canb888

Confusion with China's Solar Subsidy

Look at other points:
1. Eric quoted someone saying:"the 20 RMB/watt subsidy program is specifically for BIPV installations ...". The official policy says: "Priority will be given to building-integrated PV applications", nowhere can I find "specifically for BIPV...". "Priority" became "specifically" to suit the author's opinion. "Specifically" is close to "only" that he used in my earlier comment. Eric already has his conclusion before looking at the documents/facts.

2. Eric quoted again someone saying: "the program is focused on off-grid installations"
while the Official Policy says: "Priority will be given to grid-connected building PV applications"

If Eric used the same logic as in the BIPV I pointed out earlier, he should be saying "only" support grid-connected.. applications". Instead he is quoting exactly the opposite.

How more biased can someone be?

Confusion with China's Solar Subsidy

This is how the facts are twisted by Eric the China Solar basher:
Ministry of Finance said: "Priority will be given to building-integrated PV applications"
This writer selectively quoted someone who said:
"the program only covered what are known as “building integrated photovoltaic panels,” or BIPVs". Note the huge difference in the words "Priority" vs. "Only".

Question: Who do we trust, the Chinese Ministry of Finance who set the policy or someone who does not read Chinese and change the spirit of the new "interim measure" on solar incentives in China? Need I say more? Solars are moving up in a big way, don't fight the trend.

The 'Problem' With Solar Companies is Not Really a Problem

The problem with GS is the same as the problem they claim of the solar companies, i.e., "They need to continue to make money in order to repay their debts. It's that simple."

Who can say that is not also true for GS. If GS stop making money, how can they repay their debt? Based on that, should we all start to short GS? It's becoming ridiculous.