Seeking Alpha

rmartin929

rmartin929
Send Message
View as an RSS Feed
View rmartin929's Comments BY TICKER:
Latest comments  |  Highest rated
  • China Media Express: Up on Bad News [View article]
    Thanks for that jewel - you blew my mind. BTW when do sales reps in China keep track of SEC reports - that contention alone is a laughable. Phone call is either fake or more likely misinformation campaign directed at MW by CCME.

    You obviously have no experience in counter-intelligence. Have you ever studied counter-intelligence, or done some research on corporate espionage? You could learn something ... yada yada yada.

    You've lost the last thread of credibility I ascribed to you with your response regarding Global Hunter's on the street research: BEA wrote: "pretty much the whole report is erroneous"

    You didn't read the directions. Were you good at taking tests in school? Disprove one (1) fact in the report. I know, I know you could disprove them all, even their phone number and office address, but stick to the content of the report. Just one fact. I know you are busy providing wisdom to the masses, but take some time to help me out.

    (I used site vs. cite in a post - I don't strive for good grammar here, but the correct word would have been nice)
    Mar 4 02:29 PM | Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • China Media Express: Up on Bad News [View article]
    Nice to meet you. I would like to buy back my puts I sold on Tue for .50 cents on the dollar. Just trying to be the guy you need on the other side of the trade :) It's just that the terms ahve changed a lil' bit if that's okay with you.

    rmartin929
    Mar 3 10:01 PM | Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • Yongye International (YONG): Is Their Story Too Good To Be True? [View instapost]
    You must have gotten burned bad?! I have been reading some of your research and lot of your insanity as I research a few stocks. You should get some help, try yoga, get a girlfriend, get some sunshine once in awhile. Your ongoing babbling about why your speculation and deductions are pure reality and everyone else's are just pumpers and unworthy. Anyone you seem very angry and hurt and I won't engage further because I value my time. Just a recommendation so you don't look back one day and say what hell was I doing with my precious time?

    *** I know you will argue every single point. So yes "You say you value your time, but yet you are posting here???" Thought I'd save you the time for your response.
    Feb 26 02:07 AM | Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • Conservative, Bullish Trading Strategy on Protalix Biotherapeutics' PDUFA Date [View article]
    Just to clarify I meant AdCom's. Advisory Committees. Oh and thanks, I think this clarifies it :) To me it reads and Adcom is used at the discretion of the FDA. Seems strange to me they would use the AdCom at all pre-approval just seems to muddy the water since FDA has final say. But maybe just a way to get more input/brains. Good article out here on SA called something like 'No means no, yes mean maybe regarding Adcoms.
    Feb 19 01:34 PM | Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • Conservative, Bullish Trading Strategy on Protalix Biotherapeutics' PDUFA Date [View article]
    Since you seem to be online. I posted a question earlier about review boards and maybe you can help. When, why, what are FDA review panels/boards utilized. I saw that OREX's drug went before a FDA review board, but many other drugs do not seem to go that path. Is it an elective process or at times required?
    Feb 19 01:25 PM | Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • Conservative, Bullish Trading Strategy on Protalix Biotherapeutics' PDUFA Date [View article]
    What are your thoughts on strangle trade. I think the move to the down side would be larger move; since as you point out the need for cash regardless of outcome.

    Maybe buy the $5 puts and where to position the call $10 or $12.50. Like to see your thoughts.
    Feb 19 12:27 PM | Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • Warning Biotech Investors: FDA Advisory Panels' No Means No, Yes Means Maybe [View article]
    When does a drug maker us an AdCom? Is it required? Can you give a little info as to when, why, or why not they are utiliized?

    It appears to me that not all drugs up for approval use the AdCom.
    Feb 9 03:27 PM | Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • Amarin: Pending Catalysts, Potential Breakthrough [View article]
    I was searching this also. Found this patent app. on the Yahoo msg. baord appft1.uspto.gov/netac...

    Method of use app. It's my understanding these are easier to get around than a patent based on the drug composition.
    Feb 7 09:05 PM | Likes Like |Link to Comment
COMMENTS STATS
23 Comments
29 Likes