<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>Mike Maher's Comments</title>
    <description>Mike Maher's Comments RSS Syndication from SeekingAlpha.com</description>
    <link>http://seekingalpha.com/user/730330/comments</link>
    <item>
      <title>An opinion piece titled "The Other Government Motors" from the WSJ isn't too subtle about taking apart the Q1 profit Tesla Motors (TSLA +1.4%) reported as it hitched a free ride with U.S. taxpayers. The zero-emission tax credits Tesla can sell to other automakers and the generous $7.5K federal tax credits to motivate buyers are the big two complaints. But what isn't entirely clear is why other car companies selling EVs aren't lumped into the same discourse?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/1046071?source=feed#comment-19207891</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">19207891</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[And right on cue, a bunch of people holding Tesla stock jump to the company's defense.  Don't love your investments, it makes you less objective.  Tesla had a good quarter, but they aren't going to get bought by Apple, or Google, or any other flashy tech company.  They get government money, but so what?  Cash is cash.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 11:13:32 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[And right on cue, a bunch of people holding Tesla stock jump to the company's defense.  Don't love your investments, it makes you less objective.  Tesla had a good quarter, but they aren't going to get bought by Apple, or Google, or any other flashy tech company.  They get government money, but so what?  Cash is cash.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Kinder Morgan says it could eventually simplify its complex gaggle of companies, even though "we like having the two MLPs out there to accelerate dropdowns," CFO Kimberly Dang says. The dropdowns will wrap up next year, and a combination would have to "make economic sense. If the economics don&amp;rsquo;t work... we have no issue running two MLPs. [It] is not a huge administrative burden.&amp;rdquo;</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/1044711?source=feed#comment-19191571</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">19191571</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[An all cash deal would never work for KMP, likely an all stock deal with a bit of premium.  ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 23:14:44 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[An all cash deal would never work for KMP, likely an all stock deal with a bit of premium.  ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Kinder Morgan says it could eventually simplify its complex gaggle of companies, even though "we like having the two MLPs out there to accelerate dropdowns," CFO Kimberly Dang says. The dropdowns will wrap up next year, and a combination would have to "make economic sense. If the economics don&amp;rsquo;t work... we have no issue running two MLPs. [It] is not a huge administrative burden.&amp;rdquo;</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/1044711?source=feed#comment-19183251</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">19183251</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[KMI basically runs KMP and EPB by controlling the general partners in each,  and a large number of units.  After KMI has sold all of El Paso's assets to KMP and EPB, they will look to see if it makes economic sense to combine KMP and EPB, likely by having KMP issue new units to EPB unitholders.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 18:04:13 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[KMI basically runs KMP and EPB by controlling the general partners in each,  and a large number of units.  After KMI has sold all of El Paso's assets to KMP and EPB, they will look to see if it makes economic sense to combine KMP and EPB, likely by having KMP issue new units to EPB unitholders.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Breaking Down The Alerian Index Round II: Kinder Morgan Energy Partners</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1451691/comments?source=feed#comment-19183201</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">19183201</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[The whole statement I made says &quot;The issue of having both trade publicly is that you have duplicates of all the administrative staffs, annual filing and reporting requirements, etc. Kinder Morgan said they may look at combining KMP and EPB later on, which makes sense, since having KMI drop down assets to two different MLPs seems needlessly complicated.&quot;<br/><br/>You dont really need to quote my comments and repost them, since everyone can read them, especially if you are only going to try to quote parts that make me sound incorrect.  Maybe I should quote where you say that they will keep EPB public in order to raise money?]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 18:02:17 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[The whole statement I made says &quot;The issue of having both trade publicly is that you have duplicates of all the administrative staffs, annual filing and reporting requirements, etc. Kinder Morgan said they may look at combining KMP and EPB later on, which makes sense, since having KMI drop down assets to two different MLPs seems needlessly complicated.&quot;<br/><br/>You dont really need to quote my comments and repost them, since everyone can read them, especially if you are only going to try to quote parts that make me sound incorrect.  Maybe I should quote where you say that they will keep EPB public in order to raise money?]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Breaking Down The Alerian Index Round II: Kinder Morgan Energy Partners</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1451691/comments?source=feed#comment-19179181</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">19179181</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[CFO Kimberly Dang saying that it makes &quot;economic sense&quot; to combine $KMP and $EPB after drop downs from $KMI are complete<br/><a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://on.barrons.com/10WdT0a'>http://on.barrons.com/...</a>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 16:25:51 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[CFO Kimberly Dang saying that it makes &quot;economic sense&quot; to combine $KMP and $EPB after drop downs from $KMI are complete<br/><a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://on.barrons.com/10WdT0a'>http://on.barrons.com/...