<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>Keep It Simple's Comments</title>
    <description>Keep It Simple's Comments RSS Syndication from SeekingAlpha.com</description>
    <link>http://seekingalpha.com/user/923439/comments</link>
    <item>
      <title>Danger Zone For This Week: Apple</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1436441/comments?source=feed#comment-18910571</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18910571</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Mr. Trainer,<br/><br/>Your biggest fault is using ROIC on a company that doesn't have much need for IC.  Apple outsources almost all of their production.<br/><br/>I'm really not sure how you can justify using Invested Capital as a metric for Apple.  Common sense dictates otherwise.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 15:00:07 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Mr. Trainer,<br/><br/>Your biggest fault is using ROIC on a company that doesn't have much need for IC.  Apple outsources almost all of their production.<br/><br/>I'm really not sure how you can justify using Invested Capital as a metric for Apple.  Common sense dictates otherwise.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Danger Zone For This Week: Apple</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1436441/comments?source=feed#comment-18854311</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18854311</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Agreed!  Please short Apple and tell all your fund buddies to do the same.  Why?  Because I want Apple to buy as much stock as they can with their buyback money while I continue adding to my position.<br/><br/>I love people like David Trainer &amp; Company.  They allow me to buy great companies on sale.  <br/><br/>See you at $1,000 per share in less than 5 years, David!]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 12:26:02 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Agreed!  Please short Apple and tell all your fund buddies to do the same.  Why?  Because I want Apple to buy as much stock as they can with their buyback money while I continue adding to my position.<br/><br/>I love people like David Trainer &amp; Company.  They allow me to buy great companies on sale.  <br/><br/>See you at $1,000 per share in less than 5 years, David!]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Julian Robertson's Tiger Management unloaded the 42K Apple (AAPL) shares the firm still had going into Q1. Tiger, which has owned Apple for years, had pared its stake from 101K in Q4. On the other hand, Tiger initiated positions in Dunkin' Brands (DNKN - 546K shares), Monsanto (MON - 192K), McGraw Hill (MHP - 408K), and H&amp;amp;R Block (HRB - 849K). AAPL -1.1%. (13F) (Q4 hedge fund sales)</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/1026461?source=feed#comment-18851551</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18851551</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Well I hope a lot of people think that way and keep the price down while I acquire more shares.  To think that Apple has lost all innovation is absurd.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 11:28:40 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Well I hope a lot of people think that way and keep the price down while I acquire more shares.  To think that Apple has lost all innovation is absurd.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Julian Robertson's Tiger Management unloaded the 42K Apple (AAPL) shares the firm still had going into Q1. Tiger, which has owned Apple for years, had pared its stake from 101K in Q4. On the other hand, Tiger initiated positions in Dunkin' Brands (DNKN - 546K shares), Monsanto (MON - 192K), McGraw Hill (MHP - 408K), and H&amp;amp;R Block (HRB - 849K). AAPL -1.1%. (13F) (Q4 hedge fund sales)</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/1026461?source=feed#comment-18846041</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18846041</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Silly move.  Apple is a much better company than all of those combined.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 09:52:52 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Silly move.  Apple is a much better company than all of those combined.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Apple, Zynga Lead Sharp Rise In Short Interest On Tech Names</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1432761/comments?source=feed#comment-18845961</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18845961</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Bill - Looking at the chart, you'd venture to guess that those 20 mil additional short shares came in from 4/17 - 4/24?]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 09:51:02 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Bill - Looking at the chart, you'd venture to guess that those 20 mil additional short shares came in from 4/17 - 4/24?]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Apple, Zynga Lead Sharp Rise In Short Interest On Tech Names</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1432761/comments?source=feed#comment-18845601</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18845601</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Thanks for clearing that one up.  10% runup &amp; massive shorting at the same time doesn't make any sense to me.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 09:44:38 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Thanks for clearing that one up.  10% runup &amp; massive shorting at the same time doesn't make any sense to me.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Apple (AAPL -2.5%) has dived over the last 30 minutes of trading on heavy volume, without any news to explain the move. The decline comes with the NASDAQ still up 0.5% on the day.</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/1024511?source=feed#comment-18821741</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18821741</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Bingo!]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 15:26:11 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Bingo!]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Apple, Zynga Lead Sharp Rise In Short Interest On Tech Names</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1432761/comments?source=feed#comment-18813051</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18813051</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[If you think most of those shorts came in after earnings, then why the 10% runup?<br/><br/>The timeline around 4/17 marked a huge volume spike where Apple was hovering around $400.  You see the same spike after earnings around $400.  I'd venture to guess that most shorts came in around that $400 level thinking AAPL was going to drop into the mid $300s.