Seeking Alpha

SteadfastMason » Comments » GMGMQ.PK

  • PIMCO's Bill Gross Sees a Bleak Future [View article]
    1.) Start a Non-Profit 501C3 corporation and apply government grants...for whatever.

    2.) Buy residential rental property (at extreme short-sale prices)

    3.) buy Artwork

    4.) Invest in tax defered oil and gas trusts

    5.) Start an R&D company with Venture Capital and a few years to develop before going to market

    6.) VOTE out Democrat congress and senate at mid-term election
    May 31 23:22 pm |Rating: +9 -4 |Link to Comment
  • Candidates to Replace GM, Citigroup in the Dow [View article]
    Caveat Emptor.
    May 30 00:25 am |Rating: +3 -5 |Link to Comment
  • Candidates to Replace GM, Citigroup in the Dow [View article]
    It doesn't matter who replaces GM on the DOW. The Dow, S&P, NASDC, etc...are volumes, highs and lows, are ALL fabricated and manipulated. At the present time, there is ABSOLUTELY no free market.

    SteadfastMason
    May 30 00:24 am |Rating: +7 -8 |Link to Comment
  • Obama Proposes Higher Fuel Standards [View article]
    That is pretty good, then. How viable is solar/wind generation as the primary energy source for electricity to recharge cars across the USA? How much land area (for solar) or how many windmills are required to supply and distribute that amount of electricity?


    On May 21 02:52 PM realist2 wrote:

    > @ SteadfastMason
    >
    > Not in my case.
    >
    > My electric vehicle, my daily driver commuter, is 100% wind powered
    > from a commercial, nearby wind farm, thanks to a subscription plan
    > from my regional power company, at prices less than coal in most
    > states, at both my residence and work place. Ok, I do my V2G with
    > grid tied residential and small commercial solar systems, and I've
    > charged at them a few times too, so maybe 99% wind, 1% solar.
    >
    > Thus, all my fuel dollars stay in the domestic economy instead of
    > going overseas to fund volatile parts of the world, as yours do when
    > you drive a full gasser.
    May 21 22:22 pm |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment
  • Obama Proposes Higher Fuel Standards [View article]
    Electric hybrids are powered by....electricity....w... is generated by power plants....powered by....OIL.


    On May 20 12:06 PM user396040 wrote:

    > I think that in the long or intermediate term, we will move to plug
    > in hybrids. For typical commuters, the use of the electric engine
    > for in city driving is very attractive because it is so much more
    > efficient. It will be interesting to see how they are "scored" for
    > CAFE purposes. Plug in hybrids will also create a new demand for
    > electricity and thus intensify the need for a better grid and more
    > generating facilities.
    May 20 22:40 pm |Rating: +1 0 |Link to Comment
  • Obama Proposes Higher Fuel Standards [View article]
    If you really want to save the Earth, why not take Obama's oil conservation program even further? just prohibit ALL car production and sale; Then implement a tax to produce government bicycles to be distributed for every man, woman, and child. No more oil needed to make cars. No more steel, aluminum, etc.... No more US dollars spent on foriegn cars (the soon to be only remaing car manufacturers). No more car accidents. No more car insurance or excise tax. And no more gas stations. No more obesity issues. All us comrads will be fit and trim. That will really save all of us money while saving the earth.

    What a wonderful world it will be?

    Woooo Hoooo!





    On May 20 12:44 AM Tony101 wrote:

    > Everyone drives a hybrid and shares the responsibility to save the
    > planet what is wrong with that? If you are complaining that hybrid
    > is expensive, Honda Insight 2010 is coming in with a price of 21k.
    >
    May 20 10:33 am |Rating: +2 0 |Link to Comment
  • Death of an American Icon [View article]
    I understand that the US. Gov.t has recenly been restricting the supply of munitions-grade copper/brass to manufacture bullets. If so, it sounds like a possible end-run around the Constitution's guarantee that we can keep and bear arms. What use are guns for any militia - be it one man or an army - without an available supply of ammunition?


    On May 14 08:20 PM wheelbarrelsofcash wrote:

    > Don't worry about the second amendment - the new Supreme Court will
    > decide that the "right to bear arms" was supposed to say "the right
    > to BARE arms" and will promptly ban ownership of all weapons including
    > cork screws and paring knives.
    May 15 21:18 pm |Rating: +3 0 |Link to Comment
  • Obama to Announce Chrysler Bankruptcy Thursday [View article]
    Why would the POTUS be the one to give an update on Chrystler's status? It is (still) a non-government owned company.

    Seems we have a meglomaniac for president. "Today, Private Enterprise...Tomorrow, the world." Sounds familiar.

    SteadfastMason
    Apr 30 09:44 am |Rating: +2 0 |Link to Comment
More on GMGMQ.PK by SteadfastMason
Comments by Ticker
SteadfastMason's
Comments Stats
49 comments
Rating: 110 (159 - 49 )