<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>freebra's Comments</title>
    <description>freebra's Comments RSS Syndication from SeekingAlpha.com</description>
    <link>http://seekingalpha.com/user/861018/comments</link>
    <item>
      <title>O Is A Buy, Not A Bargain</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1501562/comments?source=feed#comment-19999062</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">19999062</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Brad, Thanks !   I missed that article.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Jun 2013 17:25:56 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Brad, Thanks !   I missed that article.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>O Is A Buy, Not A Bargain</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1501562/comments?source=feed#comment-19998822</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">19998822</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Brad, as somewhat of a 'new' investor in the REIT arena and reference to 'pointgiven' s comment above, are REIT &quot;preferred&quot; investments comparable to 'preferred' common stock. If not, what are the differences, advantages, less risks, distributions, etc.<br/><br/>Value your knowledge, articles and newsletters.<br/><br/>Freedom Bravo ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Jun 2013 17:17:39 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Brad, as somewhat of a 'new' investor in the REIT arena and reference to 'pointgiven' s comment above, are REIT &quot;preferred&quot; investments comparable to 'preferred' common stock. If not, what are the differences, advantages, less risks, distributions, etc.<br/><br/>Value your knowledge, articles and newsletters.<br/><br/>Freedom Bravo ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Why I Was Wrong To Predict A Windstream Dividend Cut</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1490592/comments?source=feed#comment-19809382</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">19809382</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[@Baba &gt; GSA - General Services Administration (Federal Gov't).]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Jun 2013 15:58:29 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[@Baba &gt; GSA - General Services Administration (Federal Gov't).]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>AT&amp;T - Upside Potential Of 20%</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1483821/comments?source=feed#comment-19699221</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">19699221</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[No, Only Verizon has the governmental authority (so far). <br/><br/>Freedom Bravo]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Jun 2013 19:34:37 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[No, Only Verizon has the governmental authority (so far). <br/><br/>Freedom Bravo]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>We're Just At The Tip Of The Iceberg, Triple Net REITs Will Soon Be A Glacier Sector</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1469521/comments?source=feed#comment-19610741</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">19610741</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Not sure who he was referring to, and maybe he didn't either. However, this is no place for those offense remarks. I'm sure there are plenty of sites on the internet for his type. Thanks SA editors.<br/><br/>Freedom Bravo]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Jun 2013 16:51:48 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Not sure who he was referring to, and maybe he didn't either. However, this is no place for those offense remarks. I'm sure there are plenty of sites on the internet for his type. Thanks SA editors.<br/><br/>Freedom Bravo]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>We're Just At The Tip Of The Iceberg, Triple Net REITs Will Soon Be A Glacier Sector</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1469521/comments?source=feed#comment-19608701</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">19608701</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Brad,<br/>Ignore '@itscalledcommonsense'. Apparently he enjoys making immature comments and calls the intelligent advisors names (industry pimp) to enhance his pitiful ego. <br/><br/>Keep up the GOOD work. <br/><br/>Freedom Bravo ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Jun 2013 15:56:38 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Brad,<br/>Ignore '@itscalledcommonsense'. Apparently he enjoys making immature comments and calls the intelligent advisors names (industry pimp) to enhance his pitiful ego. <br/><br/>Keep up the GOOD work. <br/><br/>Freedom Bravo ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>6 Mid-Cap Electric Utilities For An Income Portfolio</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1453091/comments?source=feed#comment-19416421</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">19416421</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[This is true, but SCG also is in the NG pipeline transportation.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 May 2013 09:54:22 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[This is true, but SCG also is in the NG pipeline transportation.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Dangers Of Utility Investing: An Unappreciated Risk Is Growing Bigger Every Day</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1452501/comments?source=feed#comment-19382871</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">19382871</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[@J*H*P&gt; Please provide your source of information with reference to Georgia Power blocking SolarCity from &quot;competing&quot;. I believe that the Department of Commerce, DOJ, DOE, etc. would have Georgia Power in the Federal Courts within days. Besides the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) would definitely prevent this from occurring.