<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>Jack Wildcat's Comments</title>
    <description>Jack Wildcat's Comments RSS Syndication from SeekingAlpha.com</description>
    <link>http://seekingalpha.com/user/871885/comments</link>
    <item>
      <title>Emerald Oil Could Replicate Kodiak's Success In The Bakken</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/944241/comments?source=feed#comment-18893381</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18893381</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Breakeven price for drilling a well in the bakken is about 250,000. 100,000 is not that good. I seriously doubt those Buda wells were under $4 million. Your lack of knowledge about the oil and gas business makes this article ludicrous, I am done.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 09:34:58 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Breakeven price for drilling a well in the bakken is about 250,000. 100,000 is not that good. I seriously doubt those Buda wells were under $4 million. Your lack of knowledge about the oil and gas business makes this article ludicrous, I am done.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Emerald Oil Could Replicate Kodiak's Success In The Bakken</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/944241/comments?source=feed#comment-18823702</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18823702</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[USEG is not drilling anywhere in McKenzie and if I am wrong feel free to point out the Township Range and well name. Are they even an operator? If you are merely pointing out a non-operated position you are even more lost on the oil and gas business than I previously thought. As I already pointed out, KOG is in the middle of the Bakken and has prime acreage, EOX does not and is drilling in a speculative area where success is unlikely because it is on the fringe. You do realize it costs $10-$12 million to drill a well right? Considering the upfront investment I expect more &quot;capital raises&quot; aka dilution in the future. Good luck. ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 16:33:53 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[USEG is not drilling anywhere in McKenzie and if I am wrong feel free to point out the Township Range and well name. Are they even an operator? If you are merely pointing out a non-operated position you are even more lost on the oil and gas business than I previously thought. As I already pointed out, KOG is in the middle of the Bakken and has prime acreage, EOX does not and is drilling in a speculative area where success is unlikely because it is on the fringe. You do realize it costs $10-$12 million to drill a well right? Considering the upfront investment I expect more &quot;capital raises&quot; aka dilution in the future. Good luck. ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Emerald Oil Could Replicate Kodiak's Success In The Bakken</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/944241/comments?source=feed#comment-18777271</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18777271</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[&quot;No hidden value here, just more dilution and suffering. I am sorry if you are a share holder but the facts are facts.&quot;]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 15:36:19 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[&quot;No hidden value here, just more dilution and suffering. I am sorry if you are a share holder but the facts are facts.&quot;]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Buy Natural Gas On The Dip</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1425521/comments?source=feed#comment-18691981</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18691981</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Salty,<br/><br/>CHK has $13-$15 billion in debt and McClendon nearly ran it into the ground on easy money. The interest payments alone and the underwhelming sales of their good assets make this company a dud. Look for companies with less debt, I will hop on board with McClendon's next adventure. No one is going to pay up for CHK either so I hope you are not basis your beliefs on it as a takeover target either. No need to &quot;bash&quot; Cheseapeake, go look at their financials.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2013 17:43:59 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Salty,<br/><br/>CHK has $13-$15 billion in debt and McClendon nearly ran it into the ground on easy money. The interest payments alone and the underwhelming sales of their good assets make this company a dud. Look for companies with less debt, I will hop on board with McClendon's next adventure. No one is going to pay up for CHK either so I hope you are not basis your beliefs on it as a takeover target either. No need to &quot;bash&quot; Cheseapeake, go look at their financials.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Buy Natural Gas On The Dip</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1425521/comments?source=feed#comment-18691611</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18691611</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Natural gas is going to be stuck in the $3-$4 range until exports are allowed barring a black swan event. Short term bump due to the sharp decline in natural gas drilling will be held down. There is too much supply.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2013 17:33:39 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Natural gas is going to be stuck in the $3-$4 range until exports are allowed barring a black swan event. Short term bump due to the sharp decline in natural gas drilling will be held down. There is too much supply.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Obama Administration's Natural Gas Policy Is Tragically Misguided</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1423441/comments?source=feed#comment-18672731</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18672731</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Also we need to balance our budget so exporting makes sense financially. ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2013 10:39:10 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Also we need to balance our budget so exporting makes sense financially. ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Obama Administration's Natural Gas Policy Is Tragically Misguided</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1423441/comments?source=feed#comment-18672641</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18672641</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Current technology does not provide a high enough recovery factor on those gas wells. The gas in North Dakota is flared because over supply and there is not enough infrastructure. There is plenty of gas for us to export and still have enough gas for hundreds of years as technology evolves. Peak oil and any thought of peak natural gas or that we will run out at some point is simply comical and usually from someone outside the industry who does not understand how it works.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2013 10:37:29 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Current technology does not provide a high enough recovery factor on those gas wells. The gas in North Dakota is flared because over supply and there is not enough infrastructure. There is plenty of gas for us to export and still have enough gas for hundreds of years as technology evolves. Peak oil and any thought of peak natural gas or that we will run out at some point is simply comical and usually from someone outside the industry who does not understand how it works.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Chelsea Therapeutics (CHTP): Q1 EPS of -$0.06 misses by $0.01. (PR)</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/989941?source=feed#comment-18360521</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18360521</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Wish that was true for HK. Getting killed for missing by 1 cent.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2013 12:09:01 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Wish that was true for HK. Getting killed for missing by 1 cent.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Is The Coal Supercycle Back?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1356091/comments?source=feed#comment-17962661</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">17962661</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Marc Anthony?]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Apr 2013 23:19:50 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Marc Anthony?]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Precious metals continue lower in volatile trade this evening, gold (GLD) off another 1.3% to $1,343/oz., and silver (SLV) tacking on another 3.3% in losses to $22.57. WTI crude oil slides 2.4% to $86.60/barrel. Stock index futures, however, show signs of a rebound, the S&amp;amp;P 500 (SPY) +0.3% and Nasdaq 100 (QQQ) +0.5%.</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/944301?source=feed#comment-17677241</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">17677241</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Buffet has bailed on stocks shedding 21% of his holdings lately and exiting bank stocks...]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Apr 2013 00:56:54 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Buffet has bailed on stocks shedding 21% of his holdings lately and exiting bank stocks...]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Stock Watch Thursday, 11 April 2013</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1334651/comments?source=feed#comment-17505661</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">17505661</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Regarding Sanuwave Health; have you heard of MDXG (MiMedx)? Are these two competitors? What about MRIC still following that one?]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2013 14:50:59 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Regarding Sanuwave Health; have you heard of MDXG (MiMedx)? Are these two competitors? What about MRIC still following that one?]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Acadia Pharmaceuticals Implies Sanuwave Could Triple On New Study Design</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1322621/comments?source=feed#comment-17505531</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">17505531</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Hey have you heard of MDXG? Are these two competitors? What about MRIC still following that one?]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2013 14:49:04 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Hey have you heard of MDXG? Are these two competitors? What about MRIC still following that one?]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Dara Biosciences: Don't Believe The Hype Surrounding This Biopharma</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1334331/comments?source=feed#comment-17491451</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">17491451</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Well you did say to short KERX and so far it has risen about 25%-30% since Feb. 4 so not sure I want to follow your recommendations. Interesting opinion on the matter but at these prices I think you are better off shorting more expensive stocks.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2013 10:13:28 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Well you did say to short KERX and so far it has risen about 25%-30% since Feb. 4 so not sure I want to follow your recommendations. Interesting opinion on the matter but at these prices I think you are better off shorting more expensive stocks.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Timing The Next Move In Coal</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1293101/comments?source=feed#comment-16652751</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">16652751</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Actually I don't own BTU. Even though I don't believe you started the term &quot;stuckholders&quot; I seemed to be having a bad day yesterday so I apologize for my unnecessary criticism. If possible I would delete my prior comment. My point is that just because getting to Gillette is harder than St. Louis does not mean there is a conspiracy theory. It is in the middle of coal country. Good luck investing.