Ariad Pharmaceuticals: Advancing in Front of Phase 3 Interim Results [View article]
Oh, I'm fine don't worry about me. I'm sincerely asking you what the near term catalyst is? Is phase III preliminary data still any day?
On Jul 31 01:02 PM Justin M. Hall wrote:
> R. Ennis: > > You should consider listening to the conference call. Merck did > not back out on the collaboration with ARIA. You are misrepresenting > the facts. One phase 2 trial out of four was discontinued due to > the combination of drugs selected for the trial. That's hardly backing > out on the deal. > > As I said earlier this week, ARIA is a speculative play. Maybe this > sort of investing is NOT for you. Based on your reaction, you might > consider talking with a financial advisor. It appears you may need > one. > > I do wish the best. > > Justin
Ariad Pharmaceuticals: Advancing in Front of Phase 3 Interim Results [View article]
What now Justin? Merck backing out of deal, is there still a near term catalyst? I don't see one.
I'm holding options that expire in Aug. have a feeling they are worthless....
On Jul 31 03:03 AM Justin M. Hall wrote:
> Rumi Frost: > > Thank you for the question. > > Regarding the ARIA's price, it is very difficult to determine what > the price will be following a catalyst. > > I do share the belief that an interim analysis of Phase 3 data for > a potentially [very] effective cancer drug is a significant catalyst, > one that investors would likely reward nicely. > > Because ARIA has a term-friendly collaboration with MRK, most investors > could foresee the possibility of an acquisition. It is worth noting > that MRK appears on Mike Harvilla's Big Pharma Patent Exposure Index(seekingalpha.com/symbol/c) > at biomedreports.com. This means, MRK may need to expand > their pipeline as some of their existing drugs are nearing patent > expiration. With positive data, deforolimus would certainly make > an excellent addition to MRK's cancer drug portfolio. > > While I did not provide you with a specific price, I hope the response > provided is helpful. Thank you again for the question. > > Good luck! > > Justin
Ariad Pharmaceuticals: Advancing in Front of Phase 3 Interim Results [View article]
On Jul 31 01:02 PM Justin M. Hall wrote:
> R. Ennis:
>
> You should consider listening to the conference call. Merck did
> not back out on the collaboration with ARIA. You are misrepresenting
> the facts. One phase 2 trial out of four was discontinued due to
> the combination of drugs selected for the trial. That's hardly backing
> out on the deal.
>
> As I said earlier this week, ARIA is a speculative play. Maybe this
> sort of investing is NOT for you. Based on your reaction, you might
> consider talking with a financial advisor. It appears you may need
> one.
>
> I do wish the best.
>
> Justin
Ariad Pharmaceuticals: Advancing in Front of Phase 3 Interim Results [View article]
I'm holding options that expire in Aug. have a feeling they are worthless....
On Jul 31 03:03 AM Justin M. Hall wrote:
> Rumi Frost:
>
> Thank you for the question.
>
> Regarding the ARIA's price, it is very difficult to determine what
> the price will be following a catalyst.
>
> I do share the belief that an interim analysis of Phase 3 data for
> a potentially [very] effective cancer drug is a significant catalyst,
> one that investors would likely reward nicely.
>
> Because ARIA has a term-friendly collaboration with MRK, most investors
> could foresee the possibility of an acquisition. It is worth noting
> that MRK appears on Mike Harvilla's Big Pharma Patent Exposure Index(seekingalpha.com/symbol/c)
> at biomedreports.com. This means, MRK may need to expand
> their pipeline as some of their existing drugs are nearing patent
> expiration. With positive data, deforolimus would certainly make
> an excellent addition to MRK's cancer drug portfolio.
>
> While I did not provide you with a specific price, I hope the response
> provided is helpful. Thank you again for the question.
>
> Good luck!
>
> Justin