<br/><br/>SolarCity (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/scty' title='SolarCity Corp.'>SCTY</a>) is working with (not competing with) numerous other Electric Utilities and don't believe Georgia Power (and certainly not Southern Energy) is any different.<br/><br/>Does SolarCity even have the capability to compete ? It is my understanding that they design, engineer, fabricate, market, install and provide maintenance of their solar panels. SolarCity, to my knowledge and research, does not have the capability to 'retail' electricity on the open market. <br/><br/>Awaiting your information source(s).<br/><br/>Freedom Bravo]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 May 2013 15:02:23 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[@J*H*P&gt; Please provide your source of information with reference to Georgia Power blocking SolarCity from &quot;competing&quot;. I believe that the Department of Commerce, DOJ, DOE, etc. would have Georgia Power in the Federal Courts within days. Besides the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) would definitely prevent this from occurring.<br/><br/>SolarCity (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/scty' title='SolarCity Corp.'>SCTY</a>) is working with (not competing with) numerous other Electric Utilities and don't believe Georgia Power (and certainly not Southern Energy) is any different.<br/><br/>Does SolarCity even have the capability to compete ? It is my understanding that they design, engineer, fabricate, market, install and provide maintenance of their solar panels. SolarCity, to my knowledge and research, does not have the capability to 'retail' electricity on the open market. <br/><br/>Awaiting your information source(s).<br/><br/>Freedom Bravo]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Dangers Of Utility Investing: An Unappreciated Risk Is Growing Bigger Every Day</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1452501/comments?source=feed#comment-19356111</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">19356111</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[@Arthur11 &gt; Suggest using Solar Flux Density in lieu of Insolation. Much less confusing and easier units to work with when doing the calculations. Germany vs. U.S. is like comparing the solar radiation inclination of Maine to that of Florida. Yes, Latitude is definitely one of many important unmentioned variables.<br/><br/>Under the best of conditions (location, clear skies, etc.) and at (or near) sea level, the absolute most efficient &quot;Solar Flux Density&quot; will last only 4-5 hours (max.) of a 24 hour day. One-eighth of a day which is not totally inclusive of the high electrical demand (usage) time of the day in any area. Furthermore, seasons also will impact efficiency (again, Solar Radiation Inclination). Do you know how many days of 365 have clear skies with no pollution/smog, fog, overcast, rain/snow ? This naturally depends on the area where solar panels are most applicable (cost affective).<br/><br/>There are many other factors to consider, but understand I am not against solar energy at all. I am for any and all renewable energy, but we Americans are spoiled and wasteful.<br/><br/>Do you know of another industry that encourages their customers to NOT use their product other than the electric generating utilities ? I just received a $200 Rebate from my utility for replacing my 4 ton HVAC with a newer more efficient (SEER) unit. Insulation rebates, lighting credits, elec. to nat. gas hot water heater upgrades, electric usage discounts, etc. are available and encouraged by all electric utes. Energy Conservation is always encouraged by the electric utilities.<br/><br/>Arthur11, I don't mean to direct this to only you, but there just seems to be too many &quot;Solar Experts&quot; that think solar panels on your roof will solve the environmental and elec. service costs issues. Solar will contribute, but not replace your reliable service.<br/><br/>Freedom Bravo]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 May 2013 01:47:23 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[@Arthur11 &gt; Suggest using Solar Flux Density in lieu of Insolation. Much less confusing and easier units to work with when doing the calculations. Germany vs. U.S. is like comparing the solar radiation inclination of Maine to that of Florida. Yes, Latitude is definitely one of many important unmentioned variables.<br/><br/>Under the best of conditions (location, clear skies, etc.) and at (or near) sea level, the absolute most efficient &quot;Solar Flux Density&quot; will last only 4-5 hours (max.) of a 24 hour day. One-eighth of a day which is not totally inclusive of the high electrical demand (usage) time of the day in any area. Furthermore, seasons also will impact efficiency (again, Solar Radiation Inclination). Do you know how many days of 365 have clear skies with no pollution/smog, fog, overcast, rain/snow ? This naturally depends on the area where solar panels are most applicable (cost affective).<br/><br/>There are many other factors to consider, but understand I am not against solar energy at all. I am for any and all renewable energy, but we Americans are spoiled and wasteful.<br/><br/>Do you know of another industry that encourages their customers to NOT use their product other than the electric generating utilities ? I just received a $200 Rebate from my utility for replacing my 4 ton HVAC with a newer more efficient (SEER) unit. Insulation rebates, lighting credits, elec. to nat. gas hot water heater upgrades, electric usage discounts, etc. are available and encouraged by all electric utes. Energy Conservation is always encouraged by the electric utilities.