Proposal to Correct Resource Misallocation in the Housing/Lending Sector [View article]
Gibberish aside, the difficulty on its implementation, as Malkiel failed to explain, would be on preventing fraud. In other words, how can all the parties (bank/lender, borrower, marginal home buyers, gov't) somehow not further distort reality - so how would you get their interest aligned?
The borrower wants the highest possible selling price, ok. The banks too. The government is neutralized in your scheme by legislation. And the rest of the power balance is the marginal home buyer, who wants the lowest possible price. It could theoretically work if this balance holds. Chances are, they don't - or they still take more than one year, as you said, to balance themselves out. Plenty of risk in your strategy but I trust your logic.
Miracle: Bush To Part The Bankrupt Sea [View article]
So assuming 150k loan balance, about 80k people will be 12 Billion US$ of new mortgages per annum. The troubled portion of the subprime (with high LTV and at least 50% payment increase) within a year is 500 Billion US$.
Plus the usual finelining like no 95LTV for this and that borrower, definitely only owner occ- and primary home, etc will be enough to just guarantee that less than the meager $12 B "bailout" will be deployable. Plus the other filter that they're likely to use: geography , loan limit, and income, which will cut out the FL, CA, NV, MA, and AZ loans making up 90+% of the blowups right now.
This Horowitz guy isn't looking out for his investors.
Bank of America Invests $2B in Countrywide: Who Wins? [View article]
In my opinion BAC will most likely make very little money in return for a sound guarantee of losing none of its previous investments with Cwide. The 30% capacity is about right: I calculated that at 30% current rate of "burn" that combined 13B might last them 4 weeks. The question is since they have 65,000 people would they rather keep 100% resources for 30% utilization, or a really massive workforce adjustment is in the works? Keep in mind the US adds a net 100k job monthly these days, so that number if done in a day is huge. One last thing, don't you all see the irony of it all? Cwide gets a subprime loan from BAC. Hahahaha.
Proposal to Correct Resource Misallocation in the Housing/Lending Sector [View article]
The borrower wants the highest possible selling price, ok. The banks too. The government is neutralized in your scheme by legislation. And the rest of the power balance is the marginal home buyer, who wants the lowest possible price. It could theoretically work if this balance holds. Chances are, they don't - or they still take more than one year, as you said, to balance themselves out. Plenty of risk in your strategy but I trust your logic.
Miracle: Bush To Part The Bankrupt Sea [View article]
Plus the usual finelining like no 95LTV for this and that borrower, definitely only owner occ- and primary home, etc will be enough to just guarantee that less than the meager $12 B "bailout" will be deployable. Plus the other filter that they're likely to use: geography , loan limit, and income, which will cut out the FL, CA, NV, MA, and AZ loans making up 90+% of the blowups right now.
This Horowitz guy isn't looking out for his investors.
Bank of America Invests $2B in Countrywide: Who Wins? [View article]