</a>]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Breaking Down The Alerian Index Round II: Kinder Morgan Energy Partners</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1451691/comments?source=feed#comment-19179051</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">19179051</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I've only just started looking at them - I feel like I missed the boat a little bit.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 16:24:11 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I've only just started looking at them - I feel like I missed the boat a little bit.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Halcon Resources (HK -9.4%) falls sharply midday as investors don't seem impressed with an operational update the company provided regarding its acreage in the Utica/Point Pleasant play. Updates were given on the Philips 1H, the Allam 1H, the Brugler 1H, the Yoder 2H, and the Kibler 1H wells. The company says the delineation process will be substantially complete by Q4. (PR)</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/1043851?source=feed#comment-19174851</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">19174851</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Look at some of the presentations on the Investor Relations Websites from Gulfport and PDC Energy.  Their acreage has had much higher production, and therefore, is more valuable.  Results from those two, and Antero, have shown there is a very productive part of the Utica, and that land appears, so far, to hold the most value.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 14:57:24 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Look at some of the presentations on the Investor Relations Websites from Gulfport and PDC Energy.  Their acreage has had much higher production, and therefore, is more valuable.  Results from those two, and Antero, have shown there is a very productive part of the Utica, and that land appears, so far, to hold the most value.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The NYSE rules to let stand all trades in American Electric Power (AEP -1%) and NextEra Energy (NEE -1.2%) but prices for certain "aberrant" trades will be excluded from the high and low prices in data feeds. There were hundreds of trades early this morning in AEP at or below $46.03 and in NEE at or below $76.19, more than 50% below yesterday's closing prices.</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/1044011?source=feed#comment-19172561</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">19172561</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I might leave standing orders for some MLPs at 20% below the market just in case.  I've heard of some people on here getting luck with the so called &quot;stink bids.&quot;]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 14:15:42 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I might leave standing orders for some MLPs at 20% below the market just in case.  I've heard of some people on here getting luck with the so called &quot;stink bids.&quot;]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Trading is temporarily halted in NextEra Energy (NEE) and American Electric Power (AEP) after early trades printed as low as $30.37 and $22.28, respectively. Yesterday's respective closing prices were $79.16 and $48.59.</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/1043221?source=feed#comment-19172241</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">19172241</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Seriously, thats crazy]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 14:10:53 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Seriously, thats crazy]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The NYSE rules to let stand all trades in American Electric Power (AEP -1%) and NextEra Energy (NEE -1.2%) but prices for certain "aberrant" trades will be excluded from the high and low prices in data feeds. There were hundreds of trades early this morning in AEP at or below $46.03 and in NEE at or below $76.19, more than 50% below yesterday's closing prices.</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/1044011?source=feed#comment-19172131</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">19172131</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[How do they let these stand?  Thats nuts<br/><br/>Also the prices given in this current are not correct fyi.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 14:07:48 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[How do they let these stand?  Thats nuts<br/><br/>Also the prices given in this current are not correct fyi.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Halcon Resources (HK -9.4%) falls sharply midday as investors don't seem impressed with an operational update the company provided regarding its acreage in the Utica/Point Pleasant play. Updates were given on the Philips 1H, the Allam 1H, the Brugler 1H, the Yoder 2H, and the Kibler 1H wells. The company says the delineation process will be substantially complete by Q4. (PR)</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/1043851?source=feed#comment-19169941</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">19169941</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[That acreage is much further north and east than the great Utica results from GPOR and PDCE]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 13:16:15 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[That acreage is much further north and east than the great Utica results from GPOR and PDCE]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Silver Bay Realty Trust: A Disaster Waiting To Happen</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1449201/comments?source=feed#comment-19155131</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">19155131</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[The $64 million is from the article on the potential stabilized rent.  Not sure if this has a vacancy rate in it, I assumed it considered a 100% occupancy rate, but I could very well be wrong - all I did was some back of the envelope math to get a feel for value.  I'm in the northeast, so on residential properties with no real estate tax pass through, a 27% expense rate would be very good.  Its all about the location though.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 08:16:16 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[The $64 million is from the article on the potential stabilized rent.  Not sure if this has a vacancy rate in it, I assumed it considered a 100% occupancy rate, but I could very well be wrong - all I did was some back of the envelope math to get a feel for value.  