<br/><br/>Arthur11, I don't mean to direct this to only you, but there just seems to be too many &quot;Solar Experts&quot; that think solar panels on your roof will solve the environmental and elec. service costs issues. Solar will contribute, but not replace your reliable service.<br/><br/>Freedom Bravo]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Stay On The REIT Track And Sleep Well At Night</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1462271/comments?source=feed#comment-19339211</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">19339211</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[@Bucknfl &gt; Thanks for the information and reference. GOV dividend is tempting, but obviously the quality and style of management (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/rmr' title='RMR Real Estate Fund'>RMR</a>) is highly questionable based on CWH 'results' (external management).<br/><br/>Thanks again,<br/><br/>Freedom Bravo]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 May 2013 16:21:35 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[@Bucknfl &gt; Thanks for the information and reference. GOV dividend is tempting, but obviously the quality and style of management (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/rmr' title='RMR Real Estate Fund'>RMR</a>) is highly questionable based on CWH 'results' (external management).<br/><br/>Thanks again,<br/><br/>Freedom Bravo]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Stay On The REIT Track And Sleep Well At Night</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1462271/comments?source=feed#comment-19309101</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">19309101</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Brad- Thanks for the quick response. Just thinking that the govnt sector would at least be 'stable' (tenants) with potential growth, but with recent events, nothing is certain.<br/><br/>Wishing your daughter well at UNC, great U. Visited the campus many times, but decided on CU. Many fond memories of the Beacon, so long ago.<br/><br/>Freedom Bravo ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 May 2013 23:52:33 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Brad- Thanks for the quick response. Just thinking that the govnt sector would at least be 'stable' (tenants) with potential growth, but with recent events, nothing is certain.<br/><br/>Wishing your daughter well at UNC, great U. Visited the campus many times, but decided on CU. Many fond memories of the Beacon, so long ago.<br/><br/>Freedom Bravo ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Stay On The REIT Track And Sleep Well At Night</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1462271/comments?source=feed#comment-19307701</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">19307701</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Brad,<br/>I have been a follower of yours on SA for about a year and have had excellent investment returns, especially in the health care sector, by following your opinions. I wonder if you have any 'comments' with reference to GOV (REIT). It appears to be within my criteria (SWAN), but don't ever recall an article by you even mentioning it. Any comments about GOV ? <br/><br/>When was the last time you visited the Beacon Restaurant ?<br/><br/>Keep up the good work !<br/><br/>Freedom Bravo]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 May 2013 22:41:54 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Brad,<br/>I have been a follower of yours on SA for about a year and have had excellent investment returns, especially in the health care sector, by following your opinions. I wonder if you have any 'comments' with reference to GOV (REIT). It appears to be within my criteria (SWAN), but don't ever recall an article by you even mentioning it. Any comments about GOV ? <br/><br/>When was the last time you visited the Beacon Restaurant ?<br/><br/>Keep up the good work !<br/><br/>Freedom Bravo]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>6 Mid-Cap Electric Utilities For An Income Portfolio</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1453091/comments?source=feed#comment-19183771</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">19183771</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[SCG (SCANA) is the best positioned utility of those mentioned, IMO. There is a tremendous population and industrial growth in the state due to the beautiful beaches, excellent weather and a strong 'right to work' environment. Many industries have located in SC and the expected future annual electrical growth is 2%-4%. Currently constructing 2 nuclear plants (1000Mw each) to meet the expected demand as the economy slowly recovers and growth continues (industrial, commercial and residential). SCG also has a large network of natural gas pipelines (transportation and retail) in SC, NC and Georgia.<br/><br/>SCG is a well managed company, and a potential M/A candidate, since they are bordered by Duke and Southern.<br/><br/>Long on SCG&gt;&gt;<br/><br/>Freedom Bravo ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 18:12:13 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[SCG (SCANA) is the best positioned utility of those mentioned, IMO. There is a tremendous population and industrial growth in the state due to the beautiful beaches, excellent weather and a strong 'right to work' environment. Many industries have located in SC and the expected future annual electrical growth is 2%-4%. Currently constructing 2 nuclear plants (1000Mw each) to meet the expected demand as the economy slowly recovers and growth continues (industrial, commercial and residential). SCG also has a large network of natural gas pipelines (transportation and retail) in SC, NC and Georgia.<br/><br/>SCG is a well managed company, and a potential M/A candidate, since they are bordered by Duke and Southern.