Marc Faber: 'It Will All End in Disaster' [View article]
The economist and the weather man --always right-- NOT timely but always right
On Mar 25 03:41 PM CJJ wrote:
> Exactly... > > Its complaining to complain. Wait until some of these people actually > get out from in front of their computers and go rally somewhere. > They'll talk about it like its the Revolutionary War or something. > In the PAST PEOPLE ACTED. Today they write a few comments about how > they are 100% correct, throw out a few economists or bloggers that > promote their agenda, wipe their hands and go along with their lives. > > > Problem is many of the people complaining live comfortably, don't > really know what its like to be poor or really struggling. Maybe > its their wish to know it. > > For the person who says Austrian Economists have been proven correct, > care to add any proof of that? I can come out with a plan that to > win baseball games a team should bunt every at bat of the game...does > that mean then that if a team bunts one time and wins the game that > that proves my theory correct? You yourself say it isn't practiced, > so how then is it proven to work? > > > >
Marc Faber: 'It Will All End in Disaster' [View article]
On Mar 25 03:41 PM CJJ wrote:
> Exactly...
>
> Its complaining to complain. Wait until some of these people actually
> get out from in front of their computers and go rally somewhere.
> They'll talk about it like its the Revolutionary War or something.
> In the PAST PEOPLE ACTED. Today they write a few comments about how
> they are 100% correct, throw out a few economists or bloggers that
> promote their agenda, wipe their hands and go along with their lives.
>
>
> Problem is many of the people complaining live comfortably, don't
> really know what its like to be poor or really struggling. Maybe
> its their wish to know it.
>
> For the person who says Austrian Economists have been proven correct,
> care to add any proof of that? I can come out with a plan that to
> win baseball games a team should bunt every at bat of the game...does
> that mean then that if a team bunts one time and wins the game that
> that proves my theory correct? You yourself say it isn't practiced,
> so how then is it proven to work?
>
>
>
>