<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>jjmc2001's Comments</title>
    <description>jjmc2001's Comments RSS Syndication from SeekingAlpha.com</description>
    <link>http://seekingalpha.com/user/744007/comments</link>
    <item>
      <title>This Is How Much Nokia Made From Patents Last Year</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1448021/comments?source=feed#comment-19090371</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">19090371</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[there is a lot more to the whole patent sale. That was a planned sale so the acquirer could devote full effort to litigation and collection of royalties on &quot;non-essential&quot; patents. Over the years NOK had developed many patents that they are unlikely to use but can generate value. This sale is old news but at the time was considered positive as it would generate some future upside without wasting current manpower and resources.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 17:11:48 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[there is a lot more to the whole patent sale. That was a planned sale so the acquirer could devote full effort to litigation and collection of royalties on &quot;non-essential&quot; patents. Over the years NOK had developed many patents that they are unlikely to use but can generate value. This sale is old news but at the time was considered positive as it would generate some future upside without wasting current manpower and resources.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Energy Fuels, 2nd Largest U.S. Uranium Producer, Poised To Move</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/instablog/959816-peter-epstein/1868961-energy-fuels-2nd-largest-u-s-uranium-producer-poised-to-move?source=feed#comment-19078701</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">19078701</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Peter,<br/>I have not followed the uranium miners for several years. I do follow and trade other miners but I am not bullish on US coal right now due primarily to the US political climate and the looming availability of Natural Gas.<br/>I did listen to your interview with the CFO and I thought you asked all the right questions. I intend to follow that company. I toured that mill many years ago when I was working with the prior owners. ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 13:27:22 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Peter,<br/>I have not followed the uranium miners for several years. I do follow and trade other miners but I am not bullish on US coal right now due primarily to the US political climate and the looming availability of Natural Gas.<br/>I did listen to your interview with the CFO and I thought you asked all the right questions. I intend to follow that company. I toured that mill many years ago when I was working with the prior owners. ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Falling Commodity Prices Could Burst The U.S. Farmland Bubble</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1446691/comments?source=feed#comment-19047011</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">19047011</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I do not like the term bubble but certainly farm land prices have moved very high much too quickly. Using the term bubble makes one fear the impending crash and I think we will not have a crash but a more orderly reversion to the mean of suitable investment returns. I prefer looking at the actual economics and there is still US Midwest farmland to be had wherein the buyer can earn a respectable return (3-5%). To me that portends a gradual unwind in land prices as interest rates rise. I was around during the last decline in the early 80's and there was a lot more leverage in the farm belt than now. This led to a fast unwind in prices as lenders foreclosed and everyone was looking for the exits at the same time. In fact the land I now own was purchased after that bubble burst. I have recently renegotiated my rents based on a flexible rent program whereby both tenant and landlord share in gross revenue with the landlord having a floor with an acceptable return. This type of lease also protects the tenant to a degree if revenue is sub-optimum. A previous poster mentioned the decline of the small farmer.  In central Illinois that happened a long time ago.  ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 18:02:15 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I do not like the term bubble but certainly farm land prices have moved very high much too quickly. Using the term bubble makes one fear the impending crash and I think we will not have a crash but a more orderly reversion to the mean of suitable investment returns. I prefer looking at the actual economics and there is still US Midwest farmland to be had wherein the buyer can earn a respectable return (3-5%). To me that portends a gradual unwind in land prices as interest rates rise. I was around during the last decline in the early 80's and there was a lot more leverage in the farm belt than now. This led to a fast unwind in prices as lenders foreclosed and everyone was looking for the exits at the same time. In fact the land I now own was purchased after that bubble burst. I have recently renegotiated my rents based on a flexible rent program whereby both tenant and landlord share in gross revenue with the landlord having a floor with an acceptable return. This type of lease also protects the tenant to a degree if revenue is sub-optimum. A previous poster mentioned the decline of the small farmer.  In central Illinois that happened a long time ago.  ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Energy Fuels, 2nd Largest U.S. Uranium Producer, Poised To Move</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/instablog/959816-peter-epstein/1868961-energy-fuels-2nd-largest-u-s-uranium-producer-poised-to-move?source=feed#comment-19040461</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">19040461</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[The key to the success of Energy Fuels is their ability to produce and sell at a profit. Have you analyzed the cost of delivered yellowcake and looked at their contracts and key customers. Just curious. I was formerly a banker to this company many years ago when it was owned by one of the pioneers in the US uranium industry. Ownership changed a few times since then and it has never quite lived up to its potential.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 15:35:57 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[The key to the success of Energy Fuels is their ability to produce and sell at a profit. Have you analyzed the cost of delivered yellowcake and looked at their contracts and key customers. Just curious. I was formerly a banker to this company many years ago when it was owned by one of the pioneers in the US uranium industry. Ownership changed a few times since then and it has never quite lived up to its potential.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Will Caterpillar Bulldoze My Portfolio Higher?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1447331/comments?source=feed#comment-19038421</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">19038421</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Thanks for the article and also a thank you to Mr. Tweed who knows more than most of us about dividend investing. I have been watching CAT and COP for some time and finally nibbled on both(CAT @ 84 and COP @ 62). Although I am no longer a buy and hold(or hope) investor I think these two are the &quot;best of breed&quot; in their respective sectors. MRO has filled the large E &amp; P space in my portfolio for a while now but there is certainly room for COP with a higher yield. ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 14:45:58 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Thanks for the article and also a thank you to Mr. Tweed who knows more than most of us about dividend investing. I have been watching CAT and COP for some time and finally nibbled on both(CAT @ 84 and COP @ 62). Although I am no longer a buy and hold(or hope) investor I think these two are the &quot;best of breed&quot; in their respective sectors. MRO has filled the large E &amp; P space in my portfolio for a while now but there is certainly room for COP with a higher yield. ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Nokia Manufacturing Improving?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1439351/comments?source=feed#comment-18960991</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18960991</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I do not claim to have any plastics manufacturing knowledge however many years ago I was CFO of a diversified group of companies that included plastics and fiberglass manufacturing. I do know my way around cost accounting spreadsheets and income statements. <br/>None of these plastics related comments shed any new light on Mr. Elop's comments which have been greatly taken out of context. Nor do they help in any way in my analysis of the future of NOK. NOK apparently had a number of supplier issues when they were bringing the 920 to market. I have gone back over many comments Mr. Elop made back then and nowhere did he mention the color variants as a cost issue.<br/><br/>Regardless of the cost difference of a red phone or a black phone NOK has to better manage their supply chain without ending up with excess inventory. This is a challenge to any company and is a formidable one when the product life cycle of a smart phone is sometimes measured in months instead of years. Industry pundits have lain some of the &quot;parts shortage&quot; on the chip suppliers and other internal parts suppliers. I have no idea from reading the financial statements nor do I really care at this point. Hopefully that is behind NOK now. The key now is to sell a bunch of Windows phones regardless of the color. I have been using a 920 since it was released by AT&amp;T and it is a fine device and serves me well. I have also been using both a Windows 7 and Windows 8 laptop and both work quite well syncing with my 920. I can find little fault with Windows 8 and have begun upgrading my office staff to new Windows 8 laptops. So far they work just fine with our old Windows XP servers. I am long NOK, INTC. I have nothing against AAPl and have used an iphone in the past and continue to use an ipad when I can wrest it away from my wife. I do prefer to use a Windows 8 ultrabook touch laptop when casually surfing the web.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 16:33:32 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I do not claim to have any plastics manufacturing knowledge however many years ago I was CFO of a diversified group of companies that included plastics and fiberglass manufacturing. I do know my way around cost accounting spreadsheets and income statements. <br/>None of these plastics related comments shed any new light on Mr. Elop's comments which have been greatly taken out of context. Nor do they help in any way in my analysis of the future of NOK. NOK apparently had a number of supplier issues when they were bringing the 920 to market. I have gone back over many comments Mr. Elop made back then and nowhere did he mention the color variants as a cost issue.