George K's Comments George K's Comments RSS Syndication from SeekingAlpha.com http://seekingalpha.comuser/91275/comments The Mark Cuban insider-trading case shows "how far the SEC has descended into irrelevance," NY Times' Joe Nocera writes, contrasting this case with Bear Stearns, Lehman, Merrill et al. "So yes, I guess they nailed Mark Cuban. But all that shows is how completely pointless the SEC has become at a time when we've never needed it more." http://seekingalpha.com/news/market_currents/post/11709?source=feed#comment-309989 309989 sec.gov/litigation/lit...

Now, they go after Cuban and people are complaining??]]> Wed, 19 Nov 2008 12:23:13 -0500 sec.gov/litigation/lit...

Now, they go after Cuban and people are complaining??]]> Salesforce Likely To Be Below $15 By Year's End http://seekingalpha.com/article/104493-salesforce-likely-to-be-below-15-by-year-s-end?source=feed#comment-302117 302117 seekingalpha.com/artic...

I would agree, this stock is going down to 20s or less.]]> Mon, 10 Nov 2008 13:11:49 -0500 seekingalpha.com/artic...

I would agree, this stock is going down to 20s or less.]]> Salesforce.com: Clearly Mediocre http://seekingalpha.com/article/39639-salesforce-com-clearly-mediocre?source=feed#comment-89916 89916
Simply ignoring P/E ratios is just as laughable as your 'analysis.' The fact is that at some point companies like Yahoo, Ask Jeeves, and many others were trading at 1000 P/E ratios and we all know what happened next. Paying subscribers is not enough, you gotta bring revenues.

The fact that this stock is 200% above its 52-week low, can certainly be viewed as indicative of its overvalue given its earnings. As for uneducated comments, I see no value in your pseudo analysis...]]> Thu, 28 Jun 2007 13:34:23 -0400
Simply ignoring P/E ratios is just as laughable as your 'analysis.' The fact is that at some point companies like Yahoo, Ask Jeeves, and many others were trading at 1000 P/E ratios and we all know what happened next. Paying subscribers is not enough, you gotta bring revenues.

The fact that this stock is 200% above its 52-week low, can certainly be viewed as indicative of its overvalue given its earnings. As for uneducated comments, I see no value in your pseudo analysis...]]>