Seeking Alpha

xeys_00

xeys_00
Send Message
View as an RSS Feed
View xeys_00's Comments BY TICKER:
Latest  |  Highest rated
  • IBM Shrinks - Analysts Hate It [View article]
    No, Cramer will claim he called it, and that he's always liked IBM.
    Dec 10 10:47 AM | 1 Like Like |Link to Comment
  • IBM Shrinks - Analysts Hate It [View article]
    Of course he didn't. The only reason such a big deal is being made of it now with IBM is that it's the "cool" thing to hate this stock, and any reason is considered valid. Another reason I think IBM has bottomed. EVERYBODY HATES IT.
    Dec 10 09:09 AM | 1 Like Like |Link to Comment
  • IBM Shrinks - Analysts Hate It [View article]
    Reading through your history of comments, you probably shorted IBM around 200. Congrats. But don't be greedy. Might be best to cover soon.
    Dec 5 12:44 AM | Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • IBM Shrinks - Analysts Hate It [View article]
    You say "multiple unbiased sources" "suggest" Ibm isn't a player in the cloud. Let's think about that a moment. Multiple, as in many. Unbiased, as in they won't profit from the stock going down(aka impartial). Druckenmiller, a few Seeking Alpha "authors", and multiple analysts, who lowered price targets as the stock dropped in price. So there's your multiple. Unbiased? Hardly. The analysts just want to seem knowledgeable and relevant(of which they are neither). Their bias is shown by the fact they are following the stock's price instead of actually "analyzing(lol, do they ever?)" And the obvious shorters like Druck? Uh, yea... Biased. So multiple unbiased "sources"? Try again.
    Dec 4 04:56 PM | 3 Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • IBM Shrinks - Analysts Hate It [View article]
    So you're short. We get it. While I am not predicting a return to 215, I feel that 180-185 is where the stock should be at the moment. At a certain point when the current darlings get swatted like flies, the money will go to whatever is cheapest relative to a year's range. Right now, we're just about there. Buyers could wait for 160, like some people say, but they might be well out of luck. Like those that claimed they would buy Apple at 375 or even(lol) 350. Everyone can see what happened there.
    Dec 4 02:03 PM | Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • IBM Shrinks - Analysts Hate It [View article]
    Analysts know nothing. They routinely follow a stock's price when making their "targets". Stock goes up, they adjust their targets to match. Stock goes down, they downgrade the stock. A good example of this is Apple. It went to 385, Analysts said they targeted 350. It was at 700, they targeted 1,000. Case closed.
    Dec 4 10:57 AM | 25 Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • Why Buffett Is Cheering Druckenmiller's IBM Short [View article]
    If they followed him into shorting, just because they think he's a guru or something and didn't do due diligence, they deserve to lose every penny they put into this stupid trade. People like Druckenmiller rely on the stupidity of people who watch TV to make their moves work. He shorted a long time ago and needed to close his shorts. There's no way to tell if he still has the short position or not, but I bet he does not. He's probably shorting Amazon and will target them next.
    Nov 27 12:05 AM | 1 Like Like |Link to Comment
  • Why Buffett Is Cheering Druckenmiller's IBM Short [View article]
    If the Media is used? Of course you can.
    Nov 26 04:09 PM | Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • The Thinking Behind Druckenmiller's Selling Short IBM [View article]
    Just like if you're shorting, same rules apply. When the stock goes up, you lose.
    Nov 26 01:05 PM | Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • Why Buffett Is Cheering Druckenmiller's IBM Short [View article]
    Considering how they distort the market with lies, I'd vote guilty.
    Nov 26 09:39 AM | Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • Why Buffett Is Cheering Druckenmiller's IBM Short [View article]
    IBM failed to break 185 on friday because of a coordinated short attack, no other reason.
    Nov 24 12:49 PM | 2 Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • IBM falls as Druckenmiller makes short case [View news story]
    This guy probably bought puts prior to this statement.
    Nov 22 03:03 PM | 3 Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • The iPhone 5S launch has been pushed back to August-September from July, likely due to "volume production issues," says Citi's Glen Yeung, echoing last week's Jefferies note. Yeung, who downgraded Apple to Neutral on Dec. 16, is also worried iPad Mini demand is weakening, given "flattening production" (Digitimes reported something similar last week), and (like others) doesn't expect a larger iPhone to arrive this year. AAPL +0.3%, shaking off Yeung's note and supplier LG Display's soft Q1 report[View news story]
    Lower Ipad mini demand? Wow, the manipulation never ends. First these rags claimed ipad mini would cannibalize the large ipad, then they say there's lower mini demand? They can't have it both ways...
    Apr 22 08:52 AM | 2 Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • A Fallen Apple Equals A Gift To Investors Even If Sales And Margins Decline [View article]
    The only problem is that valuation metrics aren't being considered with Apple. It never defends itself against rumors and smear jobs, which is to blame for most of the fall from at least 600. I'm reluctantly long, but Tim Cook is to blame for most of the decline. The minute he leaves, Apple might be valued somewhat more fairly.
    Apr 17 06:21 PM | 6 Likes Like |Link to Comment
  • Wall Street Breakfast: Must-Know News [View article]
    Maybe GM would be further along if it hadn't scrapped the EV project in 96. They crushed all the cars too. Then they sold the battery tech to Chevron. Funny, nobody remembers this.
    Mar 7 09:00 AM | 2 Likes Like |Link to Comment
COMMENTS STATS
76 Comments
132 Likes