<br/><br/>Regardless of the cost difference of a red phone or a black phone NOK has to better manage their supply chain without ending up with excess inventory. This is a challenge to any company and is a formidable one when the product life cycle of a smart phone is sometimes measured in months instead of years. Industry pundits have lain some of the &quot;parts shortage&quot; on the chip suppliers and other internal parts suppliers. I have no idea from reading the financial statements nor do I really care at this point. Hopefully that is behind NOK now. The key now is to sell a bunch of Windows phones regardless of the color. I have been using a 920 since it was released by AT&amp;T and it is a fine device and serves me well. I have also been using both a Windows 7 and Windows 8 laptop and both work quite well syncing with my 920. I can find little fault with Windows 8 and have begun upgrading my office staff to new Windows 8 laptops. So far they work just fine with our old Windows XP servers. I am long NOK, INTC. I have nothing against AAPl and have used an iphone in the past and continue to use an ipad when I can wrest it away from my wife. I do prefer to use a Windows 8 ultrabook touch laptop when casually surfing the web.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Eagle Bulk Shipping: Enjoy The Good News For Now, But Tread Very Carefully</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1441851/comments?source=feed#comment-18923841</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18923841</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I haven't analyzed this transaction or Eagle in detail as I wrote them off a long time ago as a company that I would not invest in. However I am long DSX simply because I think it has the strongest balance sheet in this sector. DSX has been up the last few days seemingly in sympathy with EGLE. DSX reports next week and I am not expecting any surprises. Any thoughts on DSX heading into earnings? The shipping rates still look poor and DSX is redeploying their fleet at lower rates as they come off charter.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 20:24:23 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I haven't analyzed this transaction or Eagle in detail as I wrote them off a long time ago as a company that I would not invest in. However I am long DSX simply because I think it has the strongest balance sheet in this sector. DSX has been up the last few days seemingly in sympathy with EGLE. DSX reports next week and I am not expecting any surprises. Any thoughts on DSX heading into earnings? The shipping rates still look poor and DSX is redeploying their fleet at lower rates as they come off charter.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ConocoPhillips Reaches A Transformational Inflection Point - Time To Buy</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1436821/comments?source=feed#comment-18861051</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18861051</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I have had a Buy order in for a while at $58. Changed it to $62 last night and grabbed some this morning to start my position. I like the upside of MRO a little bit better but that COP 4% dividend looks pretty good right now.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 14:51:51 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I have had a Buy order in for a while at $58. Changed it to $62 last night and grabbed some this morning to start my position. I like the upside of MRO a little bit better but that COP 4% dividend looks pretty good right now.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ConocoPhillips Reaches A Transformational Inflection Point - Time To Buy</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1436821/comments?source=feed#comment-18860141</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18860141</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I think the Record date is May 24 and the Ex-Div date is May 22. According to Charles Schwab site. ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 14:30:45 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I think the Record date is May 24 and the Ex-Div date is May 22. According to Charles Schwab site. ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Bakken Update: Investment Trends In The Bakken's First Quarter Of 2013, Part III</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1430591/comments?source=feed#comment-18827961</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18827961</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Thanks for this article and all of your fine work Michael. Other than substituting different ceramics and pad drilling why are drilling costs coming down? There may be several reasons but it seems as the last 12 months wells have gotten cheaper in ND. I am curious as to what you are seeing locally that might impact this. I recently re-established a long position in TPLM (5.22 cost) and continue to be long MRO. I look at MRO as a medium term hold and TPLM as a trading opportunity (both depending on WTI) I no longer believe in anything long-term as the whole QE situation has left me more a trader than an investor. Since 2009-2010 I trade with at least one eye on the exit. Cheers and keep up the good work.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 18:56:09 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Thanks for this article and all of your fine work Michael. Other than substituting different ceramics and pad drilling why are drilling costs coming down? There may be several reasons but it seems as the last 12 months wells have gotten cheaper in ND. I am curious as to what you are seeing locally that might impact this. I recently re-established a long position in TPLM (5.22 cost) and continue to be long MRO. I look at MRO as a medium term hold and TPLM as a trading opportunity (both depending on WTI) I no longer believe in anything long-term as the whole QE situation has left me more a trader than an investor. Since 2009-2010 I trade with at least one eye on the exit. Cheers and keep up the good work.