<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>Joseph Poma's Comments</title>
    <description>Joseph Poma's Comments RSS Syndication from SeekingAlpha.com</description>
    <link>http://seekingalpha.com/user/895785/comments</link>
    <item>
      <title>Japanese stocks move higher today after the U.S. dollar rose over the 100-yen level for the first time in four years. The Nikkei Average rose 2.5% to 14,546, with exporters leading once again: Mazda (MZDAY.PK +0.5%), Nissan (NSANY.PK +2% ), Fanuc (FANUY.PK +2.8%), Panasonic (PC +3.3%), Komatsu KMTUY.PK]] +6.5%), Trend Micro (TMICY.PK +3%), Sony (SNE +3.9%) and Suzuki (SZKMY.PK +4.3%).</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/1016791?source=feed#comment-18658161</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18658161</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Japanese are pumping money into the system twice as fast as the Fed. Nikkei going much higher...]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2013 23:02:13 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Japanese are pumping money into the system twice as fast as the Fed. Nikkei going much higher...]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Microsoft (MSFT) adds ZTE (ZTCOY.PK) to its stable of Android licensees a week after having struck a deal with Foxconn. In a blog post, exec Horacio Gutierrez boasts "80 percent of Android smartphones sold in the U.S. and a majority of those sold worldwide are covered under agreements with Microsoft." Though Microsoft keeps terms confidential, the reported royalty rates and Android's staggering growth suggest Android licensing might now be a $1B+/year business, and a key reason why the E&amp;amp;D unit grew 33% Y/Y last quarter in spite of Xbox weakness. Android is almost certainly a more profitable OS for Microsoft right now than Windows Phone.</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/963501?source=feed#comment-18025631</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18025631</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Expect HUGE numbers when this company releases the XBox 720. The XBox brand has many loyal and faithful users who are greatly anticipating the launch of the next platform (720). ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2013 09:08:26 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Expect HUGE numbers when this company releases the XBox 720. The XBox brand has many loyal and faithful users who are greatly anticipating the launch of the next platform (720). ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Apple (AAPL): FQ2 EPS of $10.09 beats by $0.02. Revenue of $43.6B (+11% Y/Y) beats by $1.1B. 37.4M iPhones, 19.5M iPads, just under 4M Macs. Expects FQ3 revenue of $33.5B-$35.5B, below $39.3B consensus. Buyback increased by $50B. Shares halted. CC at 5PM ET (webcast). (PR)</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/961171?source=feed#comment-18008361</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18008361</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[HAHAHA, Ross Healy = Short AAPL]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2013 20:41:09 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[HAHAHA, Ross Healy = Short AAPL]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>From a technical perspective, at least on the surface, today's close by the S&amp;amp;P 500 below its 50-day moving average should be cause for concern. Not necessarily, says Bespoke Investment Group. At last check, the index had gone 74 sessions without ending below its 50-day average. Bespoke notes that the index has broken below its 50-day moving average after sustained periods of at least 50 days above the mark 13 times over the past decade, and over the month that followed, it actually gained an average of 2.2%.</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/953691?source=feed#comment-17817931</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">17817931</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[What is fact is that since mid-November when the S&amp;P began its trend higher, prior to each pull back, the number of stocks trading above their 20 day moving average has decreased consecutively implying that the trend higher was being built on the backs of fewer and fewer stocks as time progressed. A correction is long overdue.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2013 22:52:24 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[What is fact is that since mid-November when the S&amp;P began its trend higher, prior to each pull back, the number of stocks trading above their 20 day moving average has decreased consecutively implying that the trend higher was being built on the backs of fewer and fewer stocks as time progressed. A correction is long overdue.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>After dropping to the lowest level since March 2009 last week, bulls gain 7.5 points to 26.8% in the AAII Investor Sentiment Survey. The long-term average of bulls is 39%. Those bearish drop 6.3 points to 48.2% - still well above the long-term average of 30.5%. From Bespoke is this chart of the SPY vs. the AAII bulls since 2009.</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/951361?source=feed#comment-17780691</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">17780691</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Not for nothing, but I don't see much of a correlation between AAII bullish sentiment and market returns.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2013 09:08:29 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Not for nothing, but I don't see much of a correlation between AAII bullish sentiment and market returns.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>In what's arguably a shot across Google's (GOOG) bow, Samsung (SSNLF.PK) is partnering with Mozilla on a new browser engine called Servo. Google is the default search engine for Mozilla Firefox, but at the cost of sizable traffic acquisition payments (something unneeded for Chrome and the stock Android browser). Google is already reportedly concerned Samsung will demand higher search revenue-sharing payments for traffic coming from its Android hardware, but Samsung's dependence on Google apps and services limits its leverage for now.