<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>Inefficiency Hunter's Comments</title>
    <description>Inefficiency Hunter's Comments RSS Syndication from SeekingAlpha.com</description>
    <link>http://seekingalpha.com/user/804691/comments</link>
    <item>
      <title>Who Wants To Kill The Electric Car?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/320532/comments?source=feed#comment-2188650</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">2188650</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I find it very strange that my comments on this article have disappeared. They were mundane, they weren't spam or abuse. Either a conspiracy, a technical hitch or some editor has way too much time on their hands]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 07:12:14 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I find it very strange that my comments on this article have disappeared. They were mundane, they weren't spam or abuse. Either a conspiracy, a technical hitch or some editor has way too much time on their hands]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Who Wants To Kill The Electric Car?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/320532/comments?source=feed#comment-2187592</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">2187592</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Have my comments been removed from this article?]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 17:11:18 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Have my comments been removed from this article?]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The European Recession and Global Oil Demand 2012</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/319248/comments?source=feed#comment-2178857</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">2178857</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I'm rather amused to learn that &quot;McPeakster&quot; was intended to convey serious disdain... to me it just sounds cute, old-fasioned and quaintly American... almost like a term of endearment might :)]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 17:20:36 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I'm rather amused to learn that &quot;McPeakster&quot; was intended to convey serious disdain... to me it just sounds cute, old-fasioned and quaintly American... almost like a term of endearment might :)]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Arable Farmland And The Case For Agriculture</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/319608/comments?source=feed#comment-2175158</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">2175158</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Agreed, although I'd add one proviso about the potential of subsistence farms. Myself, I'd like to believe that these farmers could be a lot more productive with adapted organic methods, a bit of basic technology and some basic fertilizers and herbicides. The traditional farms may be forever labor intensive, but I'm not sure about necessarily unproductive. Theoretically, I think the sky is the limit for food production and pretty much anything else humankind might achieve... I think our main limiting factor is our general incompetence :)]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sun, 15 Jan 2012 03:22:53 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Agreed, although I'd add one proviso about the potential of subsistence farms. Myself, I'd like to believe that these farmers could be a lot more productive with adapted organic methods, a bit of basic technology and some basic fertilizers and herbicides. The traditional farms may be forever labor intensive, but I'm not sure about necessarily unproductive. Theoretically, I think the sky is the limit for food production and pretty much anything else humankind might achieve... I think our main limiting factor is our general incompetence :)]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Arable Farmland And The Case For Agriculture</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/319608/comments?source=feed#comment-2174639</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">2174639</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Not quite fair...they have been far more successful than most at achieving rural growth. Much of the growth seen in recent decades has been in rural areas, in contrast to most countries where income disparities generally grow between rural and urban areas. First their revolution created a more equal distribution of land holdings, then their household responsibility system created an incentive to produce. Hence generally productive land. With a population density more than four times that of the US, they're doing pretty well, considering that the US is now a net food importer. Granted, they probably have less calories in their diets.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sat, 14 Jan 2012 16:04:13 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Not quite fair...they have been far more successful than most at achieving rural growth. Much of the growth seen in recent decades has been in rural areas, in contrast to most countries where income disparities generally grow between rural and urban areas. First their revolution created a more equal distribution of land holdings, then their household responsibility system created an incentive to produce. Hence generally productive land. With a population density more than four times that of the US, they're doing pretty well, considering that the US is now a net food importer. Granted, they probably have less calories in their diets.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Arable Farmland And The Case For Agriculture</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/319608/comments?source=feed#comment-2173981</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">2173981</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[So long as we cannot even close the productivity gap between developed and developing countries (with the latter producing 20% of the former per hectare) , which exists because of a lack of infrastructure, inputs, technology and knowledge, I seriously doubt that people are going to get it together to do anything more expensive and high-tech.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sat, 14 Jan 2012 10:55:44 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[So long as we cannot even close the productivity gap between developed and developing countries (with the latter producing 20% of the former per hectare) , which exists because of a lack of infrastructure, inputs, technology and knowledge, I seriously doubt that people are going to get it together to do anything more expensive and high-tech.