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 12:11:48 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[If you think most of those shorts came in after earnings, then why the 10% runup?<br/><br/>The timeline around 4/17 marked a huge volume spike where Apple was hovering around $400.  You see the same spike after earnings around $400.  I'd venture to guess that most shorts came in around that $400 level thinking AAPL was going to drop into the mid $300s.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Apple, Zynga Lead Sharp Rise In Short Interest On Tech Names</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1432761/comments?source=feed#comment-18811191</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18811191</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Bill - It's interesting to note that the increase of 21,000,000 shares short on APPL from April 15 to April 30 had APPL trading in the range of $385 to $442.  Anyone still holding onto those purchased shares are riding them for a loss right now, and some of those losses could currently be well over 10%.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 11:37:17 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Bill - It's interesting to note that the increase of 21,000,000 shares short on APPL from April 15 to April 30 had APPL trading in the range of $385 to $442.  Anyone still holding onto those purchased shares are riding them for a loss right now, and some of those losses could currently be well over 10%.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>More Tepper: Turning to individual ideas, he says Citigroup (C) has become one of his biggest positions. On Apple (AAPL): If the company doesn't have something "revolutionary" coming, it better do something "evolutionary" - bigger screen, cheap iPhone. If we don't see anything by September, then it's "Houston we got a problem," and Tepper hopes he's quicker on the sell button than everybody else.</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/1023221?source=feed#comment-18810021</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18810021</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Tepper should sell right now if he is concerned about Apple's short term lineup.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 11:12:33 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Tepper should sell right now if he is concerned about Apple's short term lineup.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Apple: Too Far, Too Fast?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1408501/comments?source=feed#comment-18553641</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18553641</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Shred - if you're going to compare the iPhone 5 to Samsung's entire lineup, well I think that's a bit unfair.  <br/><br/>You have to keep in mind that Samsung's phones are available with many more carriers than the iPhone.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2013 17:00:42 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Shred - if you're going to compare the iPhone 5 to Samsung's entire lineup, well I think that's a bit unfair.  <br/><br/>You have to keep in mind that Samsung's phones are available with many more carriers than the iPhone.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Apple: Too Far, Too Fast?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1408501/comments?source=feed#comment-18552191</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18552191</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Short term trading is like guessing the color of the next car that comes down your street. ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2013 16:29:39 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Short term trading is like guessing the color of the next car that comes down your street. ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Apple: Too Far, Too Fast?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1408501/comments?source=feed#comment-18552061</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18552061</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Sorry richbar, but you are a joke with your figures.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2013 16:27:31 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Sorry richbar, but you are a joke with your figures.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Apple: Too Far, Too Fast?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1408501/comments?source=feed#comment-18551961</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18551961</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[&quot;much worse than it actually is&quot;  Really?  Then why does everyone I know have the latest iPhone 5 and everyone walking around in NYC... ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2013 16:25:54 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[&quot;much worse than it actually is&quot;  Really?  Then why does everyone I know have the latest iPhone 5 and everyone walking around in NYC... ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Apple: Too Far, Too Fast?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1408501/comments?source=feed#comment-18544501</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18544501</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Nice - I did the exact same thing before earnings...]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2013 13:45:55 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Nice - I did the exact same thing before earnings...]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Apple: Too Far, Too Fast?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1408501/comments?source=feed#comment-18544421</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18544421</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I love how you pulled $35 out of thin air.  Nice work!]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2013 13:43:54 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I love how you pulled $35 out of thin air.  Nice work!]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Apple: Too Far, Too Fast?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1408501/comments?source=feed#comment-18536051</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18536051</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[As a long term shareholder, I'd rather see Apple's share price decline so that the most can be made out of those buybacks.<br/><br/>For now, I plan on continuing to add to my position at 25 share blocks while Apple sits below $500.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2013 11:13:20 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[As a long term shareholder, I'd rather see Apple's share price decline so that the most can be made out of those buybacks.