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Lumia 925 (NOK) is officially revealed. Thanks to its aluminum frame, it's ~50g lighter than the 920, and ~30g lighter than the 928. Otherwise, the specs resemble the 928's: a 4.5," 1280x768, OLED display, a dual-core, 1.5 GHz., Qualcomm (QCOM) processor, and an 8.7MP camera with optical image stabilization. There's no xenon flash, but there is an advanced camera app that leverages Scalado. Nokia will be charging a steep unsubsidized price of &amp;euro;469 ($609) when the 925 hits China and Europe this June. But T-Mobile USA (TMUS) is expected to sell it for less than $100 subsidized. Shares -5%. Were investors expecting a 41MP sensor PureView phone?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/1023541?source=feed#comment-18823902</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18823902</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[@wrscomncents<br/>I am worried about China because NOK has had repeated supply line issues in China and numerous personnel changes there. I am long NOK but I am worried about Asia. My main reason for the earlier comment was to address the comments about T-mobile however Asia holds the key for the NOK turnaround in smart phones due to the large untapped potential. By the way I have owned a 920 since the day it was introduced by AT&amp;T and it is far superior to any phone I have used (yes I have used several iphones).  Apple showed us a breakthrough phone and now NOK/MSFT have made it help my business and efficiency.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 16:41:54 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[@wrscomncents<br/>I am worried about China because NOK has had repeated supply line issues in China and numerous personnel changes there. I am long NOK but I am worried about Asia. My main reason for the earlier comment was to address the comments about T-mobile however Asia holds the key for the NOK turnaround in smart phones due to the large untapped potential. By the way I have owned a 920 since the day it was introduced by AT&amp;T and it is far superior to any phone I have used (yes I have used several iphones).  Apple showed us a breakthrough phone and now NOK/MSFT have made it help my business and efficiency.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Lumia 925 (NOK) is officially revealed. Thanks to its aluminum frame, it's ~50g lighter than the 920, and ~30g lighter than the 928. Otherwise, the specs resemble the 928's: a 4.5," 1280x768, OLED display, a dual-core, 1.5 GHz., Qualcomm (QCOM) processor, and an 8.7MP camera with optical image stabilization. There's no xenon flash, but there is an advanced camera app that leverages Scalado. Nokia will be charging a steep unsubsidized price of &amp;euro;469 ($609) when the 925 hits China and Europe this June. But T-Mobile USA (TMUS) is expected to sell it for less than $100 subsidized. Shares -5%. Were investors expecting a 41MP sensor PureView phone?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/1023541?source=feed#comment-18814871</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18814871</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[30 million is not paltry but I am more worried about market share in China with 900 million and then India. ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 12:46:56 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[30 million is not paltry but I am more worried about market share in China with 900 million and then India. ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Whispers Say 'How Much' Not 'If' Ruger Will Beat Estimates</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1379171/comments?source=feed#comment-18793601</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18793601</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Yes.  ATK makes Federal and others.  OLN makes Winchester.  Both companies are much more complex than just ammo makers.  This would have been a good year for a pure ammo maker. The recent OLN conference call gave some good insight into the ammo cycle.  OLN has been in that business over a century so they have been through crazy demand cycles before.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 22:43:58 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Yes.  ATK makes Federal and others.  OLN makes Winchester.  Both companies are much more complex than just ammo makers.  This would have been a good year for a pure ammo maker. The recent OLN conference call gave some good insight into the ammo cycle.  OLN has been in that business over a century so they have been through crazy demand cycles before.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>4 Value Packed Stocks Under $7 - Revisited</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1408771/comments?source=feed#comment-18545521</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18545521</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[<br/>Anthony,<br/>Really liked your article. I was long LSE and just sold a portion of my position over $7.00 as I thought it had come too far too quickly. Sorry to nitpick but your statement: &quot;The company recently announced an initial public offering of 6,500,000 shares of company stock.&quot; is not accurate. The company is doing a secondary offering and the proceeds will be used to pay down debt or other corporate purposes. LSE is still my favorite REIT but now I am playing with profits on this one.<br/>Thanks for the update.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2013 14:10:52 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<br/>Anthony,<br/>Really liked your article. I was long LSE and just sold a portion of my position over $7.00 as I thought it had come too far too quickly. Sorry to nitpick but your statement: &quot;The company recently announced an initial public offering of 6,500,000 shares of company stock.