<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>Buffett Junior's Comments</title>
    <description>Buffett Junior's Comments RSS Syndication from SeekingAlpha.com</description>
    <link>http://seekingalpha.com/user/865411/comments</link>
    <item>
      <title>This Is Why Netflix Will Go Bankrupt</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1429601/comments?source=feed#comment-18894871</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18894871</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Are you talking about the &quot;cash cost&quot; of acquiring streaming content? That is what I was examining in my analysis. <br/><br/>Let’s use 2012 as an example. In the cash flow statement we see that &quot;additions to streaming content library&quot; totaled $2.5 billion (negative). However, during the same year &quot;change in streaming content liabilities&quot; totaled a  $762 million (positive). The difference between these two numbers would give us $1.75 billion (which is the actual cash spent on acquiring streaming content).]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 10:01:40 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Are you talking about the &quot;cash cost&quot; of acquiring streaming content? That is what I was examining in my analysis. <br/><br/>Let’s use 2012 as an example. In the cash flow statement we see that &quot;additions to streaming content library&quot; totaled $2.5 billion (negative). However, during the same year &quot;change in streaming content liabilities&quot; totaled a  $762 million (positive). The difference between these two numbers would give us $1.75 billion (which is the actual cash spent on acquiring streaming content).]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>This Is Why Netflix Will Go Bankrupt</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1429601/comments?source=feed#comment-18876441</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18876441</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I have no idea how long the run will last or when the sell off will occur. I only know one thing  - the stock will fluctuate! ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 20:41:43 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I have no idea how long the run will last or when the sell off will occur. I only know one thing  - the stock will fluctuate! ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>This Is Why Netflix Will Go Bankrupt</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1429601/comments?source=feed#comment-18875311</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18875311</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Never said 4% per year. I clearly stated 4.9% per quarter over the past 21 quarters. Next time carefully read the article before making comments. Now I cannot take you seriously. I think you are an internet troll. ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 20:14:00 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Never said 4% per year. I clearly stated 4.9% per quarter over the past 21 quarters. Next time carefully read the article before making comments. Now I cannot take you seriously. I think you are an internet troll. ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>This Is Why Netflix Will Go Bankrupt</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1429601/comments?source=feed#comment-18874481</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18874481</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[You mean puts? <br/><br/>You people will continue praising this company until one day the &quot;music stops&quot; and the stock crashes.  <br/><br/>I remember back in the late 90's everybody was a genius - everybody was making money. People (such as Jim Cramer) called Warren Buffett and idiot and they kept saying such things as &quot;value investing is dead&quot; or &quot;we must use different valuations methods.&quot; I guess people really never learn from history. They continue making the same stupid mistakes year after year. Every time there is a bubble stock investors justify its valuation by saying “this time it’s different.”  However, the problem is that it’s never different this time.  Every bubble stock has popped eventually and so will NFLX.  <br/><br/>If you people want to buy NFLX shares (or the calls) go right ahead, but I certainly won’t make such a mistake.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 19:45:24 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[You mean puts? <br/><br/>You people will continue praising this company until one day the &quot;music stops&quot; and the stock crashes.  <br/><br/>I remember back in the late 90's everybody was a genius - everybody was making money. People (such as Jim Cramer) called Warren Buffett and idiot and they kept saying such things as &quot;value investing is dead&quot; or &quot;we must use different valuations methods.&quot; I guess people really never learn from history. They continue making the same stupid mistakes year after year. Every time there is a bubble stock investors justify its valuation by saying “this time it’s different.”  However, the problem is that it’s never different this time.  Every bubble stock has popped eventually and so will NFLX.  <br/><br/>If you people want to buy NFLX shares (or the calls) go right ahead, but I certainly won’t make such a mistake.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>This Is Why Netflix Will Go Bankrupt</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1429601/comments?source=feed#comment-18858861</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18858861</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[The price that NFLX must pay for content is increasing every year. The amount of content that the company must acquire is also increasing every year. Simply put, over the long-term cash flow will continue to be negative. There is no way that the company can grow its revenue fast enough to be profitable. I also expect a price increase in the near future. Considering what happened the last time the company did this, I certainly wouldn't want to be long this stock. ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 13:58:04 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[The price that NFLX must pay for content is increasing every year. The amount of content that the company must acquire is also increasing every year. Simply put, over the long-term cash flow will continue to be negative. There is no way that the company can grow its revenue fast enough to be profitable. I also expect a price increase in the near future. Considering what happened the last time the company did this, I certainly wouldn't want to be long this stock. ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>This Is Why Netflix Will Go Bankrupt</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1429601/comments?source=feed#comment-18858521</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18858521</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I must respectfully disagree. Acquisition of content is something that NFLX must do every year in order to stay competitive. People always want to watch the latest movies. In other words, NFLX can't just skip a year and not invest in new content. ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 13:50:25 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I must respectfully disagree. Acquisition of content is something that NFLX must do every year in order to stay competitive. People always want to watch the latest movies. In other words, NFLX can't just skip a year and not invest in new content. ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>This Is Why Netflix Will Go Bankrupt</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1429601/comments?source=feed#comment-18814981</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18814981</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Do you use the same response for every company that goes bankrupt? Its easy to talk now that the stock is doing well. We will see how confident you are a few years from now!]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 12:50:46 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Do you use the same response for every company that goes bankrupt? Its easy to talk now that the stock is doing well. We will see how confident you are a few years from now!]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>This Is Why Netflix Will Go Bankrupt</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1429601/comments?source=feed#comment-18814331</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18814331</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I though we were talking about valuation. <br/><br/>At the rate things are going, NFLX simply cannot sustain spending this much on content. The company doesn't have the money! It will be forced to take on more and more debt, which will only make it a riskier investment. ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 12:34:26 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I though we were talking about valuation. <br/><br/>At the rate things are going, NFLX simply cannot sustain spending this much on content. The company doesn't have the money! It will be forced to take on more and more debt, which will only make it a riskier investment. ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>This Is Why Netflix Will Go Bankrupt</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1429601/comments?source=feed#comment-18813641</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18813641</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[If you had bough MSFT back in the early 2000's (before the bubble popped), even if you held the stock up until today you would still be in the red! That is the problem with paying a huge price for almost non-existent earnings. It takes a very long time for the company to grow into the high valuation. Lets say you buy NFLX today, you might have to wait a decade for the company to be able to earn enough to justify the current price you paid. ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 12:21:26 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[If you had bough MSFT back in the early 2000's (before the bubble popped), even if you held the stock up until today you would still be in the red! That is the problem with paying a huge price for almost non-existent earnings. It takes a very long time for the company to grow into the high valuation. Lets say you buy NFLX today, you might have to wait a decade for the company to be able to earn enough to justify the current price you paid. ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>This Is Why Netflix Will Go Bankrupt</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1429601/comments?source=feed#comment-18807501</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18807501</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[You are using long-term projections made by analysts who sit in their little cubicles and play with excel all day. I have spent years studying forecasting and the accuracy of forecasters. You know what all these analysts have in common? They are almost always wrong! <br/><br/>You mentioned what Netflix is projected to earn in 2015. Do you realize that this is more than 2.5 years from now? We can’t even know what will happen 2.5 minutes from now! <br/><br/>Investors are willing to pay a high price for something that can only be achieved if everything goes according to plan (which it never does). Even a small set-back will cause a massive crash in NFLX shares. Are you willing to take this risk? ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 10:17:21 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[You are using long-term projections made by analysts who sit in their little cubicles and play with excel all day. I have spent years studying forecasting and the accuracy of forecasters. You know what all these analysts have in common? They are almost always wrong! <br/><br/>You mentioned what Netflix is projected to earn in 2015. Do you realize that this is more than 2.5 years from now? We can’t even know what will happen 2.5 minutes from now! <br/><br/>Investors are willing to pay a high price for something that can only be achieved if everything goes according to plan (which it never does). Even a small set-back will cause a massive crash in NFLX shares. Are you willing to take this risk? ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>This Is Why Netflix Will Go Bankrupt</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1429601/comments?source=feed#comment-18806711</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18806711</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Its all in the cash flow statement. You have to do some math to figure out the amount of cash spent on the acquisition of content. Its not just one number you pull from the statement. ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 10:03:42 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Its all in the cash flow statement. You have to do some math to figure out the amount of cash spent on the acquisition of content. Its not just one number you pull from the statement. ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>This Is Why Netflix Will Go Bankrupt</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1429601/comments?source=feed#comment-18806471</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18806471</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I agree with you, they should dispose of the DVD business. In fact, they should have done it back in 2011 (remember Quickster?) <br/><br/>You also mentioned that NFLX would be more profitable if the company abandoned its international expansion. While I agree that this would make the company more profitable, wouldn't its growth slow down significantly? And if the growth slows down, whats the point of paying such a high multiple for its earnings?]