</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/924181?source=feed#comment-17182641</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">17182641</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[A Google - Samsung conflict only benefits AAPL]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2013 16:18:13 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[A Google - Samsung conflict only benefits AAPL]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>In a speech titled "Too soon to relax," San Francisco Fed chief and member of the dovish wing of the FOMC John Williams nevertheless says he thinks we could see substantial improvement in the labor market by summer. "If that happens we could start tapering our purchases then ... we could end the purchase program sometime last this year."</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/924141?source=feed#comment-17181711</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">17181711</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I think I like the AAPL iRing rumors better.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2013 15:59:09 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I think I like the AAPL iRing rumors better.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Ready for the "iRing"? After meeting with hardware suppliers in China and Taiwan, Brian White believes Apple (AAPL) will launch a TV this year with a ring accessory allowing a user to control the set by pointing their finger. White also sees the iTV coming with a 9.7" mini iTV screen to be used for things such as home security, phone calls, and video conferencing.</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/922801?source=feed#comment-17161491</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">17161491</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[One Ring To Rule Them ALL!!! <br/><br/>HAha assinine rumor.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2013 10:06:39 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[One Ring To Rule Them ALL!!! <br/><br/>HAha assinine rumor.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Ready for the "iRing"? After meeting with hardware suppliers in China and Taiwan, Brian White believes Apple (AAPL) will launch a TV this year with a ring accessory allowing a user to control the set by pointing their finger. White also sees the iTV coming with a 9.7" mini iTV screen to be used for things such as home security, phone calls, and video conferencing.</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/922801?source=feed#comment-17159491</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">17159491</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[It's not that anyone doesn't believe AAPL will enter the TV market, but that this rumor is absurd.<br/><br/>Really, a ring accessory?<br/><br/>They would sooner release a touch screen TV or TV that comes with iPad mini / iPod Touch remote.<br/><br/>My money is on a touch screen TV]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2013 09:39:00 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[It's not that anyone doesn't believe AAPL will enter the TV market, but that this rumor is absurd.<br/><br/>Really, a ring accessory?<br/><br/>They would sooner release a touch screen TV or TV that comes with iPad mini / iPod Touch remote.<br/><br/>My money is on a touch screen TV]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Ready for the "iRing"? After meeting with hardware suppliers in China and Taiwan, Brian White believes Apple (AAPL) will launch a TV this year with a ring accessory allowing a user to control the set by pointing their finger. White also sees the iTV coming with a 9.7" mini iTV screen to be used for things such as home security, phone calls, and video conferencing.</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/922801?source=feed#comment-17156371</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">17156371</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Who makes this garbage up?]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2013 08:44:18 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Who makes this garbage up?]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Zynga (ZNGA) +5.2% AH on news it will roll out two real-money gambling titles, ZyngaPlusPoker and ZyngaPlusCasino, in the U.K. later this week. That's a little ahead of a prior ETA of June. The games, which are launching in partnership with U.K. firm bwin.party, will initially be available only on the Web and via download - no Facebook or mobile offerings for now. Separately, the WSJ observes Zynga mobile title/Wheel of Fortune knockoff What's the Phrase has made it into the App Store's top-10 rankings.</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/921871?source=feed#comment-17156261</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">17156261</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Anyone who looks closely at the popular apps would realize that anything ZNGA touches is MINT. The company needs to improve monetization of their social games though. There is no doubt in my mind that their real money gaming apps are going to knock the ball out of the park.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2013 08:43:10 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Anyone who looks closely at the popular apps would realize that anything ZNGA touches is MINT. The company needs to improve monetization of their social games though. There is no doubt in my mind that their real money gaming apps are going to knock the ball out of the park.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>To no one's surprise, Starbucks (SBUX) customers like the idea of getting Hazelnut Macchiatos at half-price. A Groupon (GRPN +4.6%) deal in which $10 Starbucks gift cards are being sold for $5 has disrupted Groupon's site and (according to a Starbucks spokeswoman) yielded over 100K sales today. The promotion also seems to be giving a lift to Groupon shares, which have a history of seeing Friday short-covering rallies.