&quot; is not accurate. The company is doing a secondary offering and the proceeds will be used to pay down debt or other corporate purposes. LSE is still my favorite REIT but now I am playing with profits on this one.<br/>Thanks for the update.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Bakken Update: Triangle's Accounting Issue Is A Non-Factor</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1393671/comments?source=feed#comment-18453321</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18453321</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I wrote that too fast, Bakken wells tend to be much higher. Sorry for the mistake]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sun, 05 May 2013 00:34:09 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I wrote that too fast, Bakken wells tend to be much higher. Sorry for the mistake]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Bakken Update: Triangle's Accounting Issue Is A Non-Factor</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1393671/comments?source=feed#comment-18447241</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18447241</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Great comments on transportation. My personal view on Bakken vs. Eagle Ford is more focused on cost of production. Most of the wells in the Eagle Ford seem to be higher cost than similar production in the Bakken. About a year ago MRO made a strategic decision to focus more Cap Ex on the Eagle Ford and cut back the Bakken drilling due to cost. The problem in trying to analyze the difference and relate it to the various players is that everyone's leasehold interests and exploration budgets are different. Both of these shale plays are great for the players that have good properties and pricing will work out if they drill at reasonable costs. The infrastructure in the Bakken is improving but I will leave that analysis to Michael who knows it much better. I think Michael F recently mentioned that he viewed TPLM as more of a trading stock than a buy and hold. I concur with that completely. If I wanted to buy and hold an E&amp;P it would be COP or MRO as they pay respectable dividends and give good geographically diversified exposure. Having said that I am now long MRO and TPLM but I keep my eye on WTI and will trade TPLM in a heartbeat. ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sat, 04 May 2013 16:13:19 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Great comments on transportation. My personal view on Bakken vs. Eagle Ford is more focused on cost of production. Most of the wells in the Eagle Ford seem to be higher cost than similar production in the Bakken. About a year ago MRO made a strategic decision to focus more Cap Ex on the Eagle Ford and cut back the Bakken drilling due to cost. The problem in trying to analyze the difference and relate it to the various players is that everyone's leasehold interests and exploration budgets are different. Both of these shale plays are great for the players that have good properties and pricing will work out if they drill at reasonable costs. The infrastructure in the Bakken is improving but I will leave that analysis to Michael who knows it much better. I think Michael F recently mentioned that he viewed TPLM as more of a trading stock than a buy and hold. I concur with that completely. If I wanted to buy and hold an E&amp;P it would be COP or MRO as they pay respectable dividends and give good geographically diversified exposure. Having said that I am now long MRO and TPLM but I keep my eye on WTI and will trade TPLM in a heartbeat. ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Bakken Update: Triangle's Accounting Issue Is A Non-Factor</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1393671/comments?source=feed#comment-18380211</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18380211</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Michael,<br/>I made a comment earlier that was deleted but here is the short version:<br/><br/>Thanks for your thoughts on TPLM. I have listened to the CC and reviewed the accounting info and think it is a non-issue. What matters to me is what they can produce (and prove up) in the next several quarters. <br/>I thought that TPLM was not as prepared as they should have been to respond to the accounting questions. The issue is confusing but their responses did further their cause. Bottom line for me is I went long (again) on yesterday's dip.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2013 18:32:24 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Michael,<br/>I made a comment earlier that was deleted but here is the short version:<br/><br/>Thanks for your thoughts on TPLM. I have listened to the CC and reviewed the accounting info and think it is a non-issue. What matters to me is what they can produce (and prove up) in the next several quarters. <br/>I thought that TPLM was not as prepared as they should have been to respond to the accounting questions. The issue is confusing but their responses did further their cause. Bottom line for me is I went long (again) on yesterday's dip.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Bakken Update: Small Oil And Gas Stock Picks On The Pullback</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1343481/comments?source=feed#comment-18311701</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18311701</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Michael,<br/>Looking forward to your thoughts on today's TPLM results. I have been waiting to get back in and the decline in WTI today may give me the price I am looking for.