc...&quot;. Obviously as CEO he can prevent Skullcandy from going to Walmart, but clearly the shareholders suffered as a result. The fact that he held out so long though is almost building up some goodwill when they do actually go into Walmart (and this WILL happen) and it will be a major splash.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Why I Am Buying Skullcandy Shares Hand Over Fist</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1171941/comments?source=feed#comment-14846701</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">14846701</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Agree with the little appeal to the enthusiast market, although with Supreme Sound and in-house engineering that could change quickly. Although they don't really need this market as they have set their sights on the $50-$150 sweet spot and market to the active lifestyle.<br/><br/>Nothing is cooler than the Skullcandy skull logo and the fact that I'm seeing it on people's cars, snowboards, dirt bikes, is super cool. A company like Sony, who lacks the cool factor, would be silly not to pick this brand up on fire sale especially with the emerging gaming technology that can be bundled with PS.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2013 12:27:18 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Agree with the little appeal to the enthusiast market, although with Supreme Sound and in-house engineering that could change quickly. Although they don't really need this market as they have set their sights on the $50-$150 sweet spot and market to the active lifestyle.<br/><br/>Nothing is cooler than the Skullcandy skull logo and the fact that I'm seeing it on people's cars, snowboards, dirt bikes, is super cool. A company like Sony, who lacks the cool factor, would be silly not to pick this brand up on fire sale especially with the emerging gaming technology that can be bundled with PS.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Why I Am Buying Skullcandy Shares Hand Over Fist</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1171941/comments?source=feed#comment-14846521</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">14846521</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I think it is a better buy after the CEO departure. Andrus, while super creative and innovative, did nothing to protect shareholder value. Alden, who founded the company, has seen his net worth plummet as a result. He is coming in to right the ship, and that could include a takeover deal. Even Bloomberg is speculating on the potential for a takeover. Skullcandy is a cash cow with growth and very strong branding that could easily be trading in the teens and be considered a value play.<br/><br/><a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://bloom.bg/Z5F0tA'>http://bloom.bg/Z5F0tA</a>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2013 12:22:59 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I think it is a better buy after the CEO departure. Andrus, while super creative and innovative, did nothing to protect shareholder value. Alden, who founded the company, has seen his net worth plummet as a result. He is coming in to right the ship, and that could include a takeover deal. Even Bloomberg is speculating on the potential for a takeover. Skullcandy is a cash cow with growth and very strong branding that could easily be trading in the teens and be considered a value play.<br/><br/><a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://bloom.bg/Z5F0tA'>http://bloom.bg/Z5F0tA</a>]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Stem Cells, Dr. Oz And A Potentially Lucrative Investment Opportunity</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1091661/comments?source=feed#comment-13436271</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">13436271</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Huge volume the past few sessions. I can't buy the run-up, but stocks like this have a tendency to fall quicker than they rise. I think there will be another shot at $0.05 for those who missed the run.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2013 10:35:53 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Huge volume the past few sessions. I can't buy the run-up, but stocks like this have a tendency to fall quicker than they rise. I think there will be another shot at $0.05 for those who missed the run.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Stem Cells, Dr. Oz And A Potentially Lucrative Investment Opportunity</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1091661/comments?source=feed#comment-13391931</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">13391931</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Definitely agree with that as I don't normally even trade in penny stocks but their incentive packages were a turnoff on a cursory look at the company. Although at $0.05 like I mentioned a few sessions ago, it could be worth a flier.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2013 10:00:45 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Definitely agree with that as I don't normally even trade in penny stocks but their incentive packages were a turnoff on a cursory look at the company. Although at $0.05 like I mentioned a few sessions ago, it could be worth a flier.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Stem Cells, Dr. Oz And A Potentially Lucrative Investment Opportunity</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1091661/comments?source=feed#comment-13281971</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">13281971</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Geron still has significant stem cell assets. BioTime (made up of former management from Geron) is currently bidding on them. So no misrepresentation here, as I am well aware that their stem cell research program is stagnant. The Pluristem issue was addressed (yes its placenta based stem cells rather than embryonic).<br/><br/>I love writing about stem cells, it always brings out the most controversy about anything I ever say! I must say that those who follow the industry do so with real intensity and I'm always forced to edit something even after multiple fact checking sessions before clicking 'submit'.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2013 18:11:23 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Geron still has significant stem cell assets. BioTime (made up of former management from Geron) is currently bidding on them. So no misrepresentation here, as I am well aware that their stem cell research program is stagnant. The Pluristem issue was addressed (yes its placenta based stem cells rather than embryonic).<br/><br/>I love writing about stem cells, it always brings out the most controversy about anything I ever say! I must say that those who follow the industry do so with real intensity and I'm always forced to edit something even after multiple fact checking sessions before clicking 'submit'.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Stem Cells, Dr. Oz And A Potentially Lucrative Investment Opportunity</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1091661/comments?source=feed#comment-13281801</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">13281801</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I did notice that in my preliminary research into ACTC that management is VERY well compensated for what so far has been just hope and dreams. Its always painful to invest in small biotech companies when your shares get constantly diluted to essentially just pay massive executive salaries and bonuses. Thats the name of the game though.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2013 18:06:24 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I did notice that in my preliminary research into ACTC that management is VERY well compensated for what so far has been just hope and dreams. Its always painful to invest in small biotech companies when your shares get constantly diluted to essentially just pay massive executive salaries and bonuses. Thats the name of the game though.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Stem Cells, Dr. Oz And A Potentially Lucrative Investment Opportunity</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1091661/comments?source=feed#comment-13259201</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">13259201</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[This change has been made by the editors. Again, thank you for your input as factual accuracy is obviously very important.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2013 11:11:11 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[This change has been made by the editors. Again, thank you for your input as factual accuracy is obviously very important.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