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The European Recession and Global Oil Demand 2012</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/319248/comments?source=feed#comment-2173670</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">2173670</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Thanks Freddy. McPeakster. Love it. Even the IEA (2010) claim that conventional oil peaked in 2006, though (although admittedly they do claim a return to an &quot;undulating plateau&quot; of a similar level in 2020). Of course, there's a massive difference between a peak in conventional oil and a peak in all oil production.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sat, 14 Jan 2012 06:29:04 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Thanks Freddy. McPeakster. Love it. Even the IEA (2010) claim that conventional oil peaked in 2006, though (although admittedly they do claim a return to an &quot;undulating plateau&quot; of a similar level in 2020). Of course, there's a massive difference between a peak in conventional oil and a peak in all oil production.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Right And Wrong Of 'Ethical Investment&quot;</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/318115/comments?source=feed#comment-2171249</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">2171249</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[To be honest I don't disagree with you that much; in fact much of my article talks about the ineffectiveness of much &quot;ethical investment&quot;; I'd hate for my comments above to give the impression I genuinely think we are entering some kind of global ethical investment utopia. Despite my referencing the UN, international laws don't always hold much sway, and national laws can be easily flouted in corrupt states. In an ideal world, investors would be able to agree on a few basic principles, like transparency requirements, child labor rules and basic environmental protection. We don't need to tackle issues of abortion to agree! However, sadly, we don't live in an ideal world. You're probably more realistic than fatalistic. In principle, however, I have no problem with &quot;ethical investment&quot; - whatever that might be. I do not believe that companies should have freedom at all costs, I think that we can agree on a few basic &quot;do unto others&quot; ethics, and I don't  think political or religious issues need to be brought into the discussion.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 10:52:26 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[To be honest I don't disagree with you that much; in fact much of my article talks about the ineffectiveness of much &quot;ethical investment&quot;; I'd hate for my comments above to give the impression I genuinely think we are entering some kind of global ethical investment utopia. Despite my referencing the UN, international laws don't always hold much sway, and national laws can be easily flouted in corrupt states. In an ideal world, investors would be able to agree on a few basic principles, like transparency requirements, child labor rules and basic environmental protection. We don't need to tackle issues of abortion to agree! However, sadly, we don't live in an ideal world. You're probably more realistic than fatalistic. In principle, however, I have no problem with &quot;ethical investment&quot; - whatever that might be. I do not believe that companies should have freedom at all costs, I think that we can agree on a few basic &quot;do unto others&quot; ethics, and I don't  think political or religious issues need to be brought into the discussion.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The European Recession and Global Oil Demand 2012</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/319248/comments?source=feed#comment-2171132</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">2171132</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Thanks Dave, no offence taken. As per your link, that's interesting stuff. In a way, the demand created by exporting countries is higher because of very high and inefficient oil subsidies, along with the general growing competition from developing countries, both importers and exporters. However, currently China's highest energy subsidies are for oil, so the problem lies with importing nations as well as exporting ones. Overall, subsidies encourage over-consumption, and the competition comes from importers as well as exporters. My guess is that some of the extreme forms of waste and inefficiencies will be eliminated; for example using oil to generate power in OPEC countries. After all, I believe that is at least part of the reason why Iran wants its nuclear programme! On the other hand, if Saudi women start driving, these effects might be offset!]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 10:21:55 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Thanks Dave, no offence taken. As per your link, that's interesting stuff. In a way, the demand created by exporting countries is higher because of very high and inefficient oil subsidies, along with the general growing competition from developing countries, both importers and exporters. However, currently China's highest energy subsidies are for oil, so the problem lies with importing nations as well as exporting ones. Overall, subsidies encourage over-consumption, and the competition comes from importers as well as exporters. My guess is that some of the extreme forms of waste and inefficiencies will be eliminated; for example using oil to generate power in OPEC countries. After all, I believe that is at least part of the reason why Iran wants its nuclear programme! On the other hand, if Saudi women start driving, these effects might be offset!]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The European Recession and Global Oil Demand 2012</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/319248/comments?source=feed#comment-2171092</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">2171092</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[You're asking about supply, which is very important, for example one thing that has been constricting supply in recent years has been a sell-off in refining capacity amongst many oil players.<br/><br/>But investment decisions are also based on demand projections of the kind made here. Many types of oil production only become viable at high prices, e.g. in 2008 smaller companies had to cease operations as a result of the oil price drop. On the other hand, oil sands investment is currently high, so some companies are prepared to risk price drops in order to invest in non-conventional sources.<br/><br/>I'm not sure if by oil companies you mean the oil majors - Exxon, BP, Chevron et al - but they actually only produce around 15% of all oil supply - the rest is controlled by state entities. Much of the data we have about reserves and production estimates is released by national governments.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 10:13:15 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[You're asking about supply, which is very important, for example one thing that has been constricting supply in recent years has been a sell-off in refining capacity amongst many oil players.