I'm in the northeast, so on residential properties with no real estate tax pass through, a 27% expense rate would be very good.  Its all about the location though.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Silver Bay Realty Trust: A Disaster Waiting To Happen</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1449201/comments?source=feed#comment-19147801</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">19147801</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Expenses will eat up about half the revenue, also model in a 10% vacancy and collection loss.  So the $64 mil in potential rents nets you $57.6 after vacancy and collection losses (64 * .9).  Take the $57.6, cut it in half due to taxes, maintenance, management, insurance, legal fees, etc (50% expenses is an estimate, based on large apartment complexes.  I suspect this number could be higher) and you have NOI of $28.8 mil.  At a market cap of $716 mil the portfolio trades at a 4.0% cap rate, which is low, and not justified given the high vacancy rate.  This stock likely needs to drop to single digits to be compelling based on the value of the underlying real estate, imo.  ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 23:16:25 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Expenses will eat up about half the revenue, also model in a 10% vacancy and collection loss.  So the $64 mil in potential rents nets you $57.6 after vacancy and collection losses (64 * .9).  Take the $57.6, cut it in half due to taxes, maintenance, management, insurance, legal fees, etc (50% expenses is an estimate, based on large apartment complexes.  I suspect this number could be higher) and you have NOI of $28.8 mil.  At a market cap of $716 mil the portfolio trades at a 4.0% cap rate, which is low, and not justified given the high vacancy rate.  This stock likely needs to drop to single digits to be compelling based on the value of the underlying real estate, imo.  ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Credit Suisse stresses a more defensive posture in MLPs, focusing attention on large, relatively liquid, investment-grade MLPs or affiliates with exposure to the coming crude oil production boom in North America. Its eight favorite MLPs to buy now: WMB, QRE, LNG, TRGP, CQP, XTEX, ACMP, GEL.</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/1041351?source=feed#comment-19139951</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">19139951</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Williams is large, and owns a stake in Access.  Might be worth looking at.  I dont like QRE at all tho, not sure why they recommended it.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 18:26:34 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Williams is large, and owns a stake in Access.  Might be worth looking at.  I dont like QRE at all tho, not sure why they recommended it.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>If you harbor doubts about the sharp rise of energy MLPs, you don&amp;rsquo;t have many short sellers on your side. Fewer than 1% of the shares of MLP constituents of the Alerian index (AMJ) are out on loan. Low short interest may have less to do with a lack of negative opinion than with the nature of who owns MLPs, but it&amp;rsquo;s a notable feature since it should mean a classic short squeeze isn&amp;rsquo;t possible.</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/1039261?source=feed#comment-19139461</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">19139461</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Also, OKE just said they'll growth payments 50% in the next few years, on growing payments from OKS...those GP distribution rights really add up.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 18:17:47 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Also, OKE just said they'll growth payments 50% in the next few years, on growing payments from OKS...those GP distribution rights really add up.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>On the repayment of its government loan, Tesla (TSLA) takes the opportunity in its press release to lob a few jibes at its competitors stating: "Following this payment, Tesla will be the only American car company to have fully repaid the government." Both General Motors (GM) and Chrysler still have outstanding balances remaining with the U.S. Treasury.</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/1041821?source=feed#comment-19139001</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">19139001</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[What about Ford????]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 18:09:55 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[What about Ford????]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>A theme bubbling up at the start of the annual MLP conference (where attendance is up 38%&amp;nbsp;Y/Y): the largely retail ownership of MLPs is slowly shifting as more institutions get interested in MLPs. Individuals tend to be unwilling to sell MLPs as the deferred tax burden rises, and more institutional ownership could fuel more trading or short-short selling in MLPs.</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/1041971?source=feed#comment-19138991</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">19138991</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Again, stocks with high yields are expensive shorts.  There's not a whole lot of volatility in the names either, so they aren't exactly a traders dream.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 18:09:09 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Again, stocks with high yields are expensive shorts.  There's not a whole lot of volatility in the names either, so they aren't exactly a traders dream.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>If you harbor doubts about the sharp rise of energy MLPs, you don&amp;rsquo;t have many short sellers on your side. Fewer than 1% of the shares of MLP constituents of the Alerian index (AMJ) are out on loan. Low short interest may have less to do with a lack of negative opinion than with the nature of who owns MLPs, but it&amp;rsquo;s a notable feature since it should mean a classic short squeeze isn&amp;rsquo;t possible.</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/1039261?source=feed#comment-19138891</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">19138891</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[EPD, KMP, MWE, PAA, ETP, ETE, MMP all larger than OKS and all either at or within 5% of their highs.  OKS is the exception in the pipeline space, not the rule.  The variable MLPs are more based on individual industries, so those don't really count, IMO.  ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 18:06:42 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[EPD, KMP, MWE, PAA, ETP, ETE, MMP all larger than OKS and all either at or within 5% of their highs.  OKS is the exception in the pipeline space, not the rule.  The variable MLPs are more based on individual industries, so those don't really count, IMO.  ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Breaking Down The Alerian Index Round II: Kinder Morgan Energy Partners</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1451691/comments?source=feed#comment-19138351</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">19138351</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Thanks, I'll take a look at both those.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 17:52:41 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Thanks, I'll take a look at both those.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Why Kinder Morgan Is The Best MLP</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1450601/comments?source=feed#comment-19108851</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">19108851</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://1.usa.gov/11TuHoG'>http://1.usa.gov/11TuHoG</a>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 08:15:21 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://1.usa.gov/11TuHoG'>http://1.usa.gov/11TuHoG</a>]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Why Kinder Morgan Is The Best MLP</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1450601/comments?source=feed#comment-19103321</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">19103321</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Whats the ticker on the warrants?  ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 00:44:45 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Whats the ticker on the warrants?  ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Breaking Down The Alerian Index Round II: Kinder Morgan Energy Partners</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1451691/comments?source=feed#comment-19103301</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">19103301</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[MLPs are yield instruments too, so are REITs, and BDCs.  Debt securities aren't the only yield instruments in the market.  ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 00:44:04 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[MLPs are yield instruments too, so are REITs, and BDCs.  Debt securities aren't the only yield instruments in the market.  ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Breaking Down The Alerian Index Round II: Kinder Morgan Energy Partners</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1451691/comments?source=feed#comment-19101871</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">19101871</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[The issue of having both trade publicly is that you have duplicates of all the administrative staffs, annual filing and reporting requirements, etc.  Kinder Morgan said they may look at combining KMP and EPB later on, which makes sense, since having KMI drop down assets to two different MLPs seems needlessly complicated. <br/><br/>Copano is 10 cents a year, according to the company, not 10, then 20 and so on.  <br/><br/>You are correct that KMR has shares, but the company refers to the distributions on a per unit basis, so I kept that term.<br/><br/>I don't know how, as an investor, you can say buying because of a discount does not make any sense, but I'll ignore that.  I'd imagine that the reason management buys KMR, and that they highlight the fact it trades at a discount in every presentation they have made in the last 3 years, is that the more people that are in KMR, the less cash that goes out the door.  So they highlight the discount, make investors feel like they're getting a deal (which they are) and it benefits the company.  However the vast majority of people own MLPs for income,  KMR does not allow you the choice of income, and instead you need to sell if you want cash.  Yes, you could sell the shares each quarter, or you could simply own KMP, and either reinvest or take the cash, without having to make a transaction each quarter.<br/><br/>On an aside, the Warren Buffet argument doesn't fully make sense discussing MLPs, since Buffet argues against paying out cash to shareholders, and MLPs are designed to pay out cash to unit holders.  I understand that by investing in KMR you allow the company to continue to fund itself, but both KMP and KMI are yield instruments, and their goal is to grow distributions.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 23:56:12 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[The issue of having both trade publicly is that you have duplicates of all the administrative staffs, annual filing and reporting requirements, etc.  Kinder Morgan said they may look at combining KMP and EPB later on, which makes sense, since having KMI drop down assets to two different MLPs seems needlessly complicated. <br/><br/>Copano is 10 cents a year, according to the company, not 10, then 20 and so on.  <br/><br/>You are correct that KMR has shares, but the company refers to the distributions on a per unit basis, so I kept that term.<br/><br/>I don't know how, as an investor, you can say buying because of a discount does not make any sense, but I'll ignore that.  I'd imagine that the reason management buys KMR, and that they highlight the fact it trades at a discount in every presentation they have made in the last 3 years, is that the more people that are in KMR, the less cash that goes out the door.  So they highlight the discount, make investors feel like they're getting a deal (which they are) and it benefits the company.  However the vast majority of people own MLPs for income,  KMR does not allow you the choice of income, and instead you need to sell if you want cash.  Yes, you could sell the shares each quarter, or you could simply own KMP, and either reinvest or take the cash, without having to make a transaction each quarter.<br/><br/>On an aside, the Warren Buffet argument doesn't fully make sense discussing MLPs, since Buffet argues against paying out cash to shareholders, and MLPs are designed to pay out cash to unit holders.  I understand that by investing in KMR you allow the company to continue to fund itself, but both KMP and KMI are yield instruments, and their goal is to grow distributions.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Breaking Down The Alerian Index Round II: Enterprise Product Partners</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1447481/comments?source=feed#comment-19097621</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">19097621</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Thanks!  