Seeking Alpha

User 82064 » Comments |

Sort by:
Latest | Highest rated
  • NAR Keeps Whining About Appraisals [View article]
    When you have appraisers valuing good homes, in quality neighborhoods, with nice amenities using foreclosed homes, with few amenities, damage, and pervasive animal smells, there is something wrong. And this is happening on a daily basis. In some cases, appraisers are so busy that the best they do is drive by a property to take some pictures. The result is inaccurate outcomes.
    We are all aware of the problem the appraisals caused on the upside, but at this point, it has no relevance to what is going on today.
    And it hardly affects the agent because they will simply sell the property at a lower price which will effect their commission marginally. Where it really does the damage is that the seller can't get the true value of the property, and the buyer can't get the home they should have been able to afford. The net result is an errant devaluation of the neighborhood because an appraisal was inaccurate.
    You can come on these boards and espoused your opinions all day long. But reality is the pendulum has swung too far and it needs to come back to the middle so the market can stabilize.
    Jul 29 10:16 am |Rating: +1 -1 |Link to Comment
  • NAR Keeps Whining About Appraisals [View article]
    Unfortunately, you and the others still don't get what is going on. While most here seem to take glee in the idea that appraisals are somehow hurting the agents, it isn't as much as you think. They still get the sales, but just at a lower price. And the difference in commission they receive is small, compared to the damage the process is causing to the market.
    Most economists will agree that stability in the housing market is key to stabilizing the economy. When you have homes that are well kept, with nice features, being valued the same as homes that are foreclosed, unkept, damaged and smell like animal urine, then something is wrong.
    Seriously wrong. This hurts the person who kept their home up well, and it hurts the buyer willing to buy the nice home. So, while many have this overall feeling that agents caused this, you need to get your nose a little closer to the details to understand what is going on and how it really effects things.


    On Jul 29 01:19 AM Cold Reality wrote:

