<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>Josh Young's Comments</title>
    <description>Josh Young's Comments RSS Syndication from SeekingAlpha.com</description>
    <link>http://seekingalpha.com/user/739665/comments</link>
    <item>
      <title>Discrepancy In This Marcellus Stock Valuation - Highlighted By Overlooked Disclosure</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1432551/comments?source=feed#comment-19051351</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">19051351</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Since you seem to be interested in Gastar, I'm interested in your take on the Hunton. So far there are just under 20 well results. Based on what they're seeing in the results and the geology and drilling&amp;completion approach, how do you think future results will compare to the results they've seen so far?]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 20:31:57 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Since you seem to be interested in Gastar, I'm interested in your take on the Hunton. So far there are just under 20 well results. Based on what they're seeing in the results and the geology and drilling&amp;completion approach, how do you think future results will compare to the results they've seen so far?]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Discrepancy In This Marcellus Stock Valuation - Highlighted By Overlooked Disclosure</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1432551/comments?source=feed#comment-19051141</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">19051141</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[What they're doing is working. There's nothing to argue about here. This isn't a theoretical argument at this point, there are results.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 20:26:28 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[What they're doing is working. There's nothing to argue about here. This isn't a theoretical argument at this point, there are results.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Discrepancy In This Marcellus Stock Valuation - Highlighted By Overlooked Disclosure</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1432551/comments?source=feed#comment-19033411</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">19033411</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I'd suggest actually looking at their specific drilling program/activity rather than making general negative comments. Whatever theoretical arguments there might be, so far the results have been good.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 13:03:09 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I'd suggest actually looking at their specific drilling program/activity rather than making general negative comments. Whatever theoretical arguments there might be, so far the results have been good.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Discrepancy In This Marcellus Stock Valuation - Highlighted By Overlooked Disclosure</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1432551/comments?source=feed#comment-19018461</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">19018461</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[While that is generally true, that is not what is going on in this case, at least according to Gastar's management on their most recent conference call.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 03:59:29 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[While that is generally true, that is not what is going on in this case, at least according to Gastar's management on their most recent conference call.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Discrepancy In This Marcellus Stock Valuation - Highlighted By Overlooked Disclosure</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1432551/comments?source=feed#comment-19013641</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">19013641</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Gastar has drilled dozens of wells in their Marcellus fields. They have years worth of inventory. I agree that perhaps they should explore a sale, but it looks like they are testing down-spacing (further increasing inventory) and well azimuth (also increasing inventory by proving oddly-shaped acreage blocks can be more fully developed) - both tests look good so far, so perhaps by the end of the year their Marcellus asset will be up for sale.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 22:20:28 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Gastar has drilled dozens of wells in their Marcellus fields. They have years worth of inventory. I agree that perhaps they should explore a sale, but it looks like they are testing down-spacing (further increasing inventory) and well azimuth (also increasing inventory by proving oddly-shaped acreage blocks can be more fully developed) - both tests look good so far, so perhaps by the end of the year their Marcellus asset will be up for sale.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Discrepancy In This Marcellus Stock Valuation - Highlighted By Overlooked Disclosure</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1432551/comments?source=feed#comment-18963211</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18963211</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Thanks for the question. Current production is ~50mmcfe/d, or ~8300 boepd, just under 1/3 oil and ngl. I've been focusing on EBITDA rather than production metrics recently as EBITDA takes into account product pricing (gas vs oil vs ngls, price differentials, etc) and is reflective of actual economics for the companies.<br/><br/>2P is tough for GST, I don't think GST discloses it, and it just shot up through the roof with the recent Hunton acquisition. If they measured it like the Canadian companies that do disclose 2P reserves, it would likely be in the range of $1 billion  (very rough estimate), versus a current ~$500 mm enterprise value.