<br/><br/>For now, I plan on continuing to add to my position at 25 share blocks while Apple sits below $500.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Apple (AAPL +2.6%) commanded 57% of smartphone profits in Q1, and Samsung (SSNLF.PK) 43%, estimates Canaccord's Mike Walkley. All other OEMs collectively broke even, after having lost money last year. Apple's profit share is down from 2012's 69%, and Samsung's up from 2012's 34% - chalk those changes up to Samsung's share gains and Apple's gross margin decline. Walkley also writes Samsung's Galaxy S4 is off to a strong start (in spite of some reports of overheating), that checks indicate U.S. BlackBerry Z10 (BBRY +0.7%) sales are soft, and that U.K. Q10 supplies have been limited.</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/1001221?source=feed#comment-18504981</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18504981</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I have yet to see one person in the US with a Z10 or a Q10...]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 May 2013 15:46:42 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I have yet to see one person in the US with a Z10 or a Q10...]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Deckers Outdoor: International Growth Potential Is Enormous</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1394591/comments?source=feed#comment-18420331</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18420331</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Investors need to learn patience.  Billionaires don't happen overnight.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 16:23:28 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Investors need to learn patience.  Billionaires don't happen overnight.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Deckers Outdoor: International Growth Potential Is Enormous</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1394591/comments?source=feed#comment-18404601</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18404601</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Betting on any stock for the short term is an easy way to lose money.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 11:17:31 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Betting on any stock for the short term is an easy way to lose money.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Deckers Outdoor: International Growth Potential Is Enormous</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1394591/comments?source=feed#comment-18367511</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18367511</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Hi Bill,<br/><br/>Here's a bit more from CEO Angel Martinez in the Q1 conference call regarding China store operations in response to Eric Tracy's query:<br/><br/>&quot;we've been seeing some steady improvements on our retail store operations in China. And we're still just scratching the surface of the total opportunity there. When you look at second, third tier cities, you look at outlet concept opportunities. That is still a great opportunity. In terms of productivity, they are smaller stores. They still generate 1 year kind of paybacks, which has very strong returns on invested capital, but they are smaller stores compared to some of the U.S. and European stores.&quot;]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2013 14:39:05 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Hi Bill,<br/><br/>Here's a bit more from CEO Angel Martinez in the Q1 conference call regarding China store operations in response to Eric Tracy's query:<br/><br/>&quot;we've been seeing some steady improvements on our retail store operations in China. And we're still just scratching the surface of the total opportunity there. When you look at second, third tier cities, you look at outlet concept opportunities. That is still a great opportunity. In terms of productivity, they are smaller stores. They still generate 1 year kind of paybacks, which has very strong returns on invested capital, but they are smaller stores compared to some of the U.S. and European stores.&quot;]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Deckers Investors Might Be Missing The Bigger Picture</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1389081/comments?source=feed#comment-18336951</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18336951</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[indian - Once again, the point of my article was not about Deckers' cash generation or how Deckers is or should be valued, but about the potential for massive product diversification and risk aversion through other recently acquired brands.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 19:36:35 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[indian - Once again, the point of my article was not about Deckers' cash generation or how Deckers is or should be valued, but about the potential for massive product diversification and risk aversion through other recently acquired brands.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Deckers Investors Might Be Missing The Bigger Picture</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1389081/comments?source=feed#comment-18335021</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18335021</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[The point of my article was not about Decker's cash generation, but product diversification through other existing brands.  Even The Coca-Cola Company sells Orange Juice at a billion dollars per year.  Relying on one product (anything fur lined from the UGG brand) greatly increases your profit risk as seen from mild winters and the jump in sheepskin wool prices.<br/><br/>The point of product diversification in a business is to offset the dangerous repercussions of seasonality and sole dependence on a single brand (in this case fur lined UGG products) to maintain that cashflow you speak of.  At the end of the day, you have to prepare for when there might be less demand for your product (UGG fur lined products) and setup some safety nets.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 18:13:10 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[The point of my article was not about Decker's cash generation, but product diversification through other existing brands.  Even The Coca-Cola Company sells Orange Juice at a billion dollars per year.  Relying on one product (anything fur lined from the UGG brand) greatly increases your profit risk as seen from mild winters and the jump in sheepskin wool prices.<br/><br/>The point of product diversification in a business is to offset the dangerous repercussions of seasonality and sole dependence on a single brand (in this case fur lined UGG products) to maintain that cashflow you speak of.  