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 10:12:45 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Michael,<br/>Looking forward to your thoughts on today's TPLM results. I have been waiting to get back in and the decline in WTI today may give me the price I am looking for.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Comparing ConocoPhillips And Its Dividend To Its Peers</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1380371/comments?source=feed#comment-18240771</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18240771</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Thanks for the well written analysis. I am long MRO for many of the same reasons that COP looks good. However the COP dividend looks better than any other pure play O &amp; G exploration company out there. Wish I owned some but I will when (if) we get a pullback.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2013 16:25:51 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Thanks for the well written analysis. I am long MRO for many of the same reasons that COP looks good. However the COP dividend looks better than any other pure play O &amp; G exploration company out there. Wish I owned some but I will when (if) we get a pullback.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Whispers Say 'How Much' Not 'If' Ruger Will Beat Estimates</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1379171/comments?source=feed#comment-18235421</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18235421</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[FOr information about ammo capacity I suggest anyone interested read OLN's earnings call from last week. They specifically address capacity and the outlook for this strange demand cycle. In summary OLN is operating at capacity and have been since they moved their centerfire ammo production to MS from the higher labor cost State of Illinois. One of the keys is that they have been able to get pricing increases to stick due to the crazy demand. Going forward they will sell all they can produce but it is only about 20-30% of OLN so while a nice profitable niche it does not drive the share price much. As a long time holder of OLN I can attest to the fact that they are cyclical with economic cycles due to their industrial chemicals. A key fact to note is that they have not raised their dividend in many years. Management has gotten paid very well however. I stay long for the yield and the safety but sometimes I question my position.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2013 14:57:04 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[FOr information about ammo capacity I suggest anyone interested read OLN's earnings call from last week. They specifically address capacity and the outlook for this strange demand cycle. In summary OLN is operating at capacity and have been since they moved their centerfire ammo production to MS from the higher labor cost State of Illinois. One of the keys is that they have been able to get pricing increases to stick due to the crazy demand. Going forward they will sell all they can produce but it is only about 20-30% of OLN so while a nice profitable niche it does not drive the share price much. As a long time holder of OLN I can attest to the fact that they are cyclical with economic cycles due to their industrial chemicals. A key fact to note is that they have not raised their dividend in many years. Management has gotten paid very well however. I stay long for the yield and the safety but sometimes I question my position.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>4 REITs To Consider And 4 To Avoid</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1376781/comments?source=feed#comment-18152081</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18152081</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[@author,<br/>Good points as the dot.com boom illustrated the &quot;inefficiencies&quot; of stock market value. <br/>I tend to shy away from income property REITs as a significant percentage of my personal assets are in land and real estate. I would certainly not chase PCL and the other timber REITS at current levels as I think the prices have gotten too frothy. LSE is one that deserves a look as they tend to have high quality single credit tenant properties. I will check out the others you mentioned as it is getting tougher to find 4%+ yield that is safe.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2013 17:10:17 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[@author,<br/>Good points as the dot.com boom illustrated the &quot;inefficiencies&quot; of stock market value. <br/>I tend to shy away from income property REITs as a significant percentage of my personal assets are in land and real estate. I would certainly not chase PCL and the other timber REITS at current levels as I think the prices have gotten too frothy. LSE is one that deserves a look as they tend to have high quality single credit tenant properties. I will check out the others you mentioned as it is getting tougher to find 4%+ yield that is safe.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>4 REITs To Consider And 4 To Avoid</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1376781/comments?source=feed#comment-18149771</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18149771</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[One could also make the rebuttal argument that the stock market is perfectly efficient in that it reflects the price of a stock that is exactly the market reflection of what a willing buyer will pay a willing seller. Beyond that I find your discussion of PCL to be quite shallow. I am not familiar with the specifics of the other names. Two of my favorite REITS are PCL and LSE both of which I have over a 35% return on in a fairly short time frame. Shows my naiveté as I bought them for a 4-5% safe yield.