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 17:14:24 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Thanks for the question. Current production is ~50mmcfe/d, or ~8300 boepd, just under 1/3 oil and ngl. I've been focusing on EBITDA rather than production metrics recently as EBITDA takes into account product pricing (gas vs oil vs ngls, price differentials, etc) and is reflective of actual economics for the companies.<br/><br/>2P is tough for GST, I don't think GST discloses it, and it just shot up through the roof with the recent Hunton acquisition. If they measured it like the Canadian companies that do disclose 2P reserves, it would likely be in the range of $1 billion  (very rough estimate), versus a current ~$500 mm enterprise value.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Discrepancy In This Marcellus Stock Valuation - Highlighted By Overlooked Disclosure</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1432551/comments?source=feed#comment-18947661</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18947661</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Its hard to tell whats going on at SD right now. It looks like well results have been disappointing, particularly in the Mississippian trusts SD is operating - <a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://seekingalpha.com/a/ti8b'>http://seekingalpha.co...</a><br/><br/>I think Gastar is a cleaner story - the balance sheet is simpler, production is growing rapidly, and it is undervalued compared to its peers in the Marcellus. The Hunton horizontal redevelopment makes sense, and it looks like results are economically superior to the Mississippian.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 12:03:05 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Its hard to tell whats going on at SD right now. It looks like well results have been disappointing, particularly in the Mississippian trusts SD is operating - <a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://seekingalpha.com/a/ti8b'>http://seekingalpha.co...</a><br/><br/>I think Gastar is a cleaner story - the balance sheet is simpler, production is growing rapidly, and it is undervalued compared to its peers in the Marcellus. The Hunton horizontal redevelopment makes sense, and it looks like results are economically superior to the Mississippian.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Discrepancy In This Marcellus Stock Valuation - Highlighted By Overlooked Disclosure</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1432551/comments?source=feed#comment-18945161</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18945161</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Competition in the Hunton would be great for Gastar. Gastar has ~100,000 net acres in the core of the play. If other companies drill in the area, it will help prove up the play for Gastar.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 11:17:34 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Competition in the Hunton would be great for Gastar. Gastar has ~100,000 net acres in the core of the play. If other companies drill in the area, it will help prove up the play for Gastar.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Discrepancy In This Marcellus Stock Valuation - Highlighted By Overlooked Disclosure</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1432551/comments?source=feed#comment-18825212</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18825212</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Perhaps, but at current valuations I'd much rather own GST.<br/><br/>I got an email today after this article was published from a smart, successful investment analyst who has a position in GST that he started building at 80 cents a share. He still has a very large position, and he suggested that GST may actually hit $90 million in EBITDA in 2013, and exit 2013 at a substantially higher run-rate. If that happens, GST may be one of the best performing energy stocks this year.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 17:27:31 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Perhaps, but at current valuations I'd much rather own GST.<br/><br/>I got an email today after this article was published from a smart, successful investment analyst who has a position in GST that he started building at 80 cents a share. He still has a very large position, and he suggested that GST may actually hit $90 million in EBITDA in 2013, and exit 2013 at a substantially higher run-rate. If that happens, GST may be one of the best performing energy stocks this year.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Discrepancy In This Marcellus Stock Valuation - Highlighted By Overlooked Disclosure</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1432551/comments?source=feed#comment-18819591</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18819591</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[UPL trades at 10.5x EV/run rate Q1 2013 operating cash flow. This equates to a $10.4 price for GST (adjusted &amp; normalized) and is below the multiples of the other stocks. UPL probably should trade at a discount to this set of comps as UPL's Marcellus appears to be less economic than the others', except perhaps REXX's.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 14:36:33 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[UPL trades at 10.5x EV/run rate Q1 2013 operating cash flow. This equates to a $10.4 price for GST (adjusted &amp; normalized) and is below the multiples of the other stocks. UPL probably should trade at a discount to this set of comps as UPL's Marcellus appears to be less economic than the others', except perhaps REXX's.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Warren Resources; A Rare Deep Value E&amp;P Opportunity</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1428431/comments?source=feed#comment-18817341</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18817341</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Well written article. What % of the reserve value is in California vs the Wyoming CBM?]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 13:52:49 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Well written article. What % of the reserve value is in California vs the Wyoming CBM?]