At the end of the day, you have to prepare for when there might be less demand for your product (UGG fur lined products) and setup some safety nets.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Deckers Pullback Could Present Opportunity</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1380561/comments?source=feed#comment-18281361</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18281361</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Nice article, Bill.  <br/><br/>I think their retail store investment will pay out handsomely over the next 5 years.  <br/><br/>Earnings are greatly reduced now because of this investment, but it's a pay it forward type deal that could bring home some pretty substantial profits.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2013 14:56:40 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Nice article, Bill.  <br/><br/>I think their retail store investment will pay out handsomely over the next 5 years.  <br/><br/>Earnings are greatly reduced now because of this investment, but it's a pay it forward type deal that could bring home some pretty substantial profits.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>A debate is raging between retail analysts on whether or not a move by Deckers Outdoor (DECK +0.7%) to replace sheepskin with a new wool fiber in its Ugg products is a positive. Exec said during the earnings call (transcript) that the company could lower product costs and pursue profitable new growth opportunities by making the switch, but skeptic wonder about the hit to the brand. (Twitter exchange: I, II, III)</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/977801?source=feed#comment-18271021</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18271021</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[From the conference call, they mentioned retailers preffering the feel of the new UGG Pure Wool vs their traditional sheepskin wool.  Seems like a win-win - lower costs and better quality products.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2013 11:17:32 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[From the conference call, they mentioned retailers preffering the feel of the new UGG Pure Wool vs their traditional sheepskin wool.  Seems like a win-win - lower costs and better quality products.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Apple's Earnings Projections Continue To Irritate Wall Street</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1370211/comments?source=feed#comment-18092601</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18092601</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[@pk de cville<br/><br/>Thank you!  <br/><br/>People never review the actual facts...  Just what they care to look at.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Apr 2013 14:33:58 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[@pk de cville<br/><br/>Thank you!  <br/><br/>People never review the actual facts...  Just what they care to look at.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Apple's Earnings Projections Continue To Irritate Wall Street</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1370211/comments?source=feed#comment-18080401</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18080401</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[&quot;This way, Apple is able to see what the estimates are and use the buyback to meet it.&quot;<br/><br/>That's a very interesting way to look at it...]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Apr 2013 11:25:11 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[&quot;This way, Apple is able to see what the estimates are and use the buyback to meet it.&quot;<br/><br/>That's a very interesting way to look at it...]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Apple's Earnings Projections Continue To Irritate Wall Street</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1370211/comments?source=feed#comment-18080061</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18080061</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[So I had the editors here at Seeking Alpha change &quot;hoard&quot; to &quot;horde&quot; for me and they did that, but then they changed it back to &quot;hoard.&quot;  Looks like I was correct the first time around.<br/><br/>See for yourself - <a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://seekingalpha.com/p/we6'>http://seekingalpha.co...</a>]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Apr 2013 11:18:04 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[So I had the editors here at Seeking Alpha change &quot;hoard&quot; to &quot;horde&quot; for me and they did that, but then they changed it back to &quot;hoard.&quot;  Looks like I was correct the first time around.<br/><br/>See for yourself - <a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://seekingalpha.com/p/we6'>http://seekingalpha.co...</a>]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Apple's Earnings Projections Continue To Irritate Wall Street</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1370211/comments?source=feed#comment-18079491</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18079491</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[The flawed logic in comparing the iPhone 5 to previous generation iPhone sales is the fact that many more carriers sell the iPhone 4/4S now than when the 4S came out and carriers sold the 3GS/4.  You're comparing Apple's to Oranges.  <br/><br/>Right now, there are many carriers selling the iPhone 4/4S &amp; 5 vs a lot fewer that were offering the iPhone 3GS/4 &amp; 4S combo.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Apr 2013 11:07:00 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[The flawed logic in comparing the iPhone 5 to previous generation iPhone sales is the fact that many more carriers sell the iPhone 4/4S now than when the 4S came out and carriers sold the 3GS/4.  You're comparing Apple's to Oranges.  <br/><br/>Right now, there are many carriers selling the iPhone 4/4S &amp; 5 vs a lot fewer that were offering the iPhone 3GS/4 &amp; 4S combo.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Apple's Earnings Projections Continue To Irritate Wall Street</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1370211/comments?source=feed#comment-18079261</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18079261</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I'd venture to guess that Apple will put a decent dent in their share buyback program at these current levels.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Apr 2013 11:01:36 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I'd venture to guess that Apple will put a decent dent in their share buyback program at these current levels.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
