Seeking Alpha

Retired Colonel

Retired Colonel
Send Message
View as an RSS Feed
View Retired Colonel's Comments BY TICKER:
Latest  |  Highest rated
  • The Bull's Self-Delusion [View article]
    I agree with you, oh Great Swami. If I may quote myself (you'll just have to excuse me for citing myself as an example of some kind of wisdom) on what is "normal" for this market after the end of QE: "Whatever that might be, it probably is not what we've been observing for the last few years."

    That's about the only thing I'm sure of; everything else is problematic.
    Sep 2 09:27 AM | 1 Like Like |Link to Comment
  • The Bull's Self-Delusion [View article]
    Michael, I couldn't agree more with your thesis.

    We have been in the world of QE for so long, many investors have perhaps lost sight of what is "normal." Either that, or they've by now redefined the last few years as the "new normal."

    As QE ends, assuming it does, and this may take awhile, eventually we will be reminded of what normal in the market really means. Whatever that might be, it probably is not what we've been observing for the last few years. In the meantime, the bond rate is as good an indicator as any as to what the future will hold and the end will bring.

    (My apologies to the Elliott Wave folks.)
    Sep 1 11:50 AM | 4 Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • This QE Bower My Prison [View article]
    David, stick with your senses.
    Aug 31 03:45 PM | 1 Like Like |Link to Comment
  • This QE Bower My Prison [View article]
    Andysud, Obama said it, not me. You'll have to ask him. "Go ahead." But don't forget to tell me what his keepers tell you what he meant to say.

    But what he did say was: "If you've got a business—you didn't build that. Somebody else made that happen."

    Maybe he was speaking in a moment of honesty, as when he whispered to the Russian ambassador that he could be much more flexible after the election (of 2012).

    Or maybe he didn't say it at all, maybe it was actually George W. Bush. Or maybe it was Millard Filmore (he was a 19th century president).
    Aug 31 01:11 PM | 3 Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • This QE Bower My Prison [View article]
    Bookmdano, I agree with you. Military retirees have lost some of their retired health benefits and my wife lost those benefits plus her own independent health coverage from her civilian retirement. But I did say that "almost" everyone was happy with a government which always knows what's best for us. On the other hand, my whole comment was said in satire.
    Aug 31 12:26 PM | 3 Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • This QE Bower My Prison [View article]
    A continuously rising market, due in large part to Federal Reserve spending, has made those who invest in the market - happy. In fact, very happy. It's gone far beyond saving us years ago from a huge financial crises; a very worthy and needed initial move way back when.

    And it has been the function of this Fed, and this administration - to make people happy. And that makes perfect sense since the government is the only one who can make that happen. Remember, President Obama once said it wasn't the small business owner who deserved the credit for succeeding.

    Their mission has not been to allow our economy, and free enterprise in general, to flourish; or in the larger sense, to protect our citizens and provide those services which allow our country the freedom to be free. No, the Fed has seemed most concerned about feeding our market in the same way our administration spoon feeds our society - with money. And it has made our investors happy, as it does those unfortunate enough to be on the permanent dole - finding it more profitable not to work.

    Up until now, it has all made perfect sense; so what's the problem? Almost everybody has been made happy. Let's all pray QE never ends.
    Aug 31 11:27 AM | 6 Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • Are Stocks Set For A Major Decline In The Fall? [View article]
    Thanks Eric for an excellent glimpse of history.

    When the Fed first announced an autumn 2014 end for QE tapering, my first thought was - I wonder exactly how close to Black Tuesday of late October 1929 fame will that be?

    However, investors should have had enough time to factor that ending in, and other data and events have put the end of QE in the shadows to a very large degree. Now we seem to be fixated on the question of when will the Fed force rates up?

    Intuition should tell us the end of QE will probably be viewed as just another $10B decrease, admittedly the last, and more symbolic than anything. After all, those regular decreases of that same amount haven't had too much effect on the S&P so far.

    On the other hand, it's hard to calculate how the 100 billion brain neurons that are supposed to be in every trader's head will react on any given day. I haven't yet seen a chart analysis on that one.
    Aug 30 09:53 AM | 4 Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • Profit Margins And 'Fairly Valued' U.S. Stock ETFs [View article]
    Right!
    Aug 28 11:39 AM | Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • Profit Margins And 'Fairly Valued' U.S. Stock ETFs [View article]
    That was Einstein's General Law of Relativity, not his Second. Sorry Al.
    Aug 28 11:01 AM | Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • Profit Margins And 'Fairly Valued' U.S. Stock ETFs [View article]
    bbro, you don't understand "relatively" inflated. That doesn't mean everything is equally inflated, or is of the same size after inflation. A mouse and an elephant wouldn't necessarily become two elephants. I was trying to keep it simple.

    Don't feel bad, if it was an easy concept, it would have been postulated by a lesser man than Einstein long before 1915.

    On the other hand, maybe your example isn't in the bubble.
    Aug 28 10:20 AM | Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • Profit Margins And 'Fairly Valued' U.S. Stock ETFs [View article]
    Albert Einstein theorized that a man in an elevator which is in a free-fall toward the center of the earth wouldn't know that he was falling because everything around him is falling in a like manner. He called it his Second Law of Relativity.

    From standing outside a bubble, everything inside might appear inflated; but if you're inside the bubble, everything appears relatively normal, nothing appears inflated. The problem is: inside the bubble, everything is inflated, including your charts and data; and all the stocks and indexes around you.

    Of course that's just an old theory originally postulated by an old man in 1915. Right? Can't be applied to the market, right? Just a thought.
    Aug 28 09:39 AM | 1 Like Like |Link to Comment
  • A Crisis Less Extraordinary [View article]
    Thanks Eric, for putting past "crashes" into some perspective; facts upon which we can all ruminate. You and I seem to agree on a lot of things.

    "Whoever wishes to foresee the future must consult the past; for human events ever resemble those of preceding times. This arises from the fact that they are produced by men who ever have been, and ever shall be, animated by the same passions, and thus they necessarily have the same results."

    Machiavelli
    Aug 14 08:59 AM | 3 Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • Heading Into Jackson Hole [View article]
    Assuming Yellen learned anything at all from Bernanke's dithering:"Maybe we will, maybe we won't, but who knows when," she'll stick to the current taper expectations at Jackson Hole.
    Aug 13 11:52 PM | Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • Basic Market Theory And Its Application [View article]
    I'm admittedly not an expert on the EWT, but I do believe it's easier to comprehend the further back you get from the trees. Take a look at the S&P since 2000. The average eight-year-old, if asked what they think is likely to occur next in that pattern, can give you a good guess, and I believe it'll sound a lot like the EWT.
    Aug 10 11:27 AM | 1 Like Like |Link to Comment
  • Oversold Everywhere [View article]
    Oversold? Tell me, what are we going to call it on the remote, extremely unlikely, and almost impossible, okay, let's call it impossible, chance that things get very, very ugly over the next 12-18 months? I was busy doing mostly other things in 2008; what did we call it then? Just curious.
    Aug 8 08:29 PM | 1 Like Like |Link to Comment
COMMENTS STATS
316 Comments
433 Likes