<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>lorvic1's Comments</title>
    <description>lorvic1's Comments RSS Syndication from SeekingAlpha.com</description>
    <link>http://seekingalpha.com/user/819582/comments</link>
    <item>
      <title>David Trainer's $240 Apple Price Target Analysis Just Doesn't Add Up</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1439681/comments?source=feed#comment-18891161</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18891161</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[It is all on the assumptions. If they are flawed the result is flawed. It appears that Trainer may know numbers but he does not understand Apple and the market they created. Therefore he cannot come up with reasonable assumptions. ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 08:59:53 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[It is all on the assumptions. If they are flawed the result is flawed. It appears that Trainer may know numbers but he does not understand Apple and the market they created. Therefore he cannot come up with reasonable assumptions. ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Apple Solved Its First Problem</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1439721/comments?source=feed#comment-18890741</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18890741</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[If Samsung phones are so good why is their retention rate (buy the phone again) less than one half that of the iPhone?]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 08:52:56 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[If Samsung phones are so good why is their retention rate (buy the phone again) less than one half that of the iPhone?]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Bigger Picture Apple Investors Are Missing</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1418391/comments?source=feed#comment-18624751</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18624751</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Author is not current with his information. Apple is already discounting the 4S in those markets. ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2013 11:05:04 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Author is not current with his information. Apple is already discounting the 4S in those markets. ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Apple's Shareholder Program: The Day The Music Died</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1379151/comments?source=feed#comment-18186791</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18186791</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Poor analysis because it gives no viable alternatives.  The concept that it gives the wrong signal is just plane ignorant. It is in reality just a reflection on how profitable Apple is. That is a good thing not a bad thing for investors. ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sun, 28 Apr 2013 09:18:55 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Poor analysis because it gives no viable alternatives.  The concept that it gives the wrong signal is just plane ignorant. It is in reality just a reflection on how profitable Apple is. That is a good thing not a bad thing for investors. ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>More on Qualcomm: Digitimes reports Qualcomm and Spreadtrum (SPRD) have cut prices for Chinese quad-core chips due to competition from MediaTek; Qualcomm has reportedly cut prices below $10 (low by its standards). The report is noteworthy given Qualcomm's growing Chinese presence, and the fact its chip margins (along with chip/royalty mix) had much to do with its disappointing FQ3/FY13 EPS guidance. Thanks to heavy R&amp;amp;D spend and a mix shift to emerging markets, the chip unit's op. margin fell to 17% in FQ2 from the year-ago period's 20%, and is expected to stay at 17% in FQ3; aided by FQ1's 26% margin, FY13 guidance is still for 18.5%-20.5%.</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/976211?source=feed#comment-18172081</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18172081</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I did not find the last report either lacking or the guidance disappointing. I saw it as strong. ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sat, 27 Apr 2013 12:44:30 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I did not find the last report either lacking or the guidance disappointing. I saw it as strong. ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>China And Apple: The Beginning Of A Beautiful Friendship?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1371021/comments?source=feed#comment-18110811</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18110811</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[The android cheap phones in china are not &quot;smart&quot; phones. You are comparing apples to oranges. ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Apr 2013 21:18:16 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[The android cheap phones in china are not &quot;smart&quot; phones. You are comparing apples to oranges. ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Amgen (AMGN): Q1 EPS of $1.96 beats by $0.12. Revenue of $4.238B (+5% Y/Y) misses by $0.14B. Shares +0.3% AH. (PR)</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/960911?source=feed#comment-17996001</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">17996001</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Another  earnings &quot;beat&quot;, another great quarter. ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2013 16:27:38 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Another  earnings &quot;beat&quot;, another great quarter. ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Apple's Calendar Chaos Trade Of 2013</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1352601/comments?source=feed#comment-17806431</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">17806431</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Very good analysis.  Rumors control now. Which is quite amusing since most are far from reality. One rumor last week said Foxcom is adding 10,000 workers, supposedly for an Apple built out a new product. Other rumors talk about delay in product launches. ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2013 17:04:36 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Very good analysis.  Rumors control now. Which is quite amusing since most are far from reality. One rumor last week said Foxcom is adding 10,000 workers, supposedly for an Apple built out a new product. Other rumors talk about delay in product launches. ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Microsoft (MSFT): FQ3 EPS of $0.72 beats by $0.04. Revenue of $20.49B misses by $71M. Shares  +1.7% AH. (PR)</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/952731?source=feed#comment-17803741</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">17803741</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Your email alert service is not working right. It says earnings missed. But your sight says it beat. ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2013 16:24:04 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Your email alert service is not working right. It says earnings missed. But your sight says it beat. ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Anadarko's Dark Clouds Dampen Sunny Outlook</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1314851/comments?source=feed#comment-17139061</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">17139061</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[The author overly focuses on the negative while lightly notes the positive. The bias is obviously negative. That distorts any objective analysis. ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2013 20:30:35 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[The author overly focuses on the negative while lightly notes the positive. The bias is obviously negative. That distorts any objective analysis. ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Apple - It's All About Earnings</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1305431/comments?source=feed#comment-16903851</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">16903851</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I believe most of the estimates that form the consensus the author referred to are based on Weege boards as few if any supply sources or verifiable facts in coming up with their estimates. They are all trying to close the &quot;barn door&quot; long after the horse left. They were wrong before and will be just as wrong again. ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Mar 2013 18:16:14 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I believe most of the estimates that form the consensus the author referred to are based on Weege boards as few if any supply sources or verifiable facts in coming up with their estimates. They are all trying to close the &quot;barn door&quot; long after the horse left. They were wrong before and will be just as wrong again. ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Apple App Store Vs. Google Play</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1299941/comments?source=feed#comment-16805171</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">16805171</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Very poor logic. Google is growing fast with an inferior product that is going to raise up and bite them in the &quot;.  &quot; as it has no review.  When something comes out really bad they will get blamed. ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Mar 2013 22:12:01 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Very poor logic. Google is growing fast with an inferior product that is going to raise up and bite them in the &quot;.  &quot; as it has no review.  When something comes out really bad they will get blamed. ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Apple: Developing A Reasonable Expectation</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1286321/comments?source=feed#comment-16518831</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">16518831</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Very good article except I have seen several break down reports on the mini that showed the mini had a higher margin than the iPad. Therefore, the lower margin analysis based on a &quot;lower margin mini&quot; is in question. ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2013 18:29:13 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Very good article except I have seen several break down reports on the mini that showed the mini had a higher margin than the iPad. Therefore, the lower margin analysis based on a &quot;lower margin mini&quot; is in question. ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>How the Fed Could Fix The Economy -- And Why It Hasn't</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1220301/comments?source=feed#comment-15484381</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">15484381</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[The author misses on key point. Putting money in the hands of the consumer through dropping it from helicopters or funding a huge infrastructure build only will work when the &quot;fear factor&quot; subsides. Obama tried this with his trillion dollar plan the first year. It had little effect. People are still paying down debt instead of buying more. Why? They are still afraid and it does not help that are president preaches &quot;the sky is falling&quot; every time there is a conflict with him and congress. According to the latest figures $16 trillion of wealth was lost during the recession. Only $13.5 trillion has been rebuilt. Therefore, we are still in the hole. That needs to be rebuilt before there will be a significant spending will pick up. People will spend more when they feel financially comfortable and when they believe in a brighter and secure future. Now too many people do not. ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2013 13:45:51 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[The author misses on key point. Putting money in the hands of the consumer through dropping it from helicopters or funding a huge infrastructure build only will work when the &quot;fear factor&quot; subsides. Obama tried this with his trillion dollar plan the first year. It had little effect. People are still paying down debt instead of buying more. Why? They are still afraid and it does not help that are president preaches &quot;the sky is falling&quot; every time there is a conflict with him and congress. According to the latest figures $16 trillion of wealth was lost during the recession. Only $13.5 trillion has been rebuilt. Therefore, we are still in the hole. That needs to be rebuilt before there will be a significant spending will pick up. People will spend more when they feel financially comfortable and when they believe in a brighter and secure future. Now too many people do not. ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Apple: When Negatives Can Be Positives</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1221241/comments?source=feed#comment-15481921</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">15481921</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Very good article. What people fail to realize is that Apple was more of an evolution company than a revolution company under Jobs. Apple did not invent the mpg player they just made a superior one in the iPod. They did not invent the smart phone that just made a superior one in the iPhone. They did not invent the tablet they just made a superior one in the iPad. They do not really invent they just make it better. When I see Apple's stock and I see Amazon's stock price I scratch my head and just laugh. Has the market learned nothing from sky high PE's of the dot com bubble?  Amazon has shown they can grow sales but has never shown they can make money. Money or profit is whart it is all about. Apple has proved it can make money. Amazon has not. ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2013 12:53:10 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Very good article. What people fail to realize is that Apple was more of an evolution company than a revolution company under Jobs. Apple did not invent the mpg player they just made a superior one in the iPod. They did not invent the smart phone that just made a superior one in the iPhone. They did not invent the tablet they just made a superior one in the iPad. They do not really invent they just make it better. When I see Apple's stock and I see Amazon's stock price I scratch my head and just laugh. Has the market learned nothing from sky high PE's of the dot com bubble?  Amazon has shown they can grow sales but has never shown they can make money. Money or profit is whart it is all about. Apple has proved it can make money. Amazon has not. ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Potential Winners And Losers Of The Mobile World Congress 2013</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1219131/comments?source=feed#comment-15442691</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">15442691</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Nokia already lost the war. Ir is now winning a few small battles. However, in the big picture, too little, too late. ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2013 13:15:08 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Nokia already lost the war. Ir is now winning a few small battles. However, in the big picture, too little, too late. ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Apple's Revenue By Region: There's More To The Company's Story</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1219211/comments?source=feed#comment-15435191</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">15435191</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Thank you for putting together facts. Few articles on Apple do. Most just present rumors or articles devoid of real facts or logic. When I see Amazon and Google compared to Apple I know right now most analysis tha t write on these have little understanding of the field. ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2013 09:50:59 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Thank you for putting together facts. Few articles on Apple do. Most just present rumors or articles devoid of real facts or logic. When I see Amazon and Google compared to Apple I know right now most analysis tha t write on these have little understanding of the field. ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Time For Apple To Waddle And Quack</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1210981/comments?source=feed#comment-15316581</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">15316581</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Your statement about individual investors and online investing is somewhat misleading. The vast, vast, number of individual investors do not invest online. I am an individual investors and know dozens and dozens like myself. None of us are online investors. When buying small lots we are punished by the brokerage houses. I know no one that has bought 5, 10, 20 or even 50 shares of Apple because of this. ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2013 12:04:09 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Your statement about individual investors and online investing is somewhat misleading. The vast, vast, number of individual investors do not invest online. I am an individual investors and know dozens and dozens like myself. None of us are online investors. When buying small lots we are punished by the brokerage houses. I know no one that has bought 5, 10, 20 or even 50 shares of Apple because of this. ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Is Qualcomm Losing Its Luster?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1189711/comments?source=feed#comment-15175671</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">15175671</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Please put column headings on your chart or explain it. As it is, it is useless.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2013 17:47:09 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Please put column headings on your chart or explain it. As it is, it is useless.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Qualcomm: Clarifying My Stance</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1199971/comments?source=feed#comment-15174951</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">15174951</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Price is not the only consideration when choosing a product or a vendor. Since you made no evaluation as to the competive products I think your assumption that there will be competive pricing to reduce margins is premature. You need to evaluate each of the so called competitive products  on a number of matrix to make that assumption. How about price, size, power requirements, vendor capacity, vendor reliability, parents, to jjust name a few. These are not commodity type products.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2013 17:24:05 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Price is not the only consideration when choosing a product or a vendor. Since you made no evaluation as to the competive products I think your assumption that there will be competive pricing to reduce margins is premature. You need to evaluate each of the so called competitive products  on a number of matrix to make that assumption. How about price, size, power requirements, vendor capacity, vendor reliability, parents, to jjust name a few. These are not commodity type products.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Real Obstacles To Increasing Apple's Share Price</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1200351/comments?source=feed#comment-15160611</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">15160611</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Very good article with excellent recommendations. ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2013 12:12:16 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Very good article with excellent recommendations. ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Running Like A Deere Into South America</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1178531/comments?source=feed#comment-14941981</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">14941981</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Deer beats the street in revenue and earnings. They up their guidance and the stock is up in the premarket and down when the market opens. Go Figure. ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2013 13:22:02 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Deer beats the street in revenue and earnings. They up their guidance and the stock is up in the premarket and down when the market opens. Go Figure. ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Amgen (AMGN -1.3%) moves down as William Blair cuts the stock to Market Perform on valuation, noting a lack of upcoming catalysts following a sustained move to the upside.</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/818221?source=feed#comment-14847401</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">14847401</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Obviously there was no William Blair representative at the last Amgen meeting. I guess they were too busy making their cut to be bothered by getting the actual facts. Too bad. ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2013 12:40:36 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Obviously there was no William Blair representative at the last Amgen meeting. I guess they were too busy making their cut to be bothered by getting the actual facts. Too bad. ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>A Short Short Thesis On Amazon.com</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1145051/comments?source=feed#comment-14386751</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">14386751</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Amazon is a bubble stock. Soon it will blow and blow big. ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2013 22:28:40 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Amazon is a bubble stock. Soon it will blow and blow big. ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Some Thoughts On The Dell Buyout, Microsoft's Involvement And The PC Market</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1145031/comments?source=feed#comment-14386371</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">14386371</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Very analysis.  ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2013 22:11:10 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Very analysis.  ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>My Once-A-Year Article On Apple</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1118571/comments?source=feed#comment-13850411</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">13850411</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[A ten for one stock plot would truly be magical. It would put the 100 share round lot within the budget of so many Apple product lovers. They would buy and hold as they love Apple. This could take the stock out of the control of speculators, hedge fund, ETFs, etc. ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2013 18:25:55 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[A ten for one stock plot would truly be magical. It would put the 100 share round lot within the budget of so many Apple product lovers. They would buy and hold as they love Apple. This could take the stock out of the control of speculators, hedge fund, ETFs, etc. ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Worrying Wednesday: How Low Can Apple Go?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1114871/comments?source=feed#comment-13785101</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">13785101</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Some people flunked math 101. The leaked information last week said Apple cut its order rate for iPhone 5 screens from 65 million in the first quarter 50% or to 32.5 million for the second quarter because of decreasing iPhone 5 sales. That is a build rate of 97.5 million iPhone 5 units for the six months. However, most analysts project 50 million iPhone 5 sales for the first quarter then to drop to 37 million units the second quarter. That's a total of 87 million units. Note the build rate is over 10 million more than the analysts project as sales. If you assume a relatively stable inventory some one is wrong. Either Apple is deliberately building too many units or sales estimates are wrong. That does not even take in to account the iPhone 4S units that are still being sold. ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2013 13:00:28 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Some people flunked math 101. The leaked information last week said Apple cut its order rate for iPhone 5 screens from 65 million in the first quarter 50% or to 32.5 million for the second quarter because of decreasing iPhone 5 sales. That is a build rate of 97.5 million iPhone 5 units for the six months. However, most analysts project 50 million iPhone 5 sales for the first quarter then to drop to 37 million units the second quarter. That's a total of 87 million units. Note the build rate is over 10 million more than the analysts project as sales. If you assume a relatively stable inventory some one is wrong. Either Apple is deliberately building too many units or sales estimates are wrong. That does not even take in to account the iPhone 4S units that are still being sold. ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Apple (AAPL) has cut iPhone 5 component orders for calendar Q1 due to weaker-than-expected demand, sources tell the WSJ; display orders are said to be cut by ~50%. The Nikkei also claims display orders have been halved, albeit from an elevated level of 65M. The articles back up analyst reports of iPhone production and component order cuts, and raise the question of whether Apple needs a cheaper iPhone and/or one with a larger display to bolster its international share. Suppliers on watch: LPL, CRUS, OVTI, QCOM, BRCM, SWKS, TQNT, AVGO.</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/758781?source=feed#comment-13666941</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">13666941</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Another unnamed source &quot;Weege Board&quot; prediction. Not worth the space it takes up on the board. When you have actual facts let us know. ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2013 22:34:27 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Another unnamed source &quot;Weege Board&quot; prediction. Not worth the space it takes up on the board. When you have actual facts let us know. ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>A Cheaper iPhone Would Confirm A Lack Of Innovation And Declining Margins At Apple</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1102591/comments?source=feed#comment-13508511</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">13508511</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Another dumb &quot;Weege Board&quot; analysis based not on facts but on faulty logic rumors and speculation. The writer admits the new lower cost iPhone information is bases on rumor and speculation. He has no real facts. He complements the retina display and then says Apple has no innovation. He is obviously an Apple Bear. He preaches yes but negative. I have no doubt Apple could blow out the quarter and this author would preach that as a negative. ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2013 17:01:18 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Another dumb &quot;Weege Board&quot; analysis based not on facts but on faulty logic rumors and speculation. The writer admits the new lower cost iPhone information is bases on rumor and speculation. He has no real facts. He complements the retina display and then says Apple has no innovation. He is obviously an Apple Bear. He preaches yes but negative. I have no doubt Apple could blow out the quarter and this author would preach that as a negative. ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Sense And Nonsense About Climate Change. What Do Investors Need To Know?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1101351/comments?source=feed#comment-13469711</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">13469711</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[First it was global warming. Since that did not fly it is now called climate change&quot;. That covers all the bases. Whenever weather changes from our short term past or our immediate expectations we yell &quot;climate change&quot;. In the big picture we have come out of a mini ice age. Of course it is slightly warmer in some areas. Also the Antarctic ice is spreading over a larger area. Man is not near as important as some think. Wake up. The weather changes, always has and always will. ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2013 22:37:55 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[First it was global warming. Since that did not fly it is now called climate change&quot;. That covers all the bases. Whenever weather changes from our short term past or our immediate expectations we yell &quot;climate change&quot;. In the big picture we have come out of a mini ice age. Of course it is slightly warmer in some areas. Also the Antarctic ice is spreading over a larger area. Man is not near as important as some think. Wake up. The weather changes, always has and always will. ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