Its been a great name to own, and its growth should continue for years and years.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 21:12:27 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Thanks!  Its been a great name to own, and its growth should continue for years and years.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>If you harbor doubts about the sharp rise of energy MLPs, you don&amp;rsquo;t have many short sellers on your side. Fewer than 1% of the shares of MLP constituents of the Alerian index (AMJ) are out on loan. Low short interest may have less to do with a lack of negative opinion than with the nature of who owns MLPs, but it&amp;rsquo;s a notable feature since it should mean a classic short squeeze isn&amp;rsquo;t possible.</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/1039261?source=feed#comment-19097561</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">19097561</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[That article says a &quot;short squeeze isnt possible&quot;, but most of these names are at multi-year, if not all time highs.  MLPs have high yields and tax consequences for trading them, as Truffel and bsorge mention, so of course they arent going to function like high beta stocks.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 21:10:56 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[That article says a &quot;short squeeze isnt possible&quot;, but most of these names are at multi-year, if not all time highs.  MLPs have high yields and tax consequences for trading them, as Truffel and bsorge mention, so of course they arent going to function like high beta stocks.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Why Kinder Morgan Is The Best MLP</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1450601/comments?source=feed#comment-19097501</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">19097501</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[DCF comes from the same pipes in the ground, barring the El Paso and EPB assets that KMI holds that KMP does not (yet).  KMI is probably a long term better hold, for the GP distributions you mention, but I'd rather buy it in the mid $30's than up here above $41]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 21:06:29 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[DCF comes from the same pipes in the ground, barring the El Paso and EPB assets that KMI holds that KMP does not (yet).  KMI is probably a long term better hold, for the GP distributions you mention, but I'd rather buy it in the mid $30's than up here above $41]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Breaking Down The Alerian Index Round II: Kinder Morgan Energy Partners</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1451691/comments?source=feed#comment-19097371</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">19097371</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Even at $100 the yield is still above 5%..I think it could get there, given the low rate environment and the reach for yield.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 21:02:31 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Even at $100 the yield is still above 5%..I think it could get there, given the low rate environment and the reach for yield.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Why Kinder Morgan Is The Best MLP</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1450601/comments?source=feed#comment-19088901</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">19088901</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[KMI reflects a lot of that growth though, with the yield not under 4% since the shares have run up so much.  The fact KMP still yields 6% is pretty surprising to me, I think units have room to run here.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 16:42:15 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[KMI reflects a lot of that growth though, with the yield not under 4% since the shares have run up so much.  The fact KMP still yields 6% is pretty surprising to me, I think units have room to run here.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Shares of Pacific Ethanol (PEIX +20.2%) and BioFuel Energy (BIOF +11.5%) surge after the most recent EIA supply report shows ethanol stockpiles at 16.4M barrels in the week ended May 10, the lowest level since Dec. 2010. Production of ethanol also is at below-average levels for this time of year, Bloomberg data shows.</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/1038631?source=feed#comment-19086951</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">19086951</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[There's still a ton of excess capacity here.  If you want to play a widening crush spread, I'd stick to VLO]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 16:03:09 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[There's still a ton of excess capacity here.  If you want to play a widening crush spread, I'd stick to VLO]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Tim Cook (AAPL) testifies at a Senate hearing on corporate offshore taxes. "We don't depend on tax gimmicks," Cook asserts, while pushing for a big overhaul of U.S. corporate tax code. "Apple has always believed in the simple, not the complex." Sen. John McCain isn't satisfied with Apple's defenses, claiming the company "has violated the spirit of the law if not the letter of the law." Sen. Rand Paul has strongly defended Apple. "Congress should be on trial here for creating a byzantine tax code." (previous)</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/1037911?source=feed#comment-19075971</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">19075971</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[John McCain is mad Apple isn't following the spirit of the law, even though they are following the letter of the law?  If only there was some way he could influence the letter of the law....If Congress spent half as much time reforming the mess they'd made our tax as they do with these silly hearings we'd be in a much better place.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 12:26:57 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[John McCain is mad Apple isn't following the spirit of the law, even though they are following the letter of the law?  If only there was some way he could influence the letter of the law....If Congress spent half as much time reforming the mess they'd made our tax as they do with these silly hearings we'd be in a much better place.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
