<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>jagad5's Comments</title>
    <description>jagad5's Comments RSS Syndication from SeekingAlpha.com</description>
    <link>http://seekingalpha.com/user/739098/comments</link>
    <item>
      <title>Apple's Nearly Single Digit P/E Seems Underserved</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1310401/comments?source=feed#comment-17073791</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">17073791</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I Try to objectively analyze a company's revenues and earnings using nothing but statistics, adjusting for seasonal effects and attempting for predict the revenues for the next quarter or two without considering the subjective influence of who's product is prettier. I don't use Apple's products (my company won't buy 75,000 MACs since they cost twice as much and I won't buy an iPhone because my provider, Verizon, offers me an adequate smartphone for free.)<br/><br/>Apple's stock price seems to have been completely separated from the past performance of the underlying company. My seasonal forecast for Apple suggests that the next earnings report will show:<br/>REV = $48.0B<br/>NET = $11.5B<br/>EPS = $12.00<br/><br/>Of the six regression models used, the best accounts for nearly 97% of the variation in the reported revenue data. The model that comes closest to the prediction of professional analysts is the one that fits the data the worst (only 90%.) So if history repeats itself, we can expect the analyst's expectations to be exceeded.<br/><br/>As far as net earnings are concerned, the company has a consistent record of making nearly 25 cents on every dollar of revenue (18+% to 28+% and 23+% average over the last 16 quarters) so I expect about the same profit margin this quarter, too.<br/><br/>Ben Graham published his value formula about 50 years ago and if I back-solve for the growth predicted by the stock price, I get 0%. Well, the analysts expect $42B versus $39B, which is nearly 8%. While this is a lot less than the 47% revenue growth and 57% earnings growth over the last 12 quarters, 8% is a lot bigger than 0%. If I plug 10% into Ben's formula (with 3.8% yield on AAA bonds) I get a fair price estimate of nearly $1500. Do I believe it will get that high? No. But it doesn't have to get there to make Apple a very rewarding investment.<br/><br/>The current PE indicates a stock price out of touch with it's corporate performance, or that we're in for a calamitous change in the company's performance. Since our local Apple store is standing room only I doubt that a calamity is upon us, unless the North Koreans are stupid enough to actually start pulling triggers.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2013 12:19:27 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I Try to objectively analyze a company's revenues and earnings using nothing but statistics, adjusting for seasonal effects and attempting for predict the revenues for the next quarter or two without considering the subjective influence of who's product is prettier. I don't use Apple's products (my company won't buy 75,000 MACs since they cost twice as much and I won't buy an iPhone because my provider, Verizon, offers me an adequate smartphone for free.)<br/><br/>Apple's stock price seems to have been completely separated from the past performance of the underlying company. My seasonal forecast for Apple suggests that the next earnings report will show:<br/>REV = $48.0B<br/>NET = $11.5B<br/>EPS = $12.00<br/><br/>Of the six regression models used, the best accounts for nearly 97% of the variation in the reported revenue data. The model that comes closest to the prediction of professional analysts is the one that fits the data the worst (only 90%.) So if history repeats itself, we can expect the analyst's expectations to be exceeded.<br/><br/>As far as net earnings are concerned, the company has a consistent record of making nearly 25 cents on every dollar of revenue (18+% to 28+% and 23+% average over the last 16 quarters) so I expect about the same profit margin this quarter, too.<br/><br/>Ben Graham published his value formula about 50 years ago and if I back-solve for the growth predicted by the stock price, I get 0%. Well, the analysts expect $42B versus $39B, which is nearly 8%. While this is a lot less than the 47% revenue growth and 57% earnings growth over the last 12 quarters, 8% is a lot bigger than 0%. If I plug 10% into Ben's formula (with 3.8% yield on AAA bonds) I get a fair price estimate of nearly $1500. Do I believe it will get that high? No. But it doesn't have to get there to make Apple a very rewarding investment.<br/><br/>The current PE indicates a stock price out of touch with it's corporate performance, or that we're in for a calamitous change in the company's performance. Since our local Apple store is standing room only I doubt that a calamity is upon us, unless the North Koreans are stupid enough to actually start pulling triggers.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Apple's Nearly Single Digit P/E Seems Underserved</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1310401/comments?source=feed#comment-17071681</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">17071681</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Bottom-Bubble = Bobble?]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2013 11:46:49 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Bottom-Bubble = Bobble?]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Dollar Tree (DLTR): Q4 EPS of $1.01 beats by $0.02. Revenue of $2.25B (+15.4% Y/Y) beats by $0.02B. (PR)</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/854511?source=feed#comment-15568161</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">15568161</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[When a company reports 2.25B instead of 2.23B no one should say that they &quot;beat&quot; the estimate. That's 0.9%, round off error in any statistical forecast.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2013 08:28:24 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[When a company reports 2.25B instead of 2.23B no one should say that they &quot;beat&quot; the estimate. That's 0.9%, round off error in any statistical forecast.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>A Trader's Value Guide To Ancestry.com</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/647701/comments?source=feed#comment-6248531</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6248531</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I'd be interested to hear your comments about the company's fundamentals. Ancestry.com, the corporation, has been growing steadily for the last four years, 25%+ CAGR for both revenues and net income. Yet ACOM, the stock, trades for a low PE of about 19x TTM EPS.<br/><br/>Eventually, the stock price and the company's performance will converge. Will the company's performance decline to match the stock price or will the stock price improve to match the company's performance?]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2012 17:27:26 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I'd be interested to hear your comments about the company's fundamentals. Ancestry.com, the corporation, has been growing steadily for the last four years, 25%+ CAGR for both revenues and net income. Yet ACOM, the stock, trades for a low PE of about 19x TTM EPS.<br/><br/>Eventually, the stock price and the company's performance will converge. Will the company's performance decline to match the stock price or will the stock price improve to match the company's performance?]]>
      </description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