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 09:59:14 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I agree with you, they should dispose of the DVD business. In fact, they should have done it back in 2011 (remember Quickster?) <br/><br/>You also mentioned that NFLX would be more profitable if the company abandoned its international expansion. While I agree that this would make the company more profitable, wouldn't its growth slow down significantly? And if the growth slows down, whats the point of paying such a high multiple for its earnings?]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>This Is Why Netflix Will Go Bankrupt</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1429601/comments?source=feed#comment-18775431</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18775431</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[MSFT lost half of its value after the bubble popped. Even a decade later, investors still haven't gotten their money back (the stock is still significantly below its all time high). So you are willing to wait decades for NFLX to grow into its current valuation? To me this is ridiculous! <br/><br/>NFLX does not have any accounting problems like Enron or Worldcom. I just used those two examples to show that investors will buy anything as long its going up. They will even buy obvious frauds (not saying NFLX is a fraud). Most investors are sheep. In other words, they always loose in the long-run.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 15:05:36 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[MSFT lost half of its value after the bubble popped. Even a decade later, investors still haven't gotten their money back (the stock is still significantly below its all time high). So you are willing to wait decades for NFLX to grow into its current valuation? To me this is ridiculous! <br/><br/>NFLX does not have any accounting problems like Enron or Worldcom. I just used those two examples to show that investors will buy anything as long its going up. They will even buy obvious frauds (not saying NFLX is a fraud). Most investors are sheep. In other words, they always loose in the long-run.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>This Is Why Netflix Will Go Bankrupt</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1429601/comments?source=feed#comment-18774681</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18774681</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[What about the countless bubble stocks in the late 90's and early 2000's? Every bubble pops eventually! The sheep graze until one day they don't. While its impossible to predict when that day will come, I will be around to profit from the volatility using options. I am willing to lose a small amount of money for many years. I just need one &quot;black swan&quot; event to make me enormous profits. As the famous author, Nassim Taleb says: &quot;better to lose pennies and make dollars, than to lose dollars and make pennies.&quot; I'm sure that investors can make decent profits by speculating in Netflix over the short-term. However, these same investors will lose all of those profits (and much more) once Netflix crashes. ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 14:48:55 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[What about the countless bubble stocks in the late 90's and early 2000's? Every bubble pops eventually! The sheep graze until one day they don't. While its impossible to predict when that day will come, I will be around to profit from the volatility using options. I am willing to lose a small amount of money for many years. I just need one &quot;black swan&quot; event to make me enormous profits. As the famous author, Nassim Taleb says: &quot;better to lose pennies and make dollars, than to lose dollars and make pennies.&quot; I'm sure that investors can make decent profits by speculating in Netflix over the short-term. However, these same investors will lose all of those profits (and much more) once Netflix crashes. ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>This Is Why Netflix Will Go Bankrupt</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1429601/comments?source=feed#comment-18773971</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18773971</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[&quot;Without asking questions.&quot; You should always ask questions! ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 14:37:22 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[&quot;Without asking questions.&quot; You should always ask questions! ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>This Is Why Netflix Will Go Bankrupt</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1429601/comments?source=feed#comment-18770581</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18770581</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Still, how do you account for the huge discrepancy between revenue growth and the acquisition of content growth? As I stated in my article, it is growing more than four times faster than revenue. This will affect both the cash flow statement and the income statement (because of amortization). ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 13:28:12 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Still, how do you account for the huge discrepancy between revenue growth and the acquisition of content growth? As I stated in my article, it is growing more than four times faster than revenue. This will affect both the cash flow statement and the income statement (because of amortization). ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>This Is Why Netflix Will Go Bankrupt</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1429601/comments?source=feed#comment-18770361</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18770361</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[The major difference is that Amazon has an economic moat while Netflix does not. Furthermore, Amazon is more profitable, growing faster and in better financial health. So we shouldn't value these two companies the same way. ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 13:21:06 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[The major difference is that Amazon has an economic moat while Netflix does not. Furthermore, Amazon is more profitable, growing faster and in better financial health. So we shouldn't value these two companies the same way. ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>This Is Why Netflix Will Go Bankrupt</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1429601/comments?source=feed#comment-18770171</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18770171</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[You could have said the same thing about people who invested in Enron or Worldcom when these stocks were doing well. A stock that goes up in the short-term proves nothing. Most investors are sheep (and like sheep they get slaughtered in the long-run). ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 13:17:23 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[You could have said the same thing about people who invested in Enron or Worldcom when these stocks were doing well. A stock that goes up in the short-term proves nothing. Most investors are sheep (and like sheep they get slaughtered in the long-run). ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Muscle Pharm Will 'Bulk Up' Your Returns</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1369761/comments?source=feed#comment-18769831</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18769831</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[All I was trying to say was that he would not be my first choice as CEO. He is a former football player who (even though he was well paid) went bankrupt. Zuckeberg and Jobs (which you use in your example) never went bankrupt. They were also a lot more intelligent than Mr. Pyatt. <br/><br/>I also encourage you to watch some of the interviews Mr. Pyatt gave. You will then realize why this guy is not CEO material. ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 13:09:31 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[All I was trying to say was that he would not be my first choice as CEO. He is a former football player who (even though he was well paid) went bankrupt. Zuckeberg and Jobs (which you use in your example) never went bankrupt. They were also a lot more intelligent than Mr. Pyatt. <br/><br/>I also encourage you to watch some of the interviews Mr. Pyatt gave. You will then realize why this guy is not CEO material. ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Muscle Pharm Will 'Bulk Up' Your Returns</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1369761/comments?source=feed#comment-18172631</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18172631</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I am in the process of building a position in the stock. I will try to acquire as many shares as I can before the uplisting. <br/><br/>Out of the three competitors that you listed above, the only one that is a threat is Optimum Nutrition (ON). In fact, ON is the number one sports supplement brand! You can think of ON as the Coca-Cola of the supplement industry: strong brand, quality products and reasonable price. Too bad ON got acquired a few years ago by a European company. ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sat, 27 Apr 2013 13:14:10 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I am in the process of building a position in the stock. I will try to acquire as many shares as I can before the uplisting. <br/><br/>Out of the three competitors that you listed above, the only one that is a threat is Optimum Nutrition (ON). In fact, ON is the number one sports supplement brand! You can think of ON as the Coca-Cola of the supplement industry: strong brand, quality products and reasonable price. Too bad ON got acquired a few years ago by a European company. ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Why Netflix Is Not Overvalued</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1365061/comments?source=feed#comment-18111201</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18111201</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[What about the shorts who made &quot;piles of money&quot; when the stock crashed to below $53 per share? Was it a momentum stock then? Were they fighting the tape then? Please answer these questions, good sir!<br/><br/>The more leverage (on and off-balance sheet) Netflix takes on, the more overvalued the stock becomes -- the more excited I become. Out of the money puts are very cheap, and I can use them to keep betting against this company quarter after quarter, year after year. Most of the time I will lose money (options will expire). However, when the crash does happen, I make enormous profits!]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Apr 2013 21:31:29 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[What about the shorts who made &quot;piles of money&quot; when the stock crashed to below $53 per share? Was it a momentum stock then? Were they fighting the tape then? Please answer these questions, good sir!<br/><br/>The more leverage (on and off-balance sheet) Netflix takes on, the more overvalued the stock becomes -- the more excited I become. Out of the money puts are very cheap, and I can use them to keep betting against this company quarter after quarter, year after year. Most of the time I will lose money (options will expire). However, when the crash does happen, I make enormous profits!]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Muscle Pharm Will 'Bulk Up' Your Returns</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1369761/comments?source=feed#comment-18108961</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18108961</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[You need to build up that position quickly if you want to profit from the uplisting! Once the stock begins trading on a major exchange, you will never again be able to purchase the shares as cheaply as you can currently. ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Apr 2013 20:24:07 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[You need to build up that position quickly if you want to profit from the uplisting! Once the stock begins trading on a major exchange, you will never again be able to purchase the shares as cheaply as you can currently. ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Muscle Pharm Will 'Bulk Up' Your Returns</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1369761/comments?source=feed#comment-18108701</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18108701</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[FitMiss is a new line of products so we cannot know how it is selling until the company reports first quarter earnings. <br/><br/>I must disagree with you, I think it was actually smart to launch a new brand that only targets women (since they are 50% of the population). It will allow them to capture more market-share, which is never a bad thing! Profitability will come just be patient. ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Apr 2013 20:19:12 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[FitMiss is a new line of products so we cannot know how it is selling until the company reports first quarter earnings. <br/><br/>I must disagree with you, I think it was actually smart to launch a new brand that only targets women (since they are 50% of the population). It will allow them to capture more market-share, which is never a bad thing! Profitability will come just be patient. ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Muscle Pharm Will 'Bulk Up' Your Returns</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1369761/comments?source=feed#comment-18108411</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18108411</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I agree, the CFO and COO have actual business experience. On the other hand, Mr. Pyatt has no business experience. He is an ex-NFL player who went bankrupt, now he thinks he can run a company. Thankfully, as I mentioned in my article, this is a simple business (even an idiot -- Mr. Pyatt) can run it.  ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Apr 2013 20:11:58 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I agree, the CFO and COO have actual business experience. On the other hand, Mr. Pyatt has no business experience. He is an ex-NFL player who went bankrupt, now he thinks he can run a company. Thankfully, as I mentioned in my article, this is a simple business (even an idiot -- Mr. Pyatt) can run it.  ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Workday: Overvaluation And Lock-Up Expiration Will Cause Shares To Crash</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1309471/comments?source=feed#comment-17748821</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">17748821</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Keep posting all of their trades. People need to see this. ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Apr 2013 14:59:48 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Keep posting all of their trades. People need to see this. ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Workday: Overvaluation And Lock-Up Expiration Will Cause Shares To Crash</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1309471/comments?source=feed#comment-17588671</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">17588671</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[It would be crazy not to short this bubble-stock. I will keeping betting quarter after quarter because I know it will eventually crash. This stock truly is priced for perfection. Even a small disappointment in earnings, revenue, etc.. will cause investors to run like a herd of sheep. ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sat, 13 Apr 2013 18:13:04 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[It would be crazy not to short this bubble-stock. I will keeping betting quarter after quarter because I know it will eventually crash. This stock truly is priced for perfection. Even a small disappointment in earnings, revenue, etc.. will cause investors to run like a herd of sheep. ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Workday: Overvaluation And Lock-Up Expiration Will Cause Shares To Crash</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1309471/comments?source=feed#comment-17579831</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">17579831</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Some large institutions had to be buying at the exact same time insiders were selling. That is the only reason the stock price did not go down. They had to make a deal with some of these institutions (like letting them buy the shares at a slight discount) in order for this to happen. Whatever happened, it certainly was not ethical. ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sat, 13 Apr 2013 11:31:25 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Some large institutions had to be buying at the exact same time insiders were selling. That is the only reason the stock price did not go down. They had to make a deal with some of these institutions (like letting them buy the shares at a slight discount) in order for this to happen. Whatever happened, it certainly was not ethical. ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Workday: Overvaluation And Lock-Up Expiration Will Cause Shares To Crash</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1309471/comments?source=feed#comment-17474821</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">17474821</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[WDAY might become profitable, but that doesn't mean that the current valuation is reasonable. This company will have to achieve some pretty astounding long-term growth rates in order to justify the current valuation. ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 20:56:39 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[WDAY might become profitable, but that doesn't mean that the current valuation is reasonable. This company will have to achieve some pretty astounding long-term growth rates in order to justify the current valuation. ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Workday: Overvaluation And Lock-Up Expiration Will Cause Shares To Crash</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1309471/comments?source=feed#comment-17473091</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">17473091</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I began shorting this stock (using out-of-the money puts) when the stock was around $65 per share. The stock was selling for around 38x sales. Even at half the value (19x sales or $32.5 per share), this stock would still be grossly overvalued. My long-term price target is below $30 per share. ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 19:50:07 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I began shorting this stock (using out-of-the money puts) when the stock was around $65 per share. The stock was selling for around 38x sales. Even at half the value (19x sales or $32.5 per share), this stock would still be grossly overvalued. My long-term price target is below $30 per share. ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Zynga And Workday In Parallel Lives?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1332921/comments?source=feed#comment-17460701</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">17460701</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[My friend, you must understand that Amazon has a competitive advantage (economic moat). Zynga, on the other hand, does not. Therefore it is not a good long-term investment. ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 15:10:48 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[My friend, you must understand that Amazon has a competitive advantage (economic moat). Zynga, on the other hand, does not. Therefore it is not a good long-term investment. ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