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Mart Resources: A 14% Yield And Big Catalysts</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1413441/comments?source=feed#comment-18740021</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18740021</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Have you dug into Renegade? Looks like they're way outspending cash flow, makes the dividend look pretty unsustainable (thus the high yield). Any thoughts?]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sun, 12 May 2013 15:40:34 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Have you dug into Renegade? Looks like they're way outspending cash flow, makes the dividend look pretty unsustainable (thus the high yield). Any thoughts?]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Energy Operations Updates: Halcon And Gastar</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1396911/comments?source=feed#comment-18711691</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18711691</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[ There was enough reserve upside for there to be a massively oversubscribed $200 million high yield deal at 100 bps below the offer price. I don't have non-public information about the company's reserves, but the upside is obviously the undeveloped Marcellus inventory and the huge Hunton play. If the Hunton works how management thinks it will, GST could be worth many times what it is currently trading for.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sat, 11 May 2013 12:26:38 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[ There was enough reserve upside for there to be a massively oversubscribed $200 million high yield deal at 100 bps below the offer price. I don't have non-public information about the company's reserves, but the upside is obviously the undeveloped Marcellus inventory and the huge Hunton play. If the Hunton works how management thinks it will, GST could be worth many times what it is currently trading for.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Energy Operations Updates: Halcon And Gastar</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1396911/comments?source=feed#comment-18679321</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18679321</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Not going to happen. Its a bond offering, going to be used to pay down bank debt and to fund the acquisition and share buyback. Might still be positive for the preferred as it will improve Gastar's liquidity position. But should be better for the common stock.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2013 12:35:03 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Not going to happen. Its a bond offering, going to be used to pay down bank debt and to fund the acquisition and share buyback. Might still be positive for the preferred as it will improve Gastar's liquidity position. But should be better for the common stock.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Mart Resources: A 14% Yield And Big Catalysts</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1413441/comments?source=feed#comment-18634551</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18634551</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Is Mart still producing cost oil or have they flipped to profit oil? Sometimes these international producers need to be examined closely, as their production can be cut dramatically when they go from &quot;cost recovery&quot; phase into &quot;profit&quot; phase.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2013 13:50:06 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Is Mart still producing cost oil or have they flipped to profit oil? Sometimes these international producers need to be examined closely, as their production can be cut dramatically when they go from &quot;cost recovery&quot; phase into &quot;profit&quot; phase.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Get Ready For The Big One - Bakken Flooding Coming This Year?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1295461/comments?source=feed#comment-18594151</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18594151</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[The topography does support the contention I made - there were substantial production and drilling disruptions the last time there was significant flooding in the region, in 2011. Yes, some locations are on high ground, but they need to be accessed by roads which go through lower areas. I checked with multiple operators in the area prior to publishing and they acknowledged the risk of flooding impacting operations.<br/><br/>To my knowledge, the weather predictions were inaccurate, there has not been significant flooding. However, the point about valuations and production disruptions has been accurate, despite WTI oil at almost $100/barrel, KOG and TPLM are down since the article, driven to a certain extent by production disappointments, partly driven by weather / road access.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 May 2013 16:09:44 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[The topography does support the contention I made - there were substantial production and drilling disruptions the last time there was significant flooding in the region, in 2011. Yes, some locations are on high ground, but they need to be accessed by roads which go through lower areas. I checked with multiple operators in the area prior to publishing and they acknowledged the risk of flooding impacting operations.<br/><br/>To my knowledge, the weather predictions were inaccurate, there has not been significant flooding. However, the point about valuations and production disruptions has been accurate, despite WTI oil at almost $100/barrel, KOG and TPLM are down since the article, driven to a certain extent by production disappointments, partly driven by weather / road access.