</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/905461?source=feed#comment-16667321</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">16667321</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Looks like the deal has been taken down from Groupon.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Mar 2013 14:24:35 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Looks like the deal has been taken down from Groupon.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Like, No... Love Facebook</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1273331/comments?source=feed#comment-16366911</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">16366911</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I just submitted a request for the archived data to see exactly what is and isn't included, when that gets back to me I'll pass all the info along.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sat, 16 Mar 2013 11:21:05 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I just submitted a request for the archived data to see exactly what is and isn't included, when that gets back to me I'll pass all the info along.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Like, No... Love Facebook</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1273331/comments?source=feed#comment-16343811</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">16343811</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[While Facebook does allow you to download your profile information, even if you are tagged in photos posted by your friends, the archived file will not include those photos. Only photos that you have uploaded and photos that friends explicitly post to your wall will be included. More often than not a friend will not post every single picture of you on your wall.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2013 16:18:06 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[While Facebook does allow you to download your profile information, even if you are tagged in photos posted by your friends, the archived file will not include those photos. Only photos that you have uploaded and photos that friends explicitly post to your wall will be included. More often than not a friend will not post every single picture of you on your wall.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Like, No... Love Facebook</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1273331/comments?source=feed#comment-16320181</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">16320181</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Thanks Chris! Are you long using stock or options? Personally I'm long the January 2014 Calls @ 25 strike.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2013 09:02:09 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Thanks Chris! Are you long using stock or options? Personally I'm long the January 2014 Calls @ 25 strike.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Like, No... Love Facebook</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1273331/comments?source=feed#comment-16302621</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">16302621</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[No problem, and thanks for your input. As I mentioned in the article 30% growth over three years I don't think is unreasonable given the initiatives and anticipated growth in corporate spending on online advertising. I also don't see growth dropping down to 15% by the fourth year but left that as a conservative approach. As for 6% growth, you're right in that it may be to aggressive but I believe that over time their will be a significant shift from TV/paper advertising towards online. Currently online advertising is only about 15% of advertising budgets, I don't think it's absurd to think that we could see that expand to 20% or even 25% over the next 5 years, especially given how well online advertising can target its audience. With Facebook's global reach, they will also benefit from the expansion of developing markets.<br/>Maybe you'll find this information interesting from ZenithOptimedia...<br/><br/><a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://bit.ly/YelntV'>http://bit.ly/YelntV</a>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2013 19:26:19 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[No problem, and thanks for your input. As I mentioned in the article 30% growth over three years I don't think is unreasonable given the initiatives and anticipated growth in corporate spending on online advertising. I also don't see growth dropping down to 15% by the fourth year but left that as a conservative approach. As for 6% growth, you're right in that it may be to aggressive but I believe that over time their will be a significant shift from TV/paper advertising towards online. Currently online advertising is only about 15% of advertising budgets, I don't think it's absurd to think that we could see that expand to 20% or even 25% over the next 5 years, especially given how well online advertising can target its audience. With Facebook's global reach, they will also benefit from the expansion of developing markets.<br/>Maybe you'll find this information interesting from ZenithOptimedia...<br/><br/><a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://bit.ly/YelntV'>http://bit.ly/YelntV</a>]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Like, No... Love Facebook</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1273331/comments?source=feed#comment-16301241</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">16301241</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[An ocean, I like that! Certainly very true. I've reiterated the statement many times over to friends, Facebook is not the major player in social networking, it is the ONLY player. Twitter and LinkedIn serve two totally separate purposes and Google+ is, in my own opinion, a joke. Don't get me wrong, I like Google. On several occasions I've owned the stock, and while they do well with search advertising, they need to take a pass on Google+. <br/><br/>I agree that Facebook is basing at the moment. I believe we'll see similar price action as we saw prior to the last earnings call. Stock will probably run higher on anticipation and sell off on the announcement. I'm looking for the company to show more fiscal control over R&amp;D over the next several quarters. Now that they have put into place several initiatives, they need to ease off the spending to see how these initiatives play out. Once they see how they perform then they should move on, building on what works and fixing/removing what doesn't.