Woodshedder

Is Microvision Ready For a Big Fall?

Jackie, I did not comment on the "Company and its technology." I simply commented on the warrants and institutional interest. Whether its stupid or not to call warrants is certainly up for debate. Again, I didn't debate that. I simply highlighted that our anonymous hedgie stated they would be called "this week." Strange that someone working for a hedge fund could state unequivocally when warrants would be called, don't you agree?

Secondly, you are comparing apples to cumquats (excuse the spelling), but the pun is intended, as you will see. Lets consider NTRI. Had there been diet plans before NTRI? Certainly. Lets consider Apple. Has there been cell phones before the i-phone? How about google? Were there search engines before GOOG?

I'm curious how you can safely make a statement such as "with a product that so far, no one seems to want." This product, a miniaturized laser capable of fitting in a cell phone and providing a wide-screen viewing experience has never been marketed before. Of course, how could anyone "want" it when it has yet to be offered. A better argument would be, "What makes you think MVIS is going to succeed in getting a product to market in which previous companies have failed." But you didn't use that one. Regardless, it is faulty logic to assume that since others have failed, so will MVIS.