Seeking Alpha

gpcooper3 » Comments |

Sort by:
Latest | Highest rated
  • Don’t Blame Wall Street - At Least Not Completely  [View article]
    by the way...the pilgrims would have starved to death had it not been for the natives. Much the same that Wall Street would starve to death without people who bring real value to the economy.
    Sep 30 08:41 am |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment
  • Don’t Blame Wall Street - At Least Not Completely  [View article]
    You have a lot of nerve saying that everyone is to blame.

    I live within my means and always have. I pay my full share of taxes. I pay my bills on time. I have never had the money to invest except a small 401k that I had to take out early to pay for my kids college...because I make too much money for him to get scholarships. So yes, maybe we are not as well educated as you, but we paid for our education and are doing it over and over because you well educated, smarter than everyone else, blame shifting, create no real value for society parasites keep forcing us to pay.

    Your dad might have worked hard and your grandad may have been in Korea, but what have you done except perpetuate the excess of speculation, corporate raiding, and pillaging of what your dad and grandad built.

    So, don't you blame me for this. You should be the one looking in the mirror.
    Sep 30 08:30 am |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment
  • US Oil Companies Borrow A Page From OPEC's Playbook [View article]
    I have to agree with you here. The energy coefficient for ethanol definately does not make it a viable choice for a fuel alternative to fossil fuels. We can only hope that the higher profits of the day result in a larger R&D budget that will make for a more realistic fuel source.

    But how else would democrats gain support in the typically red farm states? I think we are returning to the days of farm subsidies.
    Jun 19 10:12 am |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment
  • US Oil Companies Borrow A Page From OPEC's Playbook [View article]
    That simply proves my point. Decreased supply of refined products contrasted against an increasing demand of refined products will only cause prices to go up.

    If and only if the supply of alternatives to refined products exceeds the increased rate of consumption of energy will the demand for refined products reduce and cause a decrease in the price of gasoline. I don't see that happening anytime soon, especially in the face of reduced refining capabilities.

    The decoulping of crude prices and gas prices means that profit margins will increase. So wouldn't this qualify as artificially induced inflation since there is an intentional effort to not invest in production capabilities? I think they have become accustomed to the higher margins.
    Jun 19 10:06 am |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment
  • US Oil Companies Borrow A Page From OPEC's Playbook [View article]
    I believe that the lack of logic is on your side. A shortage of refineries results in a shortage of supply. There will be no shortage of demand in this country or especially in the Chinese market. And what does a shortage of supply cause? Certainly not a decrease in price!

    Looks like you skipped economics class altogether!
    Jun 19 09:13 am |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment
Comments by Ticker
gpcooper3's
Comments Stats
5 comments
Rating: 0 (0 - 0 )