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2013 16:06:54 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[One could also make the rebuttal argument that the stock market is perfectly efficient in that it reflects the price of a stock that is exactly the market reflection of what a willing buyer will pay a willing seller. Beyond that I find your discussion of PCL to be quite shallow. I am not familiar with the specifics of the other names. Two of my favorite REITS are PCL and LSE both of which I have over a 35% return on in a fairly short time frame. Shows my naiveté as I bought them for a 4-5% safe yield.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Anatomy Of A Gold Mining Crash - And Recovery</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1370911/comments?source=feed#comment-18138541</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18138541</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Same with NEM heading into earnings.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2013 12:51:18 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Same with NEM heading into earnings.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Investors' Primer For Kinder Morgan</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1359761/comments?source=feed#comment-18054311</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18054311</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Thank you for the excellent job on your first article. I have long been intrigued by these names but have not invested yet mainly due to my lack of understanding of the differences of the entities. You have made my job simpler. Just the kind of work I would expect from a fellow Illini.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2013 19:10:47 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Thank you for the excellent job on your first article. I have long been intrigued by these names but have not invested yet mainly due to my lack of understanding of the differences of the entities. You have made my job simpler. Just the kind of work I would expect from a fellow Illini.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Best Bang For Your Buck: How Smith &amp; Wesson Gets To $16</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1328371/comments?source=feed#comment-18050751</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18050751</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[When you can sell everything you can produce at a good margin for the foreseeable future I find that to be a good stock to invest in. The reality is the demand for guns and ammo is real and not just in a few rural areas. The gun ownership population has expanded greatly in the last several years and these people will keep buying both guns and ammo. At the present I do not own RGR of SWHC but have owned both several times. I am long OLN but it is more of an industrial chemicals play than an ammo producer. They report earnings on 4/25 after hours. I predict blowout sales for the Winchester segment (again). The chemicals side will be inline. I further predict the stock will sell off on Friday as it always does after earnings. But on the dip and collect the fat dividend. OLN is boring but just keeps chugging along.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2013 17:27:21 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[When you can sell everything you can produce at a good margin for the foreseeable future I find that to be a good stock to invest in. The reality is the demand for guns and ammo is real and not just in a few rural areas. The gun ownership population has expanded greatly in the last several years and these people will keep buying both guns and ammo. At the present I do not own RGR of SWHC but have owned both several times. I am long OLN but it is more of an industrial chemicals play than an ammo producer. They report earnings on 4/25 after hours. I predict blowout sales for the Winchester segment (again). The chemicals side will be inline. I further predict the stock will sell off on Friday as it always does after earnings. But on the dip and collect the fat dividend. OLN is boring but just keeps chugging along.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Nokia As Comeback King: Using A Grassroots Approach To Win</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1365771/comments?source=feed#comment-18042701</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18042701</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[@doggie,<br/>Don't forget that the US carriers operate on different systems so even if you had an unlocked 920 it would not work on Verizon. Therefore NOK is desigining a phone rumored to be the 928 which will work on Verizons network. Sprint is yet another network. NOK made a deal with At&amp;T to be exclusive on the 920. They also had a phone for T-Mobile. I am not defending their marketing but they will be making different phones for different markets (and carriers) for specific reasons. Bringing the Asha line to the US would be a disaster as the US consumer does not want feature phones now. Rather they need to fill out the US product line with entry level smartphones to grab share from the lower priced Androids. For the record I will not be terribly upset if NOK spends its marketing dollars in Asia rather than the US.