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Mar 2013 10:39:42 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Actually I don't own BTU. Even though I don't believe you started the term &quot;stuckholders&quot; I seemed to be having a bad day yesterday so I apologize for my unnecessary criticism. If possible I would delete my prior comment. My point is that just because getting to Gillette is harder than St. Louis does not mean there is a conspiracy theory. It is in the middle of coal country. Good luck investing.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Timing The Next Move In Coal</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1293101/comments?source=feed#comment-16630361</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">16630361</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I don't know about your letter but if you know anything about coal you have heard of Gillette, Wyoming. Your clever pun on &quot;stuckholders&quot; is childish. I hope that no one is foolish enough to read your letter because you sound like a 15 year old with your comments. Leave the analysis to the adults please.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2013 19:13:50 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I don't know about your letter but if you know anything about coal you have heard of Gillette, Wyoming. Your clever pun on &quot;stuckholders&quot; is childish. I hope that no one is foolish enough to read your letter because you sound like a 15 year old with your comments. Leave the analysis to the adults please.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>5 Commodity Stocks Moving On News</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1246991/comments?source=feed#comment-16605701</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">16605701</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Tom,<br/><br/>I understand there are a few other possibilities but their debt load is too high and at this point dwarfs their market cap. No one wants to buy the company either because the assets are nowhere near worth their debt plus market cap so there is really no upside. Understandable at this point you may just hold on due to the likely fact that you are down on your position but sometimes it is best to just cut bait and look for better opportunities in the market. Good luck.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2013 11:51:53 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Tom,<br/><br/>I understand there are a few other possibilities but their debt load is too high and at this point dwarfs their market cap. No one wants to buy the company either because the assets are nowhere near worth their debt plus market cap so there is really no upside. Understandable at this point you may just hold on due to the likely fact that you are down on your position but sometimes it is best to just cut bait and look for better opportunities in the market. Good luck.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>5 Commodity Stocks Moving On News</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1246991/comments?source=feed#comment-16491241</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">16491241</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Incorrect. Mostly Billings County and they are about to go bankrupt so get out while you still can.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2013 10:08:06 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Incorrect. Mostly Billings County and they are about to go bankrupt so get out while you still can.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>10 Catalysts That Could Propel MiMedx To $9</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1263331/comments?source=feed#comment-16184921</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">16184921</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Have you heard of MRIC (MRI Interventions?). Some familiar people and looks like they are an up and coming growth story...]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2013 13:17:47 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Have you heard of MRIC (MRI Interventions?). Some familiar people and looks like they are an up and coming growth story...]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>5 Commodity Stocks Moving On News</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1246991/comments?source=feed#comment-15989041</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">15989041</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Do you even know where there acreage is? Are you just a guy who thinks it is great because it is in the &quot;Bakken&quot;? They don't have the budget to operate in the Williston Basin, it takes $10 to $12 million to drill wells up here. You do the math. Bankruptcy is the only way this one is eventually going, too much debt is a killer.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Mar 2013 13:20:29 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Do you even know where there acreage is? Are you just a guy who thinks it is great because it is in the &quot;Bakken&quot;? They don't have the budget to operate in the Williston Basin, it takes $10 to $12 million to drill wells up here. You do the math. Bankruptcy is the only way this one is eventually going, too much debt is a killer.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>5 'Must-Buy' Oil Stocks For Big Potential Gains Into 2013</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1068951/comments?source=feed#comment-12736721</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">12736721</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Mark,<br/><br/>That might be the dumbest comment you have made. Nobody is losing $96 a barrel. I am in the Bakken and above $60 a barrel you make money. Go back to natural gas there are no gimmicks as far as oil goes.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2012 13:34:01 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Mark,<br/><br/>That might be the dumbest comment you have made. Nobody is losing $96 a barrel. I am in the Bakken and above $60 a barrel you make money. Go back to natural gas there are no gimmicks as far as oil goes.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The U.S. will surpass Saudi Arabia and Russia to become the world's largest oil producer by 2017 and become "all but (energy) self-sufficient" by 2030, the IEA predicts in its annual World Energy Outlook. The forecast highlights how the U.S. shale revolution is changing the energy sector, although analysts warn that the nature of shale production means that the growth the IEA predicts isn't guaranteed.