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Energy Operations Updates: Halcon And Gastar</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1396911/comments?source=feed#comment-18593181</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18593181</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[They haven't disclosed who they're partnered with in the Hunton. And their 3rd party gas processor in the Marcellus is Williams.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 May 2013 15:51:12 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[They haven't disclosed who they're partnered with in the Hunton. And their 3rd party gas processor in the Marcellus is Williams.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Energy Operations Updates: Halcon And Gastar</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1396911/comments?source=feed#comment-18546201</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18546201</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[They're not perfect comps, I agree, but they are interesting to compare regardless. What do you think of REXX as a better comp for GST?]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2013 14:22:03 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[They're not perfect comps, I agree, but they are interesting to compare regardless. What do you think of REXX as a better comp for GST?]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Energy Operations Updates: Halcon And Gastar</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1396911/comments?source=feed#comment-18546151</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18546151</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[The street numbers for GST were off for Q1 and way off for Q2, they'll be coming up, particularly as production accelerates on the back of this new debt issue. It doesn't make sense to hit them for the debt and then not credit them for what they're spending it on.<br/><br/>HK's numbers look like they will come down more. I don't know how one can accurately model wells in exploratory plays, sounds like a good way to end up being &quot;precisely wrong&quot;.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2013 14:20:40 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[The street numbers for GST were off for Q1 and way off for Q2, they'll be coming up, particularly as production accelerates on the back of this new debt issue. It doesn't make sense to hit them for the debt and then not credit them for what they're spending it on.<br/><br/>HK's numbers look like they will come down more. I don't know how one can accurately model wells in exploratory plays, sounds like a good way to end up being &quot;precisely wrong&quot;.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Energy Operations Updates: Halcon And Gastar</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1396911/comments?source=feed#comment-18536071</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18536071</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[It will be interesting to see if that comes down considering performance so far this year.<br/><br/>In other news, GST announced a $200 mm notes offering, the stock is up 6% so far and could reprice further upon successful completion of an offering.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2013 11:13:29 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[It will be interesting to see if that comes down considering performance so far this year.<br/><br/>In other news, GST announced a $200 mm notes offering, the stock is up 6% so far and could reprice further upon successful completion of an offering.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Energy Operations Updates: Halcon And Gastar</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1396911/comments?source=feed#comment-18496251</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18496251</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Whats the consensus? The company only generated $106 mm in EBITDA in Q1...]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 May 2013 12:18:24 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Whats the consensus? The company only generated $106 mm in EBITDA in Q1...]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Energy Operations Updates: Halcon And Gastar</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1396911/comments?source=feed#comment-18423171</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18423171</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I haven't modeled it but looks like consensus is ~$500-600 mm.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 17:49:42 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I haven't modeled it but looks like consensus is ~$500-600 mm.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Energy Operations Updates: Halcon And Gastar</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1396911/comments?source=feed#comment-18419821</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18419821</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I'm going to stick with the $60 mm cited in the article, but with an upward bias.<br/><br/>Here are my thoughts: Q1 was $14 mm. Production is growing substantially in Q2 and it sounds like it will stay flat in Q3. Q4 is up in the air, depending on Mid-Con results, but probably down from Q2/Q3 and up from Q1/. Q1 run-rate is ~$56 mm, Q2 closer to ~$70mm. So $60mm is likely a low estimate, could end up more like $65mm, or higher if there is more success in the Mid-Con. <br/><br/>Compared to any of the other Marcellus players, GST is trading at an absurdly low multiple. 9x seems like a reasonable target, considering the comps range 12-20x, which could get GST to a $6+ stock with $60 mm 2013 Ebitda.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 16:08:15 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I'm going to stick with the $60 mm cited in the article, but with an upward bias.<br/><br/>Here are my thoughts: Q1 was $14 mm. Production is growing substantially in Q2 and it sounds like it will stay flat in Q3. Q4 is up in the air, depending on Mid-Con results, but probably down from Q2/Q3 and up from Q1/. Q1 run-rate is ~$56 mm, Q2 closer to ~$70mm. So $60mm is likely a low estimate, could end up more like $65mm, or higher if there is more success in the Mid-Con. <br/><br/>Compared to any of the other Marcellus players, GST is trading at an absurdly low multiple. 