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2013 14:54:52 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[@doggie,<br/>Don't forget that the US carriers operate on different systems so even if you had an unlocked 920 it would not work on Verizon. Therefore NOK is desigining a phone rumored to be the 928 which will work on Verizons network. Sprint is yet another network. NOK made a deal with At&amp;T to be exclusive on the 920. They also had a phone for T-Mobile. I am not defending their marketing but they will be making different phones for different markets (and carriers) for specific reasons. Bringing the Asha line to the US would be a disaster as the US consumer does not want feature phones now. Rather they need to fill out the US product line with entry level smartphones to grab share from the lower priced Androids. For the record I will not be terribly upset if NOK spends its marketing dollars in Asia rather than the US.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Freeport-McMoRan Is Still A Strong Buy</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1356941/comments?source=feed#comment-17941041</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">17941041</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[@Mike,<br/>One of my dumbest moves was selling FCX around $30 before the split. At the depths of the financial meltdown I bought a sizable position of FCX around $18. When it met my target I sold and then watched it continue to rise and then split. I guess you will never go broke selling for a profit but that one still sticks in my mind. I bought some last week at $27.50 and will continue to nibble at the current levels. I have spent many years following the mining industry and really liked FCX but now with the oil assets the future is less clear but perhaps much better.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Apr 2013 14:20:25 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[@Mike,<br/>One of my dumbest moves was selling FCX around $30 before the split. At the depths of the financial meltdown I bought a sizable position of FCX around $18. When it met my target I sold and then watched it continue to rise and then split. I guess you will never go broke selling for a profit but that one still sticks in my mind. I bought some last week at $27.50 and will continue to nibble at the current levels. I have spent many years following the mining industry and really liked FCX but now with the oil assets the future is less clear but perhaps much better.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ConocoPhillips: Cashing In On The Eagle Ford Shale</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1352281/comments?source=feed#comment-17855171</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">17855171</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Michael,<br/>Thanks for the article. I have been long MRO for a long while for some of the saem reasons you cited for COP and been watching COP for an entry point when we got a break in WTI. Interesting that both MRO and COP both have good Eagle Ford acreage and WI shares in the Shenandoah well.  Both simpler stocks since the refining sides have bee spun off.  I think MRO paid dearly for their Eagle Ford acreage but it looks like a winner.<br/><br/>You have to ask your buddy where he got those crawfish. they grow pretty big near that Waterford Nuclear Plant. Easy to find too cause they glow in the dark.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Apr 2013 19:24:27 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Michael,<br/>Thanks for the article. I have been long MRO for a long while for some of the saem reasons you cited for COP and been watching COP for an entry point when we got a break in WTI. Interesting that both MRO and COP both have good Eagle Ford acreage and WI shares in the Shenandoah well.  Both simpler stocks since the refining sides have bee spun off.  I think MRO paid dearly for their Eagle Ford acreage but it looks like a winner.<br/><br/>You have to ask your buddy where he got those crawfish. they grow pretty big near that Waterford Nuclear Plant. Easy to find too cause they glow in the dark.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Bakken Update: Bakken Well Costs Are Decreasing Faster Than Companies Indicate</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1350561/comments?source=feed#comment-17848421</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">17848421</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Michael,<br/>As always very nice work here. I share your view on oil pricing. I am still long MRO and waiting to pull the trigger on TPLM. Any opinion on a good entry price for TPLM heading into earnings?]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Apr 2013 16:25:39 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Michael,<br/>As always very nice work here. I share your view on oil pricing. I am still long MRO and waiting to pull the trigger on TPLM. Any opinion on a good entry price for TPLM heading into earnings?]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Going Long On Arch Coal</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1350121/comments?source=feed#comment-17836071</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">17836071</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Paulo,<br/>I was responding to the question posed. Most steam coal contracts tend to be long term in nature with minimum/maximum tonnages. Certainly short-term market forces will affect those negotiations. I think too many readers look at steam coal pricing as too similar to other industrial minerals.<br/><br/>I enjoy your work. Hope you revisit the shipping industry soon.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Apr 2013 11:54:34 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Paulo,<br/>I was responding to the question posed. Most steam coal contracts tend to be long term in nature with minimum/maximum tonnages. Certainly short-term market forces will affect those negotiations. I think too many readers look at steam coal pricing as too similar to other industrial minerals.<br/><br/>I enjoy your work. Hope you revisit the shipping industry soon.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