</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/657821?source=feed#comment-11504351</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">11504351</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Hey smart guy with current technology we get about 15%-25% of potential oil. Tertiary injections CO2 you get about 30% total. We aren't running out by any means, we are waiting on the technology to catch up. There is plenty down there. M]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2012 11:18:45 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Hey smart guy with current technology we get about 15%-25% of potential oil. Tertiary injections CO2 you get about 30% total. We aren't running out by any means, we are waiting on the technology to catch up. There is plenty down there. M]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Why Natural Gas Has Not Lifted Coal Stocks</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/882371/comments?source=feed#comment-11090011</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">11090011</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Long ACI. Overseas shipments to developing nations and coal diversification will be key in the future. LNG bulls can't wait for overseas shipment of natural gas but they might want to check if that is cost effective to make as much as they believe they can make by exporting it. ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2012 14:50:04 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Long ACI. Overseas shipments to developing nations and coal diversification will be key in the future. LNG bulls can't wait for overseas shipment of natural gas but they might want to check if that is cost effective to make as much as they believe they can make by exporting it. ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Emerald Oil Could Replicate Kodiak's Success In The Bakken</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/944241/comments?source=feed#comment-10851801</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">10851801</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[That is fine. But the only thing that matters is the location of their assets. KOG is in the middle of the Bakken shale play. Emerald Oil is drilling unproven lands with a one rig program outside of the fairway of the Bakken Shale play. I am in the oil business so I might understand the difference between location. Strategy does not matter if you don't have the assets leased in the main part of a proven play. No hidden value here, just more dilution and suffering. I am sorry if you are a share holder but the facts are facts. <br/><br/>E.D. Hart- Go take a look at Kodiak's acreage compared to this company's (specifically net acreage because unless you own majority you cannot operate) It is not apples to apples. Emerald Oil does not have majority ownership (for drilling) in any lands that is appealing to the players up here. If anything, their stock is incredibly overvalued already so don't listen to any trading at a discount BS. Comparing Emerald to KOG is like comparing a rotten apple to one that is not quite ripe (Kodiak). Kodiak also has buyout potential, hence the reason it is at a premium price right now.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2012 13:31:45 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[That is fine. But the only thing that matters is the location of their assets. KOG is in the middle of the Bakken shale play. Emerald Oil is drilling unproven lands with a one rig program outside of the fairway of the Bakken Shale play. I am in the oil business so I might understand the difference between location. Strategy does not matter if you don't have the assets leased in the main part of a proven play. No hidden value here, just more dilution and suffering. I am sorry if you are a share holder but the facts are facts. <br/><br/>E.D. Hart- Go take a look at Kodiak's acreage compared to this company's (specifically net acreage because unless you own majority you cannot operate) It is not apples to apples. Emerald Oil does not have majority ownership (for drilling) in any lands that is appealing to the players up here. If anything, their stock is incredibly overvalued already so don't listen to any trading at a discount BS. Comparing Emerald to KOG is like comparing a rotten apple to one that is not quite ripe (Kodiak). Kodiak also has buyout potential, hence the reason it is at a premium price right now.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Emerald Oil Could Replicate Kodiak's Success In The Bakken</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/944241/comments?source=feed#comment-10847501</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">10847501</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Right that was the other part I forgot raising the outstanding share limit to half a billion shares (major dilution). Guarantee you they will use them all to raise more money for their worthless acreage. Difference between this weak company and Kodiak is that KOG has acreage in some of the best areas of the Bakken and Emerald does not. Seriously they don't even belong in the same sentence. I have followed VOG before Emerald and I implore everyone to stay out of this. ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2012 11:53:54 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Right that was the other part I forgot raising the outstanding share limit to half a billion shares (major dilution). Guarantee you they will use them all to raise more money for their worthless acreage. Difference between this weak company and Kodiak is that KOG has acreage in some of the best areas of the Bakken and Emerald does not. Seriously they don't even belong in the same sentence. I have followed VOG before Emerald and I implore everyone to stay out of this. ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Emerald Oil Could Replicate Kodiak's Success In The Bakken</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/944241/comments?source=feed#comment-10841771</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">10841771</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Wow were you paid by Emerald to write this? Emerald Oil has just completed a reverse split and is drilling one rig in a terrible area. Title is misleading and your analysis is pretty off the mark. They are increasing their shares. Mass dilution and further capital raises. Problem is on a one rig program if you miss, your sunk...Everything about Emerald screams stay away.