    > You real estate agents keep referring to an appraisal as "errant"
    > when it does not reflect your hoped-for inflated price. Why are these
    > appraisals "errant" when the other appraisals--the ones that ratify
    > the pumped-up real-estate agent inflated price, aren't?
    >
    > Not once here have I read of a complaint about high "errant" appraisals.
    >
    >
    > Ever.
    Jul 29 10:07 am |Rating: +1 0 |Link to Comment
  • NAR Keeps Whining About Appraisals [View article]
    I am a real estate broker and have a finance degree. I've built homes and lead a 1000 acre land development project prior to the downturn. While most brokers follow the NAR religiously, I'm not one of them.
    BUT, the NAR has a point in this case. What the author and commentors are missing is that the pendulum has now swung too far in the other direction.
    While appraisers might have been pressured in the past, now they act with relative impunity. Which means the system doesn't have any checks in place. Without the checks, accuracy becomes a problem.
    Appraisers make mistakes. The system is now set up to where they can't be challenged. Many appriasals are coming back errant, and in most cases, that means low. This is due to the amount of pressure they feel given what has occurred over the past few years. Accuracy is the objective, not artificially low valuations.
    Because many appraisals come in low, the buyer/refinancer can't get their home/new loan as they would be able to if the appraisals came back correct. This serves to add to the problem of getting people into vacant homes and getting loans refinanced so more people can avoid the resets coming.
    While some may applaud this, I don't know why. It only serves to help further drive pricing down which only helps those that are renting or sitting on cash hoping for the buy of a lifetime. Perhaps that is what we have here. Or perhaps we simply have people who haven't thought out this issue thoroughly.
    Jul 28 10:27 am |Rating: +1 -3 |Link to Comment
  • Solar Power May Not be Quite so 'Green' [View article]
    The author wants me to believe that because a poly silicon company has a waste removal problem, that solar is now a bad idea?
    Did anyone really think there is a manufacturing process anywhere that doesn't leave behind some waste and residue that requires proper disposal or recycling? Is it being suggested that somehow Suntech's sales should fall because the plant manager of a supplier didn't do his job properly?
    Mar 10 16:10 pm |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment
  • Blame Realtors, Brokers and Bankers - Not Greenspan  [View article]
    Where do I begin with this article? The basic premise of this article is that because realtors made money doing their job, that they are guilty of causing the housing problems....that because a mortgage broker made money doing their job, that they are guilty of causing it too. These are wild assertions with no connectivity to the problem.
    Let's start with the realtor. This person's function is to buy and sell homes for...THE BUYER AND SELLER. A realtor finds property based on the customer's desires and needs...and sells property per the direction of the seller. In Southern California, there were condos being sold that within one week would have 20 offers on them...and all of the offers were with 100% financing! Now, should the realtor advise his seller not to take the highest bidder as long as everything else is equal? No, that would not be acting in good faith. Now, let's say you're the realtor advising one of the 20 buyers. Basically, if you don't find a property for the buyer, the buyer is going to get another broker. It isn't a situation where the broker is making the offers at the higher pricess as the author implies...it's the buyers demanding that they get a property...and it's the buyer that decides what price to put the offer in at. This author doesn't understand the process...because it is very evident that this situation came about because demand far outweighed supply. It's a situation where the buyer directs the realtor to do what they have to do to find them a property and then directs the realtor where to place the bid....and if they don't, the customer will find another who will do as they direct.
    And this brings the whole issue back to where so much of the blame rests. That's with all of us who participated in the market. Let's take these poor buyers who are now pointing fingers everywhere except in the mirror. When they bought, they knew the market was moving and appreciating. They were also provided HUD, lender, and escrow forms that clearly state the purchase price, the interest rate, the rate it adjusts to, the current payment, the payment the loan will adjust to, and when. Any person who stands up today and says I was duped is basically saying, "I did not read the large print on the many forms I signed, on the largest purchase of my life". And people like this author buys into that. Please go into your own files and pull out the last real estate documents you signed and count the number of forms that clearly states the terms of your loan. For the bleeding hearts and politicians to publicly state that the buyers were duped is a disgrace. It demonstrates many of the problems that we as a country face today. It's all about trying to place blame on someone else, and not themselves. Whatever happened to honorably admitting "I made a mistake"?
    If a broker or realtor couldn't help a customer, the customer would simply go find another who would.
    The problem here is one of a systemic nature. There was failure throughout the entire system. Yes, Greenspan kept rates low for too long and then raised them too fast for the market to adjust. Yes, the investors in the derivatives should have insisted in the supporting paperwork for adequate due diligence. But the buyers didn't have to buy! And they did...And they created the demand.
    The situation was further fueled by well meaning politicians who placed pressure on the largest lenders to lower lending standards so that lower income and minorities could own homes as well. Now, those same politicians and many others are blaming the largest lenders for...lowering lending standards to lower income and minorities. The results of these actions should be very clear given that many of these homeowners are walking away from the homes BEFORE the loans adjust.
    And so it goes...I was watching a Congressional hearing the other day where a Congressman was recounting a story about a black couple who were financed by Countrywide. Their closing date was delayed and through the process were informed that their loan was going to have a higher interest rate than originally quoted. Because of this, the buyers can no longer afford their home. What the Congressman didn't say, is that loans are normally delayed to everyone, and the buyers had every right to contact another lender to see if they could do better somewhere else. The buyer also could have chosen to back out of the deal. But no, instead let's blame the lender. Could it have been that there were some credit issues that arose during the lender's due diligence...and this caused the increase in rate? It's a sad state of affairs that we find ourselves in.
    Not just the market, but in general.
    Mar 10 11:11 am |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment
  • The John McCain Market Selloff [View article]
    Barry went on too long without letting us know where he was going with this. By the time I got to the charts, I was already starting to discount everything I've heard him say over the years as possibly politically motivated. There are very few that tell it as it is and without the partisanship seeping from Jan and Truthpeeler's posts above.
    Look at what we learned this week...Our Fed Chairman thinks the banks should reduce the amount owed to them from borrowers... Thornburg got huge margin calls and may fail....Several other entities aren't far behind....Retails sales were awful outside of Walmart...The GSEs may be in trouble without the "explicit" guarantee from the government. The surge in mortgage rates have basically put one of the final nails in real estate's coffin....Citigroup has a lot more to write off which means more dilution....The jobs number points to recession, etc. etc. Its no wonder the market wasn't down by three times as much!
    Whew! It's a good thing the MCCain effect kicked in to support the market! Sounds crazy, right?
    Mar 09 14:44 pm |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment
Comments by Ticker
User 82064's
Comments Stats
6 comments
Rating: -1 (3 - 4 )