<br/><br/>Long on SCG&gt;&gt;<br/><br/>Freedom Bravo ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Can Windstream Maintain Its Ample Dividend Yield?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1448101/comments?source=feed#comment-19090641</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">19090641</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[@Sunset&gt;  I don't know what you got 'in' at, but &quot;got out at $11.25&quot; appears to me to be an excellent time to re-enter !  If not, don't look back.<br/><br/>Long on WIN.  Cut the dividend 50%.<br/><br/>Freedom Bravo]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 17:19:35 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[@Sunset&gt;  I don't know what you got 'in' at, but &quot;got out at $11.25&quot; appears to me to be an excellent time to re-enter !  If not, don't look back.<br/><br/>Long on WIN.  Cut the dividend 50%.<br/><br/>Freedom Bravo]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Why AT&amp;T Is An Income And No Growth Story</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1447461/comments?source=feed#comment-19090091</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">19090091</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[An analogy for your thoughts: &quot;The second mouse always gets the cheese&quot;.<br/><br/>Long on T and VOD&gt;]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 17:05:38 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[An analogy for your thoughts: &quot;The second mouse always gets the cheese&quot;.<br/><br/>Long on T and VOD&gt;]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>It's Now Trading At $50, So Is There Any Oxygen Left In O?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1383131/comments?source=feed#comment-18963631</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18963631</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Brad, Always enjoy your Articles and value your analyses.  Could you give us your website address, if allowed under SA ?  Profile ? If not, then how can we find it ?  Will you still contribute to SA ?  <br/> <br/>Thanks for the GREAT Articles........have profited very pleasantly.<br/> <br/>Freedom Bravo<br/> <br/> ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 17:22:56 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Brad, Always enjoy your Articles and value your analyses.  Could you give us your website address, if allowed under SA ?  Profile ? If not, then how can we find it ?  Will you still contribute to SA ?  <br/> <br/>Thanks for the GREAT Articles........have profited very pleasantly.<br/> <br/>Freedom Bravo<br/> <br/> ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Verizon Wireless distributions will be "more lean" going forward than they have been thus far as the carrier pays down debt and bids in upcoming spectrum auctions, says Verizon (VZ) CFO Frank Shammo in the wake of a $7B payout. The comments suggest Verizon might still use the distributions as a bargaining chip (previous) to get Vodafone (VOD) to sell its stake. Shammo also states 1/3 of Big Red's postpaid subs are now on its costly shared data plans; that's up from 13% last November. (earlier)</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/1025101?source=feed#comment-18834221</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18834221</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[OK by me.  Buyout of VOD (45%) 'ain't gonna' get no cheaper.<br/><br/>Long on VOD.<br/><br/>Freedom Bravo ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 23:00:58 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[OK by me.  Buyout of VOD (45%) 'ain't gonna' get no cheaper.<br/><br/>Long on VOD.<br/><br/>Freedom Bravo ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Seadrill: An 8.5% Dividend Yield With A Growing Fleet</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1425481/comments?source=feed#comment-18826151</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18826151</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Agreed ! Well stated.<br/><br/>Freedom Bravo]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 17:56:14 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Agreed ! Well stated.<br/><br/>Freedom Bravo]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Seadrill: An 8.5% Dividend Yield With A Growing Fleet</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1425481/comments?source=feed#comment-18782461</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18782461</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Apparently, not current with the news, investment newbies or just too lazy to do some 'minor' research. Perhaps a different hobby would be appropriate. ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 17:09:57 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Apparently, not current with the news, investment newbies or just too lazy to do some 'minor' research. Perhaps a different hobby would be appropriate. ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Duke Energy - As Interest Rates Keep Falling, Investors Keep Looking For Yield</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1407721/comments?source=feed#comment-18724291</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18724291</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Most Utilities are currently overvalued due to Dividend Hunters.  Best investments during these uncertain times.<br/><br/>Long on DUK<br/><br/>Freedom Bravo (Investor not Trader)]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sat, 11 May 2013 23:40:40 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Most Utilities are currently overvalued due to Dividend Hunters.  Best investments during these uncertain times.