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2013 18:46:55 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[An ocean, I like that! Certainly very true. I've reiterated the statement many times over to friends, Facebook is not the major player in social networking, it is the ONLY player. Twitter and LinkedIn serve two totally separate purposes and Google+ is, in my own opinion, a joke. Don't get me wrong, I like Google. On several occasions I've owned the stock, and while they do well with search advertising, they need to take a pass on Google+. <br/><br/>I agree that Facebook is basing at the moment. I believe we'll see similar price action as we saw prior to the last earnings call. Stock will probably run higher on anticipation and sell off on the announcement. I'm looking for the company to show more fiscal control over R&amp;D over the next several quarters. Now that they have put into place several initiatives, they need to ease off the spending to see how these initiatives play out. Once they see how they perform then they should move on, building on what works and fixing/removing what doesn't.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Tech Bubble 2.0: Overvalued And Undervalued Stocks</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1274901/comments?source=feed#comment-16295781</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">16295781</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Thanks for the article, definitely appreciate the insight. I am long AAPL and completely agree with the call on its undervaluation, however I have a different perspective on Facebook. The PE and PEG ratios are extremely misleading because the EPS for 2012 were severely altered by significant spending in R&amp;D and administrative expenses. Costs such as these will not continue at the rate they occurred last year, which was expenditures at the rate of 62% of revenues. The previous two years the company had expenses of 22% and 29% of revenues, a much more reasonable number. I also believe that the extra R&amp;D spending will pay off. Facebook Exchange, Facebook Gifts and the combination of a revamp to news feed to emphasize sponsored stories I anticipate will pay significant dividends. Above that, 64% of companies surveyed said they plan to increase their online advertising budgets versus 2% which said they would be decreasing those budgets. Overall online advertising is expected to make up close to 15% of all advertising spending. <br/><br/>Personally I believe the story of Facebook and there is more to come. You can read my reasoning here: <a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://seekingalpha.com/a/raib'>http://seekingalpha.co...</a>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2013 16:51:38 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Thanks for the article, definitely appreciate the insight. I am long AAPL and completely agree with the call on its undervaluation, however I have a different perspective on Facebook. The PE and PEG ratios are extremely misleading because the EPS for 2012 were severely altered by significant spending in R&amp;D and administrative expenses. Costs such as these will not continue at the rate they occurred last year, which was expenditures at the rate of 62% of revenues. The previous two years the company had expenses of 22% and 29% of revenues, a much more reasonable number. I also believe that the extra R&amp;D spending will pay off. Facebook Exchange, Facebook Gifts and the combination of a revamp to news feed to emphasize sponsored stories I anticipate will pay significant dividends. Above that, 64% of companies surveyed said they plan to increase their online advertising budgets versus 2% which said they would be decreasing those budgets. Overall online advertising is expected to make up close to 15% of all advertising spending. <br/><br/>Personally I believe the story of Facebook and there is more to come. You can read my reasoning here: <a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://seekingalpha.com/a/raib'>http://seekingalpha.co...</a>]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Like, No... Love Facebook</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1273331/comments?source=feed#comment-16294801</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">16294801</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[My response was a quick eyeball approximation of the numbers. $27/0.64 ~40, 40/30 = 1.3333. I certainly wasn't intending to mislead anyone.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2013 16:36:27 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[My response was a quick eyeball approximation of the numbers. $27/0.64 ~40, 40/30 = 1.3333. I certainly wasn't intending to mislead anyone.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Like, No... Love Facebook</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1273331/comments?source=feed#comment-16294671</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">16294671</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Thanks James for info!]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2013 16:33:40 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Thanks James for info!]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Like, No... Love Facebook</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1273331/comments?source=feed#comment-16280891</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">16280891</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Unfortunately I don't have access to comparable statistics. Certainly would be interesting to see though.