anon anon's Comments RSS Syndication from SeekingAlpha.com http://seekingalpha.comuser/83074/comments http://seekingalpha.com/article/36811-crystallexs-speculative-shine-begins-to-tarnish?source=feed#comment-87240 87240 Wed, 30 May 2007 08:37:00 -0400 http://seekingalpha.com/article/36461-gold-and-silver-bells-are-ringing?source=feed#comment-87090 87090
Sorry lorenzo, he was caught with his schoolboy pants down and is too full of himself to admit his error. He has most certainly not answered and addressed the issue. A self-proclaimed analyst who massages his own stock pick predictions cannot be trusted for one minute. You choose to follow his advice in the future at your own peril.]]> Sat, 26 May 2007 15:22:22 -0400
Sorry lorenzo, he was caught with his schoolboy pants down and is too full of himself to admit his error. He has most certainly not answered and addressed the issue. A self-proclaimed analyst who massages his own stock pick predictions cannot be trusted for one minute. You choose to follow his advice in the future at your own peril.]]> http://seekingalpha.com/article/36461-gold-and-silver-bells-are-ringing?source=feed#comment-87080 87080
on Feb 15th "....we remain neutral toward NTO and will wait for some encouraging news before taking a position...."

on May 8th ".....Both of our stock picks (FRG and NTO) for 2007 have generated the exact same annualized return… 143%. It must be a magic number.........."

You did NOT pick NTO on the 15th February, yet you claim it as a pick on the 8th May.

The evidence is as clear as it could possibly be; one example or not, it is clearly false information. You cannot admit your error like a man, all you can do is hide behind a wall of sarcastic comment and dare to give me advice on how i should spend my weekend. It is clear that your advice is something built on shaky ground.

Did you or did you not say "neutral NTO" and then say "NTO is our stock pick" 143% points later? A simple question.]]> Sat, 26 May 2007 00:33:17 -0400
on Feb 15th "....we remain neutral toward NTO and will wait for some encouraging news before taking a position...."

on May 8th ".....Both of our stock picks (FRG and NTO) for 2007 have generated the exact same annualized return… 143%. It must be a magic number.........."

You did NOT pick NTO on the 15th February, yet you claim it as a pick on the 8th May.

The evidence is as clear as it could possibly be; one example or not, it is clearly false information. You cannot admit your error like a man, all you can do is hide behind a wall of sarcastic comment and dare to give me advice on how i should spend my weekend. It is clear that your advice is something built on shaky ground.

Did you or did you not say "neutral NTO" and then say "NTO is our stock pick" 143% points later? A simple question.]]> http://seekingalpha.com/article/36461-gold-and-silver-bells-are-ringing?source=feed#comment-87074 87074
Your record is getting worse by the post.

Why not throw another gratuitous insult? It seems to suit your character. I am quite sure that this little exchange has enlightened a few people to your personal moral standards. Hopefully they will never take your analysis seriously again.]]> Fri, 25 May 2007 22:20:32 -0400
Your record is getting worse by the post.

Why not throw another gratuitous insult? It seems to suit your character. I am quite sure that this little exchange has enlightened a few people to your personal moral standards. Hopefully they will never take your analysis seriously again.]]> http://seekingalpha.com/article/36461-gold-and-silver-bells-are-ringing?source=feed#comment-87070 87070
2) too arrogant to admit it

3) rude and obnoxious

i wonder why you're playing around on a free website instead of getting paid for analysis? tough one, eh?]]> Fri, 25 May 2007 21:59:00 -0400
2) too arrogant to admit it

3) rude and obnoxious

i wonder why you're playing around on a free website instead of getting paid for analysis? tough one, eh?]]> http://seekingalpha.com/article/36461-gold-and-silver-bells-are-ringing?source=feed#comment-87062 87062
You accuse somebody of 'whining' who in fact pointed out in important factual error in your analysis. That is not "slinging mud", it is called "being correct".

It is not a public disservice, it is a public service.

The only person annoyed by the plain and undeniable fact that you massaged your own stock call to suit yourself is you.

You eventually and grudgingly 'concede the point' when in fact you should be apologizing to the readership for YOUR deliberate misrepresentation. Not to me. I don't want or need your apologies. You owe an apology to the (presumably) hundreds of people who read this part of the website.

Instead of cake, try some humble pie next time.

I hope you have learned not to defend the indefensible.]]> Fri, 25 May 2007 19:04:46 -0400
You accuse somebody of 'whining' who in fact pointed out in important factual error in your analysis. That is not "slinging mud", it is called "being correct".

It is not a public disservice, it is a public service.

The only person annoyed by the plain and undeniable fact that you massaged your own stock call to suit yourself is you.

You eventually and grudgingly 'concede the point' when in fact you should be apologizing to the readership for YOUR deliberate misrepresentation. Not to me. I don't want or need your apologies. You owe an apology to the (presumably) hundreds of people who read this part of the website.

Instead of cake, try some humble pie next time.

I hope you have learned not to defend the indefensible.]]> http://seekingalpha.com/article/36461-gold-and-silver-bells-are-ringing?source=feed#comment-87058 87058
It would seem the diligent investor would have to carefully check all your "claims" before taking any advice from you. Frankly, most have better things to do than hunt through all your supposed stock recommendations to check whether they were in fact buy recommended or simply mentioned in passing and jumped upon later.]]> Fri, 25 May 2007 17:24:34 -0400
It would seem the diligent investor would have to carefully check all your "claims" before taking any advice from you. Frankly, most have better things to do than hunt through all your supposed stock recommendations to check whether they were in fact buy recommended or simply mentioned in passing and jumped upon later.]]> http://seekingalpha.com/article/36461-gold-and-silver-bells-are-ringing?source=feed#comment-87036 87036
"....we remain neutral toward NTO and will wait for some encouraging news before taking a position...."

However on May 8th you wrote:

".....Both of our stock picks (FRG and NTO) for 2007 have generated the exact same annualized return… 143%. It must be a magic number.........."

You "remain neutral" on a stock then conveniently claim it as a "stock pick" 143% later. As for "magic numbers, you sure have got them working for you!

Consider yourself well and truly exposed. You publish and you think you are unacountable for your publications? Wrong.

I suggest readers remember two things: Firstly that old saying "you get what you pay for" and secondly that goldguru does not charge access to his website.]]> Fri, 25 May 2007 12:26:06 -0400
"....we remain neutral toward NTO and will wait for some encouraging news before taking a position...."

However on May 8th you wrote:

".....Both of our stock picks (FRG and NTO) for 2007 have generated the exact same annualized return… 143%. It must be a magic number.........."

You "remain neutral" on a stock then conveniently claim it as a "stock pick" 143% later. As for "magic numbers, you sure have got them working for you!

Consider yourself well and truly exposed. You publish and you think you are unacountable for your publications? Wrong.

I suggest readers remember two things: Firstly that old saying "you get what you pay for" and secondly that goldguru does not charge access to his website.]]> http://seekingalpha.com/article/36461-gold-and-silver-bells-are-ringing?source=feed#comment-86940 86940
And will this be like the previous note "Our 2007 Gold Stock Picks: How Are We Doing?" where you claimed success for picking NTO at $3.75 in February when in fact you called it a "hold" on that day?

Having your cake and eating it?]]> Thu, 24 May 2007 13:58:57 -0400
And will this be like the previous note "Our 2007 Gold Stock Picks: How Are We Doing?" where you claimed success for picking NTO at $3.75 in February when in fact you called it a "hold" on that day?

Having your cake and eating it?]]>