<br/><br/>But investment decisions are also based on demand projections of the kind made here. Many types of oil production only become viable at high prices, e.g. in 2008 smaller companies had to cease operations as a result of the oil price drop. On the other hand, oil sands investment is currently high, so some companies are prepared to risk price drops in order to invest in non-conventional sources.<br/><br/>I'm not sure if by oil companies you mean the oil majors - Exxon, BP, Chevron et al - but they actually only produce around 15% of all oil supply - the rest is controlled by state entities. Much of the data we have about reserves and production estimates is released by national governments.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The European Recession and Global Oil Demand 2012</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/319248/comments?source=feed#comment-2170443</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">2170443</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[PS thanks for the contribution.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 03:50:03 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[PS thanks for the contribution.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The European Recession and Global Oil Demand 2012</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/319248/comments?source=feed#comment-2170440</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">2170440</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[This article doesn't consider a range of factors such as stock, gold and currency markets and oil supply. It merely deals with the impact of demand. However, demand is one of the major determinants in oil prices.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 03:48:23 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[This article doesn't consider a range of factors such as stock, gold and currency markets and oil supply. It merely deals with the impact of demand. However, demand is one of the major determinants in oil prices.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The European Recession and Global Oil Demand 2012</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/319248/comments?source=feed#comment-2170437</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">2170437</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Guilty as charged, although you didn't need to explain the difference between oil and energy! If I had had oil demand statistics and trends easily to hand I would have used them. There are some regional data available in the OPEC report but these aren't as fine-grain geographically or temporally, and I prefer not to rely on OPEC projections if I can avoid it.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 03:46:38 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Guilty as charged, although you didn't need to explain the difference between oil and energy! If I had had oil demand statistics and trends easily to hand I would have used them. There are some regional data available in the OPEC report but these aren't as fine-grain geographically or temporally, and I prefer not to rely on OPEC projections if I can avoid it.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Right And Wrong Of 'Ethical Investment&quot;</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/318115/comments?source=feed#comment-2157793</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">2157793</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[David - <br/><br/>The United Nations has managed to agree on a Universal Declaration of Human Rights. The UNFCC has managed to reach a near global consensus at least on the goals relating to Climate Change. UNEP has produced a near global consensus on a vast range of environmental issues, from pollution to conservation.<br/><br/>Of course, this belies the complex nature of personal moral differences that you point out. However, if most state representatives, mandated by most of the voters, and even many of the legislatures are able to agree on basic ethical principles, then clearly there is a considerable amount of common ground to form the basis of &quot;ethical investment&quot;.<br/><br/>Moreover, many forms of SRI don't rely on a universal definition of ethics. They merely rely on individual decisions or on a group of investors to agree.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2012 16:38:28 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[David - <br/><br/>The United Nations has managed to agree on a Universal Declaration of Human Rights. The UNFCC has managed to reach a near global consensus at least on the goals relating to Climate Change. UNEP has produced a near global consensus on a vast range of environmental issues, from pollution to conservation.<br/><br/>Of course, this belies the complex nature of personal moral differences that you point out. However, if most state representatives, mandated by most of the voters, and even many of the legislatures are able to agree on basic ethical principles, then clearly there is a considerable amount of common ground to form the basis of &quot;ethical investment&quot;.<br/><br/>Moreover, many forms of SRI don't rely on a universal definition of ethics. They merely rely on individual decisions or on a group of investors to agree.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Right And Wrong Of 'Ethical Investment&quot;</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/318115/comments?source=feed#comment-2157767</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">2157767</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[La Marque:<br/><br/>With regard to fiduciary duty, this does not preclude ethical considerations. See landmark British case law, Cowan v Scargill (1984) and Bishop of Oxford vs. Church Commissioners (1992). These judgements are taken into consideration in all common law jurisdictions.  <br/><br/>With regards to &quot;faceless managers&quot;, I can't tell if you challenging the legitimacy of dedicated SRI funds, so that amateurs aren't entitled to delegate responsibilities to professionals. If so, I'm amazed. If people can delegate fiduciary goals to managers, why not ethical ones?<br/><br/>With regards to me not being knowledgeable, it would be more constructive if you stuck to specific critiques rather than vague statements about the quality of my response.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2012 16:25:31 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[La Marque:<br/><br/>With regard to fiduciary duty, this does not preclude ethical considerations. See landmark British case law, Cowan v Scargill (1984) and Bishop of Oxford vs. Church Commissioners (1992). These judgements are taken into consideration in all common law jurisdictions.  <br/><br/>With regards to &quot;faceless managers&quot;, I can't tell if you challenging the legitimacy of dedicated SRI funds, so that amateurs aren't entitled to delegate responsibilities to professionals. If so, I'm amazed. If people can delegate fiduciary goals to managers, why not ethical ones?<br/><br/>With regards to me not being knowledgeable, it would be more constructive if you stuck to specific critiques rather than vague statements about the quality of my response.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>How Likely Is Another Oil Price Crash?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/317564/comments?source=feed#comment-2152200</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">2152200</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[The cycles, I assume being mimicked by the economy, so that we end up in boom-bust cycles. All of your demand barriers are below $160, are you sure we could end up going that high before demand cuts out and prices start falling? A high average will certainly satisfy some non-conventional players; but I need to investigate this more. Either way, we can't win. If non-conventional fuels don't start being produced, there will be a massive supply constriction which will push up the price and bring on more recession; if they are produced this means we are already into recession-level prices. Bleak stuff!]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 05:56:46 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[The cycles, I assume being mimicked by the economy, so that we end up in boom-bust cycles. All of your demand barriers are below $160, are you sure we could end up going that high before demand cuts out and prices start falling? A high average will certainly satisfy some non-conventional players; but I need to investigate this more. Either way, we can't win. If non-conventional fuels don't start being produced, there will be a massive supply constriction which will push up the price and bring on more recession; if they are produced this means we are already into recession-level prices. Bleak stuff!]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>How Likely Is Another Oil Price Crash?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/317564/comments?source=feed#comment-2152191</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">2152191</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Thanks Freddy, will check out your site.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 05:45:40 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Thanks Freddy, will check out your site.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>How Likely Is Another Oil Price Crash?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/317564/comments?source=feed#comment-2150939</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">2150939</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I'm not sure it answers your question, but economists (including Deutsche Bank) estimate that when energy expenditure is between 6.5-7.5% of total consumer expenditure, demand drops and we start hitting a recession.<br/><br/>For gas, it took $4.50 / gallon to tip demand in the summer of '08. Beyond that point, maybe less these days, you start hitting problems and the truckers go on strike.<br/><br/>I'd agree that high oil prices at least contributed to the recession.<br/><br/>Of course, for us in the UK $4.50 / gallon would be heaven!<br/><br/>I think I can feel another article coming on...]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 15:38:13 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I'm not sure it answers your question, but economists (including Deutsche Bank) estimate that when energy expenditure is between 6.5-7.5% of total consumer expenditure, demand drops and we start hitting a recession.<br/><br/>For gas, it took $4.50 / gallon to tip demand in the summer of '08. Beyond that point, maybe less these days, you start hitting problems and the truckers go on strike.<br/><br/>I'd agree that high oil prices at least contributed to the recession.<br/><br/>Of course, for us in the UK $4.50 / gallon would be heaven!<br/><br/>I think I can feel another article coming on...]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Analysts Say Nestle Is Overvalued</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/315767/comments?source=feed#comment-2127105</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">2127105</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Cool, thanks.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sat, 24 Dec 2011 08:43:25 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Cool, thanks.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Analysts Say Nestle Is Overvalued</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/315767/comments?source=feed#comment-2126352</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">2126352</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Correct me if I'm wrong, but to me it seems to come out of the algebra.<br/><br/>E/P = earnings yield = growth rate<br/><br/>It's merely theoretical, not empirical, and not important to my argument. My points were about the PEG relative to competitors.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2011 15:01:19 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Correct me if I'm wrong, but to me it seems to come out of the algebra.<br/><br/>E/P = earnings yield = growth rate<br/><br/>It's merely theoretical, not empirical, and not important to my argument. My points were about the PEG relative to competitors.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Analysts Say Nestle Is Overvalued</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/315767/comments?source=feed#comment-2126348</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">2126348</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Good stuff. Thanks.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2011 14:57:13 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Good stuff. Thanks.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Upward Pressures and Trends in Agricultural Commodity Prices</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/262638/comments?source=feed#comment-1579351</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">1579351</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Forgot to mention algae - another technology to watch. Although a long way from commercial viability, these have been estimated to yield dozens more gallons of fuel per unit area even than cellulosic biofuels, meaning far less competition with food crops.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 18:27:48 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Forgot to mention algae - another technology to watch. Although a long way from commercial viability, these have been estimated to yield dozens more gallons of fuel per unit area even than cellulosic biofuels, meaning far less competition with food crops.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