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2013 12:26:19 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Unfortunately I don't have access to comparable statistics. Certainly would be interesting to see though.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Like, No... Love Facebook</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1273331/comments?source=feed#comment-16280771</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">16280771</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[It's exactly your type of enthusiasm that I was describing when I was talking about the company's &quot;moat&quot;. Thanks for the comment!]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2013 12:24:10 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[It's exactly your type of enthusiasm that I was describing when I was talking about the company's &quot;moat&quot;. Thanks for the comment!]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Like, No... Love Facebook</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1273331/comments?source=feed#comment-16274691</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">16274691</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[So based on your investment strategy, what you're saying is you won't buy Facebook unless it reaches $0.40 /share. Take the time to actually look into Facebook. The PE ratio is extremely misleading because the EPS (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ttm' title='Tata Motors Limited'>TTM</a>) included significant and abnormally high expenses due to R&amp;D and general administrative expenses that should not be on going. Based on my full year earnings estimate of $0.64/share, Forward PE is around 40 with PEG being around 1.3. Some would argue that this is still to expensive, but company executives have shown a commitment to exploring alternative revenue streams which in my eyes is worth a premium.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2013 10:54:19 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[So based on your investment strategy, what you're saying is you won't buy Facebook unless it reaches $0.40 /share. Take the time to actually look into Facebook. The PE ratio is extremely misleading because the EPS (<a href='http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ttm' title='Tata Motors Limited'>TTM</a>) included significant and abnormally high expenses due to R&amp;D and general administrative expenses that should not be on going. Based on my full year earnings estimate of $0.64/share, Forward PE is around 40 with PEG being around 1.3. Some would argue that this is still to expensive, but company executives have shown a commitment to exploring alternative revenue streams which in my eyes is worth a premium.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Like, No... Love Facebook</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1273331/comments?source=feed#comment-16274341</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">16274341</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[The $0.02 EPS was due to significant expenses in R&amp;D as well as general administrative expenses which utilized 62%+ of the company's revenues. For 2010 and 2011 those expenses accounted for only 22% and 29% respectively. I think it's fair to say that the 62% figure will not be ongoing. I am a buyer of the stock anywhere below $28, I think in the near term this is a safe price point for entry. I do believe Facebook can end the year above $40/share, this target price is based upon a discounted cash flow that can be found towards the conclusion of the article.<br/><br/>Here is a link to the Income Statement through morningstar.<br/><br/><a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://bit.ly/M6UMtf'>http://bit.ly/M6UMtf</a>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2013 10:46:22 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[The $0.02 EPS was due to significant expenses in R&amp;D as well as general administrative expenses which utilized 62%+ of the company's revenues. For 2010 and 2011 those expenses accounted for only 22% and 29% respectively. I think it's fair to say that the 62% figure will not be ongoing. I am a buyer of the stock anywhere below $28, I think in the near term this is a safe price point for entry. I do believe Facebook can end the year above $40/share, this target price is based upon a discounted cash flow that can be found towards the conclusion of the article.<br/><br/>Here is a link to the Income Statement through morningstar.<br/><br/><a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://bit.ly/M6UMtf'>http://bit.ly/M6UMtf</a>]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Yahoo M&amp;amp;A speculation has Zynga (ZNGA +7.7%) shorts fleeing for the exits. Wunderlich's Blake Harper sees Zynga as a possible buyout target for Yahoo (YHOO), whose M&amp;amp;A chief recently said the company is working on two "significant" acquisitions (without elaborating), as the Internet giant tries to strengthen its mobile/social positioning. 16.4% of Zynga's float was shorted as of Feb. 15.</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/880151?source=feed#comment-16132911</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">16132911</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[ZNGA's growth opportunities would be severely hindered by a YHOO acquisition IMHO.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2013 12:14:51 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[ZNGA's growth opportunities would be severely hindered by a YHOO acquisition IMHO.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Macy's vs. Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia and J.C. Penney trial continues without any clear winner in sight yet. In a nutshell: 1) Macy's (M) CEO Terry Lundgren became enraged over a plan to place Martha Stewart shops inside of J.C. Penney stores in what his firm calls a breach of contract. 