x oil -field: GOP rejects Dream Act-like deportation deferrals. http://lat.ms/ZwytXN LaTimes

x oil -field: God forbid GOP does anything pos. for nation and the young people if it remotely looks pos. upon this black POTUS or reflects pos. on DEM.MO

x oil -field: Within [my] 'the family' we find it PC incorrect to call ''them'' illegal immigrants. We prefer to call them 'extended stay overs'.

x oil -field: 'Extended stay overs' has a less criminal tone-ring-sting. Plus it's less demeaning in our eyes concerning the people of a global community.

x oil -field: GOP had 'no problem' supporting a blanket-amnesty along with DEM's when Mr.Reagan was their 'spiritual leader' POTUS. http://bit.ly/YpBZ5X

x oil -field: The new and improved measure would reduce undocumented immigration worker exploitation(s) by big Mfg. reduce the unemployment#s..c>

x oil -field: ..improve the U.S. social security [less loss].Reduce the financial deficit tax bill placed on all workers.Reduce the food-stamp count..c>

x oil -field: ..but then the GOP would lose many, many, backward thinking wedge items.

x oil -field: God forbid we wouldn't want this to happen to the GOP just before mid-term elections,to lose all the so-called important issues would we?

x oil -field: The GOP 'ultra right wing' would have nothing to rally around correct?

x oil -field: Not done yet with [my] the rant...

x oil -field: Sometimes [I] we need to ask why is the 'ultra wing' so damn difficult when it comes to this POTUS?

x oil -field: Is it [A] because he's black? or is it [B] because he's a great POTUS for all 'the people' or is it [*C] both [A] & [B]?