Cramer's Mad Money - Hey Apple: Chips Are Not a Commodity (4/30/09) [View article]
Re: "This will turn out to be a big deal."
I would add "... for Apple."
Of course how big a deal it becomes depends on Apple's ability to produce "more capable" chips in a timely, cost efficient manner.
Apple continues to up the ante for the competition. That bodes well for Apple and it's shareholders.
On May 01 09:46 AM Timeline Strategy Consulting wrote:
> Consider the context in which Apple operates. If they lack the capacity > to design and fabricate their own chips, then they either: (1) subject > themselves to whims of market pricing, long lead times, process runs > of millions and millions of units; or (2) partner with, and pre-pay, > a supplier who will dedicate capacity to Apple's specific needs. > > > Either way, they are effectively held hostage by chipmaking capacity, > which is theoretically able to be purchased by any company. In that > sense it is a commodity. > > Apple is thinking many years ahead with this move. The basis of their > strategy is that the separation between semiconductor and device > manufacturers hurts product development cycles, as the device manufacturers > are subject to the above dynamics. They will be able to design, produce, > and test chips with extremely fast turnaround, and greatly speed > the development cycle. > > This will turn out to be a big deal.
Cramer's Mad Money - Hey Apple: Chips Are Not a Commodity (4/30/09) [View article]
I would add "... for Apple."
Of course how big a deal it becomes depends on Apple's ability to produce "more capable" chips in a timely, cost efficient manner.
Apple continues to up the ante for the competition. That bodes well for Apple and it's shareholders.
On May 01 09:46 AM Timeline Strategy Consulting wrote:
> Consider the context in which Apple operates. If they lack the capacity
> to design and fabricate their own chips, then they either: (1) subject
> themselves to whims of market pricing, long lead times, process runs
> of millions and millions of units; or (2) partner with, and pre-pay,
> a supplier who will dedicate capacity to Apple's specific needs.
>
>
> Either way, they are effectively held hostage by chipmaking capacity,
> which is theoretically able to be purchased by any company. In that
> sense it is a commodity.
>
> Apple is thinking many years ahead with this move. The basis of their
> strategy is that the separation between semiconductor and device
> manufacturers hurts product development cycles, as the device manufacturers
> are subject to the above dynamics. They will be able to design, produce,
> and test chips with extremely fast turnaround, and greatly speed
> the development cycle.
>
> This will turn out to be a big deal.