2) Martha Stewart is flabbergasted Lundgren hung up on her. 3) Naturally, JCP CEO Ron Johnson thought he had them both outsmarted. After the dust settles, retail analysts think MSO will suffer the most with its brand tarnished.</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/870531?source=feed#comment-15913611</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">15913611</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Analysts have it all wrong. I'm not saying I know the female mind because let's face it no one does, BUT, the Martha Stewart brand isn't going to be tarnished. Look at the brand after the woman whose name titles the brand was placed under house arrest. Come on folks, the average woman doesn't care about the legal battles of JCP vs. M. Buying opportunity in MSO IMHO.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Mar 2013 09:54:58 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Analysts have it all wrong. I'm not saying I know the female mind because let's face it no one does, BUT, the Martha Stewart brand isn't going to be tarnished. Look at the brand after the woman whose name titles the brand was placed under house arrest. Come on folks, the average woman doesn't care about the legal battles of JCP vs. M. Buying opportunity in MSO IMHO.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Samuel Adams In Cans Will Justify Boston Beer's High Price Earnings Multiple</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1209631/comments?source=feed#comment-15910531</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">15910531</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[While Sam in a Can isn't a bad idea for growth initiatives, I don't see this playing out the way they anticipate it to. Drinkers of Sam Adams are not your typical mow the lawn and crack a cold one. I won't go so far to say that they are a refined clientele, but the guys drinking Sam Adams play tennis, not lawn darts. As such, I think you'll find a sort of snobbery when it comes to the can. Sure, as you mentioned, the can will capture sales on airplanes and other anti-glass bottle destinations, but don't expect canned Sam to make it in the household fridge.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Mar 2013 09:14:46 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[While Sam in a Can isn't a bad idea for growth initiatives, I don't see this playing out the way they anticipate it to. Drinkers of Sam Adams are not your typical mow the lawn and crack a cold one. I won't go so far to say that they are a refined clientele, but the guys drinking Sam Adams play tennis, not lawn darts. As such, I think you'll find a sort of snobbery when it comes to the can. Sure, as you mentioned, the can will capture sales on airplanes and other anti-glass bottle destinations, but don't expect canned Sam to make it in the household fridge.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Apple Is Not Worth $460</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1205471/comments?source=feed#comment-15289341</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">15289341</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Growing revenues is not going to be an issue if Apple comes out with a true television and not just a set top box. Integrated iTunes, potential for touch screen, their own video streaming service, the possibilities at that point become endless. While I'm not a fan about the chatter of an iWatch, you can't say this company has lost its sense of innovation just yet. LONG AAPL]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2013 22:37:23 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Growing revenues is not going to be an issue if Apple comes out with a true television and not just a set top box. Integrated iTunes, potential for touch screen, their own video streaming service, the possibilities at that point become endless. While I'm not a fan about the chatter of an iWatch, you can't say this company has lost its sense of innovation just yet. LONG AAPL]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Oil is set to fall by 30% this year, says Levitt Capital's Robert Levitt. The impact of increased shale oil supplies have been drastically underestimated by the markets, Levitt says. This increase, when combined with the resolution of pipeline transportation issues, should ease upward pressure on oil prices. "Once we have all these issues straightened out, the price of oil is going to come down and that will be a great boom for the global economy."</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/832931?source=feed#comment-15102931</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">15102931</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Be happy the credit/cash spread is only 6 cents! Here in New York the spread is sometimes upwards of 20 cents... Robbery!]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2013 23:42:40 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Be happy the credit/cash spread is only 6 cents! Here in New York the spread is sometimes upwards of 20 cents... Robbery!]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Icahn, Loeb And Others Walk Into A Herbalife Trap Despite Ackman's Fair Warning</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1189551/comments?source=feed#comment-15096311</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">15096311</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Best trade for this stock going into earnings is a Long Straddle or Long Strangle options trade. Options are currently priced for a 3 point move in either direction. I think it's safe to say that with all of the commotion surrounding this company we can easily expect a move greater than 10% over the course of the week.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2013 17:28:41 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Best trade for this stock going into earnings is a Long Straddle or Long Strangle options trade. Options are currently priced for a 3 point move in either direction. I think it's safe to say that with all of the commotion surrounding this company we can easily expect a move greater than 10% over the course of the week.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