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2012 09:59:49 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Wow were you paid by Emerald to write this? Emerald Oil has just completed a reverse split and is drilling one rig in a terrible area. Title is misleading and your analysis is pretty off the mark. They are increasing their shares. Mass dilution and further capital raises. Problem is on a one rig program if you miss, your sunk...Everything about Emerald screams stay away.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>What If They Come After Fracking?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/919161/comments?source=feed#comment-10539381</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">10539381</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[GRJ. There are many other companies (big and small). Not all of us are Aubrey McClendon who you seem to want to use as a poster boy of the oil and gas industry.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2012 10:15:10 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[GRJ. There are many other companies (big and small). Not all of us are Aubrey McClendon who you seem to want to use as a poster boy of the oil and gas industry.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>What If They Come After Fracking?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/919161/comments?source=feed#comment-10467311</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">10467311</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[So because there are so many studies that prove fracking is safe you can ignore those and call us either Tea party or part of a Koch Brothers agenda. You don't know a damn thing about economics. I appeciate the EPA but I don't appreciate them overstepping their boundaries. The courts will appreciate it less when they get sued. ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2012 12:20:11 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[So because there are so many studies that prove fracking is safe you can ignore those and call us either Tea party or part of a Koch Brothers agenda. You don't know a damn thing about economics. I appeciate the EPA but I don't appreciate them overstepping their boundaries. The courts will appreciate it less when they get sued. ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>What If They Come After Fracking?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/919161/comments?source=feed#comment-10467201</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">10467201</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Right they are doing the moratorium so they can wait on higher natural gas prices...that is not correct at all.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2012 12:17:46 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Right they are doing the moratorium so they can wait on higher natural gas prices...that is not correct at all.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>What If They Come After Fracking?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/919161/comments?source=feed#comment-10467081</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">10467081</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Well it makes sense you are from New York. Is your state enjoying the surplus that North Dakota is enjoying....oh wait nevermind you are too busy passing stupid soda laws. First, controlled extraction? What is this communism? Shall the government control it? Do they need to control your business as well in whatever area you work? Second. Taxpayers and property owners do not eat the cost of &quot;extrenalities&quot; like wastewater disposal. The oil/gas companies pay for ALL of that, what do you think that we get to dispose our waste water for free? Third. I agree state and local governments need tax revenue badly so why do a moratorium on fracking? You understand these deposits can't be opened usually conventional methods. You want oil at $200 and gas at $6 a gallon? Maybe we should import more? Waiting some years to sell the gas...that is messing with all the natural gas companies and violates a free market. This is not amatuer hour Pete, unless you are in the business you need to quit making ridiculous claims.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2012 12:15:57 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Well it makes sense you are from New York. Is your state enjoying the surplus that North Dakota is enjoying....oh wait nevermind you are too busy passing stupid soda laws. First, controlled extraction? What is this communism? Shall the government control it? Do they need to control your business as well in whatever area you work? Second. Taxpayers and property owners do not eat the cost of &quot;extrenalities&quot; like wastewater disposal. The oil/gas companies pay for ALL of that, what do you think that we get to dispose our waste water for free? Third. I agree state and local governments need tax revenue badly so why do a moratorium on fracking? You understand these deposits can't be opened usually conventional methods. You want oil at $200 and gas at $6 a gallon? Maybe we should import more? Waiting some years to sell the gas...that is messing with all the natural gas companies and violates a free market. This is not amatuer hour Pete, unless you are in the business you need to quit making ridiculous claims.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>What If They Come After Fracking?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/919161/comments?source=feed#comment-10457421</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">10457421</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Right that is safer, so when it explodes by accident and blows up an area by too much LPG the lawyers cook that industry. Very risky and twice as expensive, the economics don't work. ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2012 09:17:21 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Right that is safer, so when it explodes by accident and blows up an area by too much LPG the lawyers cook that industry. Very risky and twice as expensive, the economics don't work. ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