9x seems like a reasonable target, considering the comps range 12-20x, which could get GST to a $6+ stock with $60 mm 2013 Ebitda.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Chesapeake Sells Another Marcellus Package At Low Valuation: Transaction Analysis</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1399251/comments?source=feed#comment-18412431</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18412431</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[This is almost as one-sided of a deal as what Gastar got - <a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://seekingalpha.com/a/t9bh'>http://seekingalpha.co...</a>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 13:44:03 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[This is almost as one-sided of a deal as what Gastar got - <a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://seekingalpha.com/a/t9bh'>http://seekingalpha.co...</a>]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Energy Operations Updates: Halcon And Gastar</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1396911/comments?source=feed#comment-18391351</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18391351</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Thanks for the detailed comments.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 02:14:22 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Thanks for the detailed comments.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Marcellus Stocks Breaking Out - Exceptional Results Driving Outperformance</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1376431/comments?source=feed#comment-18379321</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18379321</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I think the story here is GST, not MHR. GST just had blow-out earnings, impressive uptick on guidance, and its well in its new field is even better than expected. Could break out tomorrow.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2013 18:13:05 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I think the story here is GST, not MHR. GST just had blow-out earnings, impressive uptick on guidance, and its well in its new field is even better than expected. Could break out tomorrow.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Marcellus Stocks Breaking Out - Exceptional Results Driving Outperformance</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1376431/comments?source=feed#comment-18152651</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18152651</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Great question. I have a tiny out of the money call option position, I'm not a buyer of the stock here.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2013 17:27:41 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Great question. I have a tiny out of the money call option position, I'm not a buyer of the stock here.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Sandridge Could Be Further Negatively Impacted By Poor Trust Well Performance</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1376651/comments?source=feed#comment-18147911</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18147911</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I do not own nor am I short any security mentioned in the article. As always, I reserve the right to buy or sell any security mentioned at any time. Seeking Alpha has a rigorous disclosure policy (as do the regulators!)]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2013 15:29:40 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I do not own nor am I short any security mentioned in the article. As always, I reserve the right to buy or sell any security mentioned at any time. Seeking Alpha has a rigorous disclosure policy (as do the regulators!)]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Sandridge Could Be Further Negatively Impacted By Poor Trust Well Performance</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1376651/comments?source=feed#comment-18145301</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18145301</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I'm not sure what your point is? Do you disagree with this argument? I did the detailed work and the results look ugly, and I linked to the press release which goes through the details. My point was that the trusts are generating disappointing results, and this will read through negatively to SD, and I believe that is conveyed without specifying if PER drilled 80 wells or 50.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2013 14:49:55 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I'm not sure what your point is? Do you disagree with this argument? I did the detailed work and the results look ugly, and I linked to the press release which goes through the details. My point was that the trusts are generating disappointing results, and this will read through negatively to SD, and I believe that is conveyed without specifying if PER drilled 80 wells or 50.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Sandridge Could Be Further Negatively Impacted By Poor Trust Well Performance</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1376651/comments?source=feed#comment-18142671</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18142671</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[The subs have subordinated distributions subject to a table of minimum distributions outlined in the 10-k and in the proxy. Once drilling is completed for the trust, 12 months later the subs convert into common units.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2013 14:11:11 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[The subs have subordinated distributions subject to a table of minimum distributions outlined in the 10-k and in the proxy. Once drilling is completed for the trust, 12 months later the subs convert into common units.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
