Seeking Alpha

vitaminc » Comments » S

  • An SIM Free Option for LTE Should Exist [View article]
    Not sure the comparison of one-off transactions between WiMax/LTE and Wifi is valid. Most of those WiFi hotspot charges a ridiculous amount for one-off accesses (at least in US) and actually made using post-paid mobile data much more attractive. Hell even AT&T, T-Mobile USA and Sprint offers one-off hotspot free as an promotion to their DSL and 2.75G/3G+ wireless data plan packages.
    Sep 08 20:02 pm |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment
  • What Happens to WiMax with Sprint on the Ropes? [View article]
    It's ridiculous when people takes on a US centric view on WiMax deployment...
    Feb 29 18:48 pm |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment
  • WiFi vs. 3G and Session Based Mobile Broadband [View article]
    I find this article to be vastly interesting.

    While the consensus believes in the convergence of mobile data and mobile voice, the usage model is not yet clearly defined. Mobile/wireless data users are situated to a very different usage and payment model vs. the mobile voice users.

    Perhaps the convergence of the usage/payment model will happen with release of an Amazon-Kindle-like USB dongle.
    Feb 27 15:34 pm |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment
  • Verizon Interest in LTE - Don't Be So Hasty [View article]
    KDDI is rolling out WiMAX in cooperation with Intel and other investors, so I guess KDDI is not going to be a big proponent of UMB.
    Dec 02 20:50 pm |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment
  • Google Mobile: Winners and Losers [View article]
    How would carriers lose is beyond my comprehension; more off-the-shelf wireless devices drives higher wireless/data traffic and more contract signed.

    Tight control exercised by carriers? IMO they are just doing quality control. iPhone connection problems in UK were a result of poor hardware design and time constrained validation process.

    If you buy an off-the-shelf phone and it works poorly with AT&T, guess who you would blame? AT&T. Not the white-box cellphone maker, even when a proper AT&T validated device is having full bars at the same spot.
    Nov 27 17:11 pm |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment
  • Where We're Holding on WiMAX [View article]
    Xeno,

    You are dead wrong on a lot of stuff.

    1. WiMax is COMPLETELY different than WiFi, as a) WiFi travels on public spectrum b) cost of deployment is very cheap and can be done by consumers. WiMax travels on specific auctioned spectrum and the cost of deployment several magnitudes higher than WiFi thus ruling out any possibilities of the consumer deployment.

    2. As the cost of deployment is totally bared by the carriers, you will have to pay for contracts to use WiMax, similar to your GSM/UMTS/CDMA/HSPA networks.

    3. The cost of deploying WiMax network is much higher than deploying HSPA/EVDO network, as HSPA/EVDO are evolutionary network upgrades. WiMax is a complete overhaul at the equipment side (OFDM vs. TDM/CDM). Cell towers can be reused if proper licenses are granted.

    Tim,

    1. Both LTE and WiMax are not backward compatible with the current cellular networks.
    2. Emerging economies could use *FIXED* WiMax to save cost on the backhauul infrastructure, but a) fixed WiMax are not compatible with mobile WiMax and b) *FIXED* WiMax won't provide as much bandwidth capacity compare to fiber.
    Sep 28 12:28 pm |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment
More on S by vitaminc
Comments by Ticker
vitaminc's
Comments Stats
39 comments
Rating: -1 (0 - 1 is )