<br/><br/>Long on DUK<br/><br/>Freedom Bravo (Investor not Trader)]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Linn Energy: Don't Believe The (Negative) Hype</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1418301/comments?source=feed#comment-18723961</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18723961</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[@rip&gt; Great point, but too many assumptions omitted. If the merger is consummated, Bery's &quot;net&quot; operating cash will differ from past cash return. When companies merge, there are considerable operating cost savings, rather than operating as two separate and independent companies. Then there's the 'C' Corp to a MLP issue which should also be considered, as well as the merger costs and other resultant savings and earnings. Demand will be the greatest influence of all.<br/><br/>These are some of the more simplistic issues that I am sure LINN/LNCO have reviewed. <br/><br/>There certainly will not be an immediate &quot;recoup&quot;, which no one should expect. IMHO, 6 to 8 years would be more reasonable, as an absolute maximum time-line.<br/><br/>Been Long on LINN and continue to add, thanks to Barron.<br/><br/>Freedom Bravo]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sat, 11 May 2013 23:16:17 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[@rip&gt; Great point, but too many assumptions omitted. If the merger is consummated, Bery's &quot;net&quot; operating cash will differ from past cash return. When companies merge, there are considerable operating cost savings, rather than operating as two separate and independent companies. Then there's the 'C' Corp to a MLP issue which should also be considered, as well as the merger costs and other resultant savings and earnings. Demand will be the greatest influence of all.<br/><br/>These are some of the more simplistic issues that I am sure LINN/LNCO have reviewed. <br/><br/>There certainly will not be an immediate &quot;recoup&quot;, which no one should expect. IMHO, 6 to 8 years would be more reasonable, as an absolute maximum time-line.<br/><br/>Been Long on LINN and continue to add, thanks to Barron.<br/><br/>Freedom Bravo]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Seadrill: An 8.5% Dividend Yield With A Growing Fleet</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1425481/comments?source=feed#comment-18722571</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18722571</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[@Duard&gt; SDRL pre-paid the 2013 1st quarter dividend at the end of 2012 4th quarter in addition to their regular 2012 quarterly dividend due to the 'fiscal cliff'' fiasco. This was done to protect the investors' potential increase of the 2013 dividend tax. SDRL is to be commended for being investor friendly. <br/><br/>Freedom Bravo ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sat, 11 May 2013 21:59:48 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[@Duard&gt; SDRL pre-paid the 2013 1st quarter dividend at the end of 2012 4th quarter in addition to their regular 2012 quarterly dividend due to the 'fiscal cliff'' fiasco. This was done to protect the investors' potential increase of the 2013 dividend tax. SDRL is to be commended for being investor friendly. <br/><br/>Freedom Bravo ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Premarket gainers: CBMX +8%. YRCW +7%. APO +7%. CTIC +6%. Losers: PAL -12%. LNCO -7%. LINE -6%.&amp;nbsp;</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/1000251?source=feed#comment-18493091</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18493091</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Dividend cut.......value of stock declines..........BUY more @ cheaper price ($4-$5).  50% dividend cut, still a good Div (IMHO).  Market Cap too high to go 'belly-up'.<br/><br/>Long on LINN.<br/><br/>Freedom Bravo]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 May 2013 11:00:22 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Dividend cut.......value of stock declines..........BUY more @ cheaper price ($4-$5).  50% dividend cut, still a good Div (IMHO).  Market Cap too high to go 'belly-up'.<br/><br/>Long on LINN.<br/><br/>Freedom Bravo]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>AT&amp;amp;T (T -0.5%) is set to launch new prepaid plans on June 15 under a brand called All in One, Fierce Wireless reports. The services will reportedly include a $35/month feature phone plan and a $50/month smartphone plan, with each supporting unlimited voice and text to go with a data bucket. The report comes a week after AT&amp;amp;T reported a Q1 net loss of 184K prepaid subs, a number that contrasts unfavorably with Verizon's (VZ) 43K net gain. Verizon recently launched a $35/month prepaid plan for feature phones, and $60-$70/month prepaid plans for smartphones.</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/998221?source=feed#comment-18471831</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18471831</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Agree with chopchop0...........Had VZ (4 years)......T has superior customer service, super device reception(s), excellent plans, less expensive (devices &amp; plans) and as stated above, second-to-none for travel.<br/><br/>T is the better stock investment. VZ is: 1) heavily in debt for it's Market Value; 2) 'may' discontinue dividends in an attempt to discourage VOD's 45% share ownership; 3) a $100B to $130B buyout option would be a bad business decision; or 4) cash and stock option ? Maybe............?<br/><br/>Long on T &amp; VOD. Short (very) on VZ. <br/><br/>Freedom Bravo ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sun, 05 May 2013 18:45:15 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Agree with chopchop0...........Had VZ (4 years)......T has superior customer service, super device reception(s), excellent plans, less expensive (devices &amp; plans) and as stated above, second-to-none for travel.<br/><br/>T is the better stock investment. VZ is: 1) heavily in debt for it's Market Value; 2) 'may' discontinue dividends in an attempt to discourage VOD's 45% share ownership; 3) a $100B to $130B buyout option would be a bad business decision; or 4) cash and stock option ? Maybe............?<br/><br/>Long on T &amp; VOD. Short (very) on VZ. <br/><br/>Freedom Bravo ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Barron's is out with its list of the 500 financially strongest companies as ranked after a rigorous cash and sales analysis. A quick filter on the list shows a good chunk of the names trade with a single-digit price to earnings ratio including Goodyear Tire &amp;amp; Rubber (GT). Despite all the buzz about booming auto sales in the U.S. and China, concerns about growth for Goodyear's products in other regions of the globe have lowered expectations. But with auto sale estimates for full-year being taken higher, Goodyear could see enough consistent revenue growth to justify a higher trading multiple. (Top 25: AAPL, WCC, WDC, DVA, CHRW, QCOM, JOY, V, STX, MRC, MA, CVI, COF, SYMC, MCK, WCG, ETN, BRCM, TMO, CI, CBI, NOV, WNR, HFC, DK)</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/999081?source=feed#comment-18470711</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18470711</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Five and counting...........Put me down for nine.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sun, 05 May 2013 17:38:04 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Five and counting...........Put me down for nine.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Verizon Finally Ready To Bid For Vodafone's Stake In Verizon Wireless?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1373601/comments?source=feed#comment-18150881</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18150881</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I think this would be a decision of the VOD BOD, tax implications and possibly with 'some' input from VZW.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2013 16:38:41 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I think this would be a decision of the VOD BOD, tax implications and possibly with 'some' input from VZW.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>A Quick Look At National Oilwell Varco's Finances</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1361281/comments?source=feed#comment-18149521</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18149521</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[@Albert&gt; Not until the 'annual' period of 2013 NIG is determined. (2013 --&gt; 2014)<br/><br/>RayRay is correct. Only 3 'annual' periods can be counted, since 2009--&gt; 2010 is the beginning 'annual' period.<br/><br/>Freedom Bravo]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2013 16:01:17 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[@Albert&gt; Not until the 'annual' period of 2013 NIG is determined. (2013 --&gt; 2014)<br/><br/>RayRay is correct. Only 3 'annual' periods can be counted, since 2009--&gt; 2010 is the beginning 'annual' period.<br/><br/>Freedom Bravo]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SCANA Corporation (SCG) declares $0.5075/share quarterly dividend, in line with previous. Forward yield 3.79%. For shareholders of record June 10. Payable July 01. Ex-div date June 08. (PR)</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/970541?source=feed#comment-18102821</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18102821</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Extra Long on SCANA ! Is Merger being negotiated ? ?<br/><br/>Freedom Bravo]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Apr 2013 17:50:07 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Extra Long on SCANA ! Is Merger being negotiated ? ?<br/><br/>Freedom Bravo]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>AT&amp;T: Financial Shenanigans, Painful Truth Coming</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1357981/comments?source=feed#comment-18044071</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18044071</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[@Daniel&gt;Considering all the negative comments to your 'Shenanigan Article', why has there not been a single Editor's rebuttal ? ? Not even a &quot;Thanks&quot; for the few agreements. Just wondering........<br/><br/>Freedom Bravo]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2013 15:25:43 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[@Daniel&gt;Considering all the negative comments to your 'Shenanigan Article', why has there not been a single Editor's rebuttal ? ? Not even a &quot;Thanks&quot; for the few agreements. Just wondering........<br/><br/>Freedom Bravo]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Grab A 15% Yield From This Undervalued Dow Dividend Stock</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1353581/comments?source=feed#comment-17908111</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">17908111</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[@combie&gt; I fully intend to continue investing in BA and advise my investors to do the same. Your BS about &quot;Charleston is a mess&quot; and supply chains are completely unfounded and reflective of a disgruntled Unionized Grunt. BA is expanding in Charleston which you are completely unaware, obviously !<br/><br/>Long on BA.<br/><br/>Freedom Bravo]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sun, 21 Apr 2013 16:32:29 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[@combie&gt; I fully intend to continue investing in BA and advise my investors to do the same. Your BS about &quot;Charleston is a mess&quot; and supply chains are completely unfounded and reflective of a disgruntled Unionized Grunt. BA is expanding in Charleston which you are completely unaware, obviously !<br/><br/>Long on BA.